![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 32 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Thanks for uploading File:AAFC Crest - colour (large).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 03:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
I have contested the proposed deletion of AAFC Support Wings, which you endorsed, on the grounds that an article that duplicates the content of another article should be redirected to that article. Accordingly, I have redirected this article to Australian Air Force Cadets, as it seemed more appropriate to redirect to a parent article rather than a list that is a child of that article. — KuyaBriBri Talk 14:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Anwar_Yusuf_Turani&diff=471806516&oldid=470611657
I removed most of the material Tewpiq and Cornellstudent added: [1], [2], [3]. I basically only kept the infobox Tewpiq added. Most of the remaining non-infobox text of the article was written by me. Can you please remove Template:Autobiography from the article? -- Michaeldsuarez ( talk) 04:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
You
substituted the {{
No footnotes}} templates, instead of transclude it with {{
No footnotes|date=July 2024}}
. Please transclude it in the future.
Debresser (
talk)
13:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello Callanecc. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Illusion Suite, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This has been tagged for two days and no one has deleted it - probably due to the performance at ProgPower suggesting significance. Take to AfD if you don't think NBAND is met. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 15:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Do you realize that an entire book has been devoted to Vladislav Zanadvorov ( [4])? There is no requirement that sources establishing a subject's notability be in English (although Googling for "Zanadvorov" in GoogleBooks will give you hits too). Zloyvolsheb ( talk) 23:57, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
I've contested the speedy deletion of Éditions Mille-Îles. CüRlyTüRkey Talk Contribs 02:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings. Happy to from your userbox on my way in that the force is strong with you. :) Anyway, thanks for taking the pages of the oakland city council. Some of them have very long bios, some had short bios, some were redlinked. I've gone ahead and created stubs for them all, since it's easier to for my brain work on all the simultaneously.
I'm not unaware that they have issues and need work. Any advice you have to help rehabilitate them would be welcome. I don't have any axes to grind against anyone. It's just that Oakland is 8th largest city in the state, their elected leaders seems likely to be bio-worthy, but ultimately that will be up to the reliable sources that come out of the writing process, not my early 'instincts' about what's likely to be notable. :)
I just didn't want you to think I didn't hear your concerns and take them into account. Some of the content may have to be moved into officeholder articles instead of biographical-articles for the less notable council members. (or maybe not). Any help or advice welcome! be gentle with me, I'm not sure what I'm doing, but trying hard to do it well. -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 07:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
since you made no reply to my message of 09:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC) regarding your notability tag, and indeed deleted the talk section, i will assume you no longer support the tag unless you let me know otherwise. Stonewaters ( talk) 21:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I just noticed you added BLP sources to the new jazz album article Dylan Different. I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia, so forgive me if if I'm asking a dumb question, but doesn't that template only apply to biographies of living persons?
Cheers, -- RubenSchade ( talk) 08:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that you added {{ stub}} to Glen Huon, Tasmania. Please remember that this tag doesn't take a date parameter, and that it goes at the end of the article, after everything except inter-language links (see WP:FOOTERS). It makes life easier for stub-sorters if the tag is in the right, predictable, place. Thanks. Pam D 08:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Good morning,
I udpated the References links since your comment on the article I wrote. Could you please have a look to see if I updated the way you wish.
Thanks
Romain Tordo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romaintordo ( talk • contribs) 05:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
You tagged many articles which were stubs under 'one source'. The article which were stub consisted of only one line so it is rather odd to have more then one source. Also the tag states that; it depends largly on one source. But as the article consist of 1 line, it doesnot depend largely on it as one source is enough for a line. You can have 'one source' tag if the article is of more then one line. See this. So, now can you please remove 'one source' from those articles.? Happy Editing! Yash t 101 07:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I answered on the Harvey Aronson edits in my talk page. I think that's how it's done. Thanks. AC2011 ( talk) 04:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi!
Looking over your wikihistory, it seems as though you're very willing to get involved with lots of areas of the project. That's great! We are encouraged to be bold and it's always nice to see such enthusiasm from a new contributor. However, it also looks like you're having some trouble dealing with the (admittedly vast) range of policies and guidelines which govern all these different areas. I'd hate to see someone who clearly has a lot to contribute getting dispirited by a barrage of criticism, so I thought I'd draw your attention to the Adopt-a-user Project. Here you can get a more experienced editor to mentor you and help you out with the labyrinthine legalities of Wikipedia. They can also help you should you get embroiled in content disputes or arguments over policy. Being adopted gives you a leg up with the technicalities of Wikipedia, and might help you channel your enthusiasm to become a really excellent Wikipedian.
I also adopt users. So if you are interested then either contact me or other adopting user.
This is just a suggestion, not a demand, so take it or leave it
ThankS!!
Yash t 101 06:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help and warning for the SI page. I have no idea yet how to change the picture description, and to make sections. I recently changed the bios of Tony Warriner and Charles Cecil with the help of Khanassassin, but those were existing pages. I am sorry for the inconvenience, I am new to this,, but try to do it well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamnos ( talk • contribs) 10:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Callanecc. I wonder if you could advise me on how to improve the citations for the rejected article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Vladimir_Arenev. I've read all the wiki FAQ pages on the matter before creating an article. The text is initially a translation of Ukrainian version http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%83%D0%B7%D1%96%D0%B9_%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87. + some his interviews and biography at main Russian fantasy fans site (referenced). Would the books ISBNs save the thing? What could you suggest? Thank a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajaksus ( talk • contribs) 12:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/WDCW
I was wondering what specific parts of my WDCW article I should edit so that it doesn't read like an advertisement? I tried to make sure everything written was fact-based and cited independent sources for every claim. Below are the wiki pages for other ad agencies that I used as a guide. It would be helpful to know what parts of my article differ from these.
/info/en/?search=Firstborn_(digital_agency) /info/en/?search=AKQA /info/en/?search=GSD%26M_Idea_City /info/en/?search=Moxie_Sozo /info/en/?search=Barker/DZP /info/en/?search=Goodby,_Silverstein_%26_Partners /info/en/?search=McKinney_(advertising_agency)
Thank you so much. I look forward to making the changes and getting this page up!
