This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
Vaughan Corporate Ctr. (VIVA) I have reviewed your reasons for deletion and I agree that most of the VIVA-station articles should be deleted due to lack of notability. However, the Vaughan Corporate Centre station is slated to be relocated 2014 to a spot directly above Vaughan Corporate Centre (TTC) subway station, thus making it a terminal connection. I recall a statement in this deleted article referring to that relocation. Your debate on notability implies that terminals are notable. So, this article should be reinstated. jstreutker ( talk) 01:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
@Courcelles: I am at present revising the article above, because the text was completely outdated. In doing so, I am having a technical problem with the table on the right, were several informations are outdated: I simply don't know how to access the source text in order to correct it. Can you please explain how to resolve this problem? And please bear with my ignorance.... -- Aflis ( talk) 12:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
That is exactly what I am trying to do: sorry for not being precise. What I need is a foolproof explanation of how to go about it: in your answer, I don't understand what you mean by "click the link mad". What is the link you are speaking of, and what does "mad" mean in this context? Thank you for your patience! -- Aflis ( talk) 21:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
"Other countries · Atlas Politics portal view · talk · edit"
August 2011 (UTC)
Hello there. On December 30, 2010 you deleted File:Devilslake Train Station.jpg under the F4/F11 rationale ("no evidence of permission"). The image in question is part of a collection known collectively as the "Passenger Railroad Guide," maintained by Hikki Nagasaki. The file description page reprinted a disclaimer from Nagasaki's website which states, in part, that "all rights are not reserved. You are free to use all my photos on the website. You do not need to let me know when you use my photos." In addition, the original image was linked directly to establish its source.
I'm not the original uploader of this image but I've uploaded other images from that site and I'm concerned at the way this was handled. Nagasaki's disclaimer is explicit and it seems to me that Wikipedia's requisites were satisfied. I'd appreciate if you could either reverse the deletion or provide a further explanation. Best, Mackensen (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
{{
PD-self}}
it was trying to emulate, "all rights are not reserved" logically just requires him to release one of his moral rights, not all of them, notice how different PD-self's "I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law." is. Restoring this image would be playing guessing games with copyright, and that's not something we do. If we want to use them, we either need him to modify his release, or send something to OTRS along the lines of the standard, explicit release given on
commons:Commons:OTRS.
Courcelles
21:32, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Indeed it could mean a number of things. I question whether a speedy deletion was really the best way to handle this, especially given that the uploading user is inactive, but that ship sailed years ago. Hopefully Nagasaki will write with a clarification. Mackensen (talk) 22:06, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I am sure that, in future, we will not be seeing any more edits like this which use rollback despite not being an edit " reverting obvious vandalism" – thanks. ╟─ Treasury Tag► Clerk of the Parliaments─╢ 15:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Courcelles. Since you have reviewed Grammy lists in the past, is there a chance you might be able to review this Grammy list currently at FLC? I'd be much appreciated--the list needs reviews badly. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Haymaker has responded positively to the appointment of TParis with a suggestion to limit the iban to an initial 6 month period, after which parties may agree to extend. I have recommended acceptance to Roscelese, so hopefully things will be in place in under 24 hours. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 23:34, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Looks like this was missed in the text of the AfD - what should be done ? Mt king (edits) 02:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw that the page for Marco Bueno was deleted on 4th of August due to the reasons including that there is no confirmation that he is not even played for Liverpool FC. There is a spanish wiki page for him? http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Bueno. There is enough articles which specifies that he is a Liverpool player. So can we create an English page for him?
Jishnu Viswanath talk 09:51, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of NBC slogans. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. nymets2000 ( t/ c/ l) 20:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
I seem to see a lot of edits by you with a summary that says "Bypass unprintworthy redirect using AWB." Just what is that supposed to mean? I can see saying bypass a redirect but what has unprintworthy got to do with anything? I hadn't seen this particular summary used by an administrator and I am a bit confused. Thanks. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 05:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Regarding Vaughan Corporate Ctr. (VIVA)'s deletion and your comment on my comment which you have already archived: both this AfD and this AfD have comments by others (not by you, sorry for not being clear on that) that indicate that terminals should remain. Even though this subject bus stop is not presently a terminal, my case for requesting the undelete rests on it being a future certainty. Is that not enough to meet the notability requirement?
Another point of notability that I've noticed is that even if a transit company calls a station a "terminal", if it doesn't connect with other transit systems, its notability is doubtful. YRT commits that sin for several of its Viva "terminals", likely because of a marketing idea that keeps its YRT routes separate from its Viva routes, pretending they're two different systems. However, in this case, Vaughan Corporate Centre will, in the future, connect three different systems: Brampton Transit, TTC subway, and YRT.
Perhaps what instead should be done is taking the existing Vaughan Corporate Centre (TTC) article and changing its name to Vaughan Corporate Centre Terminal, to broaden it to include YRT's and Brampton Transit's involvement, similar to such articles as Richmond Hill Centre Terminal? What do you think?
