![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Tv_trigger_t.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
HagermanBot 20:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
User:Esanchez7587, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I lol'ed though
Esanchez(
Talk 2 me or
Sign here) 05:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Glenn Beck. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Cptnono (
talk) 03:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Glenn Beck, you will be
blocked from editing.
Cptnono (
talk) 04:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Ciphers (
talk) 07:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk) 20:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk) 06:01, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
FYI Aalox ( talk) 12:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Skylon_climbing.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey ( talk) 17:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear Craigboy, as it seems that you are very active on the article Spacecraft, I am contacting you. A new article SpaceLiner as been created recently but when one looks for Spaceliner (with a small "l") there is a redirection to the Spaceraft article. I guess the best solution would be to create a disambiguation page in order to let the user choose between the articles. However I am a beginner on Wikipedia and I am not sure what I should do to solve this problem. Thanks in advance for your advices. Best regards. Eypdu ( talk) 06:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
While I'm happy to discuss the merits of the external link to the NASA video on one of the current suits, and other suit related topics, I do not appreciate being told not to edit Wikipedia until I've met your requirements (i.e. reading the NASA Appropriations bill), simply because I've raised questions for discussion.. Please dont forget to assume good faith. I have done this with you and would appreciate the same. Please also remember that individual wikipedia editors do not own any articles, all are free to contribute.-- RadioFan ( talk) 13:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hermes Spaceplane ESA.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
is standard fare. And see wp:deviations; the manual of style eschews hard-coded markup. Cheers, Jack Merridew 07:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi! Could you obtain permission from this company to use their logo in the Wikipedia article illustration, as well as upload it to Wikipedia? The editors at Skylon really appreciate your previous work in negotiating with that company on the spaceplane image.-- Novus Orator 22:23, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Adrian Mann created the CG renderings of Skylon (who also retains the rights to them) and has a pretty open policy about using his stuff if you ask permission but with Reaction Engines's corporate logo you would have to contact the company directly which I have no experience in doing so. I'm sorry I couldn't have been of more help. -- Craigboy ( talk) 22:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
The Downlink | |||||||||||||||||||
Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight | Issue 1, January 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 14:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC).
Great find in the NASA archives! Thanks for finding it, and adding it to the TransHab article so that others could benefit. I have looked it over and made a comment here: Talk:TransHab. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 14:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Downlink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight | Issue 2, February 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 00:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC).
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Downlink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight | Issue 3, March 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Spaceflight at 09:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC).
Good work on starting the Spacecraft Docking and Berthing Mechanisms article. The comparative differences between docking and berthing, and the many different (and proprietary) spacecraft systems to date was something that sorely needed comparative coverage in Wikipedia. N2e ( talk) 17:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you.-- Craigboy ( talk) 17:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
There's some systems that have been left out temporarily because I had to start somewhere, they are the Kontakt docking system ( info in summary) and Shenzhou's ( info). Also I'm having trouble finding official names, and sometimes I see different names being used with the same systems.-- Craigboy ( talk) 17:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
How can you say it's not a style error? Look at all the text in the table; every entry starts with a capital letter (sentence case), whether the first word is part of an acronym or not ("Original Soyuz probe and drogue docking system", "Modern Soyuz probe and drogue docking system", "Common Docking Adapter, future US vehicles", etc.). So it should be "International Low Impact Docking System", regardless of whether "international" is part of the name. JustinTime55 ( talk) 18:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Would appreciate your input on a question I just put out. N2e ( talk) 14:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I appreciate your input on the previous Talkback, on the Unmanned resupply spacecraft article!
But I would like to get your input on the unmanned/unpressurized/robotic spacecraft docking question also on the Spacecraft Docking and Berthing Mechanisms article. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 22:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC) N2e ( talk) 22:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy !
