Hello, I'm Pulpfiction621. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Multiverse have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Pulpfiction621 ( talk) 16:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. Your recent edit(s) to the page An Inconvenient Truth appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The lead of an article should summarise its contents. If you think the article is missing an angle on failed environmental predictions leading to controversy in schools, add some detail with clear sources rather than just mentioning it unsourced in the lead. Lord Belbury ( talk) 16:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Common Core. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Richard Carrier. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Macroevolution. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
You've made quite a number of unsourced and opinionated edits to various articles today, and have continued doing so, for example here, after responding to Lord Belbury's comment above. Please note that Wikipedia goes by reliable sources. Don't add anything to lead sections unless it's supported and sourced lower down in the article; and don't add anything lower down unless you provide a reliable source for it, or you will end up blocked. (Mentioning a source here on your own page when you're challenged is not enough. Sources go in the article.) Bishonen | tålk 17:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC).
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
18:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)CrocoDIilios ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am a new user trying to learn what I can about editing Wikipedia, I just wanted to edit what I saw as biased or incorrect, I promise I will try not to disrupt. Those edits weren't even disruptive. I don't want to be your enemy so please unblock me
Decline reason:
Since you don't think that your edits were disruptive, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot ( talk) 19:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CrocoDIilios ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I promise not to break the rules anymore, I just want to be unblocked. I don't think it was fair for I - a new user - to be blocked permanently. I'm just a noobie trying to make edit
Decline reason:
From your comments below, you either have refused to engage adequately with an admin willing to unblock you for a fairly limited restriction, or you are unable to grasp their request and offer. Either is a bigger problem than just your original cause for blocks, so I am declining Nosebagbear ( talk) 10:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CrocoDIilios ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
hope I convinced you to unblock, I was just editing a page of a crocodile species to make it easier to read.
Decline reason:
Procedural close as stale; you may make another, more persuasive request. 331dot ( talk) 09:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm Pulpfiction621. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Multiverse have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Pulpfiction621 ( talk) 16:05, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Lord Belbury. Your recent edit(s) to the page An Inconvenient Truth appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The lead of an article should summarise its contents. If you think the article is missing an angle on failed environmental predictions leading to controversy in schools, add some detail with clear sources rather than just mentioning it unsourced in the lead. Lord Belbury ( talk) 16:48, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Common Core. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Richard Carrier. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Macroevolution. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
You've made quite a number of unsourced and opinionated edits to various articles today, and have continued doing so, for example here, after responding to Lord Belbury's comment above. Please note that Wikipedia goes by reliable sources. Don't add anything to lead sections unless it's supported and sourced lower down in the article; and don't add anything lower down unless you provide a reliable source for it, or you will end up blocked. (Mentioning a source here on your own page when you're challenged is not enough. Sources go in the article.) Bishonen | tålk 17:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC).
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
18:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)CrocoDIilios ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am a new user trying to learn what I can about editing Wikipedia, I just wanted to edit what I saw as biased or incorrect, I promise I will try not to disrupt. Those edits weren't even disruptive. I don't want to be your enemy so please unblock me
Decline reason:
Since you don't think that your edits were disruptive, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot ( talk) 19:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CrocoDIilios ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I promise not to break the rules anymore, I just want to be unblocked. I don't think it was fair for I - a new user - to be blocked permanently. I'm just a noobie trying to make edit
Decline reason:
From your comments below, you either have refused to engage adequately with an admin willing to unblock you for a fairly limited restriction, or you are unable to grasp their request and offer. Either is a bigger problem than just your original cause for blocks, so I am declining Nosebagbear ( talk) 10:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
CrocoDIilios ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
hope I convinced you to unblock, I was just editing a page of a crocodile species to make it easier to read.
Decline reason:
Procedural close as stale; you may make another, more persuasive request. 331dot ( talk) 09:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.