![]() Archives |
---|
|
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Calton,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Strictly-Correlated-Electrons Density Functional Theory for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone ( talk) 16:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 09:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
I have reverted you in Hans-Joachim Schäfers. Please carefully read Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people. Thanks. Sam Sailor Talk! 14:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Calton, we welcome your contributions. However, it appears you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Crown House Business Centre. If so, you have a conflict of interest.
People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:
{{
request edit}}
template);In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies.
Your trail of deletions on the following articles related to terrorism have been reviewed:
In many cases, you improperly deleted material that was properly cited and material to the article on which it appeared. Terrorist groups using charitable organizations to finance activity is real. It is well-documented in reputable sources. The text you deleted was factual reporting.
You are welcome to help build these articles with additional information cited to reputable sources. If you have counter-evidence, write it up and cite it to a reputable source. Don’t just delete text you don’t personally like. Fact Checkmater ( talk) 15:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Carlton, as fellow editors, we should be respectful of each other's efforts to contribute to Wikipedia, despite our disagreements.
However, your personal attacks against my user account are a violation of Wikipedia's conduct policies. Per WP:WIAPA, "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done."
Below is a list of the personal attacks you have written about my user account:
1. On my user Talk page, you wrote: "And this based on what, exactly? Aside from the voices inside your head?" /info/en/?search=User_talk:Fact_Checkmater#Re:_conflict_of_interest
2. On my user Talk page, you wrote: "Bullshit" and "Bottom line: if you're looking for a soapbox for your crusade, go start a blog." /info/en/?search=User_talk:Fact_Checkmater#POV
3. In an edit summary, you wrote: "Look up WP:UNDUE and WP:SYNTH before you continue your crusade." https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Emirates_Centre_for_Human_Rights&oldid=690924688
Please review WP:PERSONAL. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks harm the Wikipedia community, and the collegial atmosphere needed to create a good encyclopedia. Derogatory comments about other editors may be removed by any editor. Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks.
Thank you. Fact Checkmater ( talk) 16:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Fact Checkmater (
talk) 19:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Thanks Calton. I am using (or thought I was using) my sandbox to draft my article but you've flagged it for speedy deletion - is the sandbox not the place to create drafts? Have I done it incorrectly? If not the Sandbox, where can I create a draft within Wikipedia? Rebmaeneri ( talk) 17:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I have enabled your AWB access. -- Biblio worm 14:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Request to revisit the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaching clinic per sources presented therein. North America 1000 19:44, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
As I mentioned on the autism list talk page, I have never seen you before and can see no reason why you would suddenly be an authority on the quality of the list's sources. You may impress yourself with your vituperative remarks, but they don't mean shit to me. Come up with some substance, or be silent. 50.185.134.48 ( talk) 23:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Smartyllama (
talk) 01:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Drmies (
talk) 02:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 January 31#Category:People on the autism spectrum 50.185.134.48 ( talk) 00:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Potable water diver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scuba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Dervorguilla ( talk) 03:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you came along long before me, back in the days when the number of active editors was doubling annually. I do not know what one edit ended that and caused it to decline by 6% per year instead. I carefully protect my anonymity and it would help me greatly if you deleted and marked as (redacted) the references to my primary account. I do freely tell people in private what it is but there are some who would want to know just so they can out me and that is totally forbidden and not a good idea to enable. Also I have never and will never identify myself as male or female as a means of further protecting my identity, and prefer that no one else do so either, so if you could also change it to "he or she", they, them, or anything non-gender, that would help. Also please per AGF recognize that I am no more abusing Wikipedia than you are, which in both cases is none. If you know of any charts that are needed or would be useful, please let me know (contact me on commons on either my primary account or this one - both are active there (and no they are not used inappropriately). I am always looking for interesting things to do, and the 8,000 charts cover all subjects. Thanks.
Apteva (
talk) 07:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
No. -- Calton | Talk 09:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Ah, so NEW irrelevant breathless bafflegab. Please put on your reading glasses, then. Ready?
I've noticed in your recent edits that you replace the name "Trump" with "Drumpf". If I assumed bad faith, I would you're purposefully vandalizing these articles. If I assumed good faith, I would assume you have this Chrome extension enabled. Either way, I'd urge you to cease and desist and fix your recent edits. Falling Gravity 18:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Why are you removing PopMatters' sources? It seems you are removing the sources because you find the critics to be non- WP:Notable. Many of the critics we use for sourcing on this site are not notable enough for their own Wikipedia articles. What matters is whether the sources are reliable and whether the critical commentary is being given undue weight. In this case, you removed the source as unneeded, but that source was added because (if I'm remembering correctly) someone challenged that part of the sentence. I didn't add that source, but I don't see why it needed removal. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() Archives |
---|
|
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
Send on behalf of
The Wikipedia Library using
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Calton,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Strictly-Correlated-Electrons Density Functional Theory for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone ( talk) 16:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 09:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
I have reverted you in Hans-Joachim Schäfers. Please carefully read Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people. Thanks. Sam Sailor Talk! 14:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Calton, we welcome your contributions. However, it appears you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Crown House Business Centre. If so, you have a conflict of interest.