If you have a moment, please drop by the ISS article and look over my new work in the Costs and to a lesser extent Education and cultural outreach sections. I hope you think they are crap and object to their inclusion, or not, whatever you think. Please be the first to have your say ! lolz. ....(seriously I am desperate for help here, It's so lonely I've started talking to myself and answered the poll as if I was a third person, they'll come to take me away soon!) Penyulap talk 08:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Will do but I wont have enough free time till this weekend, so I'll go over it then.-- Craigboy ( talk) 14:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
G W … 03:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
hello, thanks for the link on justin mission from the iss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaucouplusneutre ( talk • contribs) 08:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
G W … 07:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on
Talk:Orbital Space Plane Program, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
Oneiros (
talk) 11:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
hello, i have found a video on the net about robonaut installing a nuclear powerplant on the moon http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhpvNLJgtUc i guess you seen it since you write the article i am not sure about linking it to the robonaut article , what do you think ? -- Beaucouplusneutre ( talk) 22:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
I've haven't seen it before, but the video seems be more about showing what Robonaut could be used for more than what its currently planned to do (testing on the ISS). I don't think the video would be relevant because it only shows one specific (and most likely formerly) proposed mission. The video shows the Altair lander which was canceled along with the Constellation Program and it shows R1 instead of the current R2.-- Craigboy ( talk) 00:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Proposal comparisons.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 11:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The reasons why I prefer STS-114 Raffaello module.jpg is because the MPLM is the focus, you're able to see the CBM's petals, more detail on the MPLM can be seen and the contrast on the image is better. What's your opinion? --Craigboy (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Ok I will grant you that much, I preferred the unobstructed view. But your argument stands. Lets always discuss in future. Thanks for the reasoned response. Leebrandoncremer ( talk) 23:02, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Moved discussion to Pressurized Mating Adapter talk page-- Craigboy ( talk) 11:32, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to say, I didnt want to argue, I thought Wiki was a living thing, one that changes with new information. I have been adding alot lately, People come along and have a flurry of changes, additions and well I wanted to contribute. I had no intention of being malicious, simply thought the idea was to improve pages. Like I said no one owns these pages, but like you I get offended when someone deletes or changes their work. Would be better if we coordinate and discuss from now on, if that is ok with you. Leebrandoncremer ( talk) 01:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I'll try and keep in touch as much as possible. I also hope none of my posts came off as too aggressive.-- Craigboy ( talk) 04:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
No you wern't, Ok I wasnt too certain that was the inside of PMA-2 but the NASA description said it was. Do you have an internal (empty) PMA pic? Leebrandoncremer ( talk) 13:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
No but the image you put up looks good.-- Craigboy ( talk) 22:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Found an image showing PMA-1 lined with bags.
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-134/html/s134e009323.html
--
Craigboy (
talk) 01:49, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
It's probably a bit of a late reply, but I've put a note here first time I read that page I think.. Penyulap talk 12:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give
Spacecraft docking and berthing mechanisms a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. BilCat ( talk) 13:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Please forgive the templating of a non-newbie, but it's the easiset way to spell out the rationale and give the links. However, as you're not a newbie, you should know that C-&P moves aren't permitted by now already. Please don't do it again. - BilCat ( talk) 13:58, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
The presence of a redirect page has made it not possible to move the article. -- Craigboy ( talk) 14:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the message.
I have changed the info boxes since they were about the spacecrafts and not the projects. The tables about missions and astronauts are moved to separate articles and some red links are deleted, but everything can still be found if you go a month back in the history of the articles. Soerfm ( talk) 10:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
I forgot to say, I am working on a separate article for the Mercury spacecraft but I am not sure if there is enough material. It can be seen at http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mercury_spacecraft&redirect=no by clicking Edit, removing "#" before REDIRECT and then press Show Preview. Soerfm ( talk) 18:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
About the Gemini spacecraft, no unfortunately I have not started that article yet. Soerfm ( talk) 10:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy, I'd like to move your graphic and the infobox up to the top of this page, I didn't want to do it myself, as I'm not a studied expert on the subject, sure I've studied, but I'd rather have your opinion as well first at the very least, you obviously know what is going on there. At the moment I am working out the best way to include Tiangong as part of the ISS's context. It's a similar project after all. I left a comment on the talkpage. Penyulap talk 05:14, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Which image?-- Craigboy ( talk) 05:42, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dreamchaser ISS DOCKINGsmall.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 18:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy. You've done a lot of good work with Spacecraft docking and berthing mechanisms, and I've attempted to help at the margins. If you get a chance, I'd appreciate your eyes on, and review/improvement of, Space rendezvous. I've made a few small improvements recently, but it still needs a LOT of work. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 22:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In International Space Station, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Scott Kelly ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
I've added the text in ENG and RU, but couldn't work out the two white lines (in a hurry), maybe you could ? I've got to say it looks a whole lot better now. Do you think the arrow is needed ? probably not considering the new, better shading you've done eh ? That's what I think. Penyulap talk 05:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:International Space Station#Hey Craigboy, how about this talkpage thingy ?
Penyulap talk 17:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
A trout is way too big really, but come on, 5RR ? slow down man take it easy!
