Welcome!
Hello, Chedorlaomer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Ism schism (
talk)
22:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
You missed the point i think. In Akbar's reign people of Hindoo race were forced to wear yellow patches or in local language "tukda" for easy identification. [1] Hitler's reign had the same thing happen to jewish community. No claim is made one influenced the other rather just pointed out the similarity of treatment of Hindoos and Jews. There is nothing original research here.
Two facts: 1) Akbar's realm had targeting of individuals by making them wear a small cloth piece.
2) Nazis had a similar thing done in there realm.
Why can't both things be said in the same article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by More random musing ( talk • contribs) 09:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
If you read the source it is clear that Hindoo race was made to wear a patch on their clothes so that they could be identified. Same was the requirement on Jewish race when they were asked to wear a patch so that they could be identified by the nazis. Just identical facts from two different times. This is not in realm of original research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by More random musing ( talk • contribs) 11:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I do not understand your assertion. The word Persecution is widely used in describing endangered animals. Using hyenas as baiting animals or hunting them by roping them out of their dens is not extermination. Dark hyena ( talk) 15:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Doug Hanks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Truthanado ( talk) 04:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
La dee da. What on earth could the sockpuppet who keeps going on about including the painting expect? A Sniper ( talk) 16:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
ישו לפעמים גורם לנו לחייך A Sniper ( talk) 22:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice on how to do the refs on the List of UFO sightings page. Anarwan ( talk) 13:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not undo large edits. It is considered vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by More random musing ( talk • contribs) 11:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
hi , sorry for the delay in replying. I cannot devote much time to WP any longer due to other commitments and may have to take time off for a couple of months. I did not check the books in themselves but followed the references from the article and found that they were mostly limited previews from which he drew his own conclusions. I cant promise anything due to lack of time but Ill see what I can do.-- Deepak D'Souza 09:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Just curious - why did you choose this nick? (Hope you approve of the edits being done on your namesake's article) PiCo ( talk) 23:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Winnenden school shooting. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Onorem
♠
Dil
00:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Doug Hanks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
I am struggling to see how this is relevant. Perhaps the young man was influenced by video games to some degree or another, but you must ask the question: who under the age of about 20 these days has NOT played a video game at least once in his or her life? Should we also add that he watched movies, swore occasionally, and perhaps picked his nose? The killer was obviously deranged, and had other problems in his life much bigger than a few general hobbies. Hayden120 ( talk) 23:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Spree shooters who played video games ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 01:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
try this
Here Ford 20:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Chedorlaomer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This is not a "bad hand" account, but rather my main account. The other account (which I would like to avoid mentioned by name if possible) was created later because I had made some IP edits on a certain topic back in September, and I felt nervous about connecting my main account to my IP (because my IP is revealing), so I left the IP to almost exclusively edit that topic, and in December created an account just to do the IP's editing. Chedorlaomer has remained my account for everything else. The two accounts did not edit any articles in common, leave alone engage in abuse of multiple accounts.
Decline reason:
Until I know what the other account is, there's really no effective way for me to review this. However, if your main concern is that you edited while logged out, oversight is usually willing to zap those edits in order to hide that information. -- slakr\ talk / 00:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chedorlaomer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The block, allegedly for abuse of multiple accounts, does not prevent disruption because there was no "abuse" of multiple accounts in the first place. I've explained my case in greater detail on this page, with responses to the blocking admin. I assert that the blocking admin is mistaken about my accounts, and I would like another review, preferably by an admin who is willing to look through the block log to figure out the name of the other account, which I do not want to state openly because it is connected to my IP. It may also be better to move this whole situation to a higher board of discussion as it has dragged out without fair resolution, and also because there appears to be no good reason to use Checkuser privilege against my account; it lacked due process.
