Your submission at Articles for creation: Orsto Ltd (January 9)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orsto Ltd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Createn,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
RadioFan (
talk)
03:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The article Leisuretime has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not seem to meet notability guidelines; sources offered only support the existence of this company and do not indicate how it is notable or significant
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
331dot (
talk)
16:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page
Orsto Ltd. has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Pages that were not created by yourelf can not be tagged as created in error. if you feel these pages meet Wikipedias criteria for
speedy deletion then please tag them using one of the appropriate criteria.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
16:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- I think what you were trying to do was to replace the article titled Orsto Ltd. with an identical article titled Orsto Ltd (no period). But we don't do that by copying the article text and pasting it into a different title. Instead, Wikipedia has a "Move" function that allows you to change the title of an article without copying, and thereby preserves the edit history of the article. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 02:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Createn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of
conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on
neutral point of view and
what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a
black hat practice.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Createn. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Createn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE ( talk) 15:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tobo121, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Orsto Ltd (January 9)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orsto Ltd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
|
Hello! Createn,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
RadioFan (
talk)
03:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
|
The article Leisuretime has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Does not seem to meet notability guidelines; sources offered only support the existence of this company and do not indicate how it is notable or significant
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
331dot (
talk)
16:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page
Orsto Ltd. has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Pages that were not created by yourelf can not be tagged as created in error. if you feel these pages meet Wikipedias criteria for
speedy deletion then please tag them using one of the appropriate criteria.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
16:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- I think what you were trying to do was to replace the article titled Orsto Ltd. with an identical article titled Orsto Ltd (no period). But we don't do that by copying the article text and pasting it into a different title. Instead, Wikipedia has a "Move" function that allows you to change the title of an article without copying, and thereby preserves the edit history of the article. -- R'n'B ( call me Russ) 02:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello Createn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic. Paid advocacy is a category of
conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on
neutral point of view and
what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a
black hat practice.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Createn. The template {{ Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Createn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE ( talk) 15:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tobo121, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.