This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
Hello, Cenarium, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Rama (
talk)
19:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Did you even have time to read the article before you tagged it for deletion ? What on earth do you know about this subject as a math student ? It is not non-sence and if <<personal attack>> Dowew ( talk) 02:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know: O jo kaluguran daka was written in another language, and therefore shouldn't be tagged as nonsense. I deleted it anyway, but because it failed another criterion: failure to assert notability. Nyttend ( talk) 04:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I didnt vandalize the page... Is this the way to talk to you? by editing your page? ElvynKoa ( talk) 13:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
You vandalized the page, not I. I improved the treatment of the topic; you erased my work. Why destroy truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.227.121 ( talk) 14:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
In regard to this article, I wanted to clarify which procedure you were trying to use to delete it. You placed a {{ prod}} notice on the page for proposed deletion, but you also created a page for it at Articles for deletion. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikilost ( talk) 06:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Rage Epilepsy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Rage Epilepsy.
Eubulides (
talk)
03:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the silly stuff on my talk page. [2] This IP has been pestering about ever since I spent the day watching the featured article on the main page about four weeks ago. Just out of curiosity, how did it come to your attention? Risker ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I removed the section on the beta because it is now irrelevant. The game is gold and available at retail in 2 days. What is the point of a beta section or putting it back in? 66.26.82.58 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I've changed the tag slightly - R3 (redirect form an implausible spelling mistake) seems to fit the situation a fair bit better. Thanks! gb ( t, c) 19:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Crashdown (album). The reason is:
For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Don Not delete the article, I'm trying to put its notability. This band has worked and collaborated with bands like Rage, Primal Fear, Angra, Sinner, all thi gives importance to the band. Please hangon until I put all the references and their njotabillity. Rockk3r ( talk) 17:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I have removed the speedy tag you placed on DarkSun. The articles assert that this band has released three albums in the last six years. Releasing albums can lead to notability, so this article is not eleigible for CSD A7. If you feel that this band fails the more general notability criteria, then PROD and AfD are still available. Dsmdgold ( talk) 19:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
The article is unlikely to be deleted. I do agree that I need to enunciate the band's notability better. I think it could be btter just to tag on the article {{ unsourced}} because you're right about one thing - it needs references. I'm gonna put this on their talk page Rockk3r Talk to me 16:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I see you have offered the suggestion of moving the trivia information to the biography section of the article. I think that is a good idea, and you can go ahead and do that if you wish so we can get rid of that trivia section. If you need any help let me know and I shall assist in any way i can. AnthonyWalters ( talk) 14:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I reverted edit by User:Reddogg as he has removed only the negative statements about T. Rajendar thereby making it a POV. As per my knowledge, Wikipedia does not prohibit the usage of criticism, only that the article should not be heavily biased for or against the person concerned.- Ravichandar 04:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to note that the page you keep citing, Wikipedia:Trivia sections, when discussing Did you know boxes and hooks in portals, was created with intention to be applied to articles. Many, and I daresay most of the hooks (the Did you know items, i.e. "Did you know that...") in such boxes have actually appeared on the Main Page as such and aren't just useless lists of unsourced information. I'd appreciate it if you stop disregarding others' hard work on DYK articles and classing them as "trivia". Cheers, Spebi 00:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sir, thank you for rev to last correct vers, you have my gratitude, the other guy seems to be driven by some sort of agenda refusing to use newer reports and ignoring the dom of the horse in Lorestan region. and etc. thanx again. Cyrus111 ( talk) 23:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
I recently tried to edit the James Coburn film,High Risk.
I see you misunderstood at what I was doing.
I am wishing soon we can fix the tiny issue.
Thanks a lot, EJ Electric Japan ( talk) 12:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Do you have prove of this comment: "Muhammad's lechery prompted him to invent a commandment from Allah" ? One needs to prove intent to prove lechery.Provide proof for that intention to support claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.154.253.113 ( talk) 16:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I just feel sooo sooo bad I promise I won't do it again Heatsketch ( talk) 05:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks any help you provide. I appreciate this.
EJ Electric Japan ( talk) 14:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:131.216.163.226
some parts were repeated.
131.216.163.226 (
talk)
20:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)E.
Hi there. I noticed that you removed my speedy tag on the 'possible film' with the reason "can't speedy a film". Can you tell me where it says this in the CSD criteria? I'm asking because I can't see it and would like to know for future use. Best wishes - Fritzpoll ( talk) 22:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Restored and fixed. :-) east.718 at 13:01, February 17, 2008
SyntaxError55
talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! For reverting vandalism on my user page. :D
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for the revert! J.delanoy gabs adds 23:25, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
J.delanoy
gabs
adds has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
And for mine too :) Seraphim♥ Whipp 23:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, at least you're not just jumping to conclusions. 142.162.15.17 ( talk) 23:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
By the way, I do have an account, I just can't seem to get into it right now for some reason, my password is correct though. 142.162.15.17 ( talk) 23:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
This article is VERY notable. This company is one of the biggest independent players in a little thing called the Barnett Shale, one of the largest natural gas fields in the US. This is a billion dollar company. Do I need more references, links to newspaper articles, etc? I tried to follow the same format as other companies in the same industry. See Devon Energy and Chesapeake Energy.
