An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a
sockpuppet of
Qrc2006 (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Your recent edit to Potrero Hills ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II ( talk) 03:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Boomgaylove for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- jonny- m t 17:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
!!! I saw that and was like, good for you! The wikipedia is not censored! and then when i clicked Next, i must have clicked revert...o.O dangit! Warning removed ✬Dillard421✬ ( talk • contribs) 07:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Kristen Bjorn. Thank you. ✬Dillard421✬ ( talk • contribs) 07:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
|
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Martin Czehmester, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Martin Czehmester.
SilkTork *
What's YOUR point?
00:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Martin Czehmester, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Czehmester. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SilkTork * YES! 23:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a
sockpuppet of
Qrc2006 (
talk ·
contribs ·
logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Your recent edit to Potrero Hills ( diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II ( talk) 03:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Boomgaylove for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- jonny- m t 17:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
!!! I saw that and was like, good for you! The wikipedia is not censored! and then when i clicked Next, i must have clicked revert...o.O dangit! Warning removed ✬Dillard421✬ ( talk • contribs) 07:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Kristen Bjorn. Thank you. ✬Dillard421✬ ( talk • contribs) 07:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
|
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Martin Czehmester, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Martin Czehmester.
SilkTork *
What's YOUR point?
00:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Martin Czehmester, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Czehmester. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SilkTork * YES! 23:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)