This is an
archive of past discussions for the period 21 July 2009 – 3 February 2010. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Hello, I recently did a search on the internet a few weeks back into the source of the document (cop-vio) in question that I used for the "Production" section for the Lion King. I discovered that the source that I used from "Lionking.org", was an exact copy of the IMAX Lion King Press Release (Which would make it Copyleft). IMAX's website no longer has it for download in its original Adobe format and I've checked the archives, however I was able to find a copy of it here. [1] I hope that it may help you for your work on the article in the future should you ever need it. DrNegative ( talk) 07:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, Camaron! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.
MOTD Needs Your Help!
Delivered By – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
You protected the page but you left the vandalized version. The user removes information since days as you can see on the history page, also, many users and I explained him why he shouldn't do that on discussion pages and that user has received many warnings because his behavior. This is the original version [2]. Regards. -- PuebloUnited ( talk) 17:17, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I've been looking at articles about schools in Worcestershire as part of a drive to improve them. According to the
November 2008 Ofsted inspection report:
The Bewdley School and Sixth Form Centre' (an article that you recently assessed)
...opened in September 2007 as a new school. It was formed from the amalgamation of two middle schools and a high school.
It does not however mention which schools were merged. The contents of this 2008 report has little in common with the school's existing article. Moreover, the article on
Heathfield School, Wolverley states that it was merged with the Bewdley School and Sixth Form centre, but it is unreferenced, and apart from its own website which promotes it as a private school, there are no other references to it other than online directories, and it is not listed by Ofsted. The article's creator apparently has a history of vandalism. There is clearly something wrong here but I hesitate before making a PROD on the heathfield article just yet. What do you think is the necessary action? --
Kudpung (
talk) 12:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
A meetup is taking place in Manchester if you are interested. Majorly talk 18:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, I notice you did the original article assessment for the article on Guildford School of Acting. I've had a look at it and re-written it to try and make it read more as an encyclopedia article, so I was wondering if you could take another look and give me your thoughts. I've made it my mission to bring some uniformity to articles about UK performing arts schools and this one was high on my agenda. I still need to seek out sources so that I can delete the last tag, but I hope I've made a significant improvement. Crazy-dancing ( talk) 18:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
As a major contributor to The Lion King, I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article currently fails the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:The Lion King/GA1. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 03:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)H
I'm sorry but I really must ask why you declined it. The article is vandalized almost every day and numerous times per day. The edits may appear to be good faith but many are not, especially the intensity changing ones. These include minor changes that most people wouldn't notice as they don't check the references. All the correct information on intensities is on the talk page of the season and the sub archives for each month. The same thing had been happening to the 2009 Pacific hurricane season and resulted in a one month-semi protection so I urge you to put a semi-protect on the Pacific typhoon season too. Regards, Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 17:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
I thought I would have more time to finish up the history section at Oak Park and River Forest High School ... you are just too efficient for my slow pace. I am glad the articles are moving along, and am glad to see there are some potential GA candidates ... I had not anticipated that, especially for Proviso East High School ... the school has seen better days, but has a very interesting history. Thanks for your work. LonelyBeacon ( talk) 14:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Look again, the user Italodal seems never understand. No matter what or who talks with him/her. -- TownDown How's going? 16:04, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
..for dealing with 96.57.187.186 + 71.172.97.38. Much appreciated. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
First, thanks for the barnstar and props. It was my first, and I always appreciate kind words, especially from editors who have been around and know the lay of the land.
Second, I would like an opinion: the Oak Park and River Forest High School article is getting really big (over 80k now), and growing (I am still writing the history, and have only reached the 1950s). The academic section will hopefully also be expanded soon.
In your opinion, is this article a candidate to have its alumni list split off as a separate page? LonelyBeacon ( talk) 20:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I have checked WP:ASSESS, and it only says that the article should have references, but not necessarily inline citations to qualify for class C. Also, I haven't accessed this article originally (because I was the author), someone else did, and when I noted your edit, I thought the original assessment was closer. Having said that - you are right, I shouldn't have made the change myself. I will appreciate if you could ask 3rd party else to provide assessment (I am not very familiar with the process of how to request it). Thanks again, Wikiolap ( talk) 05:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank's for your help! I already report the user as you said to me. I also read what you wrote on talk page and I agree with you. I already wrote several times on that discussion page, including with sources, explaining why that list shouldn't be built. But the TownDown/Prodyginet doesn't accepted it. In fact I'm tired to give reasons and arguments and always see that all I wrote is in vain.-- Italodal ( talk) 07:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 23:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello my friend, sorry for ask, but do you know the procedures for deleting an article? Recently I found 3 articles that could be merged into one. I improved the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Table_Tennis_Championships. But the two others articles contain the same information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Table_Tennis_Champions and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Team_Table_Tennis_Championships. Could you help me delete these two articles and improve the original article? English isn't my native language so the article may contain some errors. Thanks.-- Italodal ( talk) 12:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Yep I have been confusing start and stub class more than anything. I'll try not to do that in future. Its not that I like littering Wikipedia with stubs. I once created an article for every school in List of schools in Essex and they do become decent articles eventually! It just requires someone to make lots of substubs. Francium12 17:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Does {{ User WPEngland}} work better for you now? I moved it to using the UBX sybtax, instead of a table. → ROUX ₪ 18:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
hi, you have to be somewhat of an interesting or good character. basing that on your liking of Star Wars. I would like some help with a problem I have. could you assist me? Completelyoverit ( talk) 08:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, as with the discussion at Talk:Polokwane, could you please tell me if the proposed solution is possible? Thanks, Chris DHDR 15:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for following up on this ! Wikiolap ( talk) 15:41, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
There is an important link that should be on the page as you seem to quote yet not site it. It was fixed before yet you changed it. Add the link due to the fact that you site things from the website yet don't cite it.
http://www001.upp.so-net.ne.jp/bujinkan/
Add this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjhartu ( talk • contribs) 06:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've never done this before so my apologies if I'm getting it wrong. A page I started and did some, but not all work on, Kara Kennedy Allen, was speedy deleted. I can understand if someone wants to nominate the page for deletion, but I don't see why it meets the criteria for speedy deletion in any way. Can you please undelete it or whatever the procedure is for bringing it back so it can be considered for deletion in a normal way? Again, I don't see anything on Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion that seems to fit this article. Thanks -- Crunch ( talk) 23:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Dear Camaron,
Thank you for your faith in me. I have read in detail the appropriate policy and can see the advantages in using this feature as opposed to my current method of Undo then Warn / Welcome, and therefore gratefully accept your proposition.
Kind regards,
-- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 13:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I just sent you an email. Amsaim ( talk) 19:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Dear Camaron, I am new to editing and I would appreciate your review and comment on the above article you recently reviewed The previous version was a bit too much "The Battle of Waterloo was won on the playing-fields of Eton" especially that "Only" 5 students from public schools were awarded the VC. I tried to explain that the list is biased as some winners were likely illiterate and that the awards are biased towards the NCO and officer class. I want to make sure that I have not gone too much the other way and whether the analysis is original research and therefore not allowed
rgds wakelamp
Hi Camaron, Just a quick note to check something with you. I've had 2 users via another talk page Talk:List_of_channels_on_Virgin_TV basically throwing instructions on how my user page and talk page should be operated. Are there set instructions on how a user should set out their own profile and talk pages? I was under the impression that a user could layout their profile to their own personal taste. They also quote to saying that I should not archive items on my personal talk page. Is this true? Should archiving only be done on official articles and not on personal talk pages? I value your opinion on this. Regards (Gareth aka ( Pr3st0n ( talk) 11:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC)))
the problem is not that they can not delete stuff but this user is delete stuff they claiming they never had a message and refusing to engage in a talk so that we resolve a dispute, there attuide is it there way or no way-- Andrewcrawford ( talk - contrib) 19:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Peace | ||
I'm awarding you with this Barnstar of Peace, in recognition of your help in trying to resolve an on-going dispute, to bring together peace within the Wikipedia Community Pr3st0n ( talk) 08:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
Camaron,
Sorry to be a pain in the ass, I was wondering if you'd be able to do me a favour and check on an article for which I've done a major clean up operation on. The article itself is on the village of Lostock Hall in which I have lived there for all of my life. The article didn't have much content to it originally, and I took it upon myself to frantically search the internet so that I could add sourced references to all of the historical facts which I've added to the article. Also I've uploaded some photos of the Village (some of which are historical too), permission for 3 of them have been granted. I know that you won't know much about the area, however, I want to double check with a more experienced member of wikipedia, that I've kept the article looking professional to a degree, and not breeched any violations set out by Wikipedia. Much appreciated in advance... Gareth aka Pr3st0n ( talk) 14:56, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I confirm for obtaining a cloak that the person in control of the username 'Camaron' on IRC is myself. Camaron · Christopher · talk 20:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Since you were the blocking admin previously, I thought you should know the anon 208.101.226.27 continues to blank his/her talk page of the WhoIs template. I am not getting in the middle of this one after getting blocked for reverting a WhoIs template war previously (on a different page), so I will leave it up to you. Just a heads up. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your assessment. It has shed some light on the missing elements of the article. If you peruse the wiki entry now you will see that some of your comments have been implemented, though it still has a ways to go. If you have any comments now about how the document is shaping up do feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Look out for another assessment request soon. Thanks again! X01 ( talk) 14:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Again, your detailed assessment has helped to guide this article to the ranks of B-class status. This is not the end of the road for I am to collect some more information and take my time and reword the document as per the Wikipedia standards and revamp the layout. Not any time soon but you will surely be seeing a review request. Many thanks! X01 ( talk) 10:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Good Afternoon,
I work at Sprinturf and am trying to add Sprinturf to wikipedia. It is not being used as a source of advertisement but as a form of research material for people who are interested in learning more about Sprinturf. It is not allowing me to add Sprinturf to wiki. Please assist. Thank you.