Also, why wasn't an effort made to move the important information from Vaughan Corporate Ctr. (VIVA) to the Other Vivastations article? (In this, I make an assumption that this is a typical thing that Wikipedia administrators do.)
jstreutker ( talk) 18:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 80 | ← | Archive 84 | Archive 85 | Archive 86 | Archive 87 | Archive 88 | → | Archive 90 |
Vaughan Corporate Ctr. (VIVA) I have reviewed your reasons for deletion and I agree that most of the VIVA-station articles should be deleted due to lack of notability. However, the Vaughan Corporate Centre station is slated to be relocated 2014 to a spot directly above Vaughan Corporate Centre (TTC) subway station, thus making it a terminal connection. I recall a statement in this deleted article referring to that relocation. Your debate on notability implies that terminals are notable. So, this article should be reinstated. jstreutker ( talk) 01:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
@Courcelles: I am at present revising the article above, because the text was completely outdated. In doing so, I am having a technical problem with the table on the right, were several informations are outdated: I simply don't know how to access the source text in order to correct it. Can you please explain how to resolve this problem? And please bear with my ignorance.... -- Aflis ( talk) 12:14, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
That is exactly what I am trying to do: sorry for not being precise. What I need is a foolproof explanation of how to go about it: in your answer, I don't understand what you mean by "click the link mad". What is the link you are speaking of, and what does "mad" mean in this context? Thank you for your patience! -- Aflis ( talk) 21:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
"Other countries · Atlas Politics portal view · talk · edit"
August 2011 (UTC)
Hello there. On December 30, 2010 you deleted File:Devilslake Train Station.jpg under the F4/F11 rationale ("no evidence of permission"). The image in question is part of a collection known collectively as the "Passenger Railroad Guide," maintained by Hikki Nagasaki. The file description page reprinted a disclaimer from Nagasaki's website which states, in part, that "all rights are not reserved. You are free to use all my photos on the website. You do not need to let me know when you use my photos." In addition, the original image was linked directly to establish its source.
I'm not the original uploader of this image but I've uploaded other images from that site and I'm concerned at the way this was handled. Nagasaki's disclaimer is explicit and it seems to me that Wikipedia's requisites were satisfied. I'd appreciate if you could either reverse the deletion or provide a further explanation. Best, Mackensen (talk) 19:40, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
{{
PD-self}}
it was trying to emulate, "all rights are not reserved" logically just requires him to release one of his moral rights, not all of them, notice how different PD-self's "I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law." is. Restoring this image would be playing guessing games with copyright, and that's not something we do. If we want to use them, we either need him to modify his release, or send something to OTRS along the lines of the standard, explicit release given on
commons:Commons:OTRS.
Courcelles
21:32, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Indeed it could mean a number of things. I question whether a speedy deletion was really the best way to handle this, especially given that the uploading user is inactive, but that ship sailed years ago. Hopefully Nagasaki will write with a clarification. Mackensen (talk) 22:06, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I am sure that, in future, we will not be seeing any more edits like this which use rollback despite not being an edit " reverting obvious vandalism" – thanks. ╟─ Treasury Tag► Clerk of the Parliaments─╢ 15:50, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Courcelles. Since you have reviewed Grammy lists in the past, is there a chance you might be able to review this Grammy list currently at FLC? I'd be much appreciated--the list needs reviews badly. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Haymaker has responded positively to the appointment of TParis with a suggestion to limit the iban to an initial 6 month period, after which parties may agree to extend. I have recommended acceptance to Roscelese, so hopefully things will be in place in under 24 hours. LessHeard vanU ( talk) 23:34, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Looks like this was missed in the text of the AfD - what should be done ? Mt king (edits) 02:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I just saw that the page for Marco Bueno was deleted on 4th of August due to the reasons including that there is no confirmation that he is not even played for Liverpool FC. There is a spanish wiki page for him? http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Bueno. There is enough articles which specifies that he is a Liverpool player. So can we create an English page for him?
Jishnu Viswanath talk 09:51, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of List of NBC slogans. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. nymets2000 ( t/ c/ l) 20:06, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
I seem to see a lot of edits by you with a summary that says "Bypass unprintworthy redirect using AWB." Just what is that supposed to mean? I can see saying bypass a redirect but what has unprintworthy got to do with anything? I hadn't seen this particular summary used by an administrator and I am a bit confused. Thanks. Fyunck(click) ( talk) 05:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Regarding Vaughan Corporate Ctr. (VIVA)'s deletion and your comment on my comment which you have already archived: both this AfD and this AfD have comments by others (not by you, sorry for not being clear on that) that indicate that terminals should remain. Even though this subject bus stop is not presently a terminal, my case for requesting the undelete rests on it being a future certainty. Is that not enough to meet the notability requirement?
Another point of notability that I've noticed is that even if a transit company calls a station a "terminal", if it doesn't connect with other transit systems, its notability is doubtful. YRT commits that sin for several of its Viva "terminals", likely because of a marketing idea that keeps its YRT routes separate from its Viva routes, pretending they're two different systems. However, in this case, Vaughan Corporate Centre will, in the future, connect three different systems: Brampton Transit, TTC subway, and YRT.
Perhaps what instead should be done is taking the existing Vaughan Corporate Centre (TTC) article and changing its name to Vaughan Corporate Centre Terminal, to broaden it to include YRT's and Brampton Transit's involvement, similar to such articles as Richmond Hill Centre Terminal? What do you think?
Also, why wasn't an effort made to move the important information from Vaughan Corporate Ctr. (VIVA) to the Other Vivastations article? (In this, I make an assumption that this is a typical thing that Wikipedia administrators do.)
jstreutker ( talk) 18:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC)