Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Revenue has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 20:30, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ch Nasir Mehmood! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 16 January 2019 (UTC) |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Revenue. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 10:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist ( talk) 11:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Your edits have been reverted several times. Please consider, that their content and format were not evaluated useful in this context. There is no "Nasir's Revenue Theory" in the literature. Please give reference. And try to stick to wiki-format. kind regards, -- WissensDürster ( talk) 14:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Currency appreciation and depreciation. Britishfinance ( talk) 17:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Revenue has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 20:30, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi Ch Nasir Mehmood! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 16 January 2019 (UTC) |
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Revenue. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
{{Help me}}
on
your talk page and someone will drop by to help.Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 10:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist ( talk) 11:47, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Your edits have been reverted several times. Please consider, that their content and format were not evaluated useful in this context. There is no "Nasir's Revenue Theory" in the literature. Please give reference. And try to stick to wiki-format. kind regards, -- WissensDürster ( talk) 14:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Currency appreciation and depreciation. Britishfinance ( talk) 17:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.