Take care, Rudy — Preceding unsigned comment added by RudyWillingham ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi there Callanecc, and thank you for helping out at AfC. Please note that when you use the "BLP" reason to decline a submission, it actually blanks the submission and so shouldn't be used unless there is actual defamatory material in there. I have undone you BLP decline of the above article for those reasons. Cheers, Nolelover Talk· Contribs 13:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 11:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey there. I notice that you have been tagging some AfC drafts with maintenance tags. Would you mind leaving comments for the authors, and then only tag when you're moving drafts to mainspace (for COI, stubs, etc.) instead? I think tagging drafts may be slightly bitey, seeing as they're really designed to help readers and other editors, not article authors. Thanks. wctaiwan ( talk) 14:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
The Melbourne General Post Office was a bad idea, considering it already existed at General Post Office, Melbourne. Who's going to do the merge? St Anselm ( talk) 13:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Articles for Creation is backlogged and needs YOUR help!
Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 2858 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention. ![]()
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. Click here to review to a random submissionArticle selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver. We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the
Articles for Creation project, |
Thank you for reviewing the article I wrote. I reviewed the other page you suggested merging my article with, and they are different schools. The one you suggested is located in the Philippines and was founded by different people. While the names of the schools are similar, it doesn't make sense to merge the schools. Please reconsider my article.
Thank you Rubenstein Neil ( talk) 13:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
I believe I addressed all the issues regarding the article I wrote. Please let me know your thoughts at this point. Thanks
Rubenstein Neil ( talk) 04:42, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
What are the next steps at this point? Rubenstein Neil ( talk) 13:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Callanecc,
Thanks for the talk about the article, for accepting it and for your suggestions on how to improve it.
Having read up about the maintenance tags, I've added both a lead article and sections as you suggested. Will the page be reviewed again automatically or do I need to resubmit it somehow please? Can't see a button or option for review changes?
Many thanks,
Soong2 ( talk) 09:07, 29 May 2012 (UTC) Soong2
Hi Callanecc. I am posting to follow up to your recent decision to reject the Rakim Sanders submission. You are right, being a college basketball player does not make a player notable. Sanders is notable because he a. has participated in a major international amateur or professional competition and b.Gained national media attention as an individual, not just as a player for a notable team. Sanders cemented himself as a notable collegiate athlete in countless competitions for BC and Fairfield on channels ranging from CBS to ESPN to local channels such as NESN. He received extensive media coverage from media outlets such as ESPN, NBA.com, and CBS. He hit multiple game-winning shots, and a number of his plays were highlighted in SportCenter's top ten plays (he topped the charts twice). More importantly than his relevance purely as a star college player is the fact that Sanders is considered by media outlets such as NBA.com and NBAdraft.net as a viable candidate not only to be signed by an NBA team, but to be drafted by one. Sanders not only meets Wikipedia's criteria as an amateur athlete, but also compares favorably (in terms of notability) with players such as Keith Wright (basketball) and Darius Miller. Additionally, I think the sourcing of the page proves Sanders' notablity and satisfies the criteria for the sourcing of a Wikipedia page. I recognize that it is not a clear-cut case and would appreciate if you would reconsider. Thanks for taking the time to review the page. If you need me to explain anything I just said, or further discuss, I'd be happy to. Rupert'sscribe ( talk) 15:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help. I will continue on trying to improve the page. I will also start by making sure mentions of Rakim Sanders on other pages link to his page. Thanks again. Rupert'sscribe ( talk) 12:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for helping to review articles. If you review manually (and I strongly suggest you install the script) please make sure that you change "Example" in 'u=Example' to the editor who submitted the article. Also please ensure that you provide an edit summary (such as, "declining submission due to advertisement. An example is when you reviewed Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Cheng. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk) 01:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I thank you for guiding me to review article manually , but the reason is i cannot install the script, please help me in this regards. Umerali2204 ( talk) 10:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I made these edits, mainly MoS (removing external links from text, refs following (added) punctuation, correct letter case, overlinking etc.) I think the text is OK now, I'll unprotect the article space. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for moving my article into the mainspace. My next question is if the article is in jeopardy of being deleted due to being categorized as a start page? If so...how long do I have to improve it?
Thanks
Rubenstein Neil ( talk) 12:23, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
My justification is in the talk page. Please respond there if you want any further discussion.
Thanks :) Hugzz ( talk) 12:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Dear Callanecc,
thanks for reviewing my article about Marcus Kretzer. Concerning the section "Life and education": how can I prove that he studied in Cologne and Hamburg without showing his diplomas and exams? I would have to upload them to the Commons which is not possible because these documents are absolutely privat. Besides, Kretzer won't give me them. Is the link to the Hochschule für Musik und Theater Hamburg not sufficient enough? It shows that he studied there.
The Rachmaninoff.ogg is the recording of his conert exam in the Laeiszhalle - so this should be a reference.
The dedication of the composer Skubella could only be referenced by a link to the german editor's homepage. There http://www.ffmusicians.com/mazurka_1587.html one can see the music sheet including the dedication, but this is a commercial site.
Concerning the layout errors: I don't know why the tables appear in such a different way in comparison to the german Wikipedia article http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Kretzer. Although I used the same codes the gallery appears on the left instead on the right side.
You see, I need some assistance. And please excuse my bad english. Best regards Druhlbachmuwimünchen ( talk) 12:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Callanecc ( talk) 05:09, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Yeah there are a few times, but it isn't something you would (well me anyway) laugh (etc) about, just notice. Compared with some other things are written on the English Wikipedia, your writing isn't noticeable. If you ever need help in the future please feel free to leave me a message (just under a new heading though :) - I think this one is quite long already). Callanecc ( talk) 11:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Article accepted and moved into main space.
hello, I submitted an article about Mr. Crow Swimsaway, PhD, from Athens, OH a neoshaman. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crow Swimsaway,PhD.
I would like to correct any problems and resubmit. Should I have verified each statement I made at the beginning of this article--I assumed my list of references would show where I got the information but I can reference each statement if necessary.
can you point out more specifically what should be changed or what do you recommend that I correct?
Mairyann (
talk)
17:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
mairyann
Callanecc ( talk) 05:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my article about the University of Michigan Business Engagement Center. I have now added a wider variety of sources to the articles. I was going to resubmit it, but it won't let me since you didn't officially decline it. Can you please review the article again and consider it again to be published? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean P. Dougherty ( talk • contribs) 14:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Sean P. Dougherty ( talk) 14:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! I appreciate it. Sean P. Dougherty ( talk) 15:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
I believe the information to accept the article is there, however because of the tone, non-use of the formal tone expected on Wikipedia and the use of peacock terms it reads more like an advertisement than a Wikipedia article.
Callanecc ( talk) 05:48, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Article accepted and moved into main space.
Hi!
