Thank you for
your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to
List of countries by intentional homicide rate, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
Meters (
talk)
05:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
List of countries by intentional homicide rate, without
verifying it by citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is the third time you have been undone on this article.
Meters (
talk)
05:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi CALGARY ROCKS! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Crime in China. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Meters (
talk)
03:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, CALGARY ROCKS,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Compare
Special:contributions/NISSAN GTR 1088 and
Special:contributions/CALGARY ROCKS
Meters (
talk)
04:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Category:Islamist terrorism in France.
Meters (
talk)
04:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Category:Terrorism in the Netherlands, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
18:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Category:Islamist terrorism in France, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
KylieTastic (
talk)
13:36, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 15:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 15:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ... discospinster talk 15:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Crime in China. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Additionally, going right back to the article you got blocked for edit warring in is a bad idea. If you really think the material should be changed, discuss it at the talk page. —
C.Fred (
talk)
01:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
To be clear, the relevant talk page for that article is Talk:Crime in China. — C.Fred ( talk) 01:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Crime in China, you may be
blocked from editing.
This edit changes statistics and changes a valid source to an invalid one. I suggest providing the link to the source on the talk page; if it checks out, I can assist you with changing the page. (There's a separate issue with your edit to the introduction, which adds some clunky and unnecessary language. —
C.Fred (
talk)
01:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Crime in China. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked once for edit warring this addition on this article, and we have asked you to discuss it. Meters ( talk) 17:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Crime in China.
Meters (
talk)
17:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to
List of countries by intentional homicide rate, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
Meters (
talk)
05:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to
List of countries by intentional homicide rate, without
verifying it by citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This is the third time you have been undone on this article.
Meters (
talk)
05:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi CALGARY ROCKS! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Crime in China. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Meters (
talk)
03:55, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, CALGARY ROCKS,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our
policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be
blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Compare
Special:contributions/NISSAN GTR 1088 and
Special:contributions/CALGARY ROCKS
Meters (
talk)
04:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Category:Islamist terrorism in France.
Meters (
talk)
04:16, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Category:Terrorism in the Netherlands, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Excirial (
Contact me,
Contribs)
18:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of
your recent contributions, such as the one you made with
this edit to
Category:Islamist terrorism in France, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
KylieTastic (
talk)
13:36, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 15:21, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 15:30, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ... discospinster talk 15:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Crime in China. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Additionally, going right back to the article you got blocked for edit warring in is a bad idea. If you really think the material should be changed, discuss it at the talk page. —
C.Fred (
talk)
01:04, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
To be clear, the relevant talk page for that article is Talk:Crime in China. — C.Fred ( talk) 01:10, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
Crime in China, you may be
blocked from editing.
This edit changes statistics and changes a valid source to an invalid one. I suggest providing the link to the source on the talk page; if it checks out, I can assist you with changing the page. (There's a separate issue with your edit to the introduction, which adds some clunky and unnecessary language. —
C.Fred (
talk)
01:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Crime in China. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have already been blocked once for edit warring this addition on this article, and we have asked you to discuss it. Meters ( talk) 17:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Crime in China.
Meters (
talk)
17:16, 22 August 2014 (UTC)