![]() |
Thank you for your support in my request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 38/1/0! I hope I can live up to the standards of adminship, and I will try my best to make Wikipedia a better place. Gaius Cornelius ( talk) 18:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC) |
Hello,
thank you for shortening the title of this article, but there are conventions for articles about ships; for instance, your title, "Formidable (battleship)", collides with HMS Formidable, so I've reverted to the previous title.
Cheers ! Rama ( talk) 18:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Rudget. I'm a little concerned about the swiftness with which you mark newpages as patrolled. For example, Paleolith, Not Real, Squier Stratocaster Alexander custom, True broadband, Kaukonahua River, and others. I appreciate the hard work you are doing, and there is an enormous backlog on unpatrolled pages, but I believe that is more important that the patroles are done well, then that the backlog is diminished (or it's growth slowed down in any event). Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 19:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
cross-posted to User talk:Rudget, User talk:Jdforrester/Arbitration
I see at this edit, that you've delisted Messedrocker as being too young. Could I ask what the minimunm age is? I can't seem to find it anywhere. Regards, Rudget. talk 19:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, it wasn't directed at you :-) Have a nice day. (Go Rudd!) Timeshift ( talk) 18:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Rudget, please do not add hidden comments like this: [1]. Aside from the fact it was hidden (which is unnecessary and inappropriate), users are allowed to use WP:CHU to request capitalisation fixes to their names, regardless of the amount of edits they have. Please familiarise yourself with the changing usernames guidelines before clerking further. Thank you. -- Deskana (talk) 18:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for supporting me! Please find your thank you card here, should you wish to see it. I'm honored to have received your support. All the best, ~ Eliz 81 (C) 21:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
...for helping me navigate the waters of my surprisingly peaceful
RFA, which closed successfully with 85 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral.
I would particularly like to thank Acalamari and Alison, my nominators, and everyone who watched the page and ran the tally.
If you hate RfA thankspam, please forgive me, Rudget. I promise I won't block you in retaliation for deleting it ;-) I'd also like thank you for all the good work you're doing on the Good Articles evaluations. Your evaluations have been really thorough and helpful!
If there is anything I can do to be of service in the future, please feel free to contact me.
And forgive me if I need a Wikibreak now and then (like now. I'm exhausted!). You wouldn’t want to see me climbing the Reichstag, now would you?
Off to flail around with my new mop! (what?!)
Thanks for reviewing it! I just made two more comments on its talk page. Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Caulde/Archive,
Thank you for participating in
my recent RfA, which closed successfully with 22 supports, 1 oppose, and 2 neutrals. Whether you supported, opposed, stayed neutral or simply commented or asked a question, I would like to thank you for your time and for your comments. Special thanks must go to
User:Lar and
User:John, who not only conommed, but also devoted a large proportion of their time coaching me. I am sure that what I have learnt during the coaching process can be put to good use as an admin. As an admin, I will be willing to help out with anything I can so please do not hesitate to contact me if there is anything I could help out with. I will also do my best to address any concerns raised during the RfA.
Thanks.
Tbo 157
(talk)
16:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
This RFA thanks was inspired by User:Iridescent's and User:The Random Editor's RFA thanks which were both inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
I responded to your response to my comment/question on thedemonhog's RFA. View it here. Flaminglawyer talk contrib 18:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your vote on my RfA. I think I may now have a better understanding of what it must have been like for you with your own RfA a few weeks ago.
To be honest, I'm rather beginning to regret having agreed to it. But I wanted to especially thank you, as one of those (hopefully few) editors with whom I've had a significant disagreement during my time on wikipedia. -- Malleus Fatuarum ( talk) 17:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind message. Actually - on 2nd thoughts - as it's a book cite, you don't need an accessdate at all, unless a URL is also specified, but it does no harm. -- NSH001 ( talk) 18:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
You're right. No point inflaming each other. Thanks for mediating. Pedro : Chat 21:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so very much. However, I was supposed to give you a barn star, if anyone should have given ... This is late but still I hope you will accept it. -- Kushal t 22:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I am pretty sure that for a request on a WP page, looking up the request, going to the page, diagnosing the problem, correcting it, and reporting it back at the WP Help page would take more than three minutes ... even for The Flash. Kushal t 22:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC) |
Everything is fine. I keep WP:ACC on my watchlist and try to help handle new requests. Of course if you have any suggestions for me I am willing to listen. New York Dreams ( talk) 03:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 08:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
well i did i bit more deeper review for this portal. i think there is a bit of things needs to be fixed. if you don't mind can i improve them. i have made few changes right now. thanks, Sushant gupta ( talk) 16:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The WikiProject Greater Manchester Award of Merit | |
Your outstanding contributions to all things Manchester. Also your newsletter has been brilliant in informing members about the current "goings on" with the project. You also helped immensely with Manchester's new found featured article status, a page central the success of the project. I hope you continue with your great work because I know the project will suffer without you! |
How is your next issue of the newsletter coming along? I hope it includes the grand announcement that Manchester is now a featured article! └ and-rew┘┌ talk┐ 19:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rudget,
Thank you for taking the time to review Helen Hartness Flanders for GA status. I see from the backlog that not every deserving article receives the attention that it deserves. I'll try to rectify this by picking a few articles myself to review.
In the meantime, I look forward to your feedback at the Talk:Helen Hartness Flanders page on how to improve the article to achieve GA status.
Sincerely, HopsonRoad ( talk) 19:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rudget,
Thank you, again, for taking the time to review Helen Hartness Flanders for GA status so promptly. I will look into the issues that you cite and do my best to correct them. If I find that I don't understand an issue, I'll come back here.
Sincerely, HopsonRoad ( talk) 21:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that I think you're doing a great job on the North West England Portal. I hpe you can find the energy and motivation to keep it up. -- Malleus Fatuarum ( talk) 16:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Only for the next weeks. Thanks!! (ps. if you don't work on it in segments through out this week, be prepared to take an hour and a half writing it up on monday. I'll post all the links here in a bit to make it easier. The Placebo Effect ( talk) 19:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to participate in my recent RFA nomination. I have withdrawn the nom early at 17/13/3. I am presently going to undergo admin coaching in preparation for a second candidacy somewhere down the line. I hope to see your potential support in the future. Regards, — Scott5114 ↗ 07:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Rudget! Can I ask you something? How can you propose a category, including all of its articles for deletion? - escondites 18:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to butt in, but even better than seeking an AfD or a speedy delete of a duplicate article, just redirect it to the "better" one. You do this by replacing the entire text with
#REDIRECT [[Name of target article]]
This preserves any links, preserves the edit history, saves administrator time and makes it less like duplicate articles will be created again. I've done this for List of municipalities in Adrar rather than deleting it. Hope this helps! ➔ REDVEЯS would like to show you some puppies 20:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Caulde/Archive,
Thanks for supporting my RFA. Thanks for your trust and willingness to nominate. If I can help in any way, or if I need correcting in any way, let me know. |
Thanks for the speedy promotion. That is one of the fastest promotions I have ever had.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:LOTD) 20:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for your support in my request for adminship, which succeeded with a final tally of 38/1/0! I hope I can live up to the standards of adminship, and I will try my best to make Wikipedia a better place. Gaius Cornelius ( talk) 18:20, 23 November 2007 (UTC) |
Hello,
thank you for shortening the title of this article, but there are conventions for articles about ships; for instance, your title, "Formidable (battleship)", collides with HMS Formidable, so I've reverted to the previous title.
Cheers ! Rama ( talk) 18:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Rudget. I'm a little concerned about the swiftness with which you mark newpages as patrolled. For example, Paleolith, Not Real, Squier Stratocaster Alexander custom, True broadband, Kaukonahua River, and others. I appreciate the hard work you are doing, and there is an enormous backlog on unpatrolled pages, but I believe that is more important that the patroles are done well, then that the backlog is diminished (or it's growth slowed down in any event). Martijn Hoekstra ( talk) 19:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
cross-posted to User talk:Rudget, User talk:Jdforrester/Arbitration
I see at this edit, that you've delisted Messedrocker as being too young. Could I ask what the minimunm age is? I can't seem to find it anywhere. Regards, Rudget. talk 19:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, it wasn't directed at you :-) Have a nice day. (Go Rudd!) Timeshift ( talk) 18:44, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Rudget, please do not add hidden comments like this: [1]. Aside from the fact it was hidden (which is unnecessary and inappropriate), users are allowed to use WP:CHU to request capitalisation fixes to their names, regardless of the amount of edits they have. Please familiarise yourself with the changing usernames guidelines before clerking further. Thank you. -- Deskana (talk) 18:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for supporting me! Please find your thank you card here, should you wish to see it. I'm honored to have received your support. All the best, ~ Eliz 81 (C) 21:47, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
...for helping me navigate the waters of my surprisingly peaceful
RFA, which closed successfully with 85 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral.
I would particularly like to thank Acalamari and Alison, my nominators, and everyone who watched the page and ran the tally.
If you hate RfA thankspam, please forgive me, Rudget. I promise I won't block you in retaliation for deleting it ;-) I'd also like thank you for all the good work you're doing on the Good Articles evaluations. Your evaluations have been really thorough and helpful!
If there is anything I can do to be of service in the future, please feel free to contact me.
And forgive me if I need a Wikibreak now and then (like now. I'm exhausted!). You wouldn’t want to see me climbing the Reichstag, now would you?
Off to flail around with my new mop! (what?!)