First of all, thank you for responding to my outcry :-)
I am new to wikipedia, just created an account today. I am a journalist and PhD student so I assumed I had it in the pocket, but, no, I don't. Heh. Just now, I edited the page of Hugo Nicolson Hugo Nicolson, an English producer and engineer to include a couple biographical details because I looked him up here on wiki (for another article I'm writing) and found a couple things missing... When I added another album to his discography though, wiki automatically accepted the change but much to my chagrin I found that it was to another record of the same name, and a) I'm not sure how to use the disambiguation redirect, and b) the page for the appropriate record doesn't exist and I don't know what kind of sources to cite the existence of an album???
I know that's an eyeful, but, if you have any time to help!
Thank you,
Angie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deliblujeli ( talk • contribs) 00:26, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Oh, fantastic, thank you :-) I did try with the Article Wizard a bit but I'll sit down and give it a better shot-- and I'll send it over to you for sure once I do! And yes, I did notice the signature after already posting this and tried to change it-- it's confusing to know when I've submitted something or edited something or added a new topic, oh my... Hehe... but here goes
Deliblujeli (
talk)
00:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Deliblujeli
Hello. You have
a new message at Dainomite's talk page.
Hi Callanecc, a project has been constructed and
Maryana (WMF) was wondering if you'd be able to help out with a research project her colleagues are running on the effects of MoodBar/Feedback Dashboard. They're trying to see if getting a response to MoodBar feedback helps newbies edit more – but to do that, they need to (temporarily) raise the level of responses to as close to 100% as possible. (Don't worry; it's only a week-long test.) If you could help me and her spread the word among the other FD top responders you know to help us clear the backlog by June 19th, that would be awesome! More details about this test are on
this page on Meta.
Let her know if you have any questions and feel free to get in touch with other FD leaders about this if you want :)
Cheers,
Riley Huntley
talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here.
23:58, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Callannecc, did you intend to get Karishmeh Felfeli deleted as it seems? You haven't voted at the AfD. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 07:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Good afternoon, I'm a little confused with this submission as each time I resubmit with the requested details the goal posts seem to keep changing. I was orginally told that this was a notable enough person and to submit appropriate references, which I have done. I now being told that he is not notable enough. What must I do to resolve this? Thanks, Andy Simonevans680 ( talk) 12:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Callanecc, thank you so much from me and the MoodBar research team for your work on clearing the Feedback Dashboard backlog! You and the other responders have doubled the number of responses to feedback in the past few days. I wanted to let you know that in 4 more days, the MoodBar will be temporarily disabled, so you won't see any new feedback coming in for a little while. This is just to get a sample of users to compare to the ones who could give feedback and get responses from you – it'll be back soon. So get all of your responding in now, because you might have to go through a bit of Feedback Dashboard withdrawal next week :) Thanks again, and keep up the great work! Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 18:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your response to my issue... Thankfully, it resolved itself and I was able to make the changes that I wanted to make. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fonz02152001 ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Callanecc,
I'm a bit confused with my post. I uploaded something I wrote on Chargemaster and I can't find it anywhere.
Why is this?
Thanks,
Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickb123pha ( talk • contribs) 13:12, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for getting back to me :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickb123pha ( talk • contribs) 12:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi.
I saw that you rejected my article of the "Parshvanath College of Engineering" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Parshvanath_college_of_engineering) because it seemed more like an advertisement rather than a neutral encyclopedia entry.
I have made some changes that may make it better.
But I'd like to point out that I also included an "Issues and controversies" section at the end of my article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Parshvanath_college_of_engineering#Issues_and_controversies) that describes the negative points about the college. An advertising article would not display such information.
And my article seems to be much better, more detailed, more neutral and more professional than some other "stub"-like articles about engineering colleges that are there on Wikipedia.
Please consider these points. And please also note that this is just the article's beginning on Wikipedia. It can be further improved with time (with images, further information, etc.), not only by myself, but also by other contributors.
Sincerely, Sarthak Sharma.
Intelligentguy89 ( talk) 04:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for inviting me to join Wikiproject AFC, I have joined and have begun reviewing AFCs. Athleek 123 06:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Jaggs's victim is still alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.217.231 ( talk) 13:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
(Refers to article: Ed_Kosiski)
Hi Callanecc, Thanks for stopping by. Yeah, I agree, this has taken on an aspect of "Edit war". However, I urge you to review the associated changes. I _think_ I am reverting to a better state that is more appropriate for a BLP article. Although, I suspect that everyone _thinks_ that. :) So, I don't _think_ this is just me editing to my "preferred version", I _think_ it is me reverting what amounts to vandalism. Anyway, I read through your talk page and found out about the dispute resolution and notice pages and went to check on that where I noted that another user has already submitted this page to that forum. here I will await resolution in that forum and abide with whatever they decide. Thanks again. -- 174.70.63.4 ( talk) 06:55, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
(Refers to article: Nicosia) Callanecc ( talk) 13:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. (see below) Thanks anyway, will take a wikibreak and let other users deal with it. -- Seksen ( talk) 13:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi!
The edit was made by myself while not logged in. It was not vandalism as identified in your edit summary here and, contrary to the template message here, there is an edit summary when the list was deleted. The addition of the bullet list of characters was reverted multiple times by multiple editors on this article in the past and it is a practice standard on GA and FA-class film articles, especially when a prose section on casting exists. Maybe it's not reasonable for me to expect that you check the prior edits and edit summaries pertaining to this issue but, by the same token, it may be unreasonable for you to extract bad faith from an edit where content was removed rather than added.
Please be careful using automated tools when reverting suspected vandalism. When primarily focusing on being quick rather than accurate, more harm than good can come as a result. Had it been a new IP user rather than myself forgetting to log in, they might have been intimidated of the project for good. Sometimes a first impression that a new IP user gets of Wikipedia can, unfortunately, be the only impression they get.
