I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}}
on
your userpage.
Please remember to:
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to your talk page, and a
timestamp.Sincerely,
S0091 (
talk)
21:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Sustainable Fashion, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Hi, I went ahead and removed the paragraph
Thus, concerns can be raised that the connotation between the terms "fast fashion" and "fast food" brings along classist issues and moralizations. Where poor populations are necessitated by social conditions to consume fast food, they also frequent the fast fashion stores for social acceptance and social mobility. Vilifying fast fashion is thus a position that can be taken by those who have the alternative, while it is not an available position to take from those in need.
as it was not a quote from an outside source, but apparently a statement of opinion or a conclusion you independently reached, without support from reliable sources.
BrxBrx(
talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})
18:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circular fashion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some
common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at
my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can
contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can
create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}}
on
your userpage.
Please remember to:
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to your talk page, and a
timestamp.Sincerely,
S0091 (
talk)
21:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
(Leave me a message)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Sustainable Fashion, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Hi, I went ahead and removed the paragraph
Thus, concerns can be raised that the connotation between the terms "fast fashion" and "fast food" brings along classist issues and moralizations. Where poor populations are necessitated by social conditions to consume fast food, they also frequent the fast fashion stores for social acceptance and social mobility. Vilifying fast fashion is thus a position that can be taken by those who have the alternative, while it is not an available position to take from those in need.
as it was not a quote from an outside source, but apparently a statement of opinion or a conclusion you independently reached, without support from reliable sources.
BrxBrx(
talk)(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})
18:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circular fashion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.