People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:
{{
request edit}}
template);In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies.
Your trail of deletions on the following articles related to terrorism have been reviewed:
In many cases, you improperly deleted material that was properly cited and material to the article on which it appeared. Terrorist groups using charitable organizations to finance activity is real. It is well-documented in reputable sources. The text you deleted was factual reporting.
You are welcome to help build these articles with additional information cited to reputable sources. If you have counter-evidence, write it up and cite it to a reputable source. Don’t just delete text you don’t personally like. Fact Checkmater ( talk) 15:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
Carlton, as fellow editors, we should be respectful of each other's efforts to contribute to Wikipedia, despite our disagreements.
However, your personal attacks against my user account are a violation of Wikipedia's conduct policies. Per WP:WIAPA, "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done."
Below is a list of the personal attacks you have written about my user account:
1. On my user Talk page, you wrote: "And this based on what, exactly? Aside from the voices inside your head?" /info/en/?search=User_talk:Fact_Checkmater#Re:_conflict_of_interest
2. On my user Talk page, you wrote: "Bullshit" and "Bottom line: if you're looking for a soapbox for your crusade, go start a blog." /info/en/?search=User_talk:Fact_Checkmater#POV
3. In an edit summary, you wrote: "Look up WP:UNDUE and WP:SYNTH before you continue your crusade." https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Emirates_Centre_for_Human_Rights&oldid=690924688
Please review WP:PERSONAL. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks harm the Wikipedia community, and the collegial atmosphere needed to create a good encyclopedia. Derogatory comments about other editors may be removed by any editor. Repeated or egregious personal attacks may lead to sanctions including blocks.
Thank you. Fact Checkmater ( talk) 16:38, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Fact Checkmater (
talk) 19:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Thanks Calton. I am using (or thought I was using) my sandbox to draft my article but you've flagged it for speedy deletion - is the sandbox not the place to create drafts? Have I done it incorrectly? If not the Sandbox, where can I create a draft within Wikipedia? Rebmaeneri ( talk) 17:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I have enabled your AWB access. -- Biblio worm 14:53, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
Request to revisit the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaching clinic per sources presented therein. North America 1000 19:44, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
As I mentioned on the autism list talk page, I have never seen you before and can see no reason why you would suddenly be an authority on the quality of the list's sources. You may impress yourself with your vituperative remarks, but they don't mean shit to me. Come up with some substance, or be silent. 50.185.134.48 ( talk) 23:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Smartyllama (
talk) 01:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Drmies (
talk) 02:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 January 31#Category:People on the autism spectrum 50.185.134.48 ( talk) 00:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Potable water diver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scuba. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:40, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Dervorguilla ( talk) 03:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I see that you came along long before me, back in the days when the number of active editors was doubling annually. I do not know what one edit ended that and caused it to decline by 6% per year instead. I carefully protect my anonymity and it would help me greatly if you deleted and marked as (redacted) the references to my primary account. I do freely tell people in private what it is but there are some who would want to know just so they can out me and that is totally forbidden and not a good idea to enable. Also I have never and will never identify myself as male or female as a means of further protecting my identity, and prefer that no one else do so either, so if you could also change it to "he or she", they, them, or anything non-gender, that would help. Also please per AGF recognize that I am no more abusing Wikipedia than you are, which in both cases is none. If you know of any charts that are needed or would be useful, please let me know (contact me on commons on either my primary account or this one - both are active there (and no they are not used inappropriately). I am always looking for interesting things to do, and the 8,000 charts cover all subjects. Thanks.
Apteva (
talk) 07:40, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
No. -- Calton | Talk 09:26, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Ah, so NEW irrelevant breathless bafflegab. Please put on your reading glasses, then. Ready?
I've noticed in your recent edits that you replace the name "Trump" with "Drumpf". If I assumed bad faith, I would you're purposefully vandalizing these articles. If I assumed good faith, I would assume you have this Chrome extension enabled. Either way, I'd urge you to cease and desist and fix your recent edits. Falling Gravity 18:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Why are you removing PopMatters' sources? It seems you are removing the sources because you find the critics to be non- WP:Notable. Many of the critics we use for sourcing on this site are not notable enough for their own Wikipedia articles. What matters is whether the sources are reliable and whether the critical commentary is being given undue weight. In this case, you removed the source as unneeded, but that source was added because (if I'm remembering correctly) someone challenged that part of the sentence. I didn't add that source, but I don't see why it needed removal. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)