Thanks. Big Bird ( talk • contribs) 15:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Canoe River train crash ( diff) Callanecc ( talk) 05:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I discussed it in talk. Let FA author Wehwalt have a look at it and decide. If he wants to put the infobox back, that can be done, but still using the layout of pictures. Just let it stand for a day or two. So the FA author can look at it. It is a significant layout change (with thought behind it). Not a recent changes patroller type thing. 64.134.168.97 ( talk) 05:11, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 11:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you thought my edit was vandalism, it removed content that was almost comical in its argument "the show employs actors therefore what happens in the show is fake" and is transparently link spam to a site that applies that same "criticism" to numerous tv shows. I noted that in the edit comment. The site is looking to attract traffic, and is not a reliable source by any stretch of the imagination. 67.174.199.196 ( talk) 11:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Callanecc/Archive 1. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! v/r - T P 13:47, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
i cant see where you added that ...you better change that ...i dont give a damn ..if it doesnt loook good...that article ois a load of bullshot to put it blunt..so go ahead block me if you can as if i dont own another piece of computer...i can edit it as many times as i like piss drinking hindu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.181.184 ( talk) 15:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Could you consider removing your recall question at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SwisterTwister? It has been discussed that the question is unhelpful in RfA's and causes unnecessary troubles for the candidate no matter how they answer. Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
The Dennis M. Lynch page continues to be hacked. I am going in to restore. For instance, the website name listed under the picture continues to be changed by someone. The change leads to a wrong address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.235.228 ( talk) 11:26, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Callanecc, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and DBig Xray 06:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thank you for your positive feedback to me. Johngabriel.ibay ( talk) 15:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 20:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
its my luck thati m the member of one great website — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohitrajgaba ( talk • contribs) 08:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I don't understand what's going on in mammography. I put in new lead info, shorten it radically on request, guy puts very outdated and misinfo back in and calls me a edit warrior? 32cllou ( talk) 04:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
So I guess i'm dealing with editors who are reps of the medical industry complex (re military industrial complex) conflict of interest? 32cllou ( talk) 05:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Any particular reason you removed a blp prod from Technotic? Think you need to have a recap on WP:RS...-- Otterathome ( talk) 16:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi--
I just resubmitted this article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/IBM_Rational_Automation_Framework) with more external references, from sources like Gartner and a Hurwitz.com study. I am puzzled that the article was rejected; I was very careful to present only objective information with no marketing slant, and I provided a number of non-IBM links. It seems to me that comparable articles from other IBM products, as well as from competitors, have poorer or almost nonexistent references--for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Center_Configuration_Manager http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Fusion_Middleware http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentum
I am not trying to get away with something here--all I'm trying to do is get a bare-bones article in place about a significant piece of software. I have carefully studied all the articles on how to write for Wikipedia and done my homework in terms of tracking down significant references. If you still find the article unsuitable, I would really appreciate a more detailed explanation of what your expectations are and where my article has failed to meet them.
Thanks!
Lshiner ( talk) 14:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
So, I couldn't sleep initially last night having watched this news on induced birth harm to children http://abcnews.go.com/Health/birth-37-38-weeks-linked-lower-math-reading/story?id=16683067#.T_MJqPVLFh6 since that's what prob happened to my neighbor wonderful kid but slow development and had scary breathing probs first year. Both prob due to induced like 34 weeks. Need to find the article talking about resperatory harm.
How can I get the Pediatrics and OBGYN Journal articles mentioned? Can I cite the ABC report to say states (Oregon and Arizona) and hospitals are moving to limit induced births to if there's proven high risk otherwise to mothers, or at least 39 weeks into pregnancy? I seem to remember that doctors aren't sure when a woman became pregnant, and will look for that too. 32cllou ( talk) 16:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Cntras ( talk) 14:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campusdada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campusdada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KTC ( talk) 20:20, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
-- Luke (Talk) 13:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
The article was redirected to List of Planet of the Apes characters on 22 February 2011, but then reverted six months later [14]. Since then, nothing else has been added except additional cruft.
Additionally, discussion is not necessary. The other articles were merged into List of Planet of the Apes characters without discussion.
165.125.144.133 ( talk) 19:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Thebuck093 ( talk) 19:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Eric Cartman is not a living person, but rather a fictional one. I do not understand exactly what error you think I have made; can you explain, please?
The snippet I added to the page Face is just as relevant as the part in the next thought about GWB's ears; it isn't necessary to add the part about the elephant's ears, but it is true nonetheless. That thought would be complete at "enlarged". Yet, it remains; so why does my factually accurate addition get removed? 24.179.34.43 ( talk)
Did you mean to revert me or the edit by 67.189.188.150? All you did was to remove my references. I'll leave it up to you. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 06:39, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
The user has got many more warnings. Most probably 10–12 (if I count his photo upload warnings then more than 20). Plus he is doing WP:SOCK using 3-4 or more accounts. I have not reported WP:SOCK, since his main account has most number of edits in that article, so I am deliberately little slow here. Previously I was writing edit summary in details (do this, do that), but, now, I am just tired by saying same thing again and again that rowspan=1 is not necessary, WP:MIRROR should not be added, so, you'll find my latest edit summaries are short Author's name should not be editor's name etc etc. Please don't report WP:SOCK in case you get involved in this edit warring, It'll sad if he looses all his accounts. -- Tito Dutta ✉ 12:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Mea culpa — I'm much better at speedying than remembering to close AFDs, sorry Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
why dont you like the truth about hemet? this line added by: User:71.104.252.172, User talk:71.104.252.172 .
that is knowledge around the whole town. if you lived here then you would know. Counterargument? this line added by:
http://www.city -data .com/so/so-Hemet-California.html this is to show the sex offenders live in this town which i live in. 71.104.252.172 ( talk) 10:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC) fowling the rail road track on google map the train could take you all way to riverside 71.104.252.172 ( talk) 10:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
http://thevalleychronicle .com/local-news/item/1943-mechanical-issues-not-to-blame-for-crash-outside-of-high-school, http://thevalleychronicle .com/opinion/item/1913-letter-to-the-editor, http://thevalleychronicle .com/local-news/item/1939-crime-reports-throughout-the-san-jacinto-valley, http://thevalleychronicle .com/local-news/item/1521-hemet-man-charged-with-sexual-abuse 71.104.252.172 ( talk) 10:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Hmm ... on the one hand I am flattered by that expression of trust. I can see the need and see where I could be helpful on the user-renaming end. But ... it does also include closing RFAs, and I don't have a lot of experience hanging out there (which might be a plus). I just worry about the time it might take.
I see you have persuaded at least Beeblebrox and someone else to go for it. Let's see how that goes. Give it a month or so more and I might be interested.
(Sorry I didn't get more of a chance to talk to you at Wikimania). Daniel Case ( talk) 20:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, my brain does not seem to be wired up for real editing. I suspect I am destined to be a life-long Huggle jockey. I might try writing tools, I've written tons of code. Thanks for the inspiration! Jim1138 ( talk) 09:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I was not attacking, i just have a VERY strong opinion that the article is still VERY POV and that the title of the article is WONG and does not stand up to the pillars. I expressed my opinion very strongly to make a point. Aperseghin ( talk) 13:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 32 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Thanks for uploading File:AAFC Crest - colour (large).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 03:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
I have contested the proposed deletion of AAFC Support Wings, which you endorsed, on the grounds that an article that duplicates the content of another article should be redirected to that article. Accordingly, I have redirected this article to Australian Air Force Cadets, as it seemed more appropriate to redirect to a parent article rather than a list that is a child of that article. — KuyaBriBri Talk 14:10, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Anwar_Yusuf_Turani&diff=471806516&oldid=470611657
I removed most of the material Tewpiq and Cornellstudent added: [1], [2], [3]. I basically only kept the infobox Tewpiq added. Most of the remaining non-infobox text of the article was written by me. Can you please remove Template:Autobiography from the article? -- Michaeldsuarez ( talk) 04:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
You
substituted the {{
No footnotes}} templates, instead of transclude it with {{
No footnotes|date=July 2024}}
. Please transclude it in the future.
