Hello, I'm
Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
List of territorial disputes—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Patient Zero
talk
14:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
hi
i was reply in your talk page
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
List of territorial disputes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
——
SN
54129
15:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
This problem is solved. The source is provided.
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Patient_Zero#iri/uae
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
List of territorial disputes. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —— SN 54129 16:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Coesegue! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
see this link.
Hello, I'm
Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
List of territorial disputes—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help desk. Thanks.
Patient Zero
talk
14:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
hi
i was reply in your talk page
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
List of territorial disputes. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
——
SN
54129
15:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
This problem is solved. The source is provided.
/info/en/?search=User_talk:Patient_Zero#iri/uae
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
List of territorial disputes. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. —— SN 54129 16:13, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Coesegue! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC) |
see this link.