A tag has been placed on Broom cannon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
H2H (
talk)
06:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Broom cannon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broom cannon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NuclearWarfare contact me My work 06:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
H2H ( talk) 07:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid your mistaken; I believe that "Broom Cannon" is NOT encyclopedic. Therefore, I think it should be deleted. H2H ( talk) 07:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
My comments above was not rude. I'm sorry if you are offended but I thought you are trying to fool me or something, but hey; I'm Sorry. H2H ( talk) 08:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Broom cannon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
H2H (
talk)
06:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Broom cannon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broom cannon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NuclearWarfare contact me My work 06:38, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
H2H ( talk) 07:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid your mistaken; I believe that "Broom Cannon" is NOT encyclopedic. Therefore, I think it should be deleted. H2H ( talk) 07:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
My comments above was not rude. I'm sorry if you are offended but I thought you are trying to fool me or something, but hey; I'm Sorry. H2H ( talk) 08:00, 17 August 2008 (UTC)