|
Hello Clignett73. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Clignett, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Clignett, you may be
blocked from editing. (
talk→
BWilkins
←track)
16:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Clignett with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Rm1271
talk to me
16:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Have a look at Wilkins, Palmer_(surname) for the correct use of articles about a surname. Family trees are never the purpose. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:37, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that Admin Salvio has already provided you fantastic guidelines above (first in this page). I recommend that you read what is relevant to avoid any further confusions / issues. I also noticed that Level 4 warning for editing has been used in your case; please be careful of your edits or else your account (or even IP) can get blocked. Feel free to drop me a message on my Talk page if you need some help. Cheers AKS ( talk) 19:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you Arunsingh16, i didn't see his message before i got warned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.191.101.32 ( talk) 20:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, you use terminology which is utterly different from the standard terminology of English blazoning. "Weapon" should be "Shield", "Tarpaulins" should be "Mantling", "Shield holders" should be "Supporters", just to start with etc. etc. AnonMoos ( talk) 00:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want that image to stay on Commons, then you're probably going to have to give a real source (e.g. What book is it from?)... -- AnonMoos ( talk) 03:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
That's why i asked for a suggestion to discribe. It's my family crest and this have been in my family for a long time, so whom ever created it or made I really don't know. I just took a picture of it. And I am possitive the person who made it is long gone. -- Clignett73 ( talk) 11:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
You mean on the graphic? No, only my familyname.-- Clignett73 ( talk) 15:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Excuse me, i'm not a Dude. Miss Clignett. Point 1 to 3; Why do you think i replied with; 'No, only my familyname'. -- Clignett73 ( talk) 15:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
This is all the info i can provide about my picture. Like i wrote earlier; This coat of arms has been in my family for a very long time, and i'm pretty sure the person who made it way back ( ca 1740) is not around anymore for me to ask permission if i can use this image.-- Clignett73 ( talk) 17:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
|
Hello Clignett73. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Clignett, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at
Clignett, you may be
blocked from editing. (
talk→
BWilkins
←track)
16:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Clignett with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Rm1271
talk to me
16:32, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Have a look at Wilkins, Palmer_(surname) for the correct use of articles about a surname. Family trees are never the purpose. ( talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:37, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that Admin Salvio has already provided you fantastic guidelines above (first in this page). I recommend that you read what is relevant to avoid any further confusions / issues. I also noticed that Level 4 warning for editing has been used in your case; please be careful of your edits or else your account (or even IP) can get blocked. Feel free to drop me a message on my Talk page if you need some help. Cheers AKS ( talk) 19:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you Arunsingh16, i didn't see his message before i got warned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.191.101.32 ( talk) 20:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, you use terminology which is utterly different from the standard terminology of English blazoning. "Weapon" should be "Shield", "Tarpaulins" should be "Mantling", "Shield holders" should be "Supporters", just to start with etc. etc. AnonMoos ( talk) 00:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want that image to stay on Commons, then you're probably going to have to give a real source (e.g. What book is it from?)... -- AnonMoos ( talk) 03:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
That's why i asked for a suggestion to discribe. It's my family crest and this have been in my family for a long time, so whom ever created it or made I really don't know. I just took a picture of it. And I am possitive the person who made it is long gone. -- Clignett73 ( talk) 11:45, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
You mean on the graphic? No, only my familyname.-- Clignett73 ( talk) 15:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Excuse me, i'm not a Dude. Miss Clignett. Point 1 to 3; Why do you think i replied with; 'No, only my familyname'. -- Clignett73 ( talk) 15:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
This is all the info i can provide about my picture. Like i wrote earlier; This coat of arms has been in my family for a very long time, and i'm pretty sure the person who made it way back ( ca 1740) is not around anymore for me to ask permission if i can use this image.-- Clignett73 ( talk) 17:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)