Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Bladder hammer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
NeilN
talk ♦
contribs 21:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I would like proof the Bladder Hammer does NOT exist, for I own one and have described it perfectly. -Bowmister
Is a picture enough? I have one with me. -Bowmister
What if I INVENTED the bladderhammer. Would that be enough proff. HUH? -Bowmister
If you keep spamming my talk page, I will report you for vandalism -Bowmister
Anyone can use your talk page to communicate with you - they do not need your permission. -- NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
With regard to your comments on
User talk:NeilN: Please see Wikipedia's
no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to
blocks for disruption. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
NeilN
talk ♦
contribs 20:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Stay cool? Stay cool! What kind of crap is this.
Wiki would like you to accept the award for creating the Stupidist TALK PAGE OF THE YEAR! Please, I ask for a speedy reply to allow us to give you an online digital picture and will will even give you a free GOOD JOB! and a pat on the back. Congrats!Then probably kick you off the site
Please stop. If you continue to
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
User talk:Bowmister, you will be
blocked for
vandalism.
NeilN
talk ♦
contribs 14:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
RuneScape. Your edits appeared to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
۩ Dracion ۩
✎ ✉ 20:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Your edits were unconstructive. You might want to read WP:CTW before you do any more editing. Also, you can sign your edits using ~~~~. ۩ Dracion ۩ ✎ ✉ 06:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC) I do believe, practically a year later, that I have returned with proof that I'm right and you're wrong. According to your own link, Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a controversial personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism; reinserting it despite multiple warnings is. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful attention may need to be given to whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well-intended, or outright vandalism.-Bowmister Yes, but unconstructive edits are also subject to speddy deletion, as is vandalism. In other words, dont put content on that is not worthy to be on wikipedia. -- RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 18:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
I hope you become a retired user, because all you do is nothing for wikipedia and harass evey user who tells you so, so please, don't harass us anymore, please don't vandalize, and please don't get into stupid arguments with other users, because wikipedia isn't about getting into stupid arguments, it is about imprioving our source of information, which you are hindering.
Regards, RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 18:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
The simple fact that you have returned nearly a year later to hope I retired, is proof that you are rather obsessed with something that I moved away from a long time ago. Because I honestly don't care AT ALL about what you think a constructive edit is, please don't come onto my talk page another year later and attempt to criticize me.
P.S. (And change your name to something other than Pokemon, your grammar suggests you're older than five years old.)
Bowmister ( talk) 21:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
See, you always get into arguments like this. In am sorry, I don't want to start this again. Just all the personal attacks, etc. anyway, it seems that you give people a reason to call... just take away the Bladderhammer, please! So I will stop here, but i must strongly advise you to heed to other user's suggestions. And if I see any monkey buisness, I will let you know.
-- RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 21:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
PS the Pokémon and the Poketto Monsuta games have very complicated words, storiess, dialogue and concepts (Or at least for a five year old), like I would seriously suggest an adult assistant or an in game assistant for five year olds (getting very carried away) so... yeah.
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Bladder hammer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
NeilN
talk ♦
contribs 21:54, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I would like proof the Bladder Hammer does NOT exist, for I own one and have described it perfectly. -Bowmister
Is a picture enough? I have one with me. -Bowmister
What if I INVENTED the bladderhammer. Would that be enough proff. HUH? -Bowmister
If you keep spamming my talk page, I will report you for vandalism -Bowmister
Anyone can use your talk page to communicate with you - they do not need your permission. -- NeilN talk ♦ contribs 20:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
With regard to your comments on
User talk:NeilN: Please see Wikipedia's
no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to
blocks for disruption. Please
stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.
NeilN
talk ♦
contribs 20:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Stay cool? Stay cool! What kind of crap is this.
Wiki would like you to accept the award for creating the Stupidist TALK PAGE OF THE YEAR! Please, I ask for a speedy reply to allow us to give you an online digital picture and will will even give you a free GOOD JOB! and a pat on the back. Congrats!Then probably kick you off the site
Please stop. If you continue to
delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at
User talk:Bowmister, you will be
blocked for
vandalism.
NeilN
talk ♦
contribs 14:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to
RuneScape. Your edits appeared to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
۩ Dracion ۩
✎ ✉ 20:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Your edits were unconstructive. You might want to read WP:CTW before you do any more editing. Also, you can sign your edits using ~~~~. ۩ Dracion ۩ ✎ ✉ 06:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC) I do believe, practically a year later, that I have returned with proof that I'm right and you're wrong. According to your own link, Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. For example, adding a controversial personal opinion to an article once is not vandalism; reinserting it despite multiple warnings is. Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful attention may need to be given to whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well-intended, or outright vandalism.-Bowmister Yes, but unconstructive edits are also subject to speddy deletion, as is vandalism. In other words, dont put content on that is not worthy to be on wikipedia. -- RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 18:37, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
I hope you become a retired user, because all you do is nothing for wikipedia and harass evey user who tells you so, so please, don't harass us anymore, please don't vandalize, and please don't get into stupid arguments with other users, because wikipedia isn't about getting into stupid arguments, it is about imprioving our source of information, which you are hindering.
Regards, RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 18:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
The simple fact that you have returned nearly a year later to hope I retired, is proof that you are rather obsessed with something that I moved away from a long time ago. Because I honestly don't care AT ALL about what you think a constructive edit is, please don't come onto my talk page another year later and attempt to criticize me.
P.S. (And change your name to something other than Pokemon, your grammar suggests you're older than five years old.)
Bowmister ( talk) 21:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
See, you always get into arguments like this. In am sorry, I don't want to start this again. Just all the personal attacks, etc. anyway, it seems that you give people a reason to call... just take away the Bladderhammer, please! So I will stop here, but i must strongly advise you to heed to other user's suggestions. And if I see any monkey buisness, I will let you know.
-- RayqayzaDialgaWeird2210 21:27, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
PS the Pokémon and the Poketto Monsuta games have very complicated words, storiess, dialogue and concepts (Or at least for a five year old), like I would seriously suggest an adult assistant or an in game assistant for five year olds (getting very carried away) so... yeah.