Penyulap
talk 05:52, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
I never like talking about people behind their back, I wanted to let you know I mentioned your nefarious activities (Perhaps too strong a word, but I am exaggerating, so it's probably a well proportioned exaggeration) here where I was saying about your cutting in, but I was kind of unsure if you were getting the point or not with the hints I was dropping about it, well, anyhow I was blowing off steam about this whole "Change penyulap's text' business and reverted U5K0's edit when I had a look and saw there was no prospect of any reader knowing who was talking in so very many sections. Penyulap talk 02:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at User talk:Matthewrbowker's talk page. ~
Matthewrbowker
Talk to me 03:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The International Space Station Barnstar | |
For almost two years of striving to make the
ISS article not suck so much ! Great work, keep it up !! Penyulap talk 05:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC) |
Mad work on the OPSEK pic, it's been crying out for an image for ages. The launch of Buran, Polyus, and the NM and Nauka are all like man, so crying out too. If you don't get to it sometime, maybe I'll follow your lead on that one. Inspiring. Penyulap talk 16:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Craigboy, what is a better way to put it, cause although I think it's true that the shenzhou use apas, it's also true to say that the mech is based upon apas instead. Can we say 'based on' ? Penyulap talk 09:52, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
I don't think we can say its based on APAS because we don't have any sources that specifies that it is. but I think we can say something like
"A representative of the Chinese manned space program stated that around the year 2000, China and Russia were engaged in technological exchanges regarding the development of a docking mechanism. [1] Foreign sources have stated that the docking mechanism strongly resembles APAS-89/APAS-95, with one American source going as far as to call it a clone. [2] [3] [4] There have been contradicting claims on the compatibility of the Chinese system with both current and future docking mechanisms on the ISS. [4] [5] [6]"-- Craigboy ( talk) 12:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
If you have a look at the ISS article, there are both, but I figure you saw how they have a configuration as well as a photo. We don't have a photo, and we certainly don't have a final configuration as yet. The Chinese ____Require_____ an airlock module in order to have a long term crewed station, and seriously, we need some of their pics for that, I can't find 'em, except the one I was using as a muse, and then I left it out at the last minute. Have a look at Freedom or the ISS itself, and see how many times they change the overall designs before launch. Science power modules and so forth. Plus, whats wrong with the picture that the Chinese government has on it's own website here, should we tell them it's not allowed ?
How about we call it an early depiction ? Like the power tower or dual-keel in freedom, or the umbrella thing for the ISS, actually come to think of it, we kind of need a series of the different pictures of the ISS in the ISS article don't we, I mean they don't belong anywhere else do they ? hmmm. I am intending to start work on another depiction of the CSS with newer tiangongy textures, what would you say is the best and latest of the configurations I should work with ?
If you can answer on my tp that would be cool, Penyulap talk 05:59, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Should these be merged ? I put a marker for your comments at Talk:Core Cabin Module, I figure you'll have a good idea about it. Penyulap talk 12:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
I opened a discussion about a new bot that Z and I have been working on, it's not ready for big things yet, but it can do some small tasks and I've outlined them on Talk:Tiangong 1. I would very much like you to suggest whatever you can Craigboy, as you like to chat and I love to listen ! I could really use some of your ideas. Penyulap talk 11:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Cygnus (spacecraft), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATK ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Dragon (spacecraft), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terra firma ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SpaceX COTS 2 emblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi: Do we know for certain that the COTS Demo emblem is not in the public domain? Since it is a NASA mission, I am assuming -- possibly too much -- that it would fall under the same copyright as a NASA mission. I just came across it on SpaceX's Facebook page. Your thoughts?-- Abebenjoe ( talk) 20:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Since the COTS 2 article was moved (and COTS 3 merged into it) to Dragon C2+, which we found is not the actual name of the mission, I have suggested it be moved to come in line with how we named CRS SpX-1. Discussion can be found here. Cheers! WingtipvorteX (talk) ∅ 18:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
WingtipvorteX (talk) ∅ 01:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
editors like the CSS image, but you keep on deleting it, which always makes me think, 'why bother making any more images for wikipedia if they just get deleted'
thing is, we need free images of things for wikipedia, if some articles are to be illustrated at all, the Chinese and Russian space stations especially, as there are no free images and there won't be. Fair use doesn't apply to drawings of the stations, and I don't think you get that part, so I'll show you with opsek, so someone else can explain, and accuracy is in the eye of the beholder, after all, anything less than a photo is not accurate, well, to most people. Penyulap ☏ 19:02, 20 Jun 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at International Space Station shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. See
BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
Both you and
Penyulap have already violated the three-revert rule. Discuss it on the talk page, and don't change the article until you both agree on a compromise. If you can't find anything to agree on, then go to
dispute resolution or open a
request for comment. I am sending this warning to both parties, I won't report either of you at this stage, but if you continue then you will be blocked. --
W.
D.
