Please do not add the phrase "vast superhuman strength" to the Superman article. We've decided it's an unnecessary and kind of clunky modifier; I would really appreciate seeing you add your talents to the article in another way. Thanks. -- Chris Griswold ( ☎ ☓) 18:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
I strongly suggest you check SHB template. Next time you vandalize the page, I'll report you to an administrator. — Lesfer (t/ c/ @) 03:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
There is only one character to bear the Hyperion name. Like I said, the other Hyperions are different version of the same character. As for Superman regeneration, There is the canonical reference of him regenerated from havig he throat slit by Wonder Women. Also, DKR is in AN alt, universe, but we are talking about Superman as a fictional character in the real world, so the DKR example still apply. T-1000 04:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Crystalb4, read this page carefully [1]. T-1000 03:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
"However, original research is more than just no personal crank theories. It also excludes editors' personal views, political opinions, their personal analysis or interpretation of published material, as well as any unpublished synthesis of published material, where such a synthesis appears to advance a position or opinion an editor may hold, or to support an argument or definition s/he may be trying to propose. That is, any facts, opinions, interpretations, definitions, and arguments published by Wikipedia must already have been published by a reliable publication in relation to the topic of the article."
As you see can, your personal opinion is not allowed here. T-1000 04:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Please don't keep adding "God blast" to the SHB. Even User:Asgardian, who initiated that phrase there, understands that it's disallowed jargon. Thanks. -- Tenebrae 14:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Wonder Woman. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Gscshoyru
02:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Wonder Woman. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors.
Gscshoyru
03:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Sentry (Robert Reynolds), you will be
blocked from editing. Please discuss your edits, which completely change that section of the article, on the talk page first. Thanks!
Gscshoyru
12:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
You and User:JJonz aren't the same person, are you? I think you may be... your edits are very much alike, and you have both started editing at the same time twice now. Keep in mind this is in violation of WP:SOCK so if you are, I suggest you use only one account to do your editing. If it's just a coincidence, then sorry. Oh, and incedentally, please try talking on the talk page before you make all these somewhat POV'd edits... thanks! Gscshoyru 17:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Give it a rest. Your edits are always POV, biased and problematic. you're being banned over and over for your actions. Stop being an ass on wikipedia, and learn to do it right. ThuranX 17:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add the phrase "vast superhuman strength" to the Superman article. We've decided it's an unnecessary and kind of clunky modifier; I would really appreciate seeing you add your talents to the article in another way. Thanks. -- Chris Griswold ( ☎ ☓) 18:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
I strongly suggest you check SHB template. Next time you vandalize the page, I'll report you to an administrator. — Lesfer (t/ c/ @) 03:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
There is only one character to bear the Hyperion name. Like I said, the other Hyperions are different version of the same character. As for Superman regeneration, There is the canonical reference of him regenerated from havig he throat slit by Wonder Women. Also, DKR is in AN alt, universe, but we are talking about Superman as a fictional character in the real world, so the DKR example still apply. T-1000 04:09, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Crystalb4, read this page carefully [1]. T-1000 03:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
"However, original research is more than just no personal crank theories. It also excludes editors' personal views, political opinions, their personal analysis or interpretation of published material, as well as any unpublished synthesis of published material, where such a synthesis appears to advance a position or opinion an editor may hold, or to support an argument or definition s/he may be trying to propose. That is, any facts, opinions, interpretations, definitions, and arguments published by Wikipedia must already have been published by a reliable publication in relation to the topic of the article."
As you see can, your personal opinion is not allowed here. T-1000 04:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Please don't keep adding "God blast" to the SHB. Even User:Asgardian, who initiated that phrase there, understands that it's disallowed jargon. Thanks. -- Tenebrae 14:42, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Wonder Woman. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Gscshoyru
02:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Wonder Woman. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a
consensus among editors.
Gscshoyru
03:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Sentry (Robert Reynolds), you will be
blocked from editing. Please discuss your edits, which completely change that section of the article, on the talk page first. Thanks!
Gscshoyru
12:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
You and User:JJonz aren't the same person, are you? I think you may be... your edits are very much alike, and you have both started editing at the same time twice now. Keep in mind this is in violation of WP:SOCK so if you are, I suggest you use only one account to do your editing. If it's just a coincidence, then sorry. Oh, and incedentally, please try talking on the talk page before you make all these somewhat POV'd edits... thanks! Gscshoyru 17:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Give it a rest. Your edits are always POV, biased and problematic. you're being banned over and over for your actions. Stop being an ass on wikipedia, and learn to do it right. ThuranX 17:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)