![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You may be interested in this one. Main question, curiousity plus: Would ClueBotNG have "caught" the word "poon" as a "positive"? (It was up only an hour and a half or so.) It's the word that gave me considerable confidence the edit was, despite considerable sophistication, vandalism. I'm feeling my way here, am sort of stunned I came up with "ClueBot" out of my head, do think I'm in one right place to keep on this one a ways. Guess that'll do it for now. I'll check back here. Cheers. Thanks. Swliv ( talk) 05:12, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
.. this [1]? It was a long time ago and I've only just come across it, but it's puzzling. Philip Trueman ( talk) 14:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
What the hell is the point of this?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.30.128 ( talk) 18:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Some Cluebot edits have shown up on my watchlist, that don't appear to have a bot flag, so they show up when I hide bot edits (eg [2]. Is something not set correctly? Thanks -- Tony Wills ( talk) 08:39, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
you just sent me a message about an edit and it didn't make any sense. Contact me right away. SallySallyCato 14:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sallycato ( talk • contribs)
Da panda of pandemonium has given you a
ferret! Ferrets promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day much better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a ferret, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Give someone a ferret by adding {{ subst:Ferret}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for monitoring the best bots on Wikipedia! You have been a great help to everybody in the WikiCommunity! Make a bot to give WikiLove! Hug da panda. DPandaOPande ( talk) 22:29, 5 December 2012 (UTC)DPandaOPande
{{ /censor}}
Howdy. In the not so distant past, and more recently, Clue Bot 3 appears to be copying talk page sections into my archive but not removing the original posts. Also on a possibly related note, it appears to have duplicated posts in my archive. I've removed some of the duplicates in my archive. Do you know why either of these might be occurring?-- Rockfang ( talk) 17:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Proposed new behavior:
Has this already been proposed? Is there already such a Cluebot training widget available? Would it (like Twinkle) revert, warn, and add the IP to a (new) CluebotNG rviplist? Or Category? -- Lexein ( talk) 19:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
I've noticed that sometimes when ClueBot places warnings on the talk pages of users, it will insert a section heading (e.g., December 2012) even if it already exists, unless ClueBot put it there in the first place and is giving a second warning to the same user. I can give some examples if that would help. I suspect this is an error. PStrait ( talk) 01:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
User talk:Bboisno, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Bboisno and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Bboisno during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. j⚛e decker talk 04:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
This isn't in the FAQ, so I thought I'd bring it up here. I noticed that ClueBot is marking changes "minor" ("m") instead of "bot" ("b") in the version history. Is this the behavior you want? If so, why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sangrolu ( talk • contribs) 15:31, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
I am a panda, and naturally don't know much about bots and programing. I want to figure out how to make a bot, so I wanted to get advice from the best. I want to help Wikipedia by making bots, because I have sudden urges to vandalize if I go editing (yes, I admit it). I think I would be more productive if I do bots instead. -- DPandaOPande ( talk) 20:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)DPandaOPande
I don't believe this has already been brought up here - according to this VPT thread, the registration on cluebot.org has expired. I imagine that this might be the cause of some concern? (Though, as I noted there, I have full faith in CBNG to run flawlessly for months on its own, unless you guys have to update the heuristics or whatever they're called a lot more frequently than I think.) — Francophonie&Androphilie( Je vous invite à me parler) 18:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
I haven't been able to understand why it keeps using the level 1 vandalism warning on IP talk pages such as User talk:204.122.255.162. Is this a bug, or is it intended? (or is it a feature? :P) Michaelm55 ( talk) 14:44, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
[3] - first word I started wasn't in right place, thanks for message on user talk.-- Хьюберт Фарнсворт ( talk) 13:26, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Could somebody take a look at my archive and tell me why it's filled with a bunch of garbage from articles I've never even worked on? It appears to be totally broken. Thanx.-- Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 04:36, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
This edit was not exactly vandalism. Someone added the text. That is not wanted, so the bot result is correct, but no vandalism, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
I wrote a legitimate edit on footballer "Joe Mason" and ClueBot NG blocked me which is a complete joke as my edit contained valuable information about "Joe Mason". This thing blocks legitimate edits and can Wikipedia please get rid of this automated piece of rubbish!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomage ( talk • contribs) 19:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Did not remove anything, just put short sentences together. -- Froxxen ( talk) 13:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
I added some information in this article. EN 54 is the European Standard for Fire detection and fire alarm systems and it should be in this article because it is a mandatory standard in the European Union.
this article has only wrote about NFPA standard and EN 54 must be named too.
