Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
2014–15 United States network television schedule. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
Davejohnsan (
talk)
16:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2014–15 United States network television schedule, you may be
blocked from editing.
Davejohnsan (
talk)
16:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Code Black (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
20:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
The Family (2016 TV series). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
23:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2015–16 United States network television schedule, you may be
blocked from editing.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
23:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
The Guide to Surviving Life, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
08:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Guys with Kids. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
08:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Limitless (TV series).
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
08:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Krakatoa
Katie
00:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
2015–16 United States network television schedule. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
18:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
The Simpsons, you may be
blocked from editing.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
18:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
The Real O'Neals.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
18:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Darkwind (
talk)
21:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)The name of the series is Family Guy, stop adding the to the title. Vincelord ( talk) 16:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Craigmiller123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
i am ready to edit wikipedia again this time and I'm gonna use it the right way Craigmiller123 ( talk) 23:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 13:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Craigmiller123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I used the original account Jezebel's Ponyo as told by someone else, can you try it now
Decline reason:
You were socking at least as recently as 2 months ago. You need to stay away from Wikipedia for a much longer time (think a year at least) before an unblock is considered. only ( talk) 01:42, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|reason=this is all my fault and I'm sorry for socking wikipedia, here are the user that i socked on wikipedia. Happysaddy, Forchef, Momjob, Nickyellow, Robotbird, Birdsangry, Danger 145, Fear180, Friendios105, Good457, Gigglemom, Goodies135, Jobmom, Top Wing82829, and Candlebox Spacehog. I Promised i will never sock wikipedia ever again.
Craigmiller123 (
talk)
15:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)}
I see the original block was for adding unsourced content. Please explain how you will avoid this problem in the future.-- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 17:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Craigmiller123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
to avoid this problem in the future, i have to not add unsourced content, be on one account, create my own article, be a good account user Craigmiller123 ( talk) 17:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You've been evading your block as recently as this month. In August of 2017, you were told you had to stay away from Wikipedia for much longer than two months. Rather than doing so, you evaded your block earlier this week. You've shown you cannot be trusted. You are now considered banned from Wikipedia, not just blocked, under WP:3X. Unblock request declined. Yamla ( talk) 12:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
2014–15 United States network television schedule. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
Davejohnsan (
talk)
16:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2014–15 United States network television schedule, you may be
blocked from editing.
Davejohnsan (
talk)
16:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
The article Code Black (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Amortias (
T)(
C)
20:07, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
The Family (2016 TV series). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
23:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
2015–16 United States network television schedule, you may be
blocked from editing.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
23:46, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
The Guide to Surviving Life, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
08:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Guys with Kids. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
08:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Limitless (TV series).
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
08:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Krakatoa
Katie
00:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
2015–16 United States network television schedule. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated
vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
18:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
The Simpsons, you may be
blocked from editing.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
18:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
The Real O'Neals.
Logical Fuzz (
talk)
18:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. —
Darkwind (
talk)
21:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)The name of the series is Family Guy, stop adding the to the title. Vincelord ( talk) 16:19, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Craigmiller123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
i am ready to edit wikipedia again this time and I'm gonna use it the right way Craigmiller123 ( talk) 23:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 13:19, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Craigmiller123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I used the original account Jezebel's Ponyo as told by someone else, can you try it now
Decline reason:
You were socking at least as recently as 2 months ago. You need to stay away from Wikipedia for a much longer time (think a year at least) before an unblock is considered. only ( talk) 01:42, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock|reason=this is all my fault and I'm sorry for socking wikipedia, here are the user that i socked on wikipedia. Happysaddy, Forchef, Momjob, Nickyellow, Robotbird, Birdsangry, Danger 145, Fear180, Friendios105, Good457, Gigglemom, Goodies135, Jobmom, Top Wing82829, and Candlebox Spacehog. I Promised i will never sock wikipedia ever again.
Craigmiller123 (
talk)
15:01, 23 June 2018 (UTC)}
I see the original block was for adding unsourced content. Please explain how you will avoid this problem in the future.-- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 17:07, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Craigmiller123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
to avoid this problem in the future, i have to not add unsourced content, be on one account, create my own article, be a good account user Craigmiller123 ( talk) 17:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You've been evading your block as recently as this month. In August of 2017, you were told you had to stay away from Wikipedia for much longer than two months. Rather than doing so, you evaded your block earlier this week. You've shown you cannot be trusted. You are now considered banned from Wikipedia, not just blocked, under WP:3X. Unblock request declined. Yamla ( talk) 12:41, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.