Terrence Heller
Dear Camaron, I ( User talk:Tanweer drmc) have greatly edited the article, Dhaka Residential Model College in the last few weeks. I want the article to be featured, so I need your peer-review, as I have learned that you have been editing WikiProject_Schools/Article_guidelines for a long time and you are a experiencd administrator. It will be very helpful to get peer-review from you. Thanks.
Cameron,
Thank you for your input on The Epstein School page...We will continue to work diligently on expansion of the areas as suggested and will add sections moving forward...a work in progress. In fact, I have begun expanding sections already and have added more 3rd party citations. Please let me know what you think. With my appreciation Clou2epstein ( talk) 02:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
REPLY: Cameron. Thank you very much for your encouragement, kind words and suggestions. The Epstein School article is a work in progress, but I continue to work diligently toward improvement. I am planning on incorporating all of the reccommendations you offered and more. It is my hope that I will deliver on my promise to represent the educational community well. I have continued to add/grow/develop sections. I hope you like the progress made today: I worked on development of Middle School academics....next on to Elementary, alumni...citation templates, images etc.
With my appreciation for your efforts and input. Clou2epstein ( talk) 01:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! I've been without a web connection for most of the last two years, and I quickly learned that editing Wikipedia from my iPhone was difficult at best. Right now I'm just perusing the Community Board, figuring out what I'm going to be doing for the next little while. -- Moralis ( talk) 21:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Camaron - I noted that a couple of months ago you laid two successive blocks on 190.10.0.121 ( talk · contribs) for edit warring on Template:Iraq War Coalition troop deployment. The IP user is now causing a nuisance at War in Afghanistan (2001-present) and Template:Korean War Infobox; I assume it's the same person making the edits given the associated subject matter of the articles/templates he's been frequenting. The reverts are now less frequent than back in July, but I believe what he's presently doing still constitutes edit warring; his reverts have been undone by myself and others and requests and then warnings have been left at his talk page, but the activity persists. Having dealt with this individual before, I wondered if you could have a look at and/or keep an eye on the situation. Cheers. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 03:42, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Dear Camaron, according to your suggestions and the automated peer review, I have made further improvement of Dhaka Residential Model College. I have nominated it for WP:Good articles. Now I would like to request you to review the article for WP:GA status. Thanks, User:Tanweer Morshed, User talk:Tanweer Morshed
Sorry, for inconvenience - I didn't see that.
Hope all is well in England!
I have been working over at List of New Trier High School alumni ... the list was long, and had virtually no references. It is better referenced now, but there is still maybe a dozen or so alumni out of about 100 that are not referenced ... I have looked high and wide, and while it looks like there is some evidence of alumniship, the sources are either blogs or some other source that doesn't seem to meet WP:RS. They have all been tagged accordingly.
Barring that ... I am thinking this list might be a candidate for a WP:FL. So here is my big question: can I move any unreferenced person on the list to the talk page with a note saying that they can be added when there is a reliable source? LonelyBeacon ( talk) 23:38, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3 | |
---|---|
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing |
Cameron,
Previously,you evaluated The Epstein School page. Since then, I have been working diligently to improve the page....added text and graphics, third party citations, removed self-sourced items etc. I am requesting re-evaluation.
With My Appreciation,
Clou2epstein ( talk) 16:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Just wanted to know, if you can delete User talk:RuleOfThe9th. Yeah, I was RuleOfThe9th up to September 2009, and I would be glad to have your help in deleting it, as I just left this account after dropping a {{retired}} template and departure notice on the talk page itself.-- Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 03:52, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Camaron
Thanks for correcting my mistake. We're trying to rationalise the huge number of questions (apparently there's supposed to be a limit of one question per user, but it's not yet being enforced and I hope it isn't, somehow). But could I make two suggestions:
Tony (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 05:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Camaron,
I am sorry to read about your elbow ... I hope that it is healing well.
I have been monitoring some edits at St. Ignatius College Preparatory School. The school logo was recently added, with the editor claiming that he was the owner of the image, and was releasing the copyright on it. He did the same thing with a picture of an alum that had to have been lifted from a website. I recently came across similar behavior by another editor at Lemont High School that had some very overt plagiarism issues. I could use some advice: how should I report images that are claimed by an editor, but are pretty obviously not theirs? LonelyBeacon ( talk) 03:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
As you participated in the recent
Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two
requests for comment that relate to the use of
SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the
SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (
talk) 08:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Camaron - thank you for helping out the Amador Valley High School article in the past. Over the past few months - I've addressed your comments as well as the comments of quite a few other editors on the article. The article is now going through Featured Article review and I was wondering if you would be interested in leaving your comments. Thank you - Deltawk ( talk) 06:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The November 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 06:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
hello Camaron - i found you listed on the
WP:Highly Active Users list, and am hoping you'd be willing to have a look at an RfC that needs formal closure by someone uninvolved, including a statement about whether the RfC showed consensus for any changes:
here's a link to the discussion at the end of it, since i think reading that first will make it easier to follow the rather dishevelled RfC itself, which is
just above it. in case it's relevant, there's also some current discussion of some of the same issues
here.
i'll keep your talk page watchlisted so that you could reply here, if that's convenient for you. thanks very much
Sssoul (
talk) 07:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Cities XL do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Camaron · Christopher · talk 12:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
→ Hello Cameron. Maybe they edited the guidelines for external links course the link I added fits in both under number 1 and number 2 suggestion regarding what should be linked. The link that I provided has unique news and interviews about Cities XL, both with the developers and the players. If I misunderstood the guidelines or its still not good enough then I guess you did the right thing deleting the external link. Since you've made me unsure about this matter, I will let it be, maybe someone else will add the site in the future. Thx. --15:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Sainty79 ( talk)
Camaron,
I am very sorry to hear about your recent robbery. While I am lucky enough to have never gone through anything like that myself, I did help break up a purse snatching some years ago (my back never fully recovered from it), and a colleague of mine was held up at gunpoint in his own garage for his laptop computer just about a year ago. I do hope that you work through this OK.
