Hi, the recent edit you made to Shity University of Hong Kong has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 22:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from
American Academy of Financial Management. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. Removal of these templates is also not considered a minor edit, so please do not mark as such.
RJC
Talk
Contribs
06:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Brett K — Thank you for writing. One of the pages you mention has maintenance tags on it, so the similarity of the AAFM page to it does not mean that it shouldn't have a maintenance tag. The other page may well deserve these tags: I note immediately that it doesn't cite it sources. The AAFM page doesn't follow those other pages in terms of content, however.
None of this addresses the problem of verifiability, however. All of the sources are primary sources (there is reference to a WSJ article, but the target link is to a non-existent page, and so also fails as a reliable sources). The talk page mentions some third-party sources, but links to them were not forthcoming; in any case, they should be incorporated into the article. This is not something I would take on myself, but if you like I can trim the sort of information and language from the article that makes it an advertisement. RJC Talk Contribs 18:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Brett, please resolve the issues at American Academy of Financial Management before continuing to replace links to that organization with links to your own. It would be helpful to resolve issues in one place before broadening the dispute. Thanks. Kuru talk 21:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:FabriceGrinda1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:FabriceGrinda1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 22:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
The article American Academy of Project Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RJC
Talk
Contribs
15:33, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Shity University of Hong Kong has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Gurch 22:37, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from
American Academy of Financial Management. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. Removal of these templates is also not considered a minor edit, so please do not mark as such.
RJC
Talk
Contribs
06:39, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Brett K — Thank you for writing. One of the pages you mention has maintenance tags on it, so the similarity of the AAFM page to it does not mean that it shouldn't have a maintenance tag. The other page may well deserve these tags: I note immediately that it doesn't cite it sources. The AAFM page doesn't follow those other pages in terms of content, however.
None of this addresses the problem of verifiability, however. All of the sources are primary sources (there is reference to a WSJ article, but the target link is to a non-existent page, and so also fails as a reliable sources). The talk page mentions some third-party sources, but links to them were not forthcoming; in any case, they should be incorporated into the article. This is not something I would take on myself, but if you like I can trim the sort of information and language from the article that makes it an advertisement. RJC Talk Contribs 18:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Brett, please resolve the issues at American Academy of Financial Management before continuing to replace links to that organization with links to your own. It would be helpful to resolve issues in one place before broadening the dispute. Thanks. Kuru talk 21:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:FabriceGrinda1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:FabriceGrinda1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 22:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
The article American Academy of Project Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
RJC
Talk
Contribs
15:33, 14 November 2010 (UTC)