Graham 13:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Formerly planned Unpressurized Cygnus.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Artist Cygnus high.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Stefan2 ( talk) 21:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
-- W. D. Graham 20:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
"The result of the discussion was: Delete - by the standards that Wikipedia uses the image is replaceable with a free alternative and fails WP:NFCC#1"
I'm furious because you came to a decision that is entirely inconsistent with what was discussed. I demand for you to tell me how you came to this conclusion.--
Craigboy (
talk) 02:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy,
Let me say I admire (truly) your ability to continue editing (I assume that is what you are doing) without getting involved in the Wikiproject Spaceflight issues with Penyulap. You originally brought up the issue however, so if you have any comments or input I'd appreciate it. Please don't feel that I'm forcing you to, but given that I was rather uninvolved in all the issues and I am apparently the only one who is doing something to get the problems between WDGraham and Penyulap solved, I would definitely not mind the help. Its a pity two of the best editors in the project can halt so much. I'm doing all I can to try to get them to move on, but my willingness is running out and could use other ideas on where to go.
Best,
-- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 00:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dragon landing on Mars.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dragon landing on Mars.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:00, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Manned and cargo Dragon spacecraft.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your excellent graphics here, [1], I just learned something that might suggest a slight change to the graphic may be in order. Brian Mosdell, the head launch guy at the Cape for SpaceX, indicated a several-feet length difference between the central core and the two strap-on cores of the Falcon Heavy: the strap-ons are longer. The podcast may be downloaded here: [2]. I had not heard any SpaceX-released specs, nor media coverage, of that length difference before now. This is around 12:20 minutes into the one-hour interview (Falcon Heavy discussion starts at 9:50). At any rate, thought you might like to know about it. (and Grasshopper is discussed at c. 9:00 minutes.) Cheers. N2e ( talk) 05:01, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TaurusII Wallops.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.
NASA has took a picture of today's rollout. It being PD, I have replaced the fair use image with this new one in the article per the fair use rationale of using it until there is a free replacement. If you think the fair use image adds significantly to the article, please re-add it and remove the di-orphaned notice from the file page. Thanks, WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 18:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 14:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy. I see you've listened to the lecture, from your notes on Grasshopper rocket Talk page.
Just an FYI. I've made a ton of edits to the various SpaceX rocket engine pages today, especially Merlin and Raptor, and have also created a new article SpaceX rocket engine family as it was becoming very hard to find an article on which to make non-Merlin and non-Falcon substantive edits on the new LOX/methane engines. Would appreciate your review and improvement of any of them. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 01:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy, can you deliver a source for the nomination of Kathleen Rubins to be part of Expedition 36/ 37 aboard the International Space Station? I'm wondering about that. Is Kathleen Rubins a replacement for Karen L. Nyberg? There are no hints to find in the Web. Regards -- Ras67 ( talk) 19:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy, I just posted on the the ISS talk page about a strange problem. It seems to involve something Penyulap worked on a year ago, but I don't understand it. Can you take a look? It needs attention. Thanks! Wwheaton ( talk) 22:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Manned and cargo Dragon spacecraft.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:09, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
W. D. Graham 23:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey Craigboy.
Would you be willing to consider developing a comparison graphic of the Grasshopper v1 rocket to the other Falcon family rockets? I'm thinking something like your File:Falcon 9 v1.0 - Falcon 9 v1.1 - Falcon Heavy.svg
image but with the Grasshopper v1 shown in the progression after Falcon 9.
Now, after that, and since SpaceX has publicly announced that they are developing a longer Grasshopper v2 vehicle, assuming you can find the length in a source somewhere, it would be really cool to have the Grasshopper v2 shown as well. But maybe not, maybe better to wait on part 2 (Gv2) until the first photos of the v2 Grasshopper emerge.
However the Gv2 question is answered right now, I would really appreciate you taking a cut on a good Grasshopper comparative graphic for us with the Grasshopper v1. Then I would intend to use that graphic in the Grasshopper (rocket) article right away. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 16:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craig.
I think you'll find a particular photo interesting. Look at the source on the "restartable ignition system" statement in the SpaceX reusable rocket launching system article. Musk just posted that yesterday. Looks like there is a LOT of room between the outer engine bells and the center engine bell, just like your drawings. My guess: allows for a lot of gimbaling which will be needed for the controlled descent and landing phase of bringing the boosters back. Enjoy. N2e ( talk) 04:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Tv_trigger_t.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:53, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
HagermanBot 20:05, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
User:Esanchez7587, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the
welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I lol'ed though
Esanchez(
Talk 2 me or
Sign here) 05:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Glenn Beck. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Cptnono (
talk) 03:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Glenn Beck, you will be
blocked from editing.
