Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
Whittemore Peterson Institute worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. Please do not continue to add material which has been removed by consensus. —
Arthur Rubin
(talk)
15:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Whittemore Peterson Institute . Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. —
Arthur Rubin
(talk)
15:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
You have violated the
three-revert rule. Any
administrator may now choose to
block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.
Jasper Deng
(talk)
20:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Byanose ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Yea sorry, forgot my password for Barney, and didn't realise the 3rr rule was for the same page, thought it was for a particular change. No probs won't happen again.Byanose (talk) 08:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you say below that you are "not trying to have anything unblocked", I assume this is not an unblock request. (However, I would have declined it anyway, for reasons I will explain below.) JamesBWatson ( talk) 23:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Can you please explain what you mean by "forgot my password for Barney"? Sandstein 09:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
I put it on piece of paper and then lost it. Byanose ( talk) 16:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
You are already blocked as Barny Toll and, it seems as One000. Creation of multiple accounts to evade a block does not enhance your unblock prospects.-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 17:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Not sure what I can say. I'm not trying to have anything unblocked, only to explain that I have forgotten my password for Barney. Believe me I am very prepared to wait until the block had passed. I won't create another account and don't intend to mess you around. I'm certain I understand the rules now and you won't get any trouble from me again. The only account I know the password for is the Byanose one. The One000 was set up ages ago and I never used it, again forgot the password, but I was still logged in on that computer under that name, which I didn't realise at the time. Thought it best when others didn't like what I was correcting to leave the name thing as I never thought it was a problem. I had forgotten I had even created a log in on the other computer and I don't remember when that was. Must have been months ago. It is obviously a big no for wikipedia. I accept that and I'm sorry. Byanose ( talk) 17:56, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
I am also, like I said, on shared computer Byanose ( talk) 18:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
CAn I add that I thought you would tell me which one I could use and when (which is obviously a problem when I only know the password on this one) and didn't intend to make it look like I was appealing a block. Hope that helps. Byanose ( talk) 18:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
User:One000 was created on April 13th this year. Some ten days ago only at the time I type this.-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 22:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
It wasn't I swear. It was months ago. Does it not register until you use it?Barney Toll 22:14, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
JamesBWatson, that's fine, but there is something up here as the account mentioned was created months ago. Barney Toll 23:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
I was stupid enough to think I could ignore the mistake and get back to editing with Byanose. Again, it is true the account was created months ago. Surely you have this data. Try it yourself. Create an account. Don't use it. Then in a week use it and see what date you have as the creation date for that account. Please try it first and see. Barney Toll 23:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC) I'm totally confused by all this, because the I never logged in on the other computer, didn't think to, so I must have created it months ago.Barney Toll 23:54, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
JamesBWatson, the edits on this page are where I am trying to be truthful. I'm am trying to get across what has happened. I have always had a bad habit of going back and reediting comments because I leave something out. You can see that from the talk pages and on here when I post right after I have posted. I am on shared computers. You should be able to see that.Barney Toll 00:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
I'm trying to think how to communicate this to you so that you don't think I'm trying to deceive you or drive you crazy or anything. Again, I apologise for not admitting it before, I was stupid. But why would I create two accounts on the same computer within the space of a minute, when I also have access to another machine? That's what you are saying you can see isn't it? It doesn't make sense.Barney Toll 00:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
Whittemore Peterson Institute worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. Please do not continue to add material which has been removed by consensus. —
Arthur Rubin
(talk)
15:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Whittemore Peterson Institute . Users are expected to
collaborate with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. —
Arthur Rubin
(talk)
15:25, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
You have violated the
three-revert rule. Any
administrator may now choose to
block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.
Jasper Deng
(talk)
20:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Byanose ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Yea sorry, forgot my password for Barney, and didn't realise the 3rr rule was for the same page, thought it was for a particular change. No probs won't happen again.Byanose (talk) 08:19, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you say below that you are "not trying to have anything unblocked", I assume this is not an unblock request. (However, I would have declined it anyway, for reasons I will explain below.) JamesBWatson ( talk) 23:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Can you please explain what you mean by "forgot my password for Barney"? Sandstein 09:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
I put it on piece of paper and then lost it. Byanose ( talk) 16:58, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
You are already blocked as Barny Toll and, it seems as One000. Creation of multiple accounts to evade a block does not enhance your unblock prospects.-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 17:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Not sure what I can say. I'm not trying to have anything unblocked, only to explain that I have forgotten my password for Barney. Believe me I am very prepared to wait until the block had passed. I won't create another account and don't intend to mess you around. I'm certain I understand the rules now and you won't get any trouble from me again. The only account I know the password for is the Byanose one. The One000 was set up ages ago and I never used it, again forgot the password, but I was still logged in on that computer under that name, which I didn't realise at the time. Thought it best when others didn't like what I was correcting to leave the name thing as I never thought it was a problem. I had forgotten I had even created a log in on the other computer and I don't remember when that was. Must have been months ago. It is obviously a big no for wikipedia. I accept that and I'm sorry. Byanose ( talk) 17:56, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
I am also, like I said, on shared computer Byanose ( talk) 18:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
CAn I add that I thought you would tell me which one I could use and when (which is obviously a problem when I only know the password on this one) and didn't intend to make it look like I was appealing a block. Hope that helps. Byanose ( talk) 18:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
User:One000 was created on April 13th this year. Some ten days ago only at the time I type this.-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 22:02, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
It wasn't I swear. It was months ago. Does it not register until you use it?Barney Toll 22:14, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
JamesBWatson, that's fine, but there is something up here as the account mentioned was created months ago. Barney Toll 23:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
I was stupid enough to think I could ignore the mistake and get back to editing with Byanose. Again, it is true the account was created months ago. Surely you have this data. Try it yourself. Create an account. Don't use it. Then in a week use it and see what date you have as the creation date for that account. Please try it first and see. Barney Toll 23:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC) I'm totally confused by all this, because the I never logged in on the other computer, didn't think to, so I must have created it months ago.Barney Toll 23:54, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
JamesBWatson, the edits on this page are where I am trying to be truthful. I'm am trying to get across what has happened. I have always had a bad habit of going back and reediting comments because I leave something out. You can see that from the talk pages and on here when I post right after I have posted. I am on shared computers. You should be able to see that.Barney Toll 00:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
I'm trying to think how to communicate this to you so that you don't think I'm trying to deceive you or drive you crazy or anything. Again, I apologise for not admitting it before, I was stupid. But why would I create two accounts on the same computer within the space of a minute, when I also have access to another machine? That's what you are saying you can see isn't it? It doesn't make sense.Barney Toll 00:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)