When and if you have a moment, I am coming back to an article that I tagged some time ago for a merge; History of Athletics at Stone Bridge High School. For the life of me I cannot see why this article exists .... it seems to be a clear violation of WP:NOT, acting as a history of a school's athletic department, almost all of which includes unencyclopaedic content. I tagged it a long time ago, and no one has commented. I am a bit stuck as to where to go next, as I feel sufficient time has passed. I thought I would run it past you for some advice. LonelyBeacon ( talk) 05:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
See my talk please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickens ( talk • contribs) 13:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Camaron. I'm sorry to hear about this unfortunate robbery incident. Feel free to reply when possible and you find yourself in. I think the Influence section of The Who is overstated, contains excessive POV, and needs a serious cleanup. Someone has nearly added the entire section from this page http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/thewho > Beyond: The Who > Followers into the heading of “Influence”:
Green Day,[44] The Jam,[45] Black Sabbath,[46] Aerosmith,[47], Kiss,[48] Led Zeppelin,[49] AC/DC,[50] Deep Purple,[51] Queen,[52] Van Halen,[53] Lynyrd Skynyrd,[54] Styx,[55] Iron Maiden,[56] Rush,[57] The Clash,[58], U2[59] (with Bono calling U2 the "Heirs to The Who")[60] and Pearl Jam[61]
I don’t think that’s right. This extra section on Rolling Stone was not included in the band biography. This section was just a rough inclusion, without any further explanation. Secondly, most of the AllMusic references do not work anymore. If it is valid to add bundles of bands like that, can we add following bands to:
(a) The Rolling Stones: (From http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/therollingstones)
The Heartbreakers, ZZ Top, New York Dolls, The Clash, The Sonics, The Nomads, Caesars, The Chocolate Watchband, Mott the Hoople, Bob Seger And The Last Heard, Bruce Springsteen, Shadows of Knight, Guns N' Roses, Faster Pussycat, David Johansen, The Animals, Dr. Feelgood, The Hives, Terry Reid, David Bowie, J. Geils Band, Hanoi Rocks, Cream, The Black Crowes, Jefferson Airplane, The Doors, Primal Scream, The Flamin' Groovies, Aerosmith, Led Zeppelin, Humble Pie
(b) Led Zeppelin: (From http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/ledzeppelin) UFO, Rush, Rainbow, Fastway, Whitesnake, Spinal Tap, The Answer, Enslaved, Willie Dixon, Def Leppard, The Parlor, Mob, KISS, Priestess, Heart, Cactus, Kingdom Come, Bonham, Queen, Queens of the Stone Age, Guns N' Roses, Ted Nugent, AC/DC, The Black Crowes, Aerosmith
Here, i want to make clear that the "Followers" section, on the RollingStone profile page of any artist, is a rough inclusion, and does not mean that "Band A" was actually influenced by "Band B". Following and Influencing are two different things. Secondly, if we can add the followers section word to word then it might be a problem, for example Rolling Stone lists 20-50 or so artists followed Queen, Led Zeppelin, or The Rolling Stones whatsoever. There's a difference between "Followed" and "Influenced by".
I also had another editor ( RightCowLeftCoast) involved who said that also "the content appears to be a direct copy past of a copyrighted". I'm willing to ask for your suggestions because you're an active contributor on The Who article. Thanks in advance. -- Scieberking ( talk) 02:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
hello again Camaron - very sorry to read that you were robbed. i know the feeling, and it's sure not a good one. i'm also sorry the Pete Townshend page continues to be so beleaguered by BLP issues and other disruptions, and i appreciate your keeping a watchful eye on it. could you also have a look at this uncharming addition to Sceiberking's talk page? it seems to be a violation of Wikipedia:BLP#Non-article_space ... as does a lot of the stuff that s/he (and User:Sumbuddi) put on Talk:Pete Townshend, but i feel like removals of the contentious/wrong claims (like "he pled guilty" and "he was convicted") need to be done by an admin, to avoid further uproar. thanks for whatever you deem appropriate Sssoul ( talk) 08:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words ... I try very hard to walk the line between being civil and productive, while trying to defend what is right. It is not always simple.
I am glad to see that things are better in regards to your recent incident. In case I have no reason to write beforehand, stay warm and safe over the coming holidays. LonelyBeacon ( talk) 19:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Camaron, Thank you for your help on getting the ball rolling on my project with the Amador Valley High School article. You were the one who received the article after it was placed on the assessment request list for some time. Thanks for giving some of the first feedback that the article has recieved and thank you for helping guide the article along the FAC process. Enjoy your holiday season. Deltawk ( talk) 06:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Is there a reason you are accusing me of being a sockpuppet? You need to relax. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.180.63.222 ( talk) 15:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent review of School for Creative and Performing Arts and your helpful and specific comments. I have addressed all of your comments and suggestions and expanded the article a bit following WP:WPSCH/AG#S. I'd like someone to take another look to see if I got the B-Class stuff right, and to help me get a bead on what needs to be a added for a GA assessment.
As a new editor, the requirements are a bit vague. Beyond the stylistic and citation guidelines, the expectations around content breadth, depth, and specificity are hard for the newbie to get a grip on. I am sure there is a measure on learning as you go, but any suggestions you, or others, might have would be appreciated. Are there specific sections that are weak or missing? Is there a better flow or structure I could aim for? Etc.
My goal would be a GA status for this article, but I'm not sure what to do next.
Thanks again.
Vaughanchris ( talk) 21:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote. You have previously commented at Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator. Jusdafax( talk) 00:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Since you're a member of WP:WPSCHOOLS, would you be able to work on Coosa High School and bring it up to at least C or B class? Thanks, ConCompS (Talk to me) 01:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the Barnstar award. It was a nice surprise. This is my first article and I've struggled with the learning curve, so I appreciate the encouragement. As well as your helpful comments and suggestions. I think it's getting there! Vaughanchris ( talk) 16:49, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
The Schools Barnstar | ||
For your excellent work in improving Desert Ridge Middle School. -- NerdyScienceDude :) (click here to talk to me) 19:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC) |
Cam,
I have been spending some time trying to assess articles .... I've been careful to leave a note to call it "provisional", so that people I'm not trying to push an agenda ... as some other editors have. I saw your post regarding the backlog of assessments, and while I am still editing, and not sure I can handle 2,000, I am wondering if you think I am ready to start handling assessments ... if I have doubts about an assessment, is there any method to get help other than putting it on the list to get assessed? Any thoughts, I would be appreciative. LonelyBeacon ( talk) 19:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
there's a kind of vandalism in the led zeppelin topic....
I try to put an information and somebody are deleting....
Led zeppelin Can't be considered a Heavy metal band, just because they have a more expansive sound than the heavy metal can supose, so I write this:
(in despite of they couldn't be consider as a Heavy Metal band)Plant has commented that it is unfair for people to typecast the band as heavy metal, since about a third of their music was acoustic.[43]
And it dissapeared despite it's true....
If you knew the led zeppelin sound, you will see its not Heavy metal.......
Please,
Keep my comment!!!!!
~~~~ricknupp~~~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.106.23.227 ( talk) 22:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Camaron New vandalism in Led Zeppelin page ricknupp change the stable version of the text. The sources are clear led zeppelin was called in his time and remains to this day. Please see the sources and discussion page. War issues changing stable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.67.35.253 ( talk) 05:05, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
New vandalism by ricknupp ans his socks in Led Zeppelin page. War issues changing stable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.67.35.253 ( talk) 05:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Greetings. I just wanted to tell that i think that the current protection level of the article is unnecessary, since the edit war is caused by one person with multiple sockpuppets, who ignores the cited sources and is openly opinionated. There is not much that can be discussed except for telling him/her to stop. Cheers :)-- LYKANTROP ✉ 13:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Good day! It seems that a consensus has been reached on Talk:Led Zeppelin#heavy metal first please.-- LYKANTROP ✉ 10:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
New Sources in Led Zeppelin discussion. Paulotanner ( talk) 17:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Cameron. Please check in at the Pete Townshend talk page. The discussion and your Rfc about closure on removing the paragraph on further investigations took place without some of the authors of the article. The most conservative version freezes the information in 2003 and thus advances an agenda. Thank you. Pkeets ( talk) 14:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For handling things so well and effectively on Led Zeppelin and Pete Townshend articles. Scieberking ( talk) 11:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
Christopher -- hello, and thank you for the thoughtful note. I am a little confused. Are you saying that it's libelous to include information about McKenna's lack of college education, in the section on "education" ? It seemed the appropriate place for the information. And, the information is quite germane to the discussion on ... to what extent McKenna deserves to be regarded as a PhD, as he claims.
That is the point of the section on "education," right? To inform readers about McKenna's education, and specifically, to look at the validity of his PhD claims?
I'm not sure if I am responding to you in the right way ... my email is [E-mail removed to avoid spam bots. Camaron · Christopher · talk 22:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)] if that is better. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.231.158 ( talk) 21:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
I have sent you an e-mail. -- Tenmei ( talk) 21:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I like to thank you, to keep the best information in the led Zeppelin Page, that way there'se nothing that links The led zeppelin name with anyone improper label. Please, sorry this warring, and I'm not a reeincarnation of anyone, I'm just trying to get the best information.