Cptnono (
talk) 04:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Ciphers (
talk) 07:10, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk) 20:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk) 06:01, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
FYI Aalox ( talk) 12:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Skylon_climbing.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey ( talk) 17:37, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Dear Craigboy, as it seems that you are very active on the article Spacecraft, I am contacting you. A new article SpaceLiner as been created recently but when one looks for Spaceliner (with a small "l") there is a redirection to the Spaceraft article. I guess the best solution would be to create a disambiguation page in order to let the user choose between the articles. However I am a beginner on Wikipedia and I am not sure what I should do to solve this problem. Thanks in advance for your advices. Best regards. Eypdu ( talk) 06:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
While I'm happy to discuss the merits of the external link to the NASA video on one of the current suits, and other suit related topics, I do not appreciate being told not to edit Wikipedia until I've met your requirements (i.e. reading the NASA Appropriations bill), simply because I've raised questions for discussion.. Please dont forget to assume good faith. I have done this with you and would appreciate the same. Please also remember that individual wikipedia editors do not own any articles, all are free to contribute.-- RadioFan ( talk) 13:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hermes Spaceplane ESA.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
is standard fare. And see wp:deviations; the manual of style eschews hard-coded markup. Cheers, Jack Merridew 07:02, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi! Could you obtain permission from this company to use their logo in the Wikipedia article illustration, as well as upload it to Wikipedia? The editors at Skylon really appreciate your previous work in negotiating with that company on the spaceplane image.-- Novus Orator 22:23, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Adrian Mann created the CG renderings of Skylon (who also retains the rights to them) and has a pretty open policy about using his stuff if you ask permission but with Reaction Engines's corporate logo you would have to contact the company directly which I have no experience in doing so. I'm sorry I couldn't have been of more help. -- Craigboy ( talk) 22:31, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||
The Downlink | |||||||||||||||||||
Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight | Issue 1, January 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 14:43, 1 January 2011 (UTC).
Great find in the NASA archives! Thanks for finding it, and adding it to the TransHab article so that others could benefit. I have looked it over and made a comment here: Talk:TransHab. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 14:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Downlink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight | Issue 2, February 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 00:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC).
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Downlink | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Your source for news on WikiProject Spaceflight | Issue 3, March 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Spaceflight at 09:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC).
Good work on starting the Spacecraft Docking and Berthing Mechanisms article. The comparative differences between docking and berthing, and the many different (and proprietary) spacecraft systems to date was something that sorely needed comparative coverage in Wikipedia. N2e ( talk) 17:31, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you.-- Craigboy ( talk) 17:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
There's some systems that have been left out temporarily because I had to start somewhere, they are the Kontakt docking system ( info in summary) and Shenzhou's ( info). Also I'm having trouble finding official names, and sometimes I see different names being used with the same systems.-- Craigboy ( talk) 17:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
How can you say it's not a style error? Look at all the text in the table; every entry starts with a capital letter (sentence case), whether the first word is part of an acronym or not ("Original Soyuz probe and drogue docking system", "Modern Soyuz probe and drogue docking system", "Common Docking Adapter, future US vehicles", etc.). So it should be "International Low Impact Docking System", regardless of whether "international" is part of the name. JustinTime55 ( talk) 18:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Would appreciate your input on a question I just put out. N2e ( talk) 14:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I appreciate your input on the previous Talkback, on the Unmanned resupply spacecraft article!
But I would like to get your input on the unmanned/unpressurized/robotic spacecraft docking question also on the Spacecraft Docking and Berthing Mechanisms article. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 22:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC) N2e ( talk) 22:30, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy !
If you have a moment, please drop by the ISS article and look over my new work in the Costs and to a lesser extent Education and cultural outreach sections. I hope you think they are crap and object to their inclusion, or not, whatever you think. Please be the first to have your say ! lolz. ....(seriously I am desperate for help here, It's so lonely I've started talking to myself and answered the poll as if I was a third person, they'll come to take me away soon!) Penyulap talk 08:09, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Will do but I wont have enough free time till this weekend, so I'll go over it then.-- Craigboy ( talk) 14:01, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
G W … 03:17, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
hello, thanks for the link on justin mission from the iss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaucouplusneutre ( talk • contribs) 08:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
G W … 07:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on
Talk:Orbital Space Plane Program, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.
