![]() | The owner of this account is suspected of
abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets) |
Chefsuffolk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Amazing. I'm supposed to prove that "the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia" - yet the person placing the block never offered up a shred of evidence that my edits were dispruptive. No, the accusation by an editor who constantly engages in warring and throws around sockpuppeting accusations like candy at a Halloween party was enough, I guess. Never mind that multiple people he's accused of being SPs have already come forward with the truth. No, because Drmargi and Dreadstar - whoever they are - are WikiPals, the block goes up and stays forever, I guess. Never mind the actual truth, that's irrelevant here I suppose. Anyone looking over the List of Iron Chef America Episodes discussion page can see quite clearly what's going on, but I suppose no one gives a crap. The roost is ruled by the lodest rooster, and Drmargi it is, I guess. I officially give up. I no longer care. If Drmargi wants to own the page by having every user who disagrees with him/her banned, so be it. No skin off my ass. I attempted to be helpful, to make the page more accurate, but obviously that's as relevant as the accuracy of the claims made against me. Fine. Chefsuffolk (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please only use this template for unblock requests. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chefsuffolk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Because it's not true? Fuck this shit. Chefsuffolk ( talk) 16:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 17:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chefsuffolk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Lovely. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? The ban is based on some "suspected" flibbertyjibbit. All because one particular user, Drmargi (a user who regularly gets into edit wars, breaks the 3RR, and exhibits constant ownership behavior) can't stand being wrong or having people disagree with him/her. So s/he throws out baseless accusations and then someone goes ahead and puts in a ban on his/her word alone, with no proof beyond some "suspected" mishmosh. Now I have to prove that the block is "not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia" when the person who requested the block never proved it was necessary in the first place? Horsesh*t, if you ask me. Chefsuffolk (talk) 4:02 pm, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Blaming other editors will not get your block lifted. Address the issues that led to your block and your behavior and you'll do much better. TN X Man 20:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() Welcome to WikiProject Beer
|
|
![]() Hello Chefsuffolk! welcome to WikiProject Beer! We are a group of editors who work together to better organize information in articles related to beer. The goals of WikiProject Beer:
What you can do right now:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type {{ helpme}} on this page and someone will come along. Once again, welcome to the project! | |
SilkTork * YES! 21:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I agree that there are a few people (such as myself) who dispute the "beerness" of such a distilled product - but we need a source for such a statement. If you have a source, please add it - I would prefer to have some form of qualifying statement that such freeze distilled products are disputed as beers. SilkTork * YES! 21:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Drmargi (
talk)
16:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Dreadstar
☥
04:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)![]() | The owner of this account is suspected of
abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets) |
Chefsuffolk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Amazing. I'm supposed to prove that "the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia" - yet the person placing the block never offered up a shred of evidence that my edits were dispruptive. No, the accusation by an editor who constantly engages in warring and throws around sockpuppeting accusations like candy at a Halloween party was enough, I guess. Never mind that multiple people he's accused of being SPs have already come forward with the truth. No, because Drmargi and Dreadstar - whoever they are - are WikiPals, the block goes up and stays forever, I guess. Never mind the actual truth, that's irrelevant here I suppose. Anyone looking over the List of Iron Chef America Episodes discussion page can see quite clearly what's going on, but I suppose no one gives a crap. The roost is ruled by the lodest rooster, and Drmargi it is, I guess. I officially give up. I no longer care. If Drmargi wants to own the page by having every user who disagrees with him/her banned, so be it. No skin off my ass. I attempted to be helpful, to make the page more accurate, but obviously that's as relevant as the accuracy of the claims made against me. Fine. Chefsuffolk (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please only use this template for unblock requests. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chefsuffolk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Because it's not true? Fuck this shit. Chefsuffolk ( talk) 16:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- jpgordon ::==( o ) 17:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chefsuffolk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Lovely. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? The ban is based on some "suspected" flibbertyjibbit. All because one particular user, Drmargi (a user who regularly gets into edit wars, breaks the 3RR, and exhibits constant ownership behavior) can't stand being wrong or having people disagree with him/her. So s/he throws out baseless accusations and then someone goes ahead and puts in a ban on his/her word alone, with no proof beyond some "suspected" mishmosh. Now I have to prove that the block is "not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia" when the person who requested the block never proved it was necessary in the first place? Horsesh*t, if you ask me. Chefsuffolk (talk) 4:02 pm, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
Blaming other editors will not get your block lifted. Address the issues that led to your block and your behavior and you'll do much better. TN X Man 20:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() Welcome to WikiProject Beer
|
|
![]() Hello Chefsuffolk! welcome to WikiProject Beer! We are a group of editors who work together to better organize information in articles related to beer. The goals of WikiProject Beer:
What you can do right now:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type {{ helpme}} on this page and someone will come along. Once again, welcome to the project! | |
SilkTork * YES! 21:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
I agree that there are a few people (such as myself) who dispute the "beerness" of such a distilled product - but we need a source for such a statement. If you have a source, please add it - I would prefer to have some form of qualifying statement that such freeze distilled products are disputed as beers. SilkTork * YES! 21:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of
your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted or removed. Please use
the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Drmargi (
talk)
16:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Dreadstar
☥
04:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)