Thank you again
189.106.126.250 ( talk) 13:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)ricknupp
Hi Camaron. You'd removed that peter copman thing from my talk page as per BLP special enforcement warning. Could I use this creation of mine http://mohib.org/images/kanye-wiki.jpg on my user page, which I think is offensive to none, and Wikipedians often use their favorite images on user pages. I'd really appreciate your input. Thanks -- Scieberking ( talk) 22:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
I didn't realise. I'm not really a policy-reader, so, y'know.-- Editor510 drop us a line, mate 10:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
I think it's known as "a mistake". 86.152.192.70 ( talk) 14:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Camaron, please could I request your help for a moment, there is a certain editor User:Dbachmann being very uncivil toward me and harrassing me. I'm very concerned with his behaviour toward me, as you can see on my talk page and his, and the article History of Iraq. I noticed you are an eguor admin and appeal to you in confidence. Izzedine 14:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Would you please fix this section? There doesn't seem to be a template for Belgium like it has for UK and USA. What do I do? Thank you very much. -- Scieberking ( talk) 19:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
Flag}}
with the parameter set for Belgium; that should work for most countries. You will in fact find the code for {{
USA}}
is just {{
flag|United States}}
.
Camaron · Christopher ·
talk 20:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
hello again Camaron, and thanks for keeping an eye on the beleaguered Townshend article and talk page. could you have a look at this edit, please? i feel it should be removed as an unconstructive intrusion on a genuine (but weary-making) effort to achieve consensus, but i would rather not make that call myself. in fact i feel the earlier posts speculating that Townshend had destroyed evidence (purposefully or not) and that Scotland Yard was somehow too foolish to think of that should also be deleted (i mean this post and the speculative parts of this one), but at least those posters have been making constructive efforts to reach consensus. thanks for whatever you feel is appropriate. Sssoul ( talk) 11:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
With this little thing please. I've just created this article one minute ago and added infobox but its not displaying all the elements I've provided, for instance participation, genres, date etc. Would you please have a look. Thank you very much in advance. -- Scieberking ( talk) 17:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
Infobox music festival}}
the promoter parameter does not appear to exist in the actual
template code.
Camaron · Christopher ·
talk 19:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)i was sent a message where i was accused of vandalism. what i did however was correct errors. since eurovision song contest 2010 will be held in bærum i removed oslo. bærum isnt a part of oslo. bærum lies in the county of akershus while oslo is its own county. i am from norway so i know. (the person that removed oslo from the eurovision song contest 2010 page.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.108.222 ( talk) 08:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
just check the website saying where telenor arena is located. that say bærum. since telenor arena is used to host this years eurovision song contest logic dictates that oslo is wrong. if oslo shall even be mentioned then it have to say bærum and oslo. though that would also be wrong. the truth is that eurovision song contest 2010 will be held in bærum. nrk is however a lier, so they say oslo. wikipedia should tell the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.108.222 ( talk) 10:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
the greater oslo area is another lie used as a bus company name. bærum lies in a different county than oslo. the county that bærum lies in is called akershus.(not to be confused with the fortress in oslo.) bærum itself is a city called sandvika.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.108.222 ( talk)
Hey, the user blocked last week has done all of the same edits over again. Would it be possible to administer another block? Grk1011/Stephen ( talk) 16:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
it is say bærum, oslo.(as if bærum is in oslo.) bærum isnt in oslo at all. therefore it should either say bærum without oslo or bærum and oslo.(the norwgian.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.108.222 ( talk) 23:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I wonder if I could get you to look at The Avery Coonley School. The last reviewer was unsure on the importance rating (mid vs. high). I do not disagree with their assessment. I am simply uncertain myself where it should fall given the criteria. Hoping you could lend an experienced opinion. I have requested some copy editing help and then plan to nominate the article for GA. If you have any suggestions that would help that cause, I would welcome them. Many thanks. Nasty Housecat ( talk) 07:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Camaron, just to let you know consensus appears to have been reached on the Pete Townshend page, so i've put up an edit request (hope i've done it correctly!). i'm also planning to reformat the whole talk-page discussion as one section with subsections and then archive it ... meanwhile, i'm hoping the article can stay protected until after the Superbowl, so that the consensus-approved paragraph has a chance of remaining in place for more than a few hours! 8) thanks for your help with this page Sssoul ( talk) 08:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to respond to something that you said on the Template:Unreferenced WP Tfd. You mentioned that WP:OUTCOMES is a "simple recording of facts." I wanted to clarify and let you know that this is not the case. WP:OUTCOMES is a recording of editors impressions of trends. On at least 3 occasions, WP:OUTCOMES has contradicted guidelines and had to be fixed accordingly. If it was "simply recording facts," this would not have been necessary. ɳoɍɑfʈ Talk! 16:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! -- Jayron 32 01:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
Many thanks. I don't feel like I did very much. I'm glad to have been of use, though. -- FormerIP ( talk) 16:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Really appreciated. It was a bit of a slog. And at times frustrating. But worth the effort. Now, back to solving the middle-east.... (!!!) Davidpatrick ( talk) 20:35, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Tried to use it but it's not working... Would you please have a look. Thank you very much. -- Scieberking ( talk) 11:55, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Just to inform you this user ( Paulotanner) has again started disrupting the Led Zeppelin article like here and here. However, his unconstructive edits were reverted by Fnlayson. Thank you very much. -- Scieberking ( talk) 20:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Just saw this and thought I should inform you:
The list of people who refuse to offer equal protection to BLP victims
Thank you very much. -- Scieberking ( talk) 12:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello Camaron we need you to opine on the talk page of Led Zeppelin. The sources claim that Led Zeppelin is a rock band, but not the parents of the same. The history says the parents of hard rock are Jimi Hendrix, Cream, Jeff Beck. The same sources call Led Zeppelin the fathers of heavy metal. There is a POV about it that was imposed without consensus. The first paragraph stable as we knew it was amended by a partial view. Please note Scieberking is erasing sources to impose their point of view. Your opinion would be welcome. Have a nice day! Paulotanner ( talk) 03:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Camaron.. my attention was drawn to user 98.113.216.32 on hard rock page...where he keeps editing the notable bands listed (The Beatles, The Yardbirds, The Animals) in 1960's section, by continually changing his own personal criteria for inclusion of these early forms. His last reason.."The rest didn't even make VH1's top 100".. which has got nothing to do with early examples of hard rock. Grateful if you could ensure this user stops. Thanks. JackFreeman190 ( talk 00:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, this is unfair. Very unfair. In Tallahassee, FL, there are two different Lincoln High Schools and its very unfair to mention one school and not the other. Is it possible to have two pages, one for each Lincoln High cause its very unfair to me and others that have gone and graduated from that Lincoln. If two pages cant be made then I dont see a reason that any one of them should have the glory. And both Lincoln's cannot be combined because one Lincoln was here during segregagtion and the other one came after segregation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayebook ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I was the one who changed the Lincoln High Article to the way it currently is. There ARE NOT two Lincoln High Schools. There is the current Lincoln High School (which this article represents) and the HISTORIC Lincoln, which IS NO LONGER A SCHOOL. The user Jayebook made the mistake of combining the two schools on one page. This was a mistake as both schools are completely separate entities. There should be one page for the current school and one for the historic school. If you take a look at the article as it was a year a go, you can see it is correct now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumlinehoss ( talk • contribs) 00:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I suggest that there be a "Lincoln High School (Tallahassee, FL)" Page and then a separate "Historic Lincoln High School (Tallahassee, FL)" Page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumlinehoss ( talk • contribs) 02:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
There is already a page on for the historic Lincoln. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_High_Tigers_of_Florida Just add info to that one about the historic school and keep the article "Lincoln High School (Tallahassee, FL)" About the current school. I also suggest that a link to the Historic Lincoln Article be added to the history section of the current Lincoln page. ( Drumlinehoss ( talk) 02:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC))
Why did you protect Lincoln High Tigers of Florida? It's edit history shows no disputes, only 3 edits.-- iBen talk/ contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 18:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
I think you deserve this for guiding me to the right direction and to become a good Wikipedian. Scieberking ( talk) 16:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC) |
Paulotanner's now using anonymous Brazilian IPs to disrupt the Led Zeppelin article. -- Scieberking ( talk) 12:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
there isnt a greater oslo area it is just a company name that isnt used anymore. (-- 84.208.75.65 ( talk) 18:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC))(the norwegian)
This is an
archive of past discussions for the period 21 July 2009 – 3 February 2010. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Hello, I recently did a search on the internet a few weeks back into the source of the document (cop-vio) in question that I used for the "Production" section for the Lion King. I discovered that the source that I used from "Lionking.org", was an exact copy of the IMAX Lion King Press Release (Which would make it Copyleft). IMAX's website no longer has it for download in its original Adobe format and I've checked the archives, however I was able to find a copy of it here. [1] I hope that it may help you for your work on the article in the future should you ever need it. DrNegative ( talk) 07:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, Camaron! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.