Oneiros (
talk) 11:51, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
hello, i have found a video on the net about robonaut installing a nuclear powerplant on the moon http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhpvNLJgtUc i guess you seen it since you write the article i am not sure about linking it to the robonaut article , what do you think ? -- Beaucouplusneutre ( talk) 22:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
I've haven't seen it before, but the video seems be more about showing what Robonaut could be used for more than what its currently planned to do (testing on the ISS). I don't think the video would be relevant because it only shows one specific (and most likely formerly) proposed mission. The video shows the Altair lander which was canceled along with the Constellation Program and it shows R1 instead of the current R2.-- Craigboy ( talk) 00:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Proposal comparisons.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn ( talk) 11:02, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The reasons why I prefer STS-114 Raffaello module.jpg is because the MPLM is the focus, you're able to see the CBM's petals, more detail on the MPLM can be seen and the contrast on the image is better. What's your opinion? --Craigboy (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Ok I will grant you that much, I preferred the unobstructed view. But your argument stands. Lets always discuss in future. Thanks for the reasoned response. Leebrandoncremer ( talk) 23:02, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Moved discussion to Pressurized Mating Adapter talk page-- Craigboy ( talk) 11:32, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Just wanted to say, I didnt want to argue, I thought Wiki was a living thing, one that changes with new information. I have been adding alot lately, People come along and have a flurry of changes, additions and well I wanted to contribute. I had no intention of being malicious, simply thought the idea was to improve pages. Like I said no one owns these pages, but like you I get offended when someone deletes or changes their work. Would be better if we coordinate and discuss from now on, if that is ok with you. Leebrandoncremer ( talk) 01:35, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
I'll try and keep in touch as much as possible. I also hope none of my posts came off as too aggressive.-- Craigboy ( talk) 04:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
No you wern't, Ok I wasnt too certain that was the inside of PMA-2 but the NASA description said it was. Do you have an internal (empty) PMA pic? Leebrandoncremer ( talk) 13:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
No but the image you put up looks good.-- Craigboy ( talk) 22:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Found an image showing PMA-1 lined with bags.
http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/images/shuttle/sts-134/html/s134e009323.html
--
Craigboy (
talk) 01:49, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
It's probably a bit of a late reply, but I've put a note here first time I read that page I think.. Penyulap talk 12:08, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, and thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give
Spacecraft docking and berthing mechanisms a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "
cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the
page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. BilCat ( talk) 13:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Please forgive the templating of a non-newbie, but it's the easiset way to spell out the rationale and give the links. However, as you're not a newbie, you should know that C-&P moves aren't permitted by now already. Please don't do it again. - BilCat ( talk) 13:58, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
The presence of a redirect page has made it not possible to move the article. -- Craigboy ( talk) 14:48, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the message.
I have changed the info boxes since they were about the spacecrafts and not the projects. The tables about missions and astronauts are moved to separate articles and some red links are deleted, but everything can still be found if you go a month back in the history of the articles. Soerfm ( talk) 10:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
I forgot to say, I am working on a separate article for the Mercury spacecraft but I am not sure if there is enough material. It can be seen at http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Mercury_spacecraft&redirect=no by clicking Edit, removing "#" before REDIRECT and then press Show Preview. Soerfm ( talk) 18:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
About the Gemini spacecraft, no unfortunately I have not started that article yet. Soerfm ( talk) 10:24, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy, I'd like to move your graphic and the infobox up to the top of this page, I didn't want to do it myself, as I'm not a studied expert on the subject, sure I've studied, but I'd rather have your opinion as well first at the very least, you obviously know what is going on there. At the moment I am working out the best way to include Tiangong as part of the ISS's context. It's a similar project after all. I left a comment on the talkpage. Penyulap talk 05:14, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Which image?-- Craigboy ( talk) 05:42, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dreamchaser ISS DOCKINGsmall.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page.
Thank you.
DASHBot (
talk) 18:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy. You've done a lot of good work with Spacecraft docking and berthing mechanisms, and I've attempted to help at the margins. If you get a chance, I'd appreciate your eyes on, and review/improvement of, Space rendezvous. I've made a few small improvements recently, but it still needs a LOT of work. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 22:35, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi. In International Space Station, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Scott Kelly ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
I've added the text in ENG and RU, but couldn't work out the two white lines (in a hurry), maybe you could ? I've got to say it looks a whole lot better now. Do you think the arrow is needed ? probably not considering the new, better shading you've done eh ? That's what I think. Penyulap talk 05:22, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:International Space Station#Hey Craigboy, how about this talkpage thingy ?
Penyulap talk 17:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
A trout is way too big really, but come on, 5RR ? slow down man take it easy!