Please remove the notability tag or give me a reason why you put it there. Thanks, -- Gittinsgranado ( talk) 21:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Phantom Planet(disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on
notable subjects and should provide references to
reliable sources that
verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
ukexpat (
talk)
14:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Vivio Testarossa
Talk
Who
03:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
SyG ( talk) 14:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
It has to be renamed to Pristina —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendobs ( talk • contribs) 18:05, 8 March 2008
Dude you are too fast for me, you must have beaten me to it at least 20 times tonight alone :P Nice work -- General Jazza ( talk) 21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Infradian rhythms are biological rhythms lasting for less than 24 hours. An example is the feeding cycle of some animals according to the tides. Ultradian rhythms are biological rhythms that last for longer than 24 hours. An example is the human female 28-day menstrual cycle.
Please stop changing this page not knowing what they are. For validity, look them up on a REAL MEDICAL site/publishing not some bogus source.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Aslidaku911 ( talk • contribs) 21:19, 9 March 2008
I don't want to cause a stir but do you think Theology Online should get an AFD or at least a prod? I have no problems with the content and whatnot, but it's rather odd how right after I once tagged it a speedy, an influx of new account showed up promoting the site on the talk page. - Warthog Demon 23:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I have now added quite a bit of information to the Tantus page and quite a few sources too. Can I remove the deletion tag you added? —Preceding unsigned comment added by O-Ring ( talk • contribs) 01:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
if i publish a website saying 'the sky is blue', can i then go claim copyright and force that statement off wikipedia*? what i have copied are statements of fact. to re-write them would risk the truth of the statements.
ninety: one 12:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the crap from my article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sainik1/J3HaaD
Hate people vandalizing it everyday! -- Sainik1 ( talk) 17:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium! Thank-you for your
support in my RfA (91/1/1).
|
Hello and thank you for your advice, is there any particular directory of warning templates here on wikipedia? because I am not quite sure what all the warning templates are, it would be a great help if you could provide that. AndreNatas ( talk) 21:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I have undeleted Pinki Lili and wish you the best of luck in improving it. Jon513 ( talk) 22:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you tagged Hp tx1000us. However, it seems it is not the correct CSD category. This article seems to be describing the predecessor of HP Compaq TC1100, another article that has merit. Perhaps, giving the article another chance or merge it to the HP Compaq TC1100 article would be better than speedy deleting it. Have a great day! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 20:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for catching and fixing [4] my accidential deletion! -- Kralizec! ( talk) 00:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, I know your not trying to offend me. Many people (admins especcialy) really like my program. I am not a bigginer any more if you think I am imature to adopt, I do know the banning policy, revert, rollback, ect. I would like to know how you don't like it.-- RyRy5 talk 19:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
It's ok, I'm not accusing you of anything. However, I was just concerned at the approach you were taking; your analysis of his edit statistics seemed very peculiar to me, seeing as we generally acknowledge that edit count means essentially nothing. Your response did give advice, true, and it wasn't overtly offensive, but the undertone (at least the one I got out of it) was "what are you doing? You have no idea." Anyway, in terms of the adoption program, it may be very ambitious, but it still seems good-hearted (not sure what this dubious information is), and his usage of Jimbo's talk page was probably just an effort to get it noticed by people (also, note that most new users think that Jimbo has a much more involved role in the talk-page-level workings of Wikipedia than he actually does). Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 03:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
It's OK. Most people think I'm a newcomer. I've been only here for 1 month. I'm actually slowing down the program too.-- RyRy5 talk 18:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium/Archive 1! Thank you for your
support in my RfA (87/3/3).
|
WP:AN#Cabals, part 2. There's an RFC in the making. Just notifying you in case you don't check AN, as I'd like to have the entire community (or at least a lot of opinions) in this. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 21:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for opening that. (No, seriously). I've written a bit more there as well as what I said at ANI. Basically, you're 100% correct, and I'm seriously trying to do something about it. Regards, dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 10:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
btw. out of curiosity, did you withdraw the RfC "endorsement" because of my Compwhizi/blog stuff, or some other reason? (And feel free to not answer)
Thanks for opening it and letting me know. Drmiko ( talk) 09:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium! I've noticed that you've been doing a lot of work on maths (sub-)portals - notably creating Portal:Category theory and Portal:Set theory. Given this and my recent work, it's inevitable our paths will cross at some stage. So, I was wondering what other maths portals do you think should be created? The obvious pure maths gaps are Number Theory and Analysis... but should Calculus be inluced in the latter or seperately? The whole sector of Applied Maths isn't covered - or alternatively, it's covered everywhere else in bits. I personally think that there should be one Applied portal, but not seperate ones for probabability/stats/etc.... although maybe one for Discrete maths. Anyway, enough of me rambling - let me know what you think. Tompw ( talk) ( review) 18:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
When you talk about infradian rhythms, you dont look at frequency compared to circadian, you look at length compared to circadian as all medical sites and books list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.248.246 ( talk) 04:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, how did you get the table etc onto your userpage?-- Energizer07 ( talk) 10:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
...I've replied to the comment you made here. Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk) 21:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Erm...In Nick's neutral (on this RFA), he said that my behavior left him with a bitter taste in his mouth. I was shocked to see this because I didn't really notice anything hostile that I had posted on the RFA, and because my comment to you is the only one on this RFA, I would like to apologize to you for any terseness or hard feelings created by my comment. I sincerely didn't mean to offend you, and if I did....then I apologize profusely for it. Best wishes, Malinaccier ( talk) 23:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
This has been clarified at user talk:Nick#Bitter behavior?. For the best, Cenarium Talk 02:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!-- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 03:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
You "Cenarium" added a notability Tag to Red 13 (Band, I'm new to this and I didn't really understand the rules, I read the Notability guidelines and I think that i have satisfied them. Red 13 has competed in "The Break contest" to play a nationally accredited festival "The Bamboozle", and have won, securing themselves a spot May 3rd Mainstage at "The bamboozle" @ The Medowlands Sports complex, East Rutherford, NJ according to "9. Has won or placed in a major music competition." - Wikipedia:Notability (music) & They also are releasing a album on Romulus X Records in May '08 "5. Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." Although Not Two albums.. between the One album and the major Music Competition i think red 13 is sufficiently notable. I thank you for pointing this issue out to me, so i could make the necessary adjustments. If you see anymore issues or have any suggestions please let me know.
