This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | → | Archive 55 |
In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. Cwmhiraeth ( submissions) currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. Sasata ( submissions), Hawkeye7 ( submissions)—who has never participated in the competition before—and Casliber ( submissions) follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).
The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email) and The ed17 ( talk • email) 22:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Carcharoth. In this edit you introduced what would be widely viewed as a grammatical error into a proposed principle. Your edit summary indicates that you were changing the verb to the "singular" form. However, the verb was already in the singular; what you've actually done is change it from the subjunctive mood to the indicative mood. It was correct the way Kirill originally wrote it and there was no need to change it. — Psychonaut ( talk) 08:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
For the record: FYI from User:My very best wishes . Carcharoth ( talk) 21:15, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Things can move slowly, but five years on, I have hacked together List of works in Lardner's Cabinet Cyclopædia. Work in progress still, but there are numerous overlapping sources for the list and I'm now winning. So the application of summary style really should now proceed. Charles Matthews ( talk) 13:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
There's a bigger picture, and I have left a note at User talk:Wadewitz#Talk:Lives of the Most Eminent Literary and Scientific Men#Cabinet Cyclopedia. The Cabinet Cyclopædia parts were basically monthly, meaning the publication dates can often be "inferred", not that I would want to do that in public here. Charles Matthews ( talk) 07:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Carch. Please review and fix " Fluorine". Kick us in the butt on content, etc. Like your reviews. 71.127.137.171 ( talk) 14:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello User:Carcharoth; Recently you were mentioned as someone who is occasionally able to help with FA nomination reviews. Possibly to do a peer review for theology/religion articles. I am thinking of recommending a page upgrade for a GA article to FA article status which may involve the reading of one key book if this might be possible for you. The book is the theological best-seller "Evil and the God of Love." Any possible interest? AutoJellinek ( talk) 18:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Re (Clarification): "The restrictions on adding or removing infoboxes are not because the articles should or shouldn't have infoboxes, but because the editors given those restrictions have demonstrated poor judgement over the amount of discussion needed (both too little and too much) and how to carry out those discussions." - Thank you for clarifying that, - so far I took my restriction as punishment I had to take for defending Andy, insofar deserved and unquestioned. Did you know that Smerus and I arrived at a compromise while the case was still open, see Symphony No. 1 (Sibelius). Brianboulton and I arrived at a compromise afterwards, see L'Arianna. Can we get past these smallish discussions about whether making a redirect an article is creation but expanding a one-line stub isn't? - I will have to understand why the readers get restricted (by no infobox) only because I show poor judgement. For articles where I am responsible for the content (having created 80% or more, by DYK standard) there is no contention, no discussion. I hope this was short enough ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Hi Carcharoth, A barnstar for your very thorough and astute proposals at Ebionites3. Well done! — Keithbob • Talk • 16:29, 20 October 2013 (UTC) |
I agree, too. I have several differences of opinion about a few points but the assessment is undeniably fair and it's clear you read through a lot of evidence to reach this point (most of which I'm sure was unpleasant and pretty esoteric). Liz Read! Talk! 21:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
22:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 19:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
I understand what you are saying, and I even agree with much of it. Still, I think there is much in what I've said. It is late in my time zone - but I will follow up on this if you want to talk about it. I have a TON of respect for you, and I really do appreciate that you are willing to talk to me. — Ched ZILLA 01:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Carcharoth, the problem with not including Gospel of the Hebrews is that the dispute currently resides there. It is temporarily dormant pending the outcome of arbitration, but the dispute will resume there if a remedy is not enacted that includes this article within the scope. Ignocrates ( talk) 21:25, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is Cwmhiraeth ( submissions). Our final nine were as follows:
All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:
Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.
Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email) and The ed17 ( talk • email) 00:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I've never been this involved in an ArbCom case, so I'm not familiar with all of the proper steps. Nor with how to contribute signal instead of noise. -- llywrch ( talk) 15:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Please feel free to redact the comment here and change the link on my user talk page as required. John Carter ( talk) 19:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Military Veterans Legacy Award | |
Surely, Albert Ball's legacy would not shine so bright without your invaluable help. Georgejdorner ( talk) 03:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC) |
Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of Albert Ball to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA you may have helped to write) appear as "Today's featured article" soon, please nominate it at the requests page; if you'd like to see an FA on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to the "pending" list. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with 1,336 articles in Category:Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page at present, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks, Bencherlite Talk 11:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
As you have previously shown interest in biographies of World War I flying aces, you are invited to critique the above.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 16:48, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for how you ran the Ebionites 3 case, it was the best organised and the easiest to clerk I've had so far. Hope drafting one by yourself didn't turn you off, and you'll keep drafting! Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 01:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks for your fairness and equanimity, Carcharoth. There was a lot of information to sort through but also a level of calmness about the proceedings that I don't see present in other cases. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for responding to my email. I believe I am about to be wrongfully banned. I very much appreciate your taking the time to review my edit history and advising me. Thanks again. - Ret.Prof ( talk) 01:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
05:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I am soliciting feedback for the above article. Of especial interest to me would be feedback on Werner Voss#Last stand. If you should review that section alone, I would be grateful. If you review the entire article, I would be even more grateful.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 15:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Looking back at User:Ealdgyth/2012 Arb Election votes, I see that my concerns about your editing and engagement were not borne out by the actual efforts you have put forth this year. Thank you for your service, both on and off ArbCom. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Memorial tablets to the British Empire dead of the First World War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominions ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for message. Very interesting.
I am just about to leave home until the weekend and when I get back I shall look into your query.
Weglinde ( talk) 08:30, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Carcharoth,
I left a message at the talk page of the French article for Amiens Cathedral, and at fr:Wikipédia:Atelier photographique/Objets non communs. Commons has a Picture requests page, but I don't know how active it is, and it says that requests should be in English anyway. Hopefully someone on the French Wikipedia will respond! Adam Bishop ( talk) 10:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Carcharoth, great alias. I contributed to Wiki a while ago with an article about Lords of Metal. It was deleted because I couldn't prove it is Notable. The thing is, as soon as I start bringing in evidence of the fact that those guys run a website that is very important in Holland and outside, it starts to look like promo. Unexperienced as I am, I could do with some aid on this one. (a preliminary) THANKS! -- Ravahe ( talk) 13:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Per your message, I work fairly close to Christ Church Cathedral (Vancouver). You're looking for some sort of memorial tablet? Is it inside or outside? The Interior (Talk) 15:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 45 | ← | Archive 47 | Archive 48 | Archive 49 | Archive 50 | Archive 51 | → | Archive 55 |
In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. Cwmhiraeth ( submissions) currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. Sasata ( submissions), Hawkeye7 ( submissions)—who has never participated in the competition before—and Casliber ( submissions) follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).
The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email) and The ed17 ( talk • email) 22:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Carcharoth. In this edit you introduced what would be widely viewed as a grammatical error into a proposed principle. Your edit summary indicates that you were changing the verb to the "singular" form. However, the verb was already in the singular; what you've actually done is change it from the subjunctive mood to the indicative mood. It was correct the way Kirill originally wrote it and there was no need to change it. — Psychonaut ( talk) 08:01, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
For the record: FYI from User:My very best wishes . Carcharoth ( talk) 21:15, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Things can move slowly, but five years on, I have hacked together List of works in Lardner's Cabinet Cyclopædia. Work in progress still, but there are numerous overlapping sources for the list and I'm now winning. So the application of summary style really should now proceed. Charles Matthews ( talk) 13:08, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
There's a bigger picture, and I have left a note at User talk:Wadewitz#Talk:Lives of the Most Eminent Literary and Scientific Men#Cabinet Cyclopedia. The Cabinet Cyclopædia parts were basically monthly, meaning the publication dates can often be "inferred", not that I would want to do that in public here. Charles Matthews ( talk) 07:05, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Carch. Please review and fix " Fluorine". Kick us in the butt on content, etc. Like your reviews. 71.127.137.171 ( talk) 14:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello User:Carcharoth; Recently you were mentioned as someone who is occasionally able to help with FA nomination reviews. Possibly to do a peer review for theology/religion articles. I am thinking of recommending a page upgrade for a GA article to FA article status which may involve the reading of one key book if this might be possible for you. The book is the theological best-seller "Evil and the God of Love." Any possible interest? AutoJellinek ( talk) 18:04, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Re (Clarification): "The restrictions on adding or removing infoboxes are not because the articles should or shouldn't have infoboxes, but because the editors given those restrictions have demonstrated poor judgement over the amount of discussion needed (both too little and too much) and how to carry out those discussions." - Thank you for clarifying that, - so far I took my restriction as punishment I had to take for defending Andy, insofar deserved and unquestioned. Did you know that Smerus and I arrived at a compromise while the case was still open, see Symphony No. 1 (Sibelius). Brianboulton and I arrived at a compromise afterwards, see L'Arianna. Can we get past these smallish discussions about whether making a redirect an article is creation but expanding a one-line stub isn't? - I will have to understand why the readers get restricted (by no infobox) only because I show poor judgement. For articles where I am responsible for the content (having created 80% or more, by DYK standard) there is no contention, no discussion. I hope this was short enough ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 19:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Hi Carcharoth, A barnstar for your very thorough and astute proposals at Ebionites3. Well done! — Keithbob • Talk • 16:29, 20 October 2013 (UTC) |
I agree, too. I have several differences of opinion about a few points but the assessment is undeniably fair and it's clear you read through a lot of evidence to reach this point (most of which I'm sure was unpleasant and pretty esoteric). Liz Read! Talk! 21:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
22:11, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
by The Interior ( talk · contribs), Ocaasi ( talk · contribs)
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. -- The Interior 19:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
I understand what you are saying, and I even agree with much of it. Still, I think there is much in what I've said. It is late in my time zone - but I will follow up on this if you want to talk about it. I have a TON of respect for you, and I really do appreciate that you are willing to talk to me. — Ched ZILLA 01:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Carcharoth, the problem with not including Gospel of the Hebrews is that the dispute currently resides there. It is temporarily dormant pending the outcome of arbitration, but the dispute will resume there if a remedy is not enacted that includes this article within the scope. Ignocrates ( talk) 21:25, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is Cwmhiraeth ( submissions). Our final nine were as follows:
All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:
Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!
Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.
Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn ( talk • email) and The ed17 ( talk • email) 00:27, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I've never been this involved in an ArbCom case, so I'm not familiar with all of the proper steps. Nor with how to contribute signal instead of noise. -- llywrch ( talk) 15:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Please feel free to redact the comment here and change the link on my user talk page as required. John Carter ( talk) 19:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Military Veterans Legacy Award | |
Surely, Albert Ball's legacy would not shine so bright without your invaluable help. Georgejdorner ( talk) 03:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC) |
Just a quick note to congratulate you on the promotion of Albert Ball to FA status recently. If you would like to see this (or any other FA you may have helped to write) appear as "Today's featured article" soon, please nominate it at the requests page; if you'd like to see an FA on a particular date in the next year or so, please add it to the "pending" list. In the absence of a request, the article may end up being picked at any time (although with 1,336 articles in Category:Featured articles that have not appeared on the main page at present, there's no telling how long – or short! – the wait might be). If you'd got any TFA-related questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks, Bencherlite Talk 11:11, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
As you have previously shown interest in biographies of World War I flying aces, you are invited to critique the above.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 16:48, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for how you ran the Ebionites 3 case, it was the best organised and the easiest to clerk I've had so far. Hope drafting one by yourself didn't turn you off, and you'll keep drafting! Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 01:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks for your fairness and equanimity, Carcharoth. There was a lot of information to sort through but also a level of calmness about the proceedings that I don't see present in other cases. Liz Read! Talk! 02:38, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for responding to my email. I believe I am about to be wrongfully banned. I very much appreciate your taking the time to review my edit history and advising me. Thanks again. - Ret.Prof ( talk) 01:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
|
The Bugle is published by the
Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please
join the project or sign up
here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from
this page. Your editors,
Ian Rose (
talk) and
Nick-D (
talk)
05:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello,
I am soliciting feedback for the above article. Of especial interest to me would be feedback on Werner Voss#Last stand. If you should review that section alone, I would be grateful. If you review the entire article, I would be even more grateful.
Georgejdorner ( talk) 15:51, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Looking back at User:Ealdgyth/2012 Arb Election votes, I see that my concerns about your editing and engagement were not borne out by the actual efforts you have put forth this year. Thank you for your service, both on and off ArbCom. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Memorial tablets to the British Empire dead of the First World War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominions ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for message. Very interesting.
I am just about to leave home until the weekend and when I get back I shall look into your query.
Weglinde ( talk) 08:30, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Carcharoth,
I left a message at the talk page of the French article for Amiens Cathedral, and at fr:Wikipédia:Atelier photographique/Objets non communs. Commons has a Picture requests page, but I don't know how active it is, and it says that requests should be in English anyway. Hopefully someone on the French Wikipedia will respond! Adam Bishop ( talk) 10:51, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi Carcharoth, great alias. I contributed to Wiki a while ago with an article about Lords of Metal. It was deleted because I couldn't prove it is Notable. The thing is, as soon as I start bringing in evidence of the fact that those guys run a website that is very important in Holland and outside, it starts to look like promo. Unexperienced as I am, I could do with some aid on this one. (a preliminary) THANKS! -- Ravahe ( talk) 13:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Per your message, I work fairly close to Christ Church Cathedral (Vancouver). You're looking for some sort of memorial tablet? Is it inside or outside? The Interior (Talk) 15:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC)