Prior discussion: /Archive 1 • /Archive 2 • /Archive 3 • /Archive 4; Previous threads archived. Anthøny 16:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
CorticoSpinal, your behaviour after I extended a conditional unblock to you has reached the levels of disruption: your continuing ability to edit is evidently not a net positive for the project. To outline briefly:
I'm not currently convinced that allowing you to edit is beneficial to the project at all. To that end, I've placed an indefinite block on your account. Whilst I am not opposed to an {{ unblock}} at a later date, on the condition that you can demonstrate both a reform in editing habits and attitudes (that is, that you won't repeat the behaviour detailed above, and on the relevant administrators' noticeboard for incidents thread), but at the moment, blocking your accounts seems the only option left open.
Anthøny 18:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
From WP:ARBCOM: The Arbitration Committee is a panel of experienced users that exists to impose binding solutions to Wikipedia disputes that neither communal discussion, administrators, nor mediation have been able to resolve, and to consider certain cases where exceptional factors such as privacy preclude a public hearing.
Arbitration is the last step in the dispute resolution process–it is a last resort, only to be employed when all else has failed. Try other steps first, including discussion between disputants and, where appropriate, mediation. The Arbitration Committee only deals with the most serious disputes and cases of rule-breaking.
Note, this doesn't say anything about content or behaviour as such, but disputes and rule-breaking. Gwen Gale ( talk) 20:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/CorticoSpinal for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 23:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Prior discussion: /Archive 1 • /Archive 2 • /Archive 3 • /Archive 4; Previous threads archived. Anthøny 16:42, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
CorticoSpinal, your behaviour after I extended a conditional unblock to you has reached the levels of disruption: your continuing ability to edit is evidently not a net positive for the project. To outline briefly:
I'm not currently convinced that allowing you to edit is beneficial to the project at all. To that end, I've placed an indefinite block on your account. Whilst I am not opposed to an {{ unblock}} at a later date, on the condition that you can demonstrate both a reform in editing habits and attitudes (that is, that you won't repeat the behaviour detailed above, and on the relevant administrators' noticeboard for incidents thread), but at the moment, blocking your accounts seems the only option left open.
Anthøny 18:27, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
From WP:ARBCOM: The Arbitration Committee is a panel of experienced users that exists to impose binding solutions to Wikipedia disputes that neither communal discussion, administrators, nor mediation have been able to resolve, and to consider certain cases where exceptional factors such as privacy preclude a public hearing.
Arbitration is the last step in the dispute resolution process–it is a last resort, only to be employed when all else has failed. Try other steps first, including discussion between disputants and, where appropriate, mediation. The Arbitration Committee only deals with the most serious disputes and cases of rule-breaking.
Note, this doesn't say anything about content or behaviour as such, but disputes and rule-breaking. Gwen Gale ( talk) 20:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/CorticoSpinal for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 23:07, 5 September 2008 (UTC)