MOTD Needs Your Help!
Delivered By – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 13:05, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
You protected the page but you left the vandalized version. The user removes information since days as you can see on the history page, also, many users and I explained him why he shouldn't do that on discussion pages and that user has received many warnings because his behavior. This is the original version [2]. Regards. -- PuebloUnited ( talk) 17:17, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I've been looking at articles about schools in Worcestershire as part of a drive to improve them. According to the
November 2008 Ofsted inspection report:
The Bewdley School and Sixth Form Centre' (an article that you recently assessed)
...opened in September 2007 as a new school. It was formed from the amalgamation of two middle schools and a high school.
It does not however mention which schools were merged. The contents of this 2008 report has little in common with the school's existing article. Moreover, the article on
Heathfield School, Wolverley states that it was merged with the Bewdley School and Sixth Form centre, but it is unreferenced, and apart from its own website which promotes it as a private school, there are no other references to it other than online directories, and it is not listed by Ofsted. The article's creator apparently has a history of vandalism. There is clearly something wrong here but I hesitate before making a PROD on the heathfield article just yet. What do you think is the necessary action? --
Kudpung (
talk) 12:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
A meetup is taking place in Manchester if you are interested. Majorly talk 18:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, I notice you did the original article assessment for the article on Guildford School of Acting. I've had a look at it and re-written it to try and make it read more as an encyclopedia article, so I was wondering if you could take another look and give me your thoughts. I've made it my mission to bring some uniformity to articles about UK performing arts schools and this one was high on my agenda. I still need to seek out sources so that I can delete the last tag, but I hope I've made a significant improvement. Crazy-dancing ( talk) 18:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
As a major contributor to The Lion King, I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article currently fails the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:The Lion King/GA1. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 03:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)H
I'm sorry but I really must ask why you declined it. The article is vandalized almost every day and numerous times per day. The edits may appear to be good faith but many are not, especially the intensity changing ones. These include minor changes that most people wouldn't notice as they don't check the references. All the correct information on intensities is on the talk page of the season and the sub archives for each month. The same thing had been happening to the 2009 Pacific hurricane season and resulted in a one month-semi protection so I urge you to put a semi-protect on the Pacific typhoon season too. Regards, Cyclonebiskit ( talk) 17:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
I thought I would have more time to finish up the history section at Oak Park and River Forest High School ... you are just too efficient for my slow pace. I am glad the articles are moving along, and am glad to see there are some potential GA candidates ... I had not anticipated that, especially for Proviso East High School ... the school has seen better days, but has a very interesting history. Thanks for your work. LonelyBeacon ( talk) 14:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Look again, the user Italodal seems never understand. No matter what or who talks with him/her. -- TownDown How's going? 16:04, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
..for dealing with 96.57.187.186 + 71.172.97.38. Much appreciated. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
First, thanks for the barnstar and props. It was my first, and I always appreciate kind words, especially from editors who have been around and know the lay of the land.
Second, I would like an opinion: the Oak Park and River Forest High School article is getting really big (over 80k now), and growing (I am still writing the history, and have only reached the 1950s). The academic section will hopefully also be expanded soon.
In your opinion, is this article a candidate to have its alumni list split off as a separate page? LonelyBeacon ( talk) 20:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I have checked WP:ASSESS, and it only says that the article should have references, but not necessarily inline citations to qualify for class C. Also, I haven't accessed this article originally (because I was the author), someone else did, and when I noted your edit, I thought the original assessment was closer. Having said that - you are right, I shouldn't have made the change myself. I will appreciate if you could ask 3rd party else to provide assessment (I am not very familiar with the process of how to request it). Thanks again, Wikiolap ( talk) 05:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Thank's for your help! I already report the user as you said to me. I also read what you wrote on talk page and I agree with you. I already wrote several times on that discussion page, including with sources, explaining why that list shouldn't be built. But the TownDown/Prodyginet doesn't accepted it. In fact I'm tired to give reasons and arguments and always see that all I wrote is in vain.-- Italodal ( talk) 07:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 23:44, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello my friend, sorry for ask, but do you know the procedures for deleting an article? Recently I found 3 articles that could be merged into one. I improved the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Table_Tennis_Championships. But the two others articles contain the same information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_World_Table_Tennis_Champions and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Team_Table_Tennis_Championships. Could you help me delete these two articles and improve the original article? English isn't my native language so the article may contain some errors. Thanks.-- Italodal ( talk) 12:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Yep I have been confusing start and stub class more than anything. I'll try not to do that in future. Its not that I like littering Wikipedia with stubs. I once created an article for every school in List of schools in Essex and they do become decent articles eventually! It just requires someone to make lots of substubs. Francium12 17:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Does {{ User WPEngland}} work better for you now? I moved it to using the UBX sybtax, instead of a table. → ROUX ₪ 18:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
hi, you have to be somewhat of an interesting or good character. basing that on your liking of Star Wars. I would like some help with a problem I have. could you assist me? Completelyoverit ( talk) 08:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, as with the discussion at Talk:Polokwane, could you please tell me if the proposed solution is possible? Thanks, Chris DHDR 15:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for following up on this ! Wikiolap ( talk) 15:41, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
There is an important link that should be on the page as you seem to quote yet not site it. It was fixed before yet you changed it. Add the link due to the fact that you site things from the website yet don't cite it.
http://www001.upp.so-net.ne.jp/bujinkan/
Add this site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjhartu ( talk • contribs) 06:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I've never done this before so my apologies if I'm getting it wrong. A page I started and did some, but not all work on, Kara Kennedy Allen, was speedy deleted. I can understand if someone wants to nominate the page for deletion, but I don't see why it meets the criteria for speedy deletion in any way. Can you please undelete it or whatever the procedure is for bringing it back so it can be considered for deletion in a normal way? Again, I don't see anything on Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion that seems to fit this article. Thanks -- Crunch ( talk) 23:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Dear Camaron,
Thank you for your faith in me. I have read in detail the appropriate policy and can see the advantages in using this feature as opposed to my current method of Undo then Warn / Welcome, and therefore gratefully accept your proposition.
Kind regards,
-- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) ( talk) 13:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. I just sent you an email. Amsaim ( talk) 19:31, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Dear Camaron, I am new to editing and I would appreciate your review and comment on the above article you recently reviewed The previous version was a bit too much "The Battle of Waterloo was won on the playing-fields of Eton" especially that "Only" 5 students from public schools were awarded the VC. I tried to explain that the list is biased as some winners were likely illiterate and that the awards are biased towards the NCO and officer class. I want to make sure that I have not gone too much the other way and whether the analysis is original research and therefore not allowed
rgds wakelamp
Hi Camaron, Just a quick note to check something with you. I've had 2 users via another talk page Talk:List_of_channels_on_Virgin_TV basically throwing instructions on how my user page and talk page should be operated. Are there set instructions on how a user should set out their own profile and talk pages? I was under the impression that a user could layout their profile to their own personal taste. They also quote to saying that I should not archive items on my personal talk page. Is this true? Should archiving only be done on official articles and not on personal talk pages? I value your opinion on this. Regards (Gareth aka ( Pr3st0n ( talk) 11:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC)))
the problem is not that they can not delete stuff but this user is delete stuff they claiming they never had a message and refusing to engage in a talk so that we resolve a dispute, there attuide is it there way or no way-- Andrewcrawford ( talk - contrib) 19:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Peace | ||
I'm awarding you with this Barnstar of Peace, in recognition of your help in trying to resolve an on-going dispute, to bring together peace within the Wikipedia Community Pr3st0n ( talk) 08:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC) |
Camaron,
Sorry to be a pain in the ass, I was wondering if you'd be able to do me a favour and check on an article for which I've done a major clean up operation on. The article itself is on the village of Lostock Hall in which I have lived there for all of my life. The article didn't have much content to it originally, and I took it upon myself to frantically search the internet so that I could add sourced references to all of the historical facts which I've added to the article. Also I've uploaded some photos of the Village (some of which are historical too), permission for 3 of them have been granted. I know that you won't know much about the area, however, I want to double check with a more experienced member of wikipedia, that I've kept the article looking professional to a degree, and not breeched any violations set out by Wikipedia. Much appreciated in advance... Gareth aka Pr3st0n ( talk) 14:56, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I confirm for obtaining a cloak that the person in control of the username 'Camaron' on IRC is myself. Camaron · Christopher · talk 20:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Since you were the blocking admin previously, I thought you should know the anon 208.101.226.27 continues to blank his/her talk page of the WhoIs template. I am not getting in the middle of this one after getting blocked for reverting a WhoIs template war previously (on a different page), so I will leave it up to you. Just a heads up. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:25, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your assessment. It has shed some light on the missing elements of the article. If you peruse the wiki entry now you will see that some of your comments have been implemented, though it still has a ways to go. If you have any comments now about how the document is shaping up do feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Look out for another assessment request soon. Thanks again! X01 ( talk) 14:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Again, your detailed assessment has helped to guide this article to the ranks of B-class status. This is not the end of the road for I am to collect some more information and take my time and reword the document as per the Wikipedia standards and revamp the layout. Not any time soon but you will surely be seeing a review request. Many thanks! X01 ( talk) 10:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Good Afternoon,
I work at Sprinturf and am trying to add Sprinturf to wikipedia. It is not being used as a source of advertisement but as a form of research material for people who are interested in learning more about Sprinturf. It is not allowing me to add Sprinturf to wiki. Please assist. Thank you.
