![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This issue has been raised here before but it was previously archived without a response from the bot operators. I think I know why ClueBot NG isn't reporting users to AIV. It may have happened when its edit summary was changed to "Edit by (username/IP) has been reverted by ClueBot NG due to possible noncompliance with Wikipedia guidelines. Report False Positive? (Report #) (Bot)", but after it was changed back to the original edit summary, that must have broken the bot when reporting users. Pinging User:Cobi and User:Rich Smith. — MRD2014 Talk 15:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
I have noticed that ClueBotNG does not warn users correctly. If a warning already exists for the current month, but was not issued by ClueBot, it will create a new heading for the month with a level one warning, even if the user had already received a level 4 warning earlier in the month. Jeb3 Talk at me here 14:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Its appears that ClueBot III is archiving sections at WP:GL/ILL off by a month. Pbroks13 ( talk) 18:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
I just noticed this series of edits at Tardigrade: [1] [2] [3].
My guess is that CB would have seen the first as vandalism too, but got distracted by the second. I mention this in case it's possible to improve something. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 14:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Great job Cluebot ng! You have done a very good job on your latest mission in operation wikipedia endurance. Thank you for your efforts!
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
message Thatphatguy ( talk) 13:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
Just so you know, we are arming your bomber with a-v emp bombs(Fictional) that will destroy vandal bases. Sort of like at shells, these act as at shells toward vandalization.
As it says in the section header. Cluebot NG hasn't edited in four days. Hopefully, everyone who is involved in its' upkeep knows already, but I wanted to make Absolutely Certain. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 04:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
The bot is back up and running. As a plus, it's reporting users to AIV again. — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 16:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear @ Cobi: http://review.cluebot.cluenet.org/ from Cobi Carter — Cobi (talk · contribs) — wrote and maintains the Wikipedia interface code and review interface.
is currently broken Xinbenlv ( talk) 19:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
You might want to add a comment section to some of the pages you monitor.
Obviously your watched by a human....
The most oftenly viewed/edited pages deserve a comment section.... MatthewLSr. ( talk) 07:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This issue has been raised here before but it was previously archived without a response from the bot operators. I think I know why ClueBot NG isn't reporting users to AIV. It may have happened when its edit summary was changed to "Edit by (username/IP) has been reverted by ClueBot NG due to possible noncompliance with Wikipedia guidelines. Report False Positive? (Report #) (Bot)", but after it was changed back to the original edit summary, that must have broken the bot when reporting users. Pinging User:Cobi and User:Rich Smith. — MRD2014 Talk 15:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
I have noticed that ClueBotNG does not warn users correctly. If a warning already exists for the current month, but was not issued by ClueBot, it will create a new heading for the month with a level one warning, even if the user had already received a level 4 warning earlier in the month. Jeb3 Talk at me here 14:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Its appears that ClueBot III is archiving sections at WP:GL/ILL off by a month. Pbroks13 ( talk) 18:31, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
I just noticed this series of edits at Tardigrade: [1] [2] [3].
My guess is that CB would have seen the first as vandalism too, but got distracted by the second. I mention this in case it's possible to improve something. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 14:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Great job Cluebot ng! You have done a very good job on your latest mission in operation wikipedia endurance. Thank you for your efforts!
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
message Thatphatguy ( talk) 13:12, 20 March 2019 (UTC) |
Just so you know, we are arming your bomber with a-v emp bombs(Fictional) that will destroy vandal bases. Sort of like at shells, these act as at shells toward vandalization.
As it says in the section header. Cluebot NG hasn't edited in four days. Hopefully, everyone who is involved in its' upkeep knows already, but I wanted to make Absolutely Certain. -- I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message ( talk to me) ( My edits) @ 04:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
The bot is back up and running. As a plus, it's reporting users to AIV again. — k6ka 🍁 ( Talk · Contributions) 16:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Dear @ Cobi: http://review.cluebot.cluenet.org/ from Cobi Carter — Cobi (talk · contribs) — wrote and maintains the Wikipedia interface code and review interface.
is currently broken Xinbenlv ( talk) 19:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
You might want to add a comment section to some of the pages you monitor.
Obviously your watched by a human....
The most oftenly viewed/edited pages deserve a comment section.... MatthewLSr. ( talk) 07:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)