A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NS1 (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NS1 (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I had reverted 2 of your edits and it seems you reverted them back [1], [2]. I would request you to read WP:BRD and please undo your reverts, since your edits are contested. Please explain on the article talk page why you want the particular information to be there in the article. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 14:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Never mind, I have reverted them now. Please discuss on the talk page before reinserting them back. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 14:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Why would we not want to include a managed DNS vendor to the list of managed DNS vendors on Wikipedia? It seems clear to me that not having NS1 on the list is an omission. It is presented in the same way, so I will revert this back now. Thanks. Cstate2002 ( talk) 15:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
15:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Cstate2002! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC) |
Hi Cstate2002I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia. Almost all your edits to date are about NS1. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.
Hello, Cstate2002. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.
Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).
Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with NS1? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), perhaps we can talk a bit about editing Wikipedia, to give you some more orientation to how this place works. Please reply here - I am watching this page. Thanks! Jytdog ( talk) 18:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NS1 (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NS1 (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I had reverted 2 of your edits and it seems you reverted them back [1], [2]. I would request you to read WP:BRD and please undo your reverts, since your edits are contested. Please explain on the article talk page why you want the particular information to be there in the article. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 14:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Never mind, I have reverted them now. Please discuss on the talk page before reinserting them back. -- Lemongirl942 ( talk) 14:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Why would we not want to include a managed DNS vendor to the list of managed DNS vendors on Wikipedia? It seems clear to me that not having NS1 on the list is an omission. It is presented in the same way, so I will revert this back now. Thanks. Cstate2002 ( talk) 15:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.
Lemongirl942 (
talk)
15:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Cstate2002! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC) |
Hi Cstate2002I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia. Almost all your edits to date are about NS1. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.
Hello, Cstate2002. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.
Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).
Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with NS1? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), perhaps we can talk a bit about editing Wikipedia, to give you some more orientation to how this place works. Please reply here - I am watching this page. Thanks! Jytdog ( talk) 18:50, 14 April 2016 (UTC)