|
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{help me-helped}} on this page with {{help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
I wish to edit and add information to the Our Lady of Guadalupe page, but that information and those edits keep on being removed. Why? How may I prevent this? Am I doing something wrong? Below are the HTML of the two edits I was attempting to make.
The first edit was: (→Beliefs and miracles: Elaborated on the bomb detonation issue; reworked the structure to establish the tilma's lengthy structural integrity as a fact rather than simply "[one of the claims of Catholics]") As follows: The tilma has maintained its structural integrity over nearly 500 years, while replicas normally last only about 15 years before suffering degradation. [1] [2] Catholic sources claim other miraculous and supernatural properties for the tilma such as that it repaired itself with no external help after a 1791 ammonia spill that did considerable damage. [3]
On the morning of Nov. 14, 1921, a bomb was detonated in the Basilica of Guadalupe. Luciano Perez Carpio, an employee of the Private Secretariat of the Presidency, protected by soldiers disguised as civilians, placed the bomb at the foot of the Image of the Virgin of Guadalupe. The explosion was heard a kilometer away, but absolutely nothing happened to the Image of the Virgin of Guadalupe. Bronze candelabras and a crucifix on the altar, though, were bent by the impact. [4] [5] Currently, the bronze crucifix is on public display in the basilica. [6]
The second edit was: (→Technical analyses: Added a video reference for PC's assertions.) As follows: Unsolved Mysteries published a video illustrating some of Callahan's infrared photographs and findings. [7]
Is there anything wrong with this? Why are these two edits repeatedly deleted, and how may that be prevented?
COice6 ( talk) 04:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
20:12, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
User:History2007 will not remove the wikitags that he placed on the Our Lady of Soufanieh Wipedia article page. He claims that I am not adhering to Wikipedia policy, although
I have extensively illustrated that I indeed am. Please review the Our Lady of Soufanieh article's talk page and grant me your perspective as to whether the Wikitags he has placed are truly justified. He and I appear to be the only persons interested in editing the article and I cannot make any unilateral maneuvers.
COice6 (
talk)
17:59, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Tags were removed by another user. As was the questionable content. I just love spending time in these debates..... sigh.... History2007 ( talk) 21:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Our Lady of Soufanieh has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
99.245.37.46 (
talk)
20:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry but WP:FRINGE sources such as the Journal of Scientific Exploration can't be used to assert the reality of PK as fact. I've discussed your edits at WP:FTN, the thread is here. LuckyLouie ( talk) 13:48, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Here is the Swedish research study, taking note of Tramadol (and not Kratom), pertaining to the sole cause of 9 deaths:
http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/4/242.long — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1004:B024:BD79:486E:B88A:9E76:BE5A ( talk) 14:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
|
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{help me-helped}} on this page with {{help me}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
I wish to edit and add information to the Our Lady of Guadalupe page, but that information and those edits keep on being removed. Why? How may I prevent this? Am I doing something wrong? Below are the HTML of the two edits I was attempting to make.
The first edit was: (→Beliefs and miracles: Elaborated on the bomb detonation issue; reworked the structure to establish the tilma's lengthy structural integrity as a fact rather than simply "[one of the claims of Catholics]") As follows: The tilma has maintained its structural integrity over nearly 500 years, while replicas normally last only about 15 years before suffering degradation. [1] [2] Catholic sources claim other miraculous and supernatural properties for the tilma such as that it repaired itself with no external help after a 1791 ammonia spill that did considerable damage. [3]
On the morning of Nov. 14, 1921, a bomb was detonated in the Basilica of Guadalupe. Luciano Perez Carpio, an employee of the Private Secretariat of the Presidency, protected by soldiers disguised as civilians, placed the bomb at the foot of the Image of the Virgin of Guadalupe. The explosion was heard a kilometer away, but absolutely nothing happened to the Image of the Virgin of Guadalupe. Bronze candelabras and a crucifix on the altar, though, were bent by the impact. [4] [5] Currently, the bronze crucifix is on public display in the basilica. [6]
The second edit was: (→Technical analyses: Added a video reference for PC's assertions.) As follows: Unsolved Mysteries published a video illustrating some of Callahan's infrared photographs and findings. [7]
Is there anything wrong with this? Why are these two edits repeatedly deleted, and how may that be prevented?
COice6 ( talk) 04:10, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
20:12, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
User:History2007 will not remove the wikitags that he placed on the Our Lady of Soufanieh Wipedia article page. He claims that I am not adhering to Wikipedia policy, although
I have extensively illustrated that I indeed am. Please review the Our Lady of Soufanieh article's talk page and grant me your perspective as to whether the Wikitags he has placed are truly justified. He and I appear to be the only persons interested in editing the article and I cannot make any unilateral maneuvers.
COice6 (
talk)
17:59, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Tags were removed by another user. As was the questionable content. I just love spending time in these debates..... sigh.... History2007 ( talk) 21:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Our Lady of Soufanieh has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
99.245.37.46 (
talk)
20:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry but WP:FRINGE sources such as the Journal of Scientific Exploration can't be used to assert the reality of PK as fact. I've discussed your edits at WP:FTN, the thread is here. LuckyLouie ( talk) 13:48, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Here is the Swedish research study, taking note of Tramadol (and not Kratom), pertaining to the sole cause of 9 deaths:
http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/4/242.long — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1004:B024:BD79:486E:B88A:9E76:BE5A ( talk) 14:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)