AntiMMORPG ( talk) 19:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Please take a look at WT:RFA#Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dell970, and my comment under the "Discussion" section of the RFA itself (which I added after it closed). I think allegations of racist slurs have a very credible explanation. Since the RFA is kept forever, I wonder if you would consider going back to the closed RFA, and strike any portion of your comments relating to the racist slurs? Otherwise, this is likely to haunt an otherwise good faith contributor in the future. Thanks. -- barneca ( talk) 04:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Viral email, has been listed for
deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viral email. Thank you. Do you want to
opt out of receiving this notice?
Rockfang (
talk)
15:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I noticed my mistake and went back and saw you had already corrected it. Thanks-- Startstop123 ( talk) 14:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Please be advised that I had noticed my error and corrected it before it was considered for deletion. Thank you-- Startstop123 ( talk) 14:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I see that you posted on his talk page, per his edits, in comparison with Hdayejr's edits, and his small complication with user TPIRfanSteve, he is obiviously trying to impersonate him. Isn't that a grounds for a block, username delete?— Dæ dαlus T@lk / Improve 16:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium, I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 23:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium, Im just fixing vandalism that is going on the page would you please keep an eye on there? Redman19 ( talk) 12:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Done. :) Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I saw vandalism in the first reference on the Space Needle article but I had no idea how to remove it. Can you explain it to me?
The DarkArcher was here ( talk) 22:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
RfA: Many thanks | ||
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. -- jbmurray ( talk • contribs) 06:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for the help in taking care of the vandalism on Nintendo Entertainment System. Its great to have support from other editors against vandals who make personal attacks. Jsmith86 ( talk) 22:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Putting my money where my mouth is, concerning the Featured article process (as I asked of others): if there's anything I can do to explain the process or to help you get started reviewing articles, please drop me a note. More reviewers = better FAs, and that's what it's all about. Maralia ( talk) 22:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I’ve just made a comment on possible reform of the TFA system on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article. Since you seem to be engaged in this issue I’d appreciate if you had a look and perhaps weighed in. Cheers! Lampman Talk to me! 16:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
... for the kind note you left for Laser brain. Regards, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
First of all, it was not directed at you unless you were making personal insults vs Lazer. I didn't see this to be the case, however, but I haven't read all of the scattered debate. That or if you actually were beat up by a little girl in pigtails for your lunch money. (That's a joke if you're an ESL type). My only difference with you was the "significant portion of the community" comment. That's your POV, mine is: and again at least in my experience with a completely different article, that it was a vocal minority with a different agenda then as opposed to what happened with Elderly. My post was a consolation to someone who was going through what I went through, although his attackers were a little "politer" than mine. Also, I never said that you personally needed to get more involved, just that getting involved and your suggestion about other languages were two of the best ideas I heard from that debate. I edited what I said in the interest of not fanning the flames. So, I apologize if you took it as something it was not meant to be.-- Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 18:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
for your vote of confidence and support on my RFA. I really appreciate them and will try not to disappoint! Let me know if I can help in any way... but give me some time to figure out how to do it!! -- Slp1 ( talk) 16:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for reverting the vandalism on Uranus caused by someone using an I.P. router to impersonate me back in April. Do you know of any ways to prevent this from happening again? Thanks again - Falcon537 ( talk) 03:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks.-- Barkjon 17:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you very much for cleaning up my entries on the biography of newscaster Ralph Renick and in making the article suitable in style for the Wikipedia community. Also, thanks for finishing the photo upload that I could not figure out.
Can you tell me at what point the warning at the top of the page that says "this article has numerous issues" will disappear now that you have addressed the issues?
Again, thanks very much for your help..
Thecardsaysmoops ( talk) 01:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Are you warning yourself about deletions of pages you created during clean up after vandalism?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 14:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Users are allowed to edit their userpages, but the MfD tag prohibits blanking. Does the cover the user the page belongs to as well? Ironho lds 04:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Superscript text i am a decendant of this rabbi, there has been alot of vandalism to this article in the past and this article sadly was used as a forum for personal attacks by another distant family member against the family, all and any of the infomation that was put in the article by this person was not only false but had nothing to do with this great rabbi and do only but place a negative point on this article about tis true giant of american and world judaism.
at a time there was a lock on this article so that it could not be editidet as these had been and edit war as i had to monitor the articlee daily to remove any hateful attcks, but i have noticed this lock has beed removed for whatever reason, can you please reinstate the lock on editing and can this be made permanenet you can look at this history to see the rediculous attack for your self
please help —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.227.4 ( talk) 15:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey there Cenarium, I just deleted several subpages of Portal:Lego per your request at CSD. Just wanna make sure you really did want them gone. Also, I actually thought you were an admin - are you an admin? If not, why not? How long have you been here? Are you interested in adminship? Is anything holding you back from it? You can answer here, I'll watchlist this page. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
This gave me reason to suspect, as well as his Suppert. Nothing indicates otherwise in my opinion, especially since he hasn't even responded to my comment. — Maggot Syn 14:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Best of luck for your RFA -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 09:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
You placed
a comment on
User talk:Mr.Deathhawk after I warned regarding vandalism on an essay page. Please do not belittle me, I took the time to review the users contribs, and for the past two months at least, this users contribs have been nothing but vandalism. Maybe vandalism on an essay page does not warrant a warning, but it doesn't take too long to review a users contribs and see a pattern.
