I'm a Beach , who edit on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.45.254 ( talk) 12:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Nasnema. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Gucci Mane because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Nasnema
Chat
15:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Tha Thug Show with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
Flyer22 (
talk)
18:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
|
Hi Black Santana! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:13, 24 August 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Lupe Fiasco's Food & Liquor may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
YG (rapper). Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 15:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from changing
genres, as you did to
Rolling Papers (album), without providing a
source or establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Dan56 (
talk)
22:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to change
genres without discussion or sources, as you did at
Rolling Papers (album), you may be
blocked from editing.
Dan56 (
talk)
16:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Euro (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Providence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at
Kamaal/The Abstract, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Dan56 (
talk)
19:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
00:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Promise me that you will use the talk pages to get consensus before making more genre changes and I will unblock you now. Okay? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Gorilla Zoe. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk)
02:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Gorilla Zoe. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Binksternet ( talk) 01:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Velella. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Hood Figga— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Velella
Velella Talk
20:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Keith Murray (rapper), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Tiptoety
talk
05:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Young Thug, you may be
blocked from editing.
Thomas.W
talk
12:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Young Thug. Final warning for repeatedly changing year of birth; all sources in the article clearly state year of birth as 1991, not 1992.
Thomas.W
talk
12:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Chillin (Wale song), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
20:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to change
genres without discussion or sources, as you did at
Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik, you may be
blocked from editing.
Dan56 (
talk)
20:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at
Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik.
Dan56 (
talk)
00:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist ( talk) 23:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Black Santana. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I'm a Beach , who edit on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.45.254 ( talk) 12:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Nasnema. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Gucci Mane because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks!
Nasnema
Chat
15:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Tha Thug Show with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox.
Administrators have the ability to
block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.
Flyer22 (
talk)
18:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Hi Black Santana! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot ( talk) 16:13, 24 August 2014 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Lupe Fiasco's Food & Liquor may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 23:02, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an
edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at
YG (rapper). Although repeatedly
reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Binksternet ( talk) 15:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Please refrain from changing
genres, as you did to
Rolling Papers (album), without providing a
source or establishing a
consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own
point of view are considered
disruptive. Thank you.
Dan56 (
talk)
22:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to change
genres without discussion or sources, as you did at
Rolling Papers (album), you may be
blocked from editing.
Dan56 (
talk)
16:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Euro (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Providence. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at
Kamaal/The Abstract, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Dan56 (
talk)
19:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Anna Frodesiak (
talk)
00:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Promise me that you will use the talk pages to get consensus before making more genre changes and I will unblock you now. Okay? Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 00:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Gorilla Zoe. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk)
02:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Gorilla Zoe. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Binksternet ( talk) 01:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Velella. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —the one you made with
this edit to
Hood Figga— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Velella
Velella Talk
20:16, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Keith Murray (rapper), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Tiptoety
talk
05:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Young Thug, you may be
blocked from editing.
Thomas.W
talk
12:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Young Thug. Final warning for repeatedly changing year of birth; all sources in the article clearly state year of birth as 1991, not 1992.
Thomas.W
talk
12:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Chillin (Wale song), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. —
Indian:BIO [
ChitChat ]
20:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist ( talk) 10:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to change
genres without discussion or sources, as you did at
Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik, you may be
blocked from editing.
Dan56 (
talk)
20:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at
Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik.
Dan56 (
talk)
00:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist ( talk) 23:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Black Santana. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)