Debresser (
talk)
13:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello Callanecc. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Illusion Suite, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This has been tagged for two days and no one has deleted it - probably due to the performance at ProgPower suggesting significance. Take to AfD if you don't think NBAND is met. Thank you. SmartSE ( talk) 15:07, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Do you realize that an entire book has been devoted to Vladislav Zanadvorov ( [4])? There is no requirement that sources establishing a subject's notability be in English (although Googling for "Zanadvorov" in GoogleBooks will give you hits too). Zloyvolsheb ( talk) 23:57, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
I've contested the speedy deletion of Éditions Mille-Îles. CüRlyTüRkey Talk Contribs 02:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Greetings. Happy to from your userbox on my way in that the force is strong with you. :) Anyway, thanks for taking the pages of the oakland city council. Some of them have very long bios, some had short bios, some were redlinked. I've gone ahead and created stubs for them all, since it's easier to for my brain work on all the simultaneously.
I'm not unaware that they have issues and need work. Any advice you have to help rehabilitate them would be welcome. I don't have any axes to grind against anyone. It's just that Oakland is 8th largest city in the state, their elected leaders seems likely to be bio-worthy, but ultimately that will be up to the reliable sources that come out of the writing process, not my early 'instincts' about what's likely to be notable. :)
I just didn't want you to think I didn't hear your concerns and take them into account. Some of the content may have to be moved into officeholder articles instead of biographical-articles for the less notable council members. (or maybe not). Any help or advice welcome! be gentle with me, I'm not sure what I'm doing, but trying hard to do it well. -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 07:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
since you made no reply to my message of 09:34, 6 February 2012 (UTC) regarding your notability tag, and indeed deleted the talk section, i will assume you no longer support the tag unless you let me know otherwise. Stonewaters ( talk) 21:00, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I just noticed you added BLP sources to the new jazz album article Dylan Different. I'm relatively new to editing Wikipedia, so forgive me if if I'm asking a dumb question, but doesn't that template only apply to biographies of living persons?
Cheers, -- RubenSchade ( talk) 08:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I notice that you added {{ stub}} to Glen Huon, Tasmania. Please remember that this tag doesn't take a date parameter, and that it goes at the end of the article, after everything except inter-language links (see WP:FOOTERS). It makes life easier for stub-sorters if the tag is in the right, predictable, place. Thanks. Pam D 08:47, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Good morning,
I udpated the References links since your comment on the article I wrote. Could you please have a look to see if I updated the way you wish.
Thanks
Romain Tordo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Romaintordo ( talk • contribs) 05:30, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
You tagged many articles which were stubs under 'one source'. The article which were stub consisted of only one line so it is rather odd to have more then one source. Also the tag states that; it depends largly on one source. But as the article consist of 1 line, it doesnot depend largely on it as one source is enough for a line. You can have 'one source' tag if the article is of more then one line. See this. So, now can you please remove 'one source' from those articles.? Happy Editing! Yash t 101 07:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I answered on the Harvey Aronson edits in my talk page. I think that's how it's done. Thanks. AC2011 ( talk) 04:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi!
Looking over your wikihistory, it seems as though you're very willing to get involved with lots of areas of the project. That's great! We are encouraged to be bold and it's always nice to see such enthusiasm from a new contributor. However, it also looks like you're having some trouble dealing with the (admittedly vast) range of policies and guidelines which govern all these different areas. I'd hate to see someone who clearly has a lot to contribute getting dispirited by a barrage of criticism, so I thought I'd draw your attention to the Adopt-a-user Project. Here you can get a more experienced editor to mentor you and help you out with the labyrinthine legalities of Wikipedia. They can also help you should you get embroiled in content disputes or arguments over policy. Being adopted gives you a leg up with the technicalities of Wikipedia, and might help you channel your enthusiasm to become a really excellent Wikipedian.
I also adopt users. So if you are interested then either contact me or other adopting user.
This is just a suggestion, not a demand, so take it or leave it
ThankS!!
Yash t 101 06:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help and warning for the SI page. I have no idea yet how to change the picture description, and to make sections. I recently changed the bios of Tony Warriner and Charles Cecil with the help of Khanassassin, but those were existing pages. I am sorry for the inconvenience, I am new to this,, but try to do it well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamnos ( talk • contribs) 10:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Callanecc. I wonder if you could advise me on how to improve the citations for the rejected article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Vladimir_Arenev. I've read all the wiki FAQ pages on the matter before creating an article. The text is initially a translation of Ukrainian version http://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%83%D0%B7%D1%96%D0%B9_%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%80_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8F%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87. + some his interviews and biography at main Russian fantasy fans site (referenced). Would the books ISBNs save the thing? What could you suggest? Thank a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajaksus ( talk • contribs) 12:06, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/WDCW
I was wondering what specific parts of my WDCW article I should edit so that it doesn't read like an advertisement? I tried to make sure everything written was fact-based and cited independent sources for every claim. Below are the wiki pages for other ad agencies that I used as a guide. It would be helpful to know what parts of my article differ from these.
/info/en/?search=Firstborn_(digital_agency) /info/en/?search=AKQA /info/en/?search=GSD%26M_Idea_City /info/en/?search=Moxie_Sozo /info/en/?search=Barker/DZP /info/en/?search=Goodby,_Silverstein_%26_Partners /info/en/?search=McKinney_(advertising_agency)
Thank you so much. I look forward to making the changes and getting this page up!
Take care, Rudy — Preceding unsigned comment added by RudyWillingham ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi there Callanecc, and thank you for helping out at AfC. Please note that when you use the "BLP" reason to decline a submission, it actually blanks the submission and so shouldn't be used unless there is actual defamatory material in there. I have undone you BLP decline of the above article for those reasons. Cheers, Nolelover Talk· Contribs 13:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! -- Sp33dyphil © hat ontributions 11:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey there. I notice that you have been tagging some AfC drafts with maintenance tags. Would you mind leaving comments for the authors, and then only tag when you're moving drafts to mainspace (for COI, stubs, etc.) instead? I think tagging drafts may be slightly bitey, seeing as they're really designed to help readers and other editors, not article authors. Thanks. wctaiwan ( talk) 14:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
The Melbourne General Post Office was a bad idea, considering it already existed at General Post Office, Melbourne. Who's going to do the merge? St Anselm ( talk) 13:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
Articles for Creation is backlogged and needs YOUR help!
Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 2858 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention. ![]()
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. Click here to review to a random submissionArticle selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver. We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the
Articles for Creation project, |
Thank you for reviewing the article I wrote. I reviewed the other page you suggested merging my article with, and they are different schools. The one you suggested is located in the Philippines and was founded by different people. While the names of the schools are similar, it doesn't make sense to merge the schools. Please reconsider my article.
Thank you Rubenstein Neil ( talk) 13:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
I believe I addressed all the issues regarding the article I wrote. Please let me know your thoughts at this point. Thanks
Rubenstein Neil ( talk) 04:42, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
What are the next steps at this point? Rubenstein Neil ( talk) 13:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Callanecc,
Thanks for the talk about the article, for accepting it and for your suggestions on how to improve it.
Having read up about the maintenance tags, I've added both a lead article and sections as you suggested. Will the page be reviewed again automatically or do I need to resubmit it somehow please? Can't see a button or option for review changes?
Many thanks,
Soong2 ( talk) 09:07, 29 May 2012 (UTC) Soong2
Hi Callanecc. I am posting to follow up to your recent decision to reject the Rakim Sanders submission. You are right, being a college basketball player does not make a player notable. Sanders is notable because he a. has participated in a major international amateur or professional competition and b.Gained national media attention as an individual, not just as a player for a notable team. Sanders cemented himself as a notable collegiate athlete in countless competitions for BC and Fairfield on channels ranging from CBS to ESPN to local channels such as NESN. He received extensive media coverage from media outlets such as ESPN, NBA.com, and CBS. He hit multiple game-winning shots, and a number of his plays were highlighted in SportCenter's top ten plays (he topped the charts twice). More importantly than his relevance purely as a star college player is the fact that Sanders is considered by media outlets such as NBA.com and NBAdraft.net as a viable candidate not only to be signed by an NBA team, but to be drafted by one. Sanders not only meets Wikipedia's criteria as an amateur athlete, but also compares favorably (in terms of notability) with players such as Keith Wright (basketball) and Darius Miller. Additionally, I think the sourcing of the page proves Sanders' notablity and satisfies the criteria for the sourcing of a Wikipedia page. I recognize that it is not a clear-cut case and would appreciate if you would reconsider. Thanks for taking the time to review the page. If you need me to explain anything I just said, or further discuss, I'd be happy to. Rupert'sscribe ( talk) 15:52, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help. I will continue on trying to improve the page. I will also start by making sure mentions of Rakim Sanders on other pages link to his page. Thanks again. Rupert'sscribe ( talk) 12:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for helping to review articles. If you review manually (and I strongly suggest you install the script) please make sure that you change "Example" in 'u=Example' to the editor who submitted the article. Also please ensure that you provide an edit summary (such as, "declining submission due to advertisement. An example is when you reviewed Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Cheng. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk) 01:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I thank you for guiding me to review article manually , but the reason is i cannot install the script, please help me in this regards. Umerali2204 ( talk) 10:57, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I made these edits, mainly MoS (removing external links from text, refs following (added) punctuation, correct letter case, overlinking etc.) I think the text is OK now, I'll unprotect the article space. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for moving my article into the mainspace. My next question is if the article is in jeopardy of being deleted due to being categorized as a start page? If so...how long do I have to improve it?
Thanks
Rubenstein Neil ( talk) 12:23, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
My justification is in the talk page. Please respond there if you want any further discussion.
Thanks :) Hugzz ( talk) 12:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Dear Callanecc,
thanks for reviewing my article about Marcus Kretzer. Concerning the section "Life and education": how can I prove that he studied in Cologne and Hamburg without showing his diplomas and exams? I would have to upload them to the Commons which is not possible because these documents are absolutely privat. Besides, Kretzer won't give me them. Is the link to the Hochschule für Musik und Theater Hamburg not sufficient enough? It shows that he studied there.
The Rachmaninoff.ogg is the recording of his conert exam in the Laeiszhalle - so this should be a reference.
The dedication of the composer Skubella could only be referenced by a link to the german editor's homepage. There http://www.ffmusicians.com/mazurka_1587.html one can see the music sheet including the dedication, but this is a commercial site.
Concerning the layout errors: I don't know why the tables appear in such a different way in comparison to the german Wikipedia article http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Kretzer. Although I used the same codes the gallery appears on the left instead on the right side.
You see, I need some assistance. And please excuse my bad english. Best regards Druhlbachmuwimünchen ( talk) 12:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Callanecc ( talk) 05:09, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Yeah there are a few times, but it isn't something you would (well me anyway) laugh (etc) about, just notice. Compared with some other things are written on the English Wikipedia, your writing isn't noticeable. If you ever need help in the future please feel free to leave me a message (just under a new heading though :) - I think this one is quite long already). Callanecc ( talk) 11:20, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Article accepted and moved into main space.
hello, I submitted an article about Mr. Crow Swimsaway, PhD, from Athens, OH a neoshaman. Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crow Swimsaway,PhD.
I would like to correct any problems and resubmit. Should I have verified each statement I made at the beginning of this article--I assumed my list of references would show where I got the information but I can reference each statement if necessary.
can you point out more specifically what should be changed or what do you recommend that I correct?
Mairyann (
talk)
17:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
mairyann
Callanecc ( talk) 05:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my article about the University of Michigan Business Engagement Center. I have now added a wider variety of sources to the articles. I was going to resubmit it, but it won't let me since you didn't officially decline it. Can you please review the article again and consider it again to be published? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sean P. Dougherty ( talk • contribs) 14:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Sean P. Dougherty ( talk) 14:48, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! I appreciate it. Sean P. Dougherty ( talk) 15:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
I believe the information to accept the article is there, however because of the tone, non-use of the formal tone expected on Wikipedia and the use of peacock terms it reads more like an advertisement than a Wikipedia article.
Callanecc ( talk) 05:48, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Article accepted and moved into main space.
Hi!