Yngvarr
(c)
23:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
You deleted StickK as csd-a7. I didn't see the article before it was deleted, but you probably acted correctly, since so many articles tagged for speedy don't assert notability properly, even when the topic is notable. I wanted to mention, though, that some references about the company are listed on its site (with links to the full text of news articles where they originally appeared). Could you please take a look at the references at http://www.stickk.com/about.php and see if they are enough to convince you to restore the article and improve it with those references? It sounds like a cool idea, but while I suspect that StickK is notable, I am not certain that an article about it would survive AfD. -- Eastmain ( talk) 02:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Yup, just saw and commented on it; thanks for helping out :). As i said, I'm not one to scream cabal, but 4 users who haven't contributed for a month, have similar viewpoints and edit histories and have never even touched an MfD before all deciding seperately and spontaneously to turn up, give variations on a them for keep reasons and then immediately vanish again sets alarm bells ringing even for me. Ironho lds 15:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi again, I don't think it was very appropriate for you to have closed the mfd as you had become involved in it. In this case, I would suggest that you revert the close, or anything like that, but it would be good if you would please try to avoid closing discussions in which you have any involvement or interest, even if you didn't actually !vote. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 01:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
There wasn't any need to move them because i already moved them. Check it out at my Workplace. Sorry for all the chaos. Thanks a million!!! -- Condalence 22:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Yeah go ahead. Thanks a million again. -- Condalence 22:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
For some reason i have two talk pages. Look: Talk:Condalence User Talk:Condalence -- Condalence 22:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For resolving the Voldemore MfD and sockpuppetry case so well, and also due to your massive body of previous work that doesn't seem to have any barnstars attached! Ironho lds 00:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC) |
Hi Cenarium, You wrote "Proposed deletions are reserved for articles, a user can request deletion of one's userpage using WP:CSD#U1. Cenarium Talk 23:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)"
This is not my understanding, nor my observation of actual practice. I have seen PROD used for user subpages by their users, and it seems entirely appropriate. The current introduction to WP:PROD includes "User and User talk pages may also be deleted in the same way". This indicates that pPROD can be used in userspace, although I seem to remember more explicit statements in the past.
I see WP:PROD says "but only if the user has no recent edits and has made few or no contributions to the encyclopedia." This supposes that someone else is PRODding the userpage. But reason for PRODding your own userpage is give some warning to others who may be interested.
On WP:CSD#U1, if your want to speedy delete your own page, assuming no one else ever edited, and no own else could possibly have a genuine and worthwhile interest, then how better to request deletion than via PROD tag?
-- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 00:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I did change my signature hours ago but its the old signatures that is causeing them. Should i Redirect it? Thank you. -- Condalence 01:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Since you denied the speedy-deletion for Gatineau Police, you may want to follow this pre-announcement of proposed deletions for multiple non-notable Canadian police departments. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 04:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
A single purpose account Special:Contributions/Sahyadhri is continuously adding non-RS and unsourced information in The Hindu and Frontline (magazine). He added information not supported by reference. Please see the history of the article The Hindu and Talk:The_Hindu#Inaccurate_edits, the article is currently protected. I have repeatedly told this user to join in Talk:The_Hindu#Inaccurate_edits, but he revert-warred instead of discussion. I have issued this user a warning for addition of unsourced material. I have reported this matter to ANI several times. Since no administrator is paying any attention to this matter, I am in the middle of a strange situation. You are an uninvolved admin, so I am asking you. My question is if this user again readd the non-RS in the artcile The Hindu after the protection expires, what should I do? Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 12:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Cenarium. I'd like to ask, if I may, why the 35th, 75th, and 79th fighter squadron pages were deleted? v/r Ndunruh ( talk) 17:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
If you had seen the discussion page you have got a better idea of what was going on. Regarding the publications of the Hindu group (Front line, The Hindu daily) contrarian views were not at all tolerated at any level . If you could see the articles which has been mentioned as "Poorly sourced" you can understand its tenure and the stature of Individuals who have made that. Regarding the substantiation of the claims predominantly a portal belonging to an advocacy group called ZNET is used.-- Sahyadhri ( talk) 07:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I note the sockpuppetry case has not been closed; is it still being worked on? Ironho lds 10:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I am well aware of the problem you mentioned on my talk page. Having myself received a level 3 warning from another Huggle user earlier today, I can say, however, that double-checking edits to avoid this problem will only compound it. What happens is that when two people revert an edit simultaneously, and one of them is not on the Huggle whitelist, the other one will do the revert, mistakenly reverting to the vandalized version. But this happens in such a way that the person doing the wrong revert had no time to react.
Maybe a Huggle upgrade is in order: one that shows no "updated" version of an article on the user's screen unless said user requests it.
