Please stop making vandalistic edits of articles such as this one removing China's ICBMs from the Intercontinental ballistic missile article.
Those missiles are well known and well sourced. If you remove them or proceed with further additions of questionable information as you have to several other pages in the last few days, I will have to assume you're vandalizing on purpose, and your account will be blocked from editing.
Nationalistic zeal is no replacement for accurate well sourced information. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 23:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I have changed the photograph that you put in the Infobox of the article on HAL Light Combat Helicopter, for it was a frontal photo which didnot show any details of the helicopter.
In almost all the photos on wikipedia, in the infoboxes of various Attack helicopters, photos from one side of the helicopter are displayed, because they present a better profile of the helicopter.
I have moved your photo to the gallery section and replaced it with the previous one from the edit at 14:33 [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.191.35.22 ( talk) 15:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Light Combat Helicopter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:12, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Arihant class submarine. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. large removals must be discussed first on article talk pages -
MBK
004
08:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Arihant class submarine, you may be
blocked from editing.
Cptnono (
talk)
22:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article
GTRE GTX-35VS Kaveri has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. The fact that you blanked out an entire section of sourced text, while summarizing your edit as "grammer", suggests that you are attempting to remove information without other editors noticing it. This kind of behavior is not tolerated on Wikipedia and will get you blocked if you do it again.
AtticusX (
talk)
13:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Agni-V. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ðℬig
XЯaɣ
09:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Agni-V, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Ðℬig
XЯaɣ
14:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Please cease your disruptive edits, like those you made to
List of countries by GDP (PPP).
Continued edits of this nature is
vandalism and will lead to you being
blocked from editing. --
Hdt83
Talk
04:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop making vandalistic edits of articles such as this one removing China's ICBMs from the Intercontinental ballistic missile article.
Those missiles are well known and well sourced. If you remove them or proceed with further additions of questionable information as you have to several other pages in the last few days, I will have to assume you're vandalizing on purpose, and your account will be blocked from editing.
Nationalistic zeal is no replacement for accurate well sourced information. Georgewilliamherbert ( talk) 23:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I have changed the photograph that you put in the Infobox of the article on HAL Light Combat Helicopter, for it was a frontal photo which didnot show any details of the helicopter.
In almost all the photos on wikipedia, in the infoboxes of various Attack helicopters, photos from one side of the helicopter are displayed, because they present a better profile of the helicopter.
I have moved your photo to the gallery section and replaced it with the previous one from the edit at 14:33 [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.191.35.22 ( talk) 15:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Light Combat Helicopter.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MilborneOne ( talk) 20:12, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Arihant class submarine. When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. large removals must be discussed first on article talk pages -
MBK
004
08:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to
Arihant class submarine, you may be
blocked from editing.
Cptnono (
talk)
22:25, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article
GTRE GTX-35VS Kaveri has an
edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. The fact that you blanked out an entire section of sourced text, while summarizing your edit as "grammer", suggests that you are attempting to remove information without other editors noticing it. This kind of behavior is not tolerated on Wikipedia and will get you blocked if you do it again.
AtticusX (
talk)
13:32, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Agni-V. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Ðℬig
XЯaɣ
09:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Agni-V, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Ðℬig
XЯaɣ
14:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Please cease your disruptive edits, like those you made to
List of countries by GDP (PPP).
Continued edits of this nature is
vandalism and will lead to you being
blocked from editing. --
Hdt83
Talk
04:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)