Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to
Wikipedia are appreciated, but
a recent edit of yours to the page
Ganges has an
edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
Favonian (
talk)
20:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Mayapur, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Dāsānudāsa (
talk)
07:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Confused guy 152! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Habibganj railway station that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --
Toddy1
(talk)
06:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
In Wikipedia, an article title is a
natural-language word or expression that indicates the subject of the article; as such, the article title is usually the name of the person, or of the place, or of whatever else the topic of the article is. However, some topics have multiple names, and some names have multiple topics; this can lead to disagreement about which name should be used for a given article's title. Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used, as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of
independent, reliable English-language sources. See
WP:COMMONNAME.--
Toddy1
(talk)
06:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
JPxG. I noticed that in
this edit to
Hindutva, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
jp×
g
18:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Delhi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Do not remove of sourced content and sources. And do not add Indic scripts since it contravenes
WP:NOINDICSCRIPT policy. If you have issues, discuss in the talk page and gain consensus.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
11:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 19:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Moving your real userpage and talkpage to a non-existent username may be "fun", but it's also disruptive. I have moved them back. Any more fun stuff and you'll be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 09:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC).
@ Bishonen: Please can you move this page back to its original name User talk:Confused guy 152 and then delete the redirect. It will not let me do the move.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
You seem to have removed Urdu, Punjabi and Hindi wordings of Fatehabad name on Fatehabad District Page /info/en/?search=Fatehabad_district but you did not provide any reason for doing that in edit summary. So, the edit is being reverted. Securearth ( talk) 05:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, the edit is not being reverted as the edit was correct as of wikipedia consensus of "no indic script", but next time making an edit, please include a summary for explaination of deletion of information. Securearth ( talk) 05:09, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at
Nashik, as this contravenes
WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
10:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/India-related articles, you may be
blocked from editing.
Serols (
talk)
11:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Delhi.
Serols (
talk)
11:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Removing a big chunk of text which actually itself explains that it is based on consensus in several RfC's is pure vandalism. It follows on several other disruptive removals of sourced content from Delhi, about which you have been warned above. You have been blocked for two weeks. Any further similar disruption is likely to be met with an indefinite block. You can request unblock by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 18:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC).
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to
Wikipedia are appreciated, but
a recent edit of yours to the page
Ganges has an
edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
Favonian (
talk)
20:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Mayapur, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Thank you.
Dāsānudāsa (
talk)
07:24, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi Confused guy 152! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Habibganj railway station that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --
Toddy1
(talk)
06:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
In Wikipedia, an article title is a
natural-language word or expression that indicates the subject of the article; as such, the article title is usually the name of the person, or of the place, or of whatever else the topic of the article is. However, some topics have multiple names, and some names have multiple topics; this can lead to disagreement about which name should be used for a given article's title. Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used, as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of
independent, reliable English-language sources. See
WP:COMMONNAME.--
Toddy1
(talk)
06:40, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
JPxG. I noticed that in
this edit to
Hindutva, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
jp×
g
18:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Delhi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your
sandbox for that. Do not remove of sourced content and sources. And do not add Indic scripts since it contravenes
WP:NOINDICSCRIPT policy. If you have issues, discuss in the talk page and gain consensus.
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
11:23, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 19:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
Moving your real userpage and talkpage to a non-existent username may be "fun", but it's also disruptive. I have moved them back. Any more fun stuff and you'll be blocked. Bishonen | tålk 09:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC).
@ Bishonen: Please can you move this page back to its original name User talk:Confused guy 152 and then delete the redirect. It will not let me do the move.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:47, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
You seem to have removed Urdu, Punjabi and Hindi wordings of Fatehabad name on Fatehabad District Page /info/en/?search=Fatehabad_district but you did not provide any reason for doing that in edit summary. So, the edit is being reverted. Securearth ( talk) 05:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, the edit is not being reverted as the edit was correct as of wikipedia consensus of "no indic script", but next time making an edit, please include a summary for explaination of deletion of information. Securearth ( talk) 05:09, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at
Nashik, as this contravenes
WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you -
Fylindfotberserk (
talk)
10:16, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/India-related articles, you may be
blocked from editing.
Serols (
talk)
11:31, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Delhi.
Serols (
talk)
11:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Removing a big chunk of text which actually itself explains that it is based on consensus in several RfC's is pure vandalism. It follows on several other disruptive removals of sourced content from Delhi, about which you have been warned above. You have been blocked for two weeks. Any further similar disruption is likely to be met with an indefinite block. You can request unblock by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 18:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC).
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.