Penyulap
talk 05:52, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
I never like talking about people behind their back, I wanted to let you know I mentioned your nefarious activities (Perhaps too strong a word, but I am exaggerating, so it's probably a well proportioned exaggeration) here where I was saying about your cutting in, but I was kind of unsure if you were getting the point or not with the hints I was dropping about it, well, anyhow I was blowing off steam about this whole "Change penyulap's text' business and reverted U5K0's edit when I had a look and saw there was no prospect of any reader knowing who was talking in so very many sections. Penyulap talk 02:53, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You have
a new message at User talk:Matthewrbowker's talk page. ~
Matthewrbowker
Talk to me 03:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The International Space Station Barnstar | |
For almost two years of striving to make the
ISS article not suck so much ! Great work, keep it up !! Penyulap talk 05:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC) |
Mad work on the OPSEK pic, it's been crying out for an image for ages. The launch of Buran, Polyus, and the NM and Nauka are all like man, so crying out too. If you don't get to it sometime, maybe I'll follow your lead on that one. Inspiring. Penyulap talk 16:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Craigboy, what is a better way to put it, cause although I think it's true that the shenzhou use apas, it's also true to say that the mech is based upon apas instead. Can we say 'based on' ? Penyulap talk 09:52, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
I don't think we can say its based on APAS because we don't have any sources that specifies that it is. but I think we can say something like
"A representative of the Chinese manned space program stated that around the year 2000, China and Russia were engaged in technological exchanges regarding the development of a docking mechanism. [1] Foreign sources have stated that the docking mechanism strongly resembles APAS-89/APAS-95, with one American source going as far as to call it a clone. [2] [3] [4] There have been contradicting claims on the compatibility of the Chinese system with both current and future docking mechanisms on the ISS. [4] [5] [6]"-- Craigboy ( talk) 12:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
If you have a look at the ISS article, there are both, but I figure you saw how they have a configuration as well as a photo. We don't have a photo, and we certainly don't have a final configuration as yet. The Chinese ____Require_____ an airlock module in order to have a long term crewed station, and seriously, we need some of their pics for that, I can't find 'em, except the one I was using as a muse, and then I left it out at the last minute. Have a look at Freedom or the ISS itself, and see how many times they change the overall designs before launch. Science power modules and so forth. Plus, whats wrong with the picture that the Chinese government has on it's own website here, should we tell them it's not allowed ?
How about we call it an early depiction ? Like the power tower or dual-keel in freedom, or the umbrella thing for the ISS, actually come to think of it, we kind of need a series of the different pictures of the ISS in the ISS article don't we, I mean they don't belong anywhere else do they ? hmmm. I am intending to start work on another depiction of the CSS with newer tiangongy textures, what would you say is the best and latest of the configurations I should work with ?
If you can answer on my tp that would be cool, Penyulap talk 05:59, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Should these be merged ? I put a marker for your comments at Talk:Core Cabin Module, I figure you'll have a good idea about it. Penyulap talk 12:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
I opened a discussion about a new bot that Z and I have been working on, it's not ready for big things yet, but it can do some small tasks and I've outlined them on Talk:Tiangong 1. I would very much like you to suggest whatever you can Craigboy, as you like to chat and I love to listen ! I could really use some of your ideas. Penyulap talk 11:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Cygnus (spacecraft), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATK ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 13:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Dragon (spacecraft), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terra firma ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:SpaceX COTS 2 emblem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:29, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi: Do we know for certain that the COTS Demo emblem is not in the public domain? Since it is a NASA mission, I am assuming -- possibly too much -- that it would fall under the same copyright as a NASA mission. I just came across it on SpaceX's Facebook page. Your thoughts?-- Abebenjoe ( talk) 20:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Since the COTS 2 article was moved (and COTS 3 merged into it) to Dragon C2+, which we found is not the actual name of the mission, I have suggested it be moved to come in line with how we named CRS SpX-1. Discussion can be found here. Cheers! WingtipvorteX (talk) ∅ 18:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
WingtipvorteX (talk) ∅ 01:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
editors like the CSS image, but you keep on deleting it, which always makes me think, 'why bother making any more images for wikipedia if they just get deleted'
thing is, we need free images of things for wikipedia, if some articles are to be illustrated at all, the Chinese and Russian space stations especially, as there are no free images and there won't be. Fair use doesn't apply to drawings of the stations, and I don't think you get that part, so I'll show you with opsek, so someone else can explain, and accuracy is in the eye of the beholder, after all, anything less than a photo is not accurate, well, to most people. Penyulap ☏ 19:02, 20 Jun 2012 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at International Space Station shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. See
BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant
noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary
page protection.
Both you and
Penyulap have already violated the three-revert rule. Discuss it on the talk page, and don't change the article until you both agree on a compromise. If you can't find anything to agree on, then go to
dispute resolution or open a
request for comment. I am sending this warning to both parties, I won't report either of you at this stage, but if you continue then you will be blocked. --
W.