Terrence Heller
Dear Camaron, I ( User talk:Tanweer drmc) have greatly edited the article, Dhaka Residential Model College in the last few weeks. I want the article to be featured, so I need your peer-review, as I have learned that you have been editing WikiProject_Schools/Article_guidelines for a long time and you are a experiencd administrator. It will be very helpful to get peer-review from you. Thanks.
Cameron,
Thank you for your input on The Epstein School page...We will continue to work diligently on expansion of the areas as suggested and will add sections moving forward...a work in progress. In fact, I have begun expanding sections already and have added more 3rd party citations. Please let me know what you think. With my appreciation Clou2epstein ( talk) 02:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
REPLY: Cameron. Thank you very much for your encouragement, kind words and suggestions. The Epstein School article is a work in progress, but I continue to work diligently toward improvement. I am planning on incorporating all of the reccommendations you offered and more. It is my hope that I will deliver on my promise to represent the educational community well. I have continued to add/grow/develop sections. I hope you like the progress made today: I worked on development of Middle School academics....next on to Elementary, alumni...citation templates, images etc.
With my appreciation for your efforts and input. Clou2epstein ( talk) 01:00, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! I've been without a web connection for most of the last two years, and I quickly learned that editing Wikipedia from my iPhone was difficult at best. Right now I'm just perusing the Community Board, figuring out what I'm going to be doing for the next little while. -- Moralis ( talk) 21:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Camaron - I noted that a couple of months ago you laid two successive blocks on 190.10.0.121 ( talk · contribs) for edit warring on Template:Iraq War Coalition troop deployment. The IP user is now causing a nuisance at War in Afghanistan (2001-present) and Template:Korean War Infobox; I assume it's the same person making the edits given the associated subject matter of the articles/templates he's been frequenting. The reverts are now less frequent than back in July, but I believe what he's presently doing still constitutes edit warring; his reverts have been undone by myself and others and requests and then warnings have been left at his talk page, but the activity persists. Having dealt with this individual before, I wondered if you could have a look at and/or keep an eye on the situation. Cheers. -- Ħ MIESIANIACAL 03:42, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Dear Camaron, according to your suggestions and the automated peer review, I have made further improvement of Dhaka Residential Model College. I have nominated it for WP:Good articles. Now I would like to request you to review the article for WP:GA status. Thanks, User:Tanweer Morshed, User talk:Tanweer Morshed
Sorry, for inconvenience - I didn't see that.
Hope all is well in England!
I have been working over at List of New Trier High School alumni ... the list was long, and had virtually no references. It is better referenced now, but there is still maybe a dozen or so alumni out of about 100 that are not referenced ... I have looked high and wide, and while it looks like there is some evidence of alumniship, the sources are either blogs or some other source that doesn't seem to meet WP:RS. They have all been tagged accordingly.
Barring that ... I am thinking this list might be a candidate for a WP:FL. So here is my big question: can I move any unreferenced person on the list to the talk page with a note saying that they can be added when there is a reliable source? LonelyBeacon ( talk) 23:38, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3 | |
---|---|
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing |
Cameron,
Previously,you evaluated The Epstein School page. Since then, I have been working diligently to improve the page....added text and graphics, third party citations, removed self-sourced items etc. I am requesting re-evaluation.
With My Appreciation,
Clou2epstein ( talk) 16:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Just wanted to know, if you can delete User talk:RuleOfThe9th. Yeah, I was RuleOfThe9th up to September 2009, and I would be glad to have your help in deleting it, as I just left this account after dropping a {{retired}} template and departure notice on the talk page itself.-- Berlin Approach | Lufthansa 533 at FLT230 03:52, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Camaron
Thanks for correcting my mistake. We're trying to rationalise the huge number of questions (apparently there's supposed to be a limit of one question per user, but it's not yet being enforced and I hope it isn't, somehow). But could I make two suggestions:
Tony (talk) 11:57, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 05:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Camaron,
I am sorry to read about your elbow ... I hope that it is healing well.
I have been monitoring some edits at St. Ignatius College Preparatory School. The school logo was recently added, with the editor claiming that he was the owner of the image, and was releasing the copyright on it. He did the same thing with a picture of an alum that had to have been lifted from a website. I recently came across similar behavior by another editor at Lemont High School that had some very overt plagiarism issues. I could use some advice: how should I report images that are claimed by an editor, but are pretty obviously not theirs? LonelyBeacon ( talk) 03:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
As you participated in the recent
Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two
requests for comment that relate to the use of
SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the
SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (
talk) 08:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Camaron - thank you for helping out the Amador Valley High School article in the past. Over the past few months - I've addressed your comments as well as the comments of quite a few other editors on the article. The article is now going through Featured Article review and I was wondering if you would be interested in leaving your comments. Thank you - Deltawk ( talk) 06:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
The November 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 ( talk • contrib) 06:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
hello Camaron - i found you listed on the
WP:Highly Active Users list, and am hoping you'd be willing to have a look at an RfC that needs formal closure by someone uninvolved, including a statement about whether the RfC showed consensus for any changes:
here's a link to the discussion at the end of it, since i think reading that first will make it easier to follow the rather dishevelled RfC itself, which is
just above it. in case it's relevant, there's also some current discussion of some of the same issues
here.
i'll keep your talk page watchlisted so that you could reply here, if that's convenient for you. thanks very much
Sssoul (
talk) 07:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page Cities XL do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Camaron · Christopher · talk 12:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
→ Hello Cameron. Maybe they edited the guidelines for external links course the link I added fits in both under number 1 and number 2 suggestion regarding what should be linked. The link that I provided has unique news and interviews about Cities XL, both with the developers and the players. If I misunderstood the guidelines or its still not good enough then I guess you did the right thing deleting the external link. Since you've made me unsure about this matter, I will let it be, maybe someone else will add the site in the future. Thx. --15:19, 6 December 2009 (UTC) Sainty79 ( talk)
Camaron,
I am very sorry to hear about your recent robbery. While I am lucky enough to have never gone through anything like that myself, I did help break up a purse snatching some years ago (my back never fully recovered from it), and a colleague of mine was held up at gunpoint in his own garage for his laptop computer just about a year ago. I do hope that you work through this OK.
When and if you have a moment, I am coming back to an article that I tagged some time ago for a merge; History of Athletics at Stone Bridge High School. For the life of me I cannot see why this article exists .... it seems to be a clear violation of WP:NOT, acting as a history of a school's athletic department, almost all of which includes unencyclopaedic content. I tagged it a long time ago, and no one has commented. I am a bit stuck as to where to go next, as I feel sufficient time has passed. I thought I would run it past you for some advice. LonelyBeacon ( talk) 05:11, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
See my talk please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickens ( talk • contribs) 13:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Camaron. I'm sorry to hear about this unfortunate robbery incident. Feel free to reply when possible and you find yourself in. I think the Influence section of The Who is overstated, contains excessive POV, and needs a serious cleanup. Someone has nearly added the entire section from this page http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/thewho > Beyond: The Who > Followers into the heading of “Influence”:
Green Day,[44] The Jam,[45] Black Sabbath,[46] Aerosmith,[47], Kiss,[48] Led Zeppelin,[49] AC/DC,[50] Deep Purple,[51] Queen,[52] Van Halen,[53] Lynyrd Skynyrd,[54] Styx,[55] Iron Maiden,[56] Rush,[57] The Clash,[58], U2[59] (with Bono calling U2 the "Heirs to The Who")[60] and Pearl Jam[61]
I don’t think that’s right. This extra section on Rolling Stone was not included in the band biography. This section was just a rough inclusion, without any further explanation. Secondly, most of the AllMusic references do not work anymore. If it is valid to add bundles of bands like that, can we add following bands to:
(a) The Rolling Stones: (From http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/therollingstones)
The Heartbreakers, ZZ Top, New York Dolls, The Clash, The Sonics, The Nomads, Caesars, The Chocolate Watchband, Mott the Hoople, Bob Seger And The Last Heard, Bruce Springsteen, Shadows of Knight, Guns N' Roses, Faster Pussycat, David Johansen, The Animals, Dr. Feelgood, The Hives, Terry Reid, David Bowie, J. Geils Band, Hanoi Rocks, Cream, The Black Crowes, Jefferson Airplane, The Doors, Primal Scream, The Flamin' Groovies, Aerosmith, Led Zeppelin, Humble Pie
(b) Led Zeppelin: (From http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/ledzeppelin) UFO, Rush, Rainbow, Fastway, Whitesnake, Spinal Tap, The Answer, Enslaved, Willie Dixon, Def Leppard, The Parlor, Mob, KISS, Priestess, Heart, Cactus, Kingdom Come, Bonham, Queen, Queens of the Stone Age, Guns N' Roses, Ted Nugent, AC/DC, The Black Crowes, Aerosmith
Here, i want to make clear that the "Followers" section, on the RollingStone profile page of any artist, is a rough inclusion, and does not mean that "Band A" was actually influenced by "Band B". Following and Influencing are two different things. Secondly, if we can add the followers section word to word then it might be a problem, for example Rolling Stone lists 20-50 or so artists followed Queen, Led Zeppelin, or The Rolling Stones whatsoever. There's a difference between "Followed" and "Influenced by".
I also had another editor ( RightCowLeftCoast) involved who said that also "the content appears to be a direct copy past of a copyrighted". I'm willing to ask for your suggestions because you're an active contributor on The Who article. Thanks in advance. -- Scieberking ( talk) 02:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
hello again Camaron - very sorry to read that you were robbed. i know the feeling, and it's sure not a good one. i'm also sorry the Pete Townshend page continues to be so beleaguered by BLP issues and other disruptions, and i appreciate your keeping a watchful eye on it. could you also have a look at this uncharming addition to Sceiberking's talk page? it seems to be a violation of Wikipedia:BLP#Non-article_space ... as does a lot of the stuff that s/he (and User:Sumbuddi) put on Talk:Pete Townshend, but i feel like removals of the contentious/wrong claims (like "he pled guilty" and "he was convicted") need to be done by an admin, to avoid further uproar. thanks for whatever you deem appropriate Sssoul ( talk) 08:10, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the kind words ... I try very hard to walk the line between being civil and productive, while trying to defend what is right. It is not always simple.
I am glad to see that things are better in regards to your recent incident. In case I have no reason to write beforehand, stay warm and safe over the coming holidays. LonelyBeacon ( talk) 19:01, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Camaron, Thank you for your help on getting the ball rolling on my project with the Amador Valley High School article. You were the one who received the article after it was placed on the assessment request list for some time. Thanks for giving some of the first feedback that the article has recieved and thank you for helping guide the article along the FAC process. Enjoy your holiday season. Deltawk ( talk) 06:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Is there a reason you are accusing me of being a sockpuppet? You need to relax. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.180.63.222 ( talk) 15:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your recent review of School for Creative and Performing Arts and your helpful and specific comments. I have addressed all of your comments and suggestions and expanded the article a bit following WP:WPSCH/AG#S. I'd like someone to take another look to see if I got the B-Class stuff right, and to help me get a bead on what needs to be a added for a GA assessment.
As a new editor, the requirements are a bit vague. Beyond the stylistic and citation guidelines, the expectations around content breadth, depth, and specificity are hard for the newbie to get a grip on. I am sure there is a measure on learning as you go, but any suggestions you, or others, might have would be appreciated. Are there specific sections that are weak or missing? Is there a better flow or structure I could aim for? Etc.
My goal would be a GA status for this article, but I'm not sure what to do next.
Thanks again.
Vaughanchris ( talk) 21:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Community de-adminship/Draft RfC re: a 'Motion to close', which would dissolve Cda as a proposal. The motion includes an !vote. You have previously commented at Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator. Jusdafax( talk) 00:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Since you're a member of WP:WPSCHOOLS, would you be able to work on Coosa High School and bring it up to at least C or B class? Thanks, ConCompS (Talk to me) 01:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the Barnstar award. It was a nice surprise. This is my first article and I've struggled with the learning curve, so I appreciate the encouragement. As well as your helpful comments and suggestions. I think it's getting there! Vaughanchris ( talk) 16:49, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
The Schools Barnstar | ||
For your excellent work in improving Desert Ridge Middle School. -- NerdyScienceDude :) (click here to talk to me) 19:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC) |
Cam,
I have been spending some time trying to assess articles .... I've been careful to leave a note to call it "provisional", so that people I'm not trying to push an agenda ... as some other editors have. I saw your post regarding the backlog of assessments, and while I am still editing, and not sure I can handle 2,000, I am wondering if you think I am ready to start handling assessments ... if I have doubts about an assessment, is there any method to get help other than putting it on the list to get assessed? Any thoughts, I would be appreciative. LonelyBeacon ( talk) 19:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
there's a kind of vandalism in the led zeppelin topic....
I try to put an information and somebody are deleting....
Led zeppelin Can't be considered a Heavy metal band, just because they have a more expansive sound than the heavy metal can supose, so I write this:
(in despite of they couldn't be consider as a Heavy Metal band)Plant has commented that it is unfair for people to typecast the band as heavy metal, since about a third of their music was acoustic.[43]
And it dissapeared despite it's true....
If you knew the led zeppelin sound, you will see its not Heavy metal.......
Please,
Keep my comment!!!!!
~~~~ricknupp~~~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.106.23.227 ( talk) 22:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Camaron New vandalism in Led Zeppelin page ricknupp change the stable version of the text. The sources are clear led zeppelin was called in his time and remains to this day. Please see the sources and discussion page. War issues changing stable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.67.35.253 ( talk) 05:05, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
New vandalism by ricknupp ans his socks in Led Zeppelin page. War issues changing stable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.67.35.253 ( talk) 05:13, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Greetings. I just wanted to tell that i think that the current protection level of the article is unnecessary, since the edit war is caused by one person with multiple sockpuppets, who ignores the cited sources and is openly opinionated. There is not much that can be discussed except for telling him/her to stop. Cheers :)-- LYKANTROP ✉ 13:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Good day! It seems that a consensus has been reached on Talk:Led Zeppelin#heavy metal first please.-- LYKANTROP ✉ 10:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
New Sources in Led Zeppelin discussion. Paulotanner ( talk) 17:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Cameron. Please check in at the Pete Townshend talk page. The discussion and your Rfc about closure on removing the paragraph on further investigations took place without some of the authors of the article. The most conservative version freezes the information in 2003 and thus advances an agenda. Thank you. Pkeets ( talk) 14:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For handling things so well and effectively on Led Zeppelin and Pete Townshend articles. Scieberking ( talk) 11:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC) |
Christopher -- hello, and thank you for the thoughtful note. I am a little confused. Are you saying that it's libelous to include information about McKenna's lack of college education, in the section on "education" ? It seemed the appropriate place for the information. And, the information is quite germane to the discussion on ... to what extent McKenna deserves to be regarded as a PhD, as he claims.
That is the point of the section on "education," right? To inform readers about McKenna's education, and specifically, to look at the validity of his PhD claims?
I'm not sure if I am responding to you in the right way ... my email is [E-mail removed to avoid spam bots. Camaron · Christopher · talk 22:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)] if that is better. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.231.158 ( talk) 21:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
I have sent you an e-mail. -- Tenmei ( talk) 21:37, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I like to thank you, to keep the best information in the led Zeppelin Page, that way there'se nothing that links The led zeppelin name with anyone improper label. Please, sorry this warring, and I'm not a reeincarnation of anyone, I'm just trying to get the best information.