Decline reason:
Please review WP:SOCK#SCRUTINY and WP:GHBH. Neither of these are legitimate uses of sockpuppetry. Khoi khoi 05:23, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Doug Hanks. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Hanks. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Indian Shipping - Les Hindous.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Chedorlaomer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Ism schism (
talk)
22:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
You missed the point i think. In Akbar's reign people of Hindoo race were forced to wear yellow patches or in local language "tukda" for easy identification. [1] Hitler's reign had the same thing happen to jewish community. No claim is made one influenced the other rather just pointed out the similarity of treatment of Hindoos and Jews. There is nothing original research here.
Two facts: 1) Akbar's realm had targeting of individuals by making them wear a small cloth piece.
2) Nazis had a similar thing done in there realm.
Why can't both things be said in the same article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by More random musing ( talk • contribs) 09:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
If you read the source it is clear that Hindoo race was made to wear a patch on their clothes so that they could be identified. Same was the requirement on Jewish race when they were asked to wear a patch so that they could be identified by the nazis. Just identical facts from two different times. This is not in realm of original research. —Preceding unsigned comment added by More random musing ( talk • contribs) 11:48, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I do not understand your assertion. The word Persecution is widely used in describing endangered animals. Using hyenas as baiting animals or hunting them by roping them out of their dens is not extermination. Dark hyena ( talk) 15:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Doug Hanks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Truthanado ( talk) 04:16, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
La dee da. What on earth could the sockpuppet who keeps going on about including the painting expect? A Sniper ( talk) 16:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
ישו לפעמים גורם לנו לחייך A Sniper ( talk) 22:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice on how to do the refs on the List of UFO sightings page. Anarwan ( talk) 13:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Please do not undo large edits. It is considered vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by More random musing ( talk • contribs) 11:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
hi , sorry for the delay in replying. I cannot devote much time to WP any longer due to other commitments and may have to take time off for a couple of months. I did not check the books in themselves but followed the references from the article and found that they were mostly limited previews from which he drew his own conclusions. I cant promise anything due to lack of time but Ill see what I can do.-- Deepak D'Souza 09:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Just curious - why did you choose this nick? (Hope you approve of the edits being done on your namesake's article) PiCo ( talk) 23:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Winnenden school shooting. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Onorem
♠
Dil
00:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Doug Hanks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
I am struggling to see how this is relevant. Perhaps the young man was influenced by video games to some degree or another, but you must ask the question: who under the age of about 20 these days has NOT played a video game at least once in his or her life? Should we also add that he watched movies, swore occasionally, and perhaps picked his nose? The killer was obviously deranged, and had other problems in his life much bigger than a few general hobbies. Hayden120 ( talk) 23:31, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated Category:Spree shooters who played video games ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 01:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
try this
Here Ford 20:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Chedorlaomer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
This is not a "bad hand" account, but rather my main account. The other account (which I would like to avoid mentioned by name if possible) was created later because I had made some IP edits on a certain topic back in September, and I felt nervous about connecting my main account to my IP (because my IP is revealing), so I left the IP to almost exclusively edit that topic, and in December created an account just to do the IP's editing. Chedorlaomer has remained my account for everything else. The two accounts did not edit any articles in common, leave alone engage in abuse of multiple accounts.
Decline reason:
Until I know what the other account is, there's really no effective way for me to review this. However, if your main concern is that you edited while logged out, oversight is usually willing to zap those edits in order to hide that information. -- slakr\ talk / 00:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chedorlaomer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
The block, allegedly for abuse of multiple accounts, does not prevent disruption because there was no "abuse" of multiple accounts in the first place. I've explained my case in greater detail on this page, with responses to the blocking admin. I assert that the blocking admin is mistaken about my accounts, and I would like another review, preferably by an admin who is willing to look through the block log to figure out the name of the other account, which I do not want to state openly because it is connected to my IP. It may also be better to move this whole situation to a higher board of discussion as it has dragged out without fair resolution, and also because there appears to be no good reason to use Checkuser privilege against my account; it lacked due process.
Decline reason:
Please review WP:SOCK#SCRUTINY and WP:GHBH. Neither of these are legitimate uses of sockpuppetry. Khoi khoi 05:23, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Doug Hanks. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Hanks. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Indian Shipping - Les Hindous.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:02, 24 January 2020 (UTC)