Thanks for reviewing it! I just made two more comments on its talk page. Hurricanehink ( talk) 16:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Caulde/Archive,
Thank you for participating in
my recent RfA, which closed successfully with 22 supports, 1 oppose, and 2 neutrals. Whether you supported, opposed, stayed neutral or simply commented or asked a question, I would like to thank you for your time and for your comments. Special thanks must go to
User:Lar and
User:John, who not only conommed, but also devoted a large proportion of their time coaching me. I am sure that what I have learnt during the coaching process can be put to good use as an admin. As an admin, I will be willing to help out with anything I can so please do not hesitate to contact me if there is anything I could help out with. I will also do my best to address any concerns raised during the RfA.
Thanks.
Tbo 157
(talk)
16:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
This RFA thanks was inspired by User:Iridescent's and User:The Random Editor's RFA thanks which were both inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
I responded to your response to my comment/question on thedemonhog's RFA. View it here. Flaminglawyer talk contrib 18:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your vote on my RfA. I think I may now have a better understanding of what it must have been like for you with your own RfA a few weeks ago.
To be honest, I'm rather beginning to regret having agreed to it. But I wanted to especially thank you, as one of those (hopefully few) editors with whom I've had a significant disagreement during my time on wikipedia. -- Malleus Fatuarum ( talk) 17:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind message. Actually - on 2nd thoughts - as it's a book cite, you don't need an accessdate at all, unless a URL is also specified, but it does no harm. -- NSH001 ( talk) 18:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
You're right. No point inflaming each other. Thanks for mediating. Pedro : Chat 21:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you so very much. However, I was supposed to give you a barn star, if anyone should have given ... This is late but still I hope you will accept it. -- Kushal t 22:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I am pretty sure that for a request on a WP page, looking up the request, going to the page, diagnosing the problem, correcting it, and reporting it back at the WP Help page would take more than three minutes ... even for The Flash. Kushal t 22:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC) |
Everything is fine. I keep WP:ACC on my watchlist and try to help handle new requests. Of course if you have any suggestions for me I am willing to listen. New York Dreams ( talk) 03:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 08:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
well i did i bit more deeper review for this portal. i think there is a bit of things needs to be fixed. if you don't mind can i improve them. i have made few changes right now. thanks, Sushant gupta ( talk) 16:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The WikiProject Greater Manchester Award of Merit | |
Your outstanding contributions to all things Manchester. Also your newsletter has been brilliant in informing members about the current "goings on" with the project. You also helped immensely with Manchester's new found featured article status, a page central the success of the project. I hope you continue with your great work because I know the project will suffer without you! |
How is your next issue of the newsletter coming along? I hope it includes the grand announcement that Manchester is now a featured article! └ and-rew┘┌ talk┐ 19:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rudget,
Thank you for taking the time to review Helen Hartness Flanders for GA status. I see from the backlog that not every deserving article receives the attention that it deserves. I'll try to rectify this by picking a few articles myself to review.
In the meantime, I look forward to your feedback at the Talk:Helen Hartness Flanders page on how to improve the article to achieve GA status.
Sincerely, HopsonRoad ( talk) 19:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Rudget,
Thank you, again, for taking the time to review Helen Hartness Flanders for GA status so promptly. I will look into the issues that you cite and do my best to correct them. If I find that I don't understand an issue, I'll come back here.
Sincerely, HopsonRoad ( talk) 21:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that I think you're doing a great job on the North West England Portal. I hpe you can find the energy and motivation to keep it up. -- Malleus Fatuarum ( talk) 16:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Only for the next weeks. Thanks!! (ps. if you don't work on it in segments through out this week, be prepared to take an hour and a half writing it up on monday. I'll post all the links here in a bit to make it easier. The Placebo Effect ( talk) 19:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to participate in my recent RFA nomination. I have withdrawn the nom early at 17/13/3. I am presently going to undergo admin coaching in preparation for a second candidacy somewhere down the line. I hope to see your potential support in the future. Regards, — Scott5114 ↗ 07:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi Rudget! Can I ask you something? How can you propose a category, including all of its articles for deletion? - escondites 18:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Sorry to butt in, but even better than seeking an AfD or a speedy delete of a duplicate article, just redirect it to the "better" one. You do this by replacing the entire text with
#REDIRECT [[Name of target article]]
This preserves any links, preserves the edit history, saves administrator time and makes it less like duplicate articles will be created again. I've done this for List of municipalities in Adrar rather than deleting it. Hope this helps! ➔ REDVEЯS would like to show you some puppies 20:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Caulde/Archive,
Thanks for supporting my RFA. Thanks for your trust and willingness to nominate. If I can help in any way, or if I need correcting in any way, let me know. |
Thanks for the speedy promotion. That is one of the fastest promotions I have ever had.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:LOTD) 20:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)