Hello Clarksmom, you might be interested in my comment here:
-- Edoe ( talk) 12:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Did you read the comments on the GLXP talk page before reverting? You are trying to reinsert uncited opinion, which is not in adherence with Wikipedia guidelines. Please discuss on the article talk page. Thank you. Arjuna ( talk) 05:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crowbar (tool), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Crowbar (tool) with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crowbar (tool), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Your recent editing history at Backgammon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Yunshui 雲 水 15:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crowbar (tool), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Crowbar (tool). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Yunshui
雲
水
07:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Crowbar (tool), you may be
blocked from editing.
Allens (
talk |
contribs)
03:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Federal Housing Finance Agency, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
Bbb23 (
talk)
23:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Drmies (
talk)
02:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)I saw this edit first. "Wow," I said to myself, "Someone has added an insulting comment to the talk page. That's pretty inappropriate. I can assume good faith, though; maybe she doesn't realize that this is inappropriate. Or maybe I'm wrong, and this actually is an important area to discuss." So, assuming good faith, I searched google news for the information you said was one of the most widely written-out aspects of Bono's life, and I found nothing. So, probably meant to be insulting, then, and not a well-intentioned attempt to make the article better. Then I looked at your talk page, and noticed that you had been repeatedly warned to stop making inappropriate edits, and in fact, had been warned that your next inappropriate edit would result in an indefinite block. However, looking at your edits, I suspect that, despite your name, you are probably a child or a teenager, and thus likely to learn, in time, to do good research writing. So instead of an indefinite block, I made the block for one year. Please feel free to come back, and make useful edits, when you have a better ability to do that. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 11:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
FisherQueen (
talk ·
contribs)
11:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)I recently started a discussion regarding whether dead projects should be removed from the List of distributed computing projects. Since I see you've contributed to that article in the past, I would be grateful if you would throw in your two cents. Thanks! – voidxor ( talk | contrib) 05:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello Clarksmom, you might be interested in my comment here:
-- Edoe ( talk) 12:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Did you read the comments on the GLXP talk page before reverting? You are trying to reinsert uncited opinion, which is not in adherence with Wikipedia guidelines. Please discuss on the article talk page. Thank you. Arjuna ( talk) 05:15, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crowbar (tool), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to
Crowbar (tool) with
this edit, you may be
blocked from editing.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
JamesBWatson (
talk)
13:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crowbar (tool), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Your recent editing history at Backgammon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Yunshui 雲 水 15:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crowbar (tool), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{
helpme}}
" on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Crowbar (tool). Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Yunshui
雲
水
07:30, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Crowbar (tool), you may be
blocked from editing.
Allens (
talk |
contribs)
03:29, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Federal Housing Finance Agency, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. --
Bbb23 (
talk)
23:28, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 00:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Drmies (
talk)
02:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)I saw this edit first. "Wow," I said to myself, "Someone has added an insulting comment to the talk page. That's pretty inappropriate. I can assume good faith, though; maybe she doesn't realize that this is inappropriate. Or maybe I'm wrong, and this actually is an important area to discuss." So, assuming good faith, I searched google news for the information you said was one of the most widely written-out aspects of Bono's life, and I found nothing. So, probably meant to be insulting, then, and not a well-intentioned attempt to make the article better. Then I looked at your talk page, and noticed that you had been repeatedly warned to stop making inappropriate edits, and in fact, had been warned that your next inappropriate edit would result in an indefinite block. However, looking at your edits, I suspect that, despite your name, you are probably a child or a teenager, and thus likely to learn, in time, to do good research writing. So instead of an indefinite block, I made the block for one year. Please feel free to come back, and make useful edits, when you have a better ability to do that. - FisherQueen ( talk · contribs) 11:31, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
FisherQueen (
talk ·
contribs)
11:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)I recently started a discussion regarding whether dead projects should be removed from the List of distributed computing projects. Since I see you've contributed to that article in the past, I would be grateful if you would throw in your two cents. Thanks! – voidxor ( talk | contrib) 05:26, 28 January 2015 (UTC)