Welcome!
Hello, Canstusdis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
tedder (
talk)
05:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Your edit summary on Patrick Willis called my edit "vandalism". Please remember to assume good faith on Wikipedia. I was not intending to vandalize the article. I was trying to avoid weasel words. Calling edits that are not vandalism, vandalism, is not helpful. Kansan ( talk) 07:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Link Mobile Snail 03:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Your continual removal of any annihilationist response to the list of opposing texts on annihilationism is unjustified and unfair. Considering that this is a Wikipedia page on annihilationism and that there are traditionalists responses to many of the sections on this page, it is fair and only appropriate that annihilationists have an opportunity to respond to the traditionalist position. Considering that some readers may immediately skip to this section, it is reasonable to have the annihilationist position on these texts briefly mentioned. Sven.ostring ( talk) 00:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
for offer of proofreading after Notzrim redirect is sorted out, will take you up on it. Cheers In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks. I will be happy to assist. --- Canstusdis ( talk) 12:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Necromancy". Thank you. — Apo-kalypso ( talk) 05:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I'll start a discussion on Talk:Hermann Fegelein. Thanks. Canstusdis
Discussed at Talk:Joseph Smith. Thanks. Canstusdis ( talk) 01:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
In case you didn't get the notification, there's a thread about you at WP:AN/I here. ~ Adjwilley ( talk) 22:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--
ARTEST4ECHO (
talk/
contribs)
12:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring at
Joseph Smith. I am also concerned about some disruption on article talkpages and even on your own talkpage.
[1] Please listen to advice, and take the opportunity to read
WP:BATTLE while you're blocked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bishonen |
talk
13:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC).
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Canstusdis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
tedder (
talk)
05:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Your edit summary on Patrick Willis called my edit "vandalism". Please remember to assume good faith on Wikipedia. I was not intending to vandalize the article. I was trying to avoid weasel words. Calling edits that are not vandalism, vandalism, is not helpful. Kansan ( talk) 07:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Link Mobile Snail 03:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Your continual removal of any annihilationist response to the list of opposing texts on annihilationism is unjustified and unfair. Considering that this is a Wikipedia page on annihilationism and that there are traditionalists responses to many of the sections on this page, it is fair and only appropriate that annihilationists have an opportunity to respond to the traditionalist position. Considering that some readers may immediately skip to this section, it is reasonable to have the annihilationist position on these texts briefly mentioned. Sven.ostring ( talk) 00:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
for offer of proofreading after Notzrim redirect is sorted out, will take you up on it. Cheers In ictu oculi ( talk) 02:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC) |
Thanks. I will be happy to assist. --- Canstusdis ( talk) 12:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " Necromancy". Thank you. — Apo-kalypso ( talk) 05:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
I'll start a discussion on Talk:Hermann Fegelein. Thanks. Canstusdis
Discussed at Talk:Joseph Smith. Thanks. Canstusdis ( talk) 01:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
In case you didn't get the notification, there's a thread about you at WP:AN/I here. ~ Adjwilley ( talk) 22:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--
ARTEST4ECHO (
talk/
contribs)
12:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring at
Joseph Smith. I am also concerned about some disruption on article talkpages and even on your own talkpage.
[1] Please listen to advice, and take the opportunity to read
WP:BATTLE while you're blocked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Bishonen |
talk
13:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC).
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)