Until that happens, I guess this is a problem we'll just have to live with. --Blanchardb- Me• MyEars• MyMouth-timed 16:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
Hello, Cenarium, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
Rama (
talk)
19:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Did you even have time to read the article before you tagged it for deletion ? What on earth do you know about this subject as a math student ? It is not non-sence and if <<personal attack>> Dowew ( talk) 02:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know: O jo kaluguran daka was written in another language, and therefore shouldn't be tagged as nonsense. I deleted it anyway, but because it failed another criterion: failure to assert notability. Nyttend ( talk) 04:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
I didnt vandalize the page... Is this the way to talk to you? by editing your page? ElvynKoa ( talk) 13:23, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
You vandalized the page, not I. I improved the treatment of the topic; you erased my work. Why destroy truth? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.227.121 ( talk) 14:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
In regard to this article, I wanted to clarify which procedure you were trying to use to delete it. You placed a {{ prod}} notice on the page for proposed deletion, but you also created a page for it at Articles for deletion. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikilost ( talk) 06:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Rage Epilepsy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Rage Epilepsy.
Eubulides (
talk)
03:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the silly stuff on my talk page. [2] This IP has been pestering about ever since I spent the day watching the featured article on the main page about four weeks ago. Just out of curiosity, how did it come to your attention? Risker ( talk) 23:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I removed the section on the beta because it is now irrelevant. The game is gold and available at retail in 2 days. What is the point of a beta section or putting it back in? 66.26.82.58 ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:10, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I've changed the tag slightly - R3 (redirect form an implausible spelling mistake) seems to fit the situation a fair bit better. Thanks! gb ( t, c) 19:10, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Crashdown (album). The reason is:
For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Don Not delete the article, I'm trying to put its notability. This band has worked and collaborated with bands like Rage, Primal Fear, Angra, Sinner, all thi gives importance to the band. Please hangon until I put all the references and their njotabillity. Rockk3r ( talk) 17:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I have removed the speedy tag you placed on DarkSun. The articles assert that this band has released three albums in the last six years. Releasing albums can lead to notability, so this article is not eleigible for CSD A7. If you feel that this band fails the more general notability criteria, then PROD and AfD are still available. Dsmdgold ( talk) 19:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
The article is unlikely to be deleted. I do agree that I need to enunciate the band's notability better. I think it could be btter just to tag on the article {{ unsourced}} because you're right about one thing - it needs references. I'm gonna put this on their talk page Rockk3r Talk to me 16:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
I see you have offered the suggestion of moving the trivia information to the biography section of the article. I think that is a good idea, and you can go ahead and do that if you wish so we can get rid of that trivia section. If you need any help let me know and I shall assist in any way i can. AnthonyWalters ( talk) 14:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
I reverted edit by User:Reddogg as he has removed only the negative statements about T. Rajendar thereby making it a POV. As per my knowledge, Wikipedia does not prohibit the usage of criticism, only that the article should not be heavily biased for or against the person concerned.- Ravichandar 04:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to note that the page you keep citing, Wikipedia:Trivia sections, when discussing Did you know boxes and hooks in portals, was created with intention to be applied to articles. Many, and I daresay most of the hooks (the Did you know items, i.e. "Did you know that...") in such boxes have actually appeared on the Main Page as such and aren't just useless lists of unsourced information. I'd appreciate it if you stop disregarding others' hard work on DYK articles and classing them as "trivia". Cheers, Spebi 00:13, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Sir, thank you for rev to last correct vers, you have my gratitude, the other guy seems to be driven by some sort of agenda refusing to use newer reports and ignoring the dom of the horse in Lorestan region. and etc. thanx again. Cyrus111 ( talk) 23:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
I recently tried to edit the James Coburn film,High Risk.
I see you misunderstood at what I was doing.
I am wishing soon we can fix the tiny issue.
Thanks a lot, EJ Electric Japan ( talk) 12:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Do you have prove of this comment: "Muhammad's lechery prompted him to invent a commandment from Allah" ? One needs to prove intent to prove lechery.Provide proof for that intention to support claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.154.253.113 ( talk) 16:01, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I just feel sooo sooo bad I promise I won't do it again Heatsketch ( talk) 05:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks any help you provide. I appreciate this.
EJ Electric Japan ( talk) 14:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:131.216.163.226
some parts were repeated.
131.216.163.226 (
talk)
20:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)E.
Hi there. I noticed that you removed my speedy tag on the 'possible film' with the reason "can't speedy a film". Can you tell me where it says this in the CSD criteria? I'm asking because I can't see it and would like to know for future use. Best wishes - Fritzpoll ( talk) 22:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Restored and fixed. :-) east.718 at 13:01, February 17, 2008
SyntaxError55
talk has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! For reverting vandalism on my user page. :D
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for the revert! J.delanoy gabs adds 23:25, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
J.delanoy
gabs
adds has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
And for mine too :) Seraphim♥ Whipp 23:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, at least you're not just jumping to conclusions. 142.162.15.17 ( talk) 23:41, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
By the way, I do have an account, I just can't seem to get into it right now for some reason, my password is correct though. 142.162.15.17 ( talk) 23:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
This article is VERY notable. This company is one of the biggest independent players in a little thing called the Barnett Shale, one of the largest natural gas fields in the US. This is a billion dollar company. Do I need more references, links to newspaper articles, etc? I tried to follow the same format as other companies in the same industry. See Devon Energy and Chesapeake Energy.
Please remove the notability tag or give me a reason why you put it there. Thanks, -- Gittinsgranado ( talk) 21:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on
Phantom Planet(disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on
notable subjects and should provide references to
reliable sources that
verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
ukexpat (
talk)
14:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Vivio Testarossa
Talk
Who
03:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
SyG ( talk) 14:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
It has to be renamed to Pristina —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendobs ( talk • contribs) 18:05, 8 March 2008
Dude you are too fast for me, you must have beaten me to it at least 20 times tonight alone :P Nice work -- General Jazza ( talk) 21:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Infradian rhythms are biological rhythms lasting for less than 24 hours. An example is the feeding cycle of some animals according to the tides. Ultradian rhythms are biological rhythms that last for longer than 24 hours. An example is the human female 28-day menstrual cycle.
Please stop changing this page not knowing what they are. For validity, look them up on a REAL MEDICAL site/publishing not some bogus source.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Aslidaku911 ( talk • contribs) 21:19, 9 March 2008
I don't want to cause a stir but do you think Theology Online should get an AFD or at least a prod? I have no problems with the content and whatnot, but it's rather odd how right after I once tagged it a speedy, an influx of new account showed up promoting the site on the talk page. - Warthog Demon 23:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
I have now added quite a bit of information to the Tantus page and quite a few sources too. Can I remove the deletion tag you added? —Preceding unsigned comment added by O-Ring ( talk • contribs) 01:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
if i publish a website saying 'the sky is blue', can i then go claim copyright and force that statement off wikipedia*? what i have copied are statements of fact. to re-write them would risk the truth of the statements.
ninety: one 12:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for removing the crap from my article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sainik1/J3HaaD
Hate people vandalizing it everyday! -- Sainik1 ( talk) 17:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium! Thank-you for your
support in my RfA (91/1/1).
|
Hello and thank you for your advice, is there any particular directory of warning templates here on wikipedia? because I am not quite sure what all the warning templates are, it would be a great help if you could provide that. AndreNatas ( talk) 21:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I have undeleted Pinki Lili and wish you the best of luck in improving it. Jon513 ( talk) 22:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you tagged Hp tx1000us. However, it seems it is not the correct CSD category. This article seems to be describing the predecessor of HP Compaq TC1100, another article that has merit. Perhaps, giving the article another chance or merge it to the HP Compaq TC1100 article would be better than speedy deleting it. Have a great day! - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 20:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for catching and fixing [4] my accidential deletion! -- Kralizec! ( talk) 00:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
OK, I know your not trying to offend me. Many people (admins especcialy) really like my program. I am not a bigginer any more if you think I am imature to adopt, I do know the banning policy, revert, rollback, ect. I would like to know how you don't like it.-- RyRy5 talk 19:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
It's ok, I'm not accusing you of anything. However, I was just concerned at the approach you were taking; your analysis of his edit statistics seemed very peculiar to me, seeing as we generally acknowledge that edit count means essentially nothing. Your response did give advice, true, and it wasn't overtly offensive, but the undertone (at least the one I got out of it) was "what are you doing? You have no idea." Anyway, in terms of the adoption program, it may be very ambitious, but it still seems good-hearted (not sure what this dubious information is), and his usage of Jimbo's talk page was probably just an effort to get it noticed by people (also, note that most new users think that Jimbo has a much more involved role in the talk-page-level workings of Wikipedia than he actually does). Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 03:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
It's OK. Most people think I'm a newcomer. I've been only here for 1 month. I'm actually slowing down the program too.-- RyRy5 talk 18:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium/Archive 1! Thank you for your
support in my RfA (87/3/3).
|
WP:AN#Cabals, part 2. There's an RFC in the making. Just notifying you in case you don't check AN, as I'd like to have the entire community (or at least a lot of opinions) in this. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 21:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for opening that. (No, seriously). I've written a bit more there as well as what I said at ANI. Basically, you're 100% correct, and I'm seriously trying to do something about it. Regards, dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 10:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
btw. out of curiosity, did you withdraw the RfC "endorsement" because of my Compwhizi/blog stuff, or some other reason? (And feel free to not answer)
Thanks for opening it and letting me know. Drmiko ( talk) 09:19, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium! I've noticed that you've been doing a lot of work on maths (sub-)portals - notably creating Portal:Category theory and Portal:Set theory. Given this and my recent work, it's inevitable our paths will cross at some stage. So, I was wondering what other maths portals do you think should be created? The obvious pure maths gaps are Number Theory and Analysis... but should Calculus be inluced in the latter or seperately? The whole sector of Applied Maths isn't covered - or alternatively, it's covered everywhere else in bits. I personally think that there should be one Applied portal, but not seperate ones for probabability/stats/etc.... although maybe one for Discrete maths. Anyway, enough of me rambling - let me know what you think. Tompw ( talk) ( review) 18:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
When you talk about infradian rhythms, you dont look at frequency compared to circadian, you look at length compared to circadian as all medical sites and books list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.248.246 ( talk) 04:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, how did you get the table etc onto your userpage?-- Energizer07 ( talk) 10:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
...I've replied to the comment you made here. Thanks, Malinaccier ( talk) 21:41, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Erm...In Nick's neutral (on this RFA), he said that my behavior left him with a bitter taste in his mouth. I was shocked to see this because I didn't really notice anything hostile that I had posted on the RFA, and because my comment to you is the only one on this RFA, I would like to apologize to you for any terseness or hard feelings created by my comment. I sincerely didn't mean to offend you, and if I did....then I apologize profusely for it. Best wishes, Malinaccier ( talk) 23:02, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
This has been clarified at user talk:Nick#Bitter behavior?. For the best, Cenarium Talk 02:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!-- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 03:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
You "Cenarium" added a notability Tag to Red 13 (Band, I'm new to this and I didn't really understand the rules, I read the Notability guidelines and I think that i have satisfied them. Red 13 has competed in "The Break contest" to play a nationally accredited festival "The Bamboozle", and have won, securing themselves a spot May 3rd Mainstage at "The bamboozle" @ The Medowlands Sports complex, East Rutherford, NJ according to "9. Has won or placed in a major music competition." - Wikipedia:Notability (music) & They also are releasing a album on Romulus X Records in May '08 "5. Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable)." Although Not Two albums.. between the One album and the major Music Competition i think red 13 is sufficiently notable. I thank you for pointing this issue out to me, so i could make the necessary adjustments. If you see anymore issues or have any suggestions please let me know.