First of all, thank you for responding to my outcry :-)
I am new to wikipedia, just created an account today. I am a journalist and PhD student so I assumed I had it in the pocket, but, no, I don't. Heh. Just now, I edited the page of Hugo Nicolson Hugo Nicolson, an English producer and engineer to include a couple biographical details because I looked him up here on wiki (for another article I'm writing) and found a couple things missing... When I added another album to his discography though, wiki automatically accepted the change but much to my chagrin I found that it was to another record of the same name, and a) I'm not sure how to use the disambiguation redirect, and b) the page for the appropriate record doesn't exist and I don't know what kind of sources to cite the existence of an album???
I know that's an eyeful, but, if you have any time to help!
Thank you,
Angie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deliblujeli ( talk • contribs) 00:26, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Oh, fantastic, thank you :-) I did try with the Article Wizard a bit but I'll sit down and give it a better shot-- and I'll send it over to you for sure once I do! And yes, I did notice the signature after already posting this and tried to change it-- it's confusing to know when I've submitted something or edited something or added a new topic, oh my... Hehe... but here goes
Deliblujeli (
talk)
00:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)Deliblujeli
Hello. You have
a new message at Dainomite's talk page.
Hi Callanecc, a project has been constructed and
Maryana (WMF) was wondering if you'd be able to help out with a research project her colleagues are running on the effects of MoodBar/Feedback Dashboard. They're trying to see if getting a response to MoodBar feedback helps newbies edit more – but to do that, they need to (temporarily) raise the level of responses to as close to 100% as possible. (Don't worry; it's only a week-long test.) If you could help me and her spread the word among the other FD top responders you know to help us clear the backlog by June 19th, that would be awesome! More details about this test are on
this page on Meta.
Let her know if you have any questions and feel free to get in touch with other FD leaders about this if you want :)
Cheers,
Riley Huntley
talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here.
23:58, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Callannecc, did you intend to get Karishmeh Felfeli deleted as it seems? You haven't voted at the AfD. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 07:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Good afternoon, I'm a little confused with this submission as each time I resubmit with the requested details the goal posts seem to keep changing. I was orginally told that this was a notable enough person and to submit appropriate references, which I have done. I now being told that he is not notable enough. What must I do to resolve this? Thanks, Andy Simonevans680 ( talk) 12:51, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Callanecc, thank you so much from me and the MoodBar research team for your work on clearing the Feedback Dashboard backlog! You and the other responders have doubled the number of responses to feedback in the past few days. I wanted to let you know that in 4 more days, the MoodBar will be temporarily disabled, so you won't see any new feedback coming in for a little while. This is just to get a sample of users to compare to the ones who could give feedback and get responses from you – it'll be back soon. So get all of your responding in now, because you might have to go through a bit of Feedback Dashboard withdrawal next week :) Thanks again, and keep up the great work! Maryana (WMF) ( talk) 18:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your response to my issue... Thankfully, it resolved itself and I was able to make the changes that I wanted to make. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fonz02152001 ( talk • contribs) 21:38, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Callanecc,
I'm a bit confused with my post. I uploaded something I wrote on Chargemaster and I can't find it anywhere.
Why is this?
Thanks,
Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickb123pha ( talk • contribs) 13:12, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for getting back to me :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickb123pha ( talk • contribs) 12:52, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi.
I saw that you rejected my article of the "Parshvanath College of Engineering" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Parshvanath_college_of_engineering) because it seemed more like an advertisement rather than a neutral encyclopedia entry.
I have made some changes that may make it better.
But I'd like to point out that I also included an "Issues and controversies" section at the end of my article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Parshvanath_college_of_engineering#Issues_and_controversies) that describes the negative points about the college. An advertising article would not display such information.
And my article seems to be much better, more detailed, more neutral and more professional than some other "stub"-like articles about engineering colleges that are there on Wikipedia.
Please consider these points. And please also note that this is just the article's beginning on Wikipedia. It can be further improved with time (with images, further information, etc.), not only by myself, but also by other contributors.
Sincerely, Sarthak Sharma.
Intelligentguy89 ( talk) 04:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for inviting me to join Wikiproject AFC, I have joined and have begun reviewing AFCs. Athleek 123 06:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Jaggs's victim is still alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.217.231 ( talk) 13:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
(Refers to article: Ed_Kosiski)
Hi Callanecc, Thanks for stopping by. Yeah, I agree, this has taken on an aspect of "Edit war". However, I urge you to review the associated changes. I _think_ I am reverting to a better state that is more appropriate for a BLP article. Although, I suspect that everyone _thinks_ that. :) So, I don't _think_ this is just me editing to my "preferred version", I _think_ it is me reverting what amounts to vandalism. Anyway, I read through your talk page and found out about the dispute resolution and notice pages and went to check on that where I noted that another user has already submitted this page to that forum. here I will await resolution in that forum and abide with whatever they decide. Thanks again. -- 174.70.63.4 ( talk) 06:55, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
(Refers to article: Nicosia) Callanecc ( talk) 13:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi. (see below) Thanks anyway, will take a wikibreak and let other users deal with it. -- Seksen ( talk) 13:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi!
The edit was made by myself while not logged in. It was not vandalism as identified in your edit summary here and, contrary to the template message here, there is an edit summary when the list was deleted. The addition of the bullet list of characters was reverted multiple times by multiple editors on this article in the past and it is a practice standard on GA and FA-class film articles, especially when a prose section on casting exists. Maybe it's not reasonable for me to expect that you check the prior edits and edit summaries pertaining to this issue but, by the same token, it may be unreasonable for you to extract bad faith from an edit where content was removed rather than added.
Please be careful using automated tools when reverting suspected vandalism. When primarily focusing on being quick rather than accurate, more harm than good can come as a result. Had it been a new IP user rather than myself forgetting to log in, they might have been intimidated of the project for good. Sometimes a first impression that a new IP user gets of Wikipedia can, unfortunately, be the only impression they get.