D.
Graham 13:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Formerly planned Unpressurized Cygnus.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Artist Cygnus high.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Stefan2 ( talk) 21:49, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
-- W. D. Graham 20:30, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
"The result of the discussion was: Delete - by the standards that Wikipedia uses the image is replaceable with a free alternative and fails WP:NFCC#1"
I'm furious because you came to a decision that is entirely inconsistent with what was discussed. I demand for you to tell me how you came to this conclusion.--
Craigboy (
talk) 02:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy,
Let me say I admire (truly) your ability to continue editing (I assume that is what you are doing) without getting involved in the Wikiproject Spaceflight issues with Penyulap. You originally brought up the issue however, so if you have any comments or input I'd appreciate it. Please don't feel that I'm forcing you to, but given that I was rather uninvolved in all the issues and I am apparently the only one who is doing something to get the problems between WDGraham and Penyulap solved, I would definitely not mind the help. Its a pity two of the best editors in the project can halt so much. I'm doing all I can to try to get them to move on, but my willingness is running out and could use other ideas on where to go.
Best,
-- WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 00:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Dragon landing on Mars.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
{{
di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dragon landing on Mars.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 17:00, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Manned and cargo Dragon spacecraft.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:18, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Regarding your excellent graphics here, [1], I just learned something that might suggest a slight change to the graphic may be in order. Brian Mosdell, the head launch guy at the Cape for SpaceX, indicated a several-feet length difference between the central core and the two strap-on cores of the Falcon Heavy: the strap-ons are longer. The podcast may be downloaded here: [2]. I had not heard any SpaceX-released specs, nor media coverage, of that length difference before now. This is around 12:20 minutes into the one-hour interview (Falcon Heavy discussion starts at 9:50). At any rate, thought you might like to know about it. (and Grasshopper is discussed at c. 9:00 minutes.) Cheers. N2e ( talk) 05:01, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:TaurusII Wallops.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.
NASA has took a picture of today's rollout. It being PD, I have replaced the fair use image with this new one in the article per the fair use rationale of using it until there is a free replacement. If you think the fair use image adds significantly to the article, please re-add it and remove the di-orphaned notice from the file page. Thanks, WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 18:01, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 14:49, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy. I see you've listened to the lecture, from your notes on Grasshopper rocket Talk page.
Just an FYI. I've made a ton of edits to the various SpaceX rocket engine pages today, especially Merlin and Raptor, and have also created a new article SpaceX rocket engine family as it was becoming very hard to find an article on which to make non-Merlin and non-Falcon substantive edits on the new LOX/methane engines. Would appreciate your review and improvement of any of them. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 01:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy, can you deliver a source for the nomination of Kathleen Rubins to be part of Expedition 36/ 37 aboard the International Space Station? I'm wondering about that. Is Kathleen Rubins a replacement for Karen L. Nyberg? There are no hints to find in the Web. Regards -- Ras67 ( talk) 19:34, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craigboy, I just posted on the the ISS talk page about a strange problem. It seems to involve something Penyulap worked on a year ago, but I don't understand it. Can you take a look? It needs attention. Thanks! Wwheaton ( talk) 22:03, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
File:Manned and cargo Dragon spacecraft.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot ( talk) 04:09, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
W. D. Graham 23:25, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hey Craigboy.
Would you be willing to consider developing a comparison graphic of the Grasshopper v1 rocket to the other Falcon family rockets? I'm thinking something like your File:Falcon 9 v1.0 - Falcon 9 v1.1 - Falcon Heavy.svg
image but with the Grasshopper v1 shown in the progression after Falcon 9.
Now, after that, and since SpaceX has publicly announced that they are developing a longer Grasshopper v2 vehicle, assuming you can find the length in a source somewhere, it would be really cool to have the Grasshopper v2 shown as well. But maybe not, maybe better to wait on part 2 (Gv2) until the first photos of the v2 Grasshopper emerge.
However the Gv2 question is answered right now, I would really appreciate you taking a cut on a good Grasshopper comparative graphic for us with the Grasshopper v1. Then I would intend to use that graphic in the Grasshopper (rocket) article right away. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 16:42, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi Craig.
I think you'll find a particular photo interesting. Look at the source on the "restartable ignition system" statement in the SpaceX reusable rocket launching system article. Musk just posted that yesterday. Looks like there is a LOT of room between the outer engine bells and the center engine bell, just like your drawings. My guess: allows for a lot of gimbaling which will be needed for the controlled descent and landing phase of bringing the boosters back. Enjoy. N2e ( talk) 04:46, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
{{
cite web}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)