AntiMMORPG ( talk) 19:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Please take a look at WT:RFA#Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dell970, and my comment under the "Discussion" section of the RFA itself (which I added after it closed). I think allegations of racist slurs have a very credible explanation. Since the RFA is kept forever, I wonder if you would consider going back to the closed RFA, and strike any portion of your comments relating to the racist slurs? Otherwise, this is likely to haunt an otherwise good faith contributor in the future. Thanks. -- barneca ( talk) 04:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing,
Viral email, has been listed for
deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viral email. Thank you. Do you want to
opt out of receiving this notice?
Rockfang (
talk)
15:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
I noticed my mistake and went back and saw you had already corrected it. Thanks-- Startstop123 ( talk) 14:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Please be advised that I had noticed my error and corrected it before it was considered for deletion. Thank you-- Startstop123 ( talk) 14:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
I see that you posted on his talk page, per his edits, in comparison with Hdayejr's edits, and his small complication with user TPIRfanSteve, he is obiviously trying to impersonate him. Isn't that a grounds for a block, username delete?— Dæ dαlus T@lk / Improve 16:40, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium, I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 23:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Cenarium, Im just fixing vandalism that is going on the page would you please keep an eye on there? Redman19 ( talk) 12:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Done. :) Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 22:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
I saw vandalism in the first reference on the Space Needle article but I had no idea how to remove it. Can you explain it to me?
The DarkArcher was here ( talk) 22:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
RfA: Many thanks | ||
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. -- jbmurray ( talk • contribs) 06:15, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for the help in taking care of the vandalism on Nintendo Entertainment System. Its great to have support from other editors against vandals who make personal attacks. Jsmith86 ( talk) 22:22, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Putting my money where my mouth is, concerning the Featured article process (as I asked of others): if there's anything I can do to explain the process or to help you get started reviewing articles, please drop me a note. More reviewers = better FAs, and that's what it's all about. Maralia ( talk) 22:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I’ve just made a comment on possible reform of the TFA system on Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article. Since you seem to be engaged in this issue I’d appreciate if you had a look and perhaps weighed in. Cheers! Lampman Talk to me! 16:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
... for the kind note you left for Laser brain. Regards, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 03:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
First of all, it was not directed at you unless you were making personal insults vs Lazer. I didn't see this to be the case, however, but I haven't read all of the scattered debate. That or if you actually were beat up by a little girl in pigtails for your lunch money. (That's a joke if you're an ESL type). My only difference with you was the "significant portion of the community" comment. That's your POV, mine is: and again at least in my experience with a completely different article, that it was a vocal minority with a different agenda then as opposed to what happened with Elderly. My post was a consolation to someone who was going through what I went through, although his attackers were a little "politer" than mine. Also, I never said that you personally needed to get more involved, just that getting involved and your suggestion about other languages were two of the best ideas I heard from that debate. I edited what I said in the interest of not fanning the flames. So, I apologize if you took it as something it was not meant to be.-- Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 18:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
for your vote of confidence and support on my RFA. I really appreciate them and will try not to disappoint! Let me know if I can help in any way... but give me some time to figure out how to do it!! -- Slp1 ( talk) 16:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you for reverting the vandalism on Uranus caused by someone using an I.P. router to impersonate me back in April. Do you know of any ways to prevent this from happening again? Thanks again - Falcon537 ( talk) 03:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thanks.-- Barkjon 17:44, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
I just wanted to thank you very much for cleaning up my entries on the biography of newscaster Ralph Renick and in making the article suitable in style for the Wikipedia community. Also, thanks for finishing the photo upload that I could not figure out.
Can you tell me at what point the warning at the top of the page that says "this article has numerous issues" will disappear now that you have addressed the issues?
Again, thanks very much for your help..
Thecardsaysmoops ( talk) 01:36, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Are you warning yourself about deletions of pages you created during clean up after vandalism?— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙) 14:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Users are allowed to edit their userpages, but the MfD tag prohibits blanking. Does the cover the user the page belongs to as well? Ironho lds 04:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
Superscript text i am a decendant of this rabbi, there has been alot of vandalism to this article in the past and this article sadly was used as a forum for personal attacks by another distant family member against the family, all and any of the infomation that was put in the article by this person was not only false but had nothing to do with this great rabbi and do only but place a negative point on this article about tis true giant of american and world judaism.
at a time there was a lock on this article so that it could not be editidet as these had been and edit war as i had to monitor the articlee daily to remove any hateful attcks, but i have noticed this lock has beed removed for whatever reason, can you please reinstate the lock on editing and can this be made permanenet you can look at this history to see the rediculous attack for your self
please help —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.227.4 ( talk) 15:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Hey there Cenarium, I just deleted several subpages of Portal:Lego per your request at CSD. Just wanna make sure you really did want them gone. Also, I actually thought you were an admin - are you an admin? If not, why not? How long have you been here? Are you interested in adminship? Is anything holding you back from it? You can answer here, I'll watchlist this page. Cheers, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:59, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
This gave me reason to suspect, as well as his Suppert. Nothing indicates otherwise in my opinion, especially since he hasn't even responded to my comment. — Maggot Syn 14:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Best of luck for your RFA -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 09:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
You placed
a comment on
User talk:Mr.Deathhawk after I warned regarding vandalism on an essay page. Please do not belittle me, I took the time to review the users contribs, and for the past two months at least, this users contribs have been nothing but vandalism. Maybe vandalism on an essay page does not warrant a warning, but it doesn't take too long to review a users contribs and see a pattern.