Thank you again
189.106.126.250 ( talk) 13:04, 29 December 2009 (UTC)ricknupp
Hi Camaron. You'd removed that peter copman thing from my talk page as per BLP special enforcement warning. Could I use this creation of mine http://mohib.org/images/kanye-wiki.jpg on my user page, which I think is offensive to none, and Wikipedians often use their favorite images on user pages. I'd really appreciate your input. Thanks -- Scieberking ( talk) 22:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
I didn't realise. I'm not really a policy-reader, so, y'know.-- Editor510 drop us a line, mate 10:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
I think it's known as "a mistake". 86.152.192.70 ( talk) 14:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Camaron, please could I request your help for a moment, there is a certain editor User:Dbachmann being very uncivil toward me and harrassing me. I'm very concerned with his behaviour toward me, as you can see on my talk page and his, and the article History of Iraq. I noticed you are an eguor admin and appeal to you in confidence. Izzedine 14:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Would you please fix this section? There doesn't seem to be a template for Belgium like it has for UK and USA. What do I do? Thank you very much. -- Scieberking ( talk) 19:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
Flag}}
with the parameter set for Belgium; that should work for most countries. You will in fact find the code for {{
USA}}
is just {{
flag|United States}}
.
Camaron · Christopher ·
talk 20:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
hello again Camaron, and thanks for keeping an eye on the beleaguered Townshend article and talk page. could you have a look at this edit, please? i feel it should be removed as an unconstructive intrusion on a genuine (but weary-making) effort to achieve consensus, but i would rather not make that call myself. in fact i feel the earlier posts speculating that Townshend had destroyed evidence (purposefully or not) and that Scotland Yard was somehow too foolish to think of that should also be deleted (i mean this post and the speculative parts of this one), but at least those posters have been making constructive efforts to reach consensus. thanks for whatever you feel is appropriate. Sssoul ( talk) 11:32, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
With this little thing please. I've just created this article one minute ago and added infobox but its not displaying all the elements I've provided, for instance participation, genres, date etc. Would you please have a look. Thank you very much in advance. -- Scieberking ( talk) 17:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
Infobox music festival}}
the promoter parameter does not appear to exist in the actual
template code.
Camaron · Christopher ·
talk 19:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)i was sent a message where i was accused of vandalism. what i did however was correct errors. since eurovision song contest 2010 will be held in bærum i removed oslo. bærum isnt a part of oslo. bærum lies in the county of akershus while oslo is its own county. i am from norway so i know. (the person that removed oslo from the eurovision song contest 2010 page.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.108.222 ( talk) 08:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
just check the website saying where telenor arena is located. that say bærum. since telenor arena is used to host this years eurovision song contest logic dictates that oslo is wrong. if oslo shall even be mentioned then it have to say bærum and oslo. though that would also be wrong. the truth is that eurovision song contest 2010 will be held in bærum. nrk is however a lier, so they say oslo. wikipedia should tell the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.108.222 ( talk) 10:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
the greater oslo area is another lie used as a bus company name. bærum lies in a different county than oslo. the county that bærum lies in is called akershus.(not to be confused with the fortress in oslo.) bærum itself is a city called sandvika.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.108.222 ( talk)
Hey, the user blocked last week has done all of the same edits over again. Would it be possible to administer another block? Grk1011/Stephen ( talk) 16:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
it is say bærum, oslo.(as if bærum is in oslo.) bærum isnt in oslo at all. therefore it should either say bærum without oslo or bærum and oslo.(the norwgian.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.108.222 ( talk) 23:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I wonder if I could get you to look at The Avery Coonley School. The last reviewer was unsure on the importance rating (mid vs. high). I do not disagree with their assessment. I am simply uncertain myself where it should fall given the criteria. Hoping you could lend an experienced opinion. I have requested some copy editing help and then plan to nominate the article for GA. If you have any suggestions that would help that cause, I would welcome them. Many thanks. Nasty Housecat ( talk) 07:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Camaron, just to let you know consensus appears to have been reached on the Pete Townshend page, so i've put up an edit request (hope i've done it correctly!). i'm also planning to reformat the whole talk-page discussion as one section with subsections and then archive it ... meanwhile, i'm hoping the article can stay protected until after the Superbowl, so that the consensus-approved paragraph has a chance of remaining in place for more than a few hours! 8) thanks for your help with this page Sssoul ( talk) 08:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to respond to something that you said on the Template:Unreferenced WP Tfd. You mentioned that WP:OUTCOMES is a "simple recording of facts." I wanted to clarify and let you know that this is not the case. WP:OUTCOMES is a recording of editors impressions of trends. On at least 3 occasions, WP:OUTCOMES has contradicted guidelines and had to be fixed accordingly. If it was "simply recording facts," this would not have been necessary. ɳoɍɑfʈ Talk! 16:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! -- Jayron 32 01:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
Many thanks. I don't feel like I did very much. I'm glad to have been of use, though. -- FormerIP ( talk) 16:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Really appreciated. It was a bit of a slog. And at times frustrating. But worth the effort. Now, back to solving the middle-east.... (!!!) Davidpatrick ( talk) 20:35, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Tried to use it but it's not working... Would you please have a look. Thank you very much. -- Scieberking ( talk) 11:55, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Just to inform you this user ( Paulotanner) has again started disrupting the Led Zeppelin article like here and here. However, his unconstructive edits were reverted by Fnlayson. Thank you very much. -- Scieberking ( talk) 20:45, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Just saw this and thought I should inform you:
The list of people who refuse to offer equal protection to BLP victims
Thank you very much. -- Scieberking ( talk) 12:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello Camaron we need you to opine on the talk page of Led Zeppelin. The sources claim that Led Zeppelin is a rock band, but not the parents of the same. The history says the parents of hard rock are Jimi Hendrix, Cream, Jeff Beck. The same sources call Led Zeppelin the fathers of heavy metal. There is a POV about it that was imposed without consensus. The first paragraph stable as we knew it was amended by a partial view. Please note Scieberking is erasing sources to impose their point of view. Your opinion would be welcome. Have a nice day! Paulotanner ( talk) 03:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Camaron.. my attention was drawn to user 98.113.216.32 on hard rock page...where he keeps editing the notable bands listed (The Beatles, The Yardbirds, The Animals) in 1960's section, by continually changing his own personal criteria for inclusion of these early forms. His last reason.."The rest didn't even make VH1's top 100".. which has got nothing to do with early examples of hard rock. Grateful if you could ensure this user stops. Thanks. JackFreeman190 ( talk 00:47, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, this is unfair. Very unfair. In Tallahassee, FL, there are two different Lincoln High Schools and its very unfair to mention one school and not the other. Is it possible to have two pages, one for each Lincoln High cause its very unfair to me and others that have gone and graduated from that Lincoln. If two pages cant be made then I dont see a reason that any one of them should have the glory. And both Lincoln's cannot be combined because one Lincoln was here during segregagtion and the other one came after segregation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayebook ( talk • contribs) 17:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I was the one who changed the Lincoln High Article to the way it currently is. There ARE NOT two Lincoln High Schools. There is the current Lincoln High School (which this article represents) and the HISTORIC Lincoln, which IS NO LONGER A SCHOOL. The user Jayebook made the mistake of combining the two schools on one page. This was a mistake as both schools are completely separate entities. There should be one page for the current school and one for the historic school. If you take a look at the article as it was a year a go, you can see it is correct now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumlinehoss ( talk • contribs) 00:59, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I suggest that there be a "Lincoln High School (Tallahassee, FL)" Page and then a separate "Historic Lincoln High School (Tallahassee, FL)" Page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drumlinehoss ( talk • contribs) 02:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
There is already a page on for the historic Lincoln. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln_High_Tigers_of_Florida Just add info to that one about the historic school and keep the article "Lincoln High School (Tallahassee, FL)" About the current school. I also suggest that a link to the Historic Lincoln Article be added to the history section of the current Lincoln page. ( Drumlinehoss ( talk) 02:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC))
Why did you protect Lincoln High Tigers of Florida? It's edit history shows no disputes, only 3 edits.-- iBen talk/ contribsIf you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 18:52, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
I think you deserve this for guiding me to the right direction and to become a good Wikipedian. Scieberking ( talk) 16:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC) |
Paulotanner's now using anonymous Brazilian IPs to disrupt the Led Zeppelin article. -- Scieberking ( talk) 12:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
there isnt a greater oslo area it is just a company name that isnt used anymore. (-- 84.208.75.65 ( talk) 18:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC))(the norwegian)