|
Hello, I'm
Jaellee. Your recent edit to the page
Iker Casillas appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
Jaellee (
talk)
22:23, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Manuel Neuer. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Jaellee (
talk)
18:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I have reviewed the article Manuel Neuer which you nominated at WP:GAN, and have placed it on hold for seven days; see Talk:Manuel Neuer/GA2. The article needs some extensive work to make it to GA status, but it's possible with some dedication and hard work. Feel free to contact me on my talk page with any clarification requests, etc., but I do have the review page watchlisted so I'll see any comments there. Best of luck! Thanks, Nici Vampire Heart 17:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Please don't nominate articles with citation needed tags, and please don't nominate articles that you haven't edited. Chances are you will find issues to correct even on a cursory run-through. Alot of people have put in hard work to articles and are waiting a month or more for reviewers. If you want input on improving articles, then request a look at Peer Review. Cheers, Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Airbourne has a valid {{unreferenced}} template for a whole section, this is sufficient for an GAC: Immediate failure. I strongly advise you withdraw the nomination, fix the problem(s), and then re-nominate when the article is in better condition. shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Cristianho19,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Amber My Ember for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jjjjjjdddddd ( talk) 22:31, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Until transfer has been confirmed by Inter and Real Madrid, Kovačić remains an Inter player. himynameismartyn87 ( talk)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Gareth Bale. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
20:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Jesé you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Royroydeb --
Royroydeb (
talk)
17:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The article
Jesé you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Jesé for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Royroydeb --
Royroydeb (
talk)
05:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Gareth Bale you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
07:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The article
Gareth Bale you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Gareth Bale for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
08:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article
Joel O'Keeffe. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be
verifiable, by being clearly attributed to
reliable sources, preferably using
inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see
here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at
Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at
Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
18:30, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Trivium (band) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zawl --
Zawl (
talk)
12:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Trivium (band) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Trivium (band) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zawl --
Zawl (
talk)
15:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Trivium (band) you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Trivium (band) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zawl --
Zawl (
talk)
17:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
Jaellee. Your recent edit to the page
Iker Casillas appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please
cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
Jaellee (
talk)
22:23, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Manuel Neuer. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Jaellee (
talk)
18:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi! I have reviewed the article Manuel Neuer which you nominated at WP:GAN, and have placed it on hold for seven days; see Talk:Manuel Neuer/GA2. The article needs some extensive work to make it to GA status, but it's possible with some dedication and hard work. Feel free to contact me on my talk page with any clarification requests, etc., but I do have the review page watchlisted so I'll see any comments there. Best of luck! Thanks, Nici Vampire Heart 17:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Please don't nominate articles with citation needed tags, and please don't nominate articles that you haven't edited. Chances are you will find issues to correct even on a cursory run-through. Alot of people have put in hard work to articles and are waiting a month or more for reviewers. If you want input on improving articles, then request a look at Peer Review. Cheers, Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
Airbourne has a valid {{unreferenced}} template for a whole section, this is sufficient for an GAC: Immediate failure. I strongly advise you withdraw the nomination, fix the problem(s), and then re-nominate when the article is in better condition. shaidar cuebiyar ( talk) 00:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Cristianho19,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Amber My Ember for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jjjjjjdddddd ( talk) 22:31, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Until transfer has been confirmed by Inter and Real Madrid, Kovačić remains an Inter player. himynameismartyn87 ( talk)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Gareth Bale. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
20:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Jesé you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Royroydeb --
Royroydeb (
talk)
17:01, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
The article
Jesé you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Jesé for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Royroydeb --
Royroydeb (
talk)
05:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Gareth Bale you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
07:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
The article
Gareth Bale you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Gareth Bale for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Sainsf --
Sainsf (
talk)
08:41, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article
Joel O'Keeffe. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be
verifiable, by being clearly attributed to
reliable sources, preferably using
inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see
here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at
Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at
Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --
Jax 0677 (
talk)
18:30, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Trivium (band) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zawl --
Zawl (
talk)
12:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Trivium (band) you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Trivium (band) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zawl --
Zawl (
talk)
15:20, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
The article
Trivium (band) you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Trivium (band) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Zawl --
Zawl (
talk)
17:21, 29 January 2018 (UTC)