![]() |
Hi Biologytx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Biologtyx.
The pattern of editing you have done so far in Wikipedia is very typical of people who have had other accounts here, and are building up an edit count in a new account. Would you please disclose if you have used other accounts in Wikpedia in the past? thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 00:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
Please be aware that we add websites that get spammed into Wikipedia to a spam blacklist, which harms a websites overall rankings across search engines. Jytdog ( talk) 03:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
I am nominating altogen for the spam black list now. Jytdog ( talk) 01:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Biologytx. Your edits look as if you are being paid. Paid promotion is an especially egregious type of
conflict of interest (COI)
Paid articles should be submitted through the
articles for creation process. If you are receiving or expect to receive money for your edits, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post the disclosure on your user page at
User:Biologytx. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Biologytx|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
.
If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being paid, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.
Jytdog (
talk) 01:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Three times.
What is up with that?
Wikipedia is not some blog, where you can just grab some website and throw it into Wikipedia. Think scholarly.
The biotechnology industry is a great thing. It is good you want to write about biotech here. Don't use crappy sources. Jytdog ( talk) 02:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I just saw you reached enough edits to reach extended/confirmed status. Congrats!
Hey I have a favor to ask you - -and I am asking this because it looks like you are doing much better at using high quality, secondary sources. A conflicted editor created an article, and it needs careful review to pull out the marketing hype and make it express only "accepted knowledge" and not selling... and it is molecular biology stuff. Do you want to have a go at it? It is BEAMing Jytdog ( talk) 22:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Biologytx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Here is an article that I tried to tone down the in-house style, but there may be a few things I might have missed: Aldo Zelnick. Good luck! — they call me AWESOME meeos ... [ˈɔɪ̯]! 10:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Biologytx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Biologtyx.
The pattern of editing you have done so far in Wikipedia is very typical of people who have had other accounts here, and are building up an edit count in a new account. Would you please disclose if you have used other accounts in Wikpedia in the past? thanks. Jytdog ( talk) 00:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate
external links to Wikipedia.
Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See
the external links guideline and
spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the
nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.
Please be aware that we add websites that get spammed into Wikipedia to a spam blacklist, which harms a websites overall rankings across search engines. Jytdog ( talk) 03:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
I am nominating altogen for the spam black list now. Jytdog ( talk) 01:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Biologytx. Your edits look as if you are being paid. Paid promotion is an especially egregious type of
conflict of interest (COI)
Paid articles should be submitted through the
articles for creation process. If you are receiving or expect to receive money for your edits, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post the disclosure on your user page at
User:Biologytx. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Biologytx|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
.
If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being paid, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.
Jytdog (
talk) 01:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Three times.
What is up with that?
Wikipedia is not some blog, where you can just grab some website and throw it into Wikipedia. Think scholarly.
The biotechnology industry is a great thing. It is good you want to write about biotech here. Don't use crappy sources. Jytdog ( talk) 02:35, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
I just saw you reached enough edits to reach extended/confirmed status. Congrats!
Hey I have a favor to ask you - -and I am asking this because it looks like you are doing much better at using high quality, secondary sources. A conflicted editor created an article, and it needs careful review to pull out the marketing hype and make it express only "accepted knowledge" and not selling... and it is molecular biology stuff. Do you want to have a go at it? It is BEAMing Jytdog ( talk) 22:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Biologytx. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Here is an article that I tried to tone down the in-house style, but there may be a few things I might have missed: Aldo Zelnick. Good luck! — they call me AWESOME meeos ... [ˈɔɪ̯]! 10:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)