Yngvarr
(c)
23:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
You deleted StickK as csd-a7. I didn't see the article before it was deleted, but you probably acted correctly, since so many articles tagged for speedy don't assert notability properly, even when the topic is notable. I wanted to mention, though, that some references about the company are listed on its site (with links to the full text of news articles where they originally appeared). Could you please take a look at the references at http://www.stickk.com/about.php and see if they are enough to convince you to restore the article and improve it with those references? It sounds like a cool idea, but while I suspect that StickK is notable, I am not certain that an article about it would survive AfD. -- Eastmain ( talk) 02:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Yup, just saw and commented on it; thanks for helping out :). As i said, I'm not one to scream cabal, but 4 users who haven't contributed for a month, have similar viewpoints and edit histories and have never even touched an MfD before all deciding seperately and spontaneously to turn up, give variations on a them for keep reasons and then immediately vanish again sets alarm bells ringing even for me. Ironho lds 15:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi again, I don't think it was very appropriate for you to have closed the mfd as you had become involved in it. In this case, I would suggest that you revert the close, or anything like that, but it would be good if you would please try to avoid closing discussions in which you have any involvement or interest, even if you didn't actually !vote. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 01:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
There wasn't any need to move them because i already moved them. Check it out at my Workplace. Sorry for all the chaos. Thanks a million!!! -- Condalence 22:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Yeah go ahead. Thanks a million again. -- Condalence 22:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
For some reason i have two talk pages. Look: Talk:Condalence User Talk:Condalence -- Condalence 22:21, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For resolving the Voldemore MfD and sockpuppetry case so well, and also due to your massive body of previous work that doesn't seem to have any barnstars attached! Ironho lds 00:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC) |
Hi Cenarium, You wrote "Proposed deletions are reserved for articles, a user can request deletion of one's userpage using WP:CSD#U1. Cenarium Talk 23:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)"
This is not my understanding, nor my observation of actual practice. I have seen PROD used for user subpages by their users, and it seems entirely appropriate. The current introduction to WP:PROD includes "User and User talk pages may also be deleted in the same way". This indicates that pPROD can be used in userspace, although I seem to remember more explicit statements in the past.
I see WP:PROD says "but only if the user has no recent edits and has made few or no contributions to the encyclopedia." This supposes that someone else is PRODding the userpage. But reason for PRODding your own userpage is give some warning to others who may be interested.
On WP:CSD#U1, if your want to speedy delete your own page, assuming no one else ever edited, and no own else could possibly have a genuine and worthwhile interest, then how better to request deletion than via PROD tag?
-- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 00:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I did change my signature hours ago but its the old signatures that is causeing them. Should i Redirect it? Thank you. -- Condalence 01:13, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Since you denied the speedy-deletion for Gatineau Police, you may want to follow this pre-announcement of proposed deletions for multiple non-notable Canadian police departments. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 04:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
A single purpose account Special:Contributions/Sahyadhri is continuously adding non-RS and unsourced information in The Hindu and Frontline (magazine). He added information not supported by reference. Please see the history of the article The Hindu and Talk:The_Hindu#Inaccurate_edits, the article is currently protected. I have repeatedly told this user to join in Talk:The_Hindu#Inaccurate_edits, but he revert-warred instead of discussion. I have issued this user a warning for addition of unsourced material. I have reported this matter to ANI several times. Since no administrator is paying any attention to this matter, I am in the middle of a strange situation. You are an uninvolved admin, so I am asking you. My question is if this user again readd the non-RS in the artcile The Hindu after the protection expires, what should I do? Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 12:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello Cenarium. I'd like to ask, if I may, why the 35th, 75th, and 79th fighter squadron pages were deleted? v/r Ndunruh ( talk) 17:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
If you had seen the discussion page you have got a better idea of what was going on. Regarding the publications of the Hindu group (Front line, The Hindu daily) contrarian views were not at all tolerated at any level . If you could see the articles which has been mentioned as "Poorly sourced" you can understand its tenure and the stature of Individuals who have made that. Regarding the substantiation of the claims predominantly a portal belonging to an advocacy group called ZNET is used.-- Sahyadhri ( talk) 07:03, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I note the sockpuppetry case has not been closed; is it still being worked on? Ironho lds 10:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I am well aware of the problem you mentioned on my talk page. Having myself received a level 3 warning from another Huggle user earlier today, I can say, however, that double-checking edits to avoid this problem will only compound it. What happens is that when two people revert an edit simultaneously, and one of them is not on the Huggle whitelist, the other one will do the revert, mistakenly reverting to the vandalized version. But this happens in such a way that the person doing the wrong revert had no time to react.
Maybe a Huggle upgrade is in order: one that shows no "updated" version of an article on the user's screen unless said user requests it.
Until that happens, I guess this is a problem we'll just have to live with. --Blanchardb- Me• MyEars• MyMouth-timed 16:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)