Thanks. Big Bird ( talk • contribs) 15:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Canoe River train crash ( diff) Callanecc ( talk) 05:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I discussed it in talk. Let FA author Wehwalt have a look at it and decide. If he wants to put the infobox back, that can be done, but still using the layout of pictures. Just let it stand for a day or two. So the FA author can look at it. It is a significant layout change (with thought behind it). Not a recent changes patroller type thing. 64.134.168.97 ( talk) 05:11, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 11:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you thought my edit was vandalism, it removed content that was almost comical in its argument "the show employs actors therefore what happens in the show is fake" and is transparently link spam to a site that applies that same "criticism" to numerous tv shows. I noted that in the edit comment. The site is looking to attract traffic, and is not a reliable source by any stretch of the imagination. 67.174.199.196 ( talk) 11:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Callanecc/Archive 1. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! v/r - T P 13:47, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
i cant see where you added that ...you better change that ...i dont give a damn ..if it doesnt loook good...that article ois a load of bullshot to put it blunt..so go ahead block me if you can as if i dont own another piece of computer...i can edit it as many times as i like piss drinking hindu — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.181.184 ( talk) 15:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Could you consider removing your recall question at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SwisterTwister? It has been discussed that the question is unhelpful in RfA's and causes unnecessary troubles for the candidate no matter how they answer. Ryan Vesey Review me! 04:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
The Dennis M. Lynch page continues to be hacked. I am going in to restore. For instance, the website name listed under the picture continues to be changed by someone. The change leads to a wrong address. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.235.228 ( talk) 11:26, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Callanecc, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and DBig Xray 06:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
Thank you for your positive feedback to me. Johngabriel.ibay ( talk) 15:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 20:24, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
its my luck thati m the member of one great website — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohitrajgaba ( talk • contribs) 08:09, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
I don't understand what's going on in mammography. I put in new lead info, shorten it radically on request, guy puts very outdated and misinfo back in and calls me a edit warrior? 32cllou ( talk) 04:18, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
So I guess i'm dealing with editors who are reps of the medical industry complex (re military industrial complex) conflict of interest? 32cllou ( talk) 05:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Any particular reason you removed a blp prod from Technotic? Think you need to have a recap on WP:RS...-- Otterathome ( talk) 16:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi--
I just resubmitted this article ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/IBM_Rational_Automation_Framework) with more external references, from sources like Gartner and a Hurwitz.com study. I am puzzled that the article was rejected; I was very careful to present only objective information with no marketing slant, and I provided a number of non-IBM links. It seems to me that comparable articles from other IBM products, as well as from competitors, have poorer or almost nonexistent references--for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_Center_Configuration_Manager http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Fusion_Middleware http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentum
I am not trying to get away with something here--all I'm trying to do is get a bare-bones article in place about a significant piece of software. I have carefully studied all the articles on how to write for Wikipedia and done my homework in terms of tracking down significant references. If you still find the article unsuitable, I would really appreciate a more detailed explanation of what your expectations are and where my article has failed to meet them.
Thanks!
Lshiner ( talk) 14:23, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
So, I couldn't sleep initially last night having watched this news on induced birth harm to children http://abcnews.go.com/Health/birth-37-38-weeks-linked-lower-math-reading/story?id=16683067#.T_MJqPVLFh6 since that's what prob happened to my neighbor wonderful kid but slow development and had scary breathing probs first year. Both prob due to induced like 34 weeks. Need to find the article talking about resperatory harm.
How can I get the Pediatrics and OBGYN Journal articles mentioned? Can I cite the ABC report to say states (Oregon and Arizona) and hospitals are moving to limit induced births to if there's proven high risk otherwise to mothers, or at least 39 weeks into pregnancy? I seem to remember that doctors aren't sure when a woman became pregnant, and will look for that too. 32cllou ( talk) 16:42, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Cntras ( talk) 14:42, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campusdada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campusdada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. KTC ( talk) 20:20, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
-- Luke (Talk) 13:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
The article was redirected to List of Planet of the Apes characters on 22 February 2011, but then reverted six months later [14]. Since then, nothing else has been added except additional cruft.
Additionally, discussion is not necessary. The other articles were merged into List of Planet of the Apes characters without discussion.
165.125.144.133 ( talk) 19:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Thebuck093 ( talk) 19:51, 6 July 2012 (UTC) Eric Cartman is not a living person, but rather a fictional one. I do not understand exactly what error you think I have made; can you explain, please?
The snippet I added to the page Face is just as relevant as the part in the next thought about GWB's ears; it isn't necessary to add the part about the elephant's ears, but it is true nonetheless. That thought would be complete at "enlarged". Yet, it remains; so why does my factually accurate addition get removed? 24.179.34.43 ( talk)
Did you mean to revert me or the edit by 67.189.188.150? All you did was to remove my references. I'll leave it up to you. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 06:39, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
The user has got many more warnings. Most probably 10–12 (if I count his photo upload warnings then more than 20). Plus he is doing WP:SOCK using 3-4 or more accounts. I have not reported WP:SOCK, since his main account has most number of edits in that article, so I am deliberately little slow here. Previously I was writing edit summary in details (do this, do that), but, now, I am just tired by saying same thing again and again that rowspan=1 is not necessary, WP:MIRROR should not be added, so, you'll find my latest edit summaries are short Author's name should not be editor's name etc etc. Please don't report WP:SOCK in case you get involved in this edit warring, It'll sad if he looses all his accounts. -- Tito Dutta ✉ 12:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Mea culpa — I'm much better at speedying than remembering to close AFDs, sorry Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:09, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
why dont you like the truth about hemet? this line added by: User:71.104.252.172, User talk:71.104.252.172 .
that is knowledge around the whole town. if you lived here then you would know. Counterargument? this line added by:
http://www.city -data .com/so/so-Hemet-California.html this is to show the sex offenders live in this town which i live in. 71.104.252.172 ( talk) 10:21, 8 July 2012 (UTC) fowling the rail road track on google map the train could take you all way to riverside 71.104.252.172 ( talk) 10:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
http://thevalleychronicle .com/local-news/item/1943-mechanical-issues-not-to-blame-for-crash-outside-of-high-school, http://thevalleychronicle .com/opinion/item/1913-letter-to-the-editor, http://thevalleychronicle .com/local-news/item/1939-crime-reports-throughout-the-san-jacinto-valley, http://thevalleychronicle .com/local-news/item/1521-hemet-man-charged-with-sexual-abuse 71.104.252.172 ( talk) 10:51, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Hmm ... on the one hand I am flattered by that expression of trust. I can see the need and see where I could be helpful on the user-renaming end. But ... it does also include closing RFAs, and I don't have a lot of experience hanging out there (which might be a plus). I just worry about the time it might take.
I see you have persuaded at least Beeblebrox and someone else to go for it. Let's see how that goes. Give it a month or so more and I might be interested.
(Sorry I didn't get more of a chance to talk to you at Wikimania). Daniel Case ( talk) 20:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, my brain does not seem to be wired up for real editing. I suspect I am destined to be a life-long Huggle jockey. I might try writing tools, I've written tons of code. Thanks for the inspiration! Jim1138 ( talk) 09:05, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
I was not attacking, i just have a VERY strong opinion that the article is still VERY POV and that the title of the article is WONG and does not stand up to the pillars. I expressed my opinion very strongly to make a point. Aperseghin ( talk) 13:53, 31 July 2012 (UTC)