I add some reference as www.cen.eu and www.bsigroup.com where you could find information about EN 54 standard.-- Masanalv ( talk) 23:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You may be interested in this one. Main question, curiousity plus: Would ClueBotNG have "caught" the word "poon" as a "positive"? (It was up only an hour and a half or so.) It's the word that gave me considerable confidence the edit was, despite considerable sophistication, vandalism. I'm feeling my way here, am sort of stunned I came up with "ClueBot" out of my head, do think I'm in one right place to keep on this one a ways. Guess that'll do it for now. I'll check back here. Cheers. Thanks. Swliv ( talk) 05:12, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
.. this [1]? It was a long time ago and I've only just come across it, but it's puzzling. Philip Trueman ( talk) 14:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
What the hell is the point of this?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.30.128 ( talk) 18:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Some Cluebot edits have shown up on my watchlist, that don't appear to have a bot flag, so they show up when I hide bot edits (eg [2]. Is something not set correctly? Thanks -- Tony Wills ( talk) 08:39, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
you just sent me a message about an edit and it didn't make any sense. Contact me right away. SallySallyCato 14:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sallycato ( talk • contribs)
Da panda of pandemonium has given you a
ferret! Ferrets promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day much better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a ferret, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Give someone a ferret by adding {{ subst:Ferret}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for monitoring the best bots on Wikipedia! You have been a great help to everybody in the WikiCommunity! Make a bot to give WikiLove! Hug da panda. DPandaOPande ( talk) 22:29, 5 December 2012 (UTC)DPandaOPande
{{ /censor}}
Howdy. In the not so distant past, and more recently, Clue Bot 3 appears to be copying talk page sections into my archive but not removing the original posts. Also on a possibly related note, it appears to have duplicated posts in my archive. I've removed some of the duplicates in my archive. Do you know why either of these might be occurring?-- Rockfang ( talk) 17:42, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Proposed new behavior:
Has this already been proposed? Is there already such a Cluebot training widget available? Would it (like Twinkle) revert, warn, and add the IP to a (new) CluebotNG rviplist? Or Category? -- Lexein ( talk) 19:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
I've noticed that sometimes when ClueBot places warnings on the talk pages of users, it will insert a section heading (e.g., December 2012) even if it already exists, unless ClueBot put it there in the first place and is giving a second warning to the same user. I can give some examples if that would help. I suspect this is an error. PStrait ( talk) 01:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
User talk:Bboisno, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Bboisno and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User talk:Bboisno during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. j⚛e decker talk 04:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
This isn't in the FAQ, so I thought I'd bring it up here. I noticed that ClueBot is marking changes "minor" ("m") instead of "bot" ("b") in the version history. Is this the behavior you want? If so, why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sangrolu ( talk • contribs) 15:31, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
I am a panda, and naturally don't know much about bots and programing. I want to figure out how to make a bot, so I wanted to get advice from the best. I want to help Wikipedia by making bots, because I have sudden urges to vandalize if I go editing (yes, I admit it). I think I would be more productive if I do bots instead. -- DPandaOPande ( talk) 20:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)DPandaOPande
I don't believe this has already been brought up here - according to this VPT thread, the registration on cluebot.org has expired. I imagine that this might be the cause of some concern? (Though, as I noted there, I have full faith in CBNG to run flawlessly for months on its own, unless you guys have to update the heuristics or whatever they're called a lot more frequently than I think.) — Francophonie&Androphilie( Je vous invite à me parler) 18:33, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
I haven't been able to understand why it keeps using the level 1 vandalism warning on IP talk pages such as User talk:204.122.255.162. Is this a bug, or is it intended? (or is it a feature? :P) Michaelm55 ( talk) 14:44, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
[3] - first word I started wasn't in right place, thanks for message on user talk.-- Хьюберт Фарнсворт ( talk) 13:26, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Could somebody take a look at my archive and tell me why it's filled with a bunch of garbage from articles I've never even worked on? It appears to be totally broken. Thanx.-- Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 04:36, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
This edit was not exactly vandalism. Someone added the text. That is not wanted, so the bot result is correct, but no vandalism, -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
I wrote a legitimate edit on footballer "Joe Mason" and ClueBot NG blocked me which is a complete joke as my edit contained valuable information about "Joe Mason". This thing blocks legitimate edits and can Wikipedia please get rid of this automated piece of rubbish!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boomage ( talk • contribs) 19:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Did not remove anything, just put short sentences together. -- Froxxen ( talk) 13:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
I added some information in this article. EN 54 is the European Standard for Fire detection and fire alarm systems and it should be in this article because it is a mandatory standard in the European Union.
this article has only wrote about NFPA standard and EN 54 must be named too.
I add some reference as www.cen.eu and www.bsigroup.com where you could find information about EN 54 standard.-- Masanalv ( talk) 23:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)