You have been blocked indefinately because I suspect that you are a sockpuppet of the blocked user Onofre Bouvila. While this is a new account, your interventions show that you are no newcomer to the way that Wikipedia works. The edits which you have made (I obviously include those made by 84.120.254.73 ( talk · contribs), which you yourself have claimed) can hardly be described as constructive, and follow in the line of those made by Onofre Bouvila ( talk · contribs). Please see our policy on sockpuppetry for more details, as you seem to have broken many of its provisions. Physchim62 (talk) 16:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Physchim62 (talk) 15:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
A request for arbitration has been filed concerning the articles Catalonia and Valencian Community. You may, if you wish, make a statement as to whether this request should be accepted or not, although the final decision rests with the Arbitration Committee. Physchim62 (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
I have created a page where we can all expose our controversial matters in each of the articles filled in the request for arbitration. You are invited to contribute in it in order to explain our POVs to the comittee in a clear way. -- Maurice27 13:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
As announced to you here [ 20:47, 12 July 2007 (last paragraph of my edit)] and here [ 20:47, 12 July 2007], you have been reported for breaking WP:3RR with a 4th revert and even 5th revert on articles Flag of Valencia and Valencian Community. You have been also reported for acting as a sock puppeteer of user Joanot for days.
-- Maurice27 23:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Y... 2 en la frente!... 2 times you have been unable to accuse me of 3RR... And twice: "Result: No violation". Any other trick? But please, continue to uncover yourself, continue to accuse me of falsities and please... Continue to give those unforgivable reasons to revert me... I'm having such a wonderful time collecting all the "pearls" that you are writting and all the rules you are breaking for my next report...
I loved your "Please, recheck this possible violation. There are three reversions within 24 hrs" ROFL!!! I can't stop laughing every time I see it!!! You seemed so angry about the result and you kept insisting!!!!
You even accused me of being implied in a request for arbitration!!!!!!!!! ROFL!!! And what about you? You are so deliciously naïve...
Now, to serious things... You are erroneously using symbols which you don't know:
You are making this a personal matter against me... But, I have sources, I have references, I'm not inventing arguments (
WP:V, I have 5 other users agreeing with me, I'm not a sock puppeteer, I haven't broke 3 times in a week the 3RR... etc..etc... Sincerely, Joanot, it is up to you to continue digging your hole. Meanwhile I'm keeping record of everything --
Maurice27
23:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
And another 3RR report for your collection (also reported)... That's makes 4 times you're breaking the rule in one week. Thattaboy! -- Maurice27 10:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Again, you are exposing completely unverified and/or invented arguments. Flags with different proportions can very well be hoisted aside like in the UN, NATO or EU. (see flags hoisted in the UN). You are starting to become an edit war specialised user who don't care about sources, references and opinion from other users. 3 other users apart me have expressed their opinions that, following the sources given by me, 2:3 proportions are the ones. You have already been reported for WP:3RR. I will, again, undo your edit to leave the one with sources. If reverting again, you will be reported for preventing WP:V (you are erasing sources given by me) and WP:NOR (your theory that 1:2 is more "representative"), apart that your countinuous edit warring. -- Maurice27 13:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (Talk) 00:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
The above arbitration case has closed. Maurice27 is banned for 30 days, and the parties to the underlying content disputes are encouraged to continue with the normal consensus-building process to produce high-quality articles. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 02:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
(I left you a message on your cawiki user) -- Enric Naval ( talk) 19:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
As the guidelines about talk pages is telling, you have forgotten to sign your comment altough you put there a placeholder. I've made it for you already. Ciao baby. -- Benimerin - كُنْ ذكورا إذا كُنْت كذوب - 10:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Read the
guideline...
"Own comments It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already quoted you with a diff (see above) or have otherwise responded to your statement. Therefore, use "Show preview" and think about how your amended statement may look to others before you save it.
Altering a comment after it has been replied to robs the reply of its original context. It can also be confusing. Before you change, consider taking one of the following steps:
The guideline about discussion pages clearly states: "use strike-through or a place-holder to show the comment has been altered" (read here above what a place-holder is). A place holder has been added in every place I wrote, so I'm perfectly able to erase as many comments by myself as I wish. My username is also removed as I don't wish any longer to be related to that debate of yourselfs. Re add my text once again and I swear to Jesus Christ that I will report you! -- MauritiusXXVII (Aut Doce, Aut Disce, Aut Discede!) 07:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Read the guideline guideline about removing my own comments...
It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already quoted you with a diff (see above) or have otherwise responded to your statement. Therefore, use "Show preview" and think about how your amended statement may look to others before you save it.
Altering a comment after it has been replied to robs the reply of its original context. It can also be confusing. Before you change, consider taking one of the following steps:
The guideline about discussion pages clearly states: "use strike-through or a place-holder to show the comment has been altered" (read here above what a place-holder is). A place holder has been added in every place I wrote, so I'm perfectly able to erase as many comments by myself as I wish. My username is also removed as I don't wish any longer to be related to that debate of yourselfs.
So, Benimerin:
NEXT TIME THAT YOU READD MY PAST COMMENTS TO THAT DEBATE YOU WILL BE REPORTED AS PER BREAKING THE
WP:TPG,
WP:ETIQ AND
WP:3RR. --
MauritiusXXVII
(Aut Doce, Aut Disce, Aut Discede!)
10:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I see that you want to change the caption of the flag on Senyera to say that it has a 1x2 ratio instead of a 2x3 [3], and you are propagating the changes to other two articles that mention the ratio [4] [5]. However, the image of the flag clearly has 2x3 ratio, you can measure it yourself and see that it has 2 of heigth for 3 of length (dos d'alçada per tres de llargària), so I have no idea of why you want to change the ratio.
Could you explain on Talk:Senyera why the ratio is incorrect instead of edit warring with Maurice, and provide some source or image using that ratio? You are way beyond 3RR, having made several reverts accross several articles on the same topic, so I ask to stop reverting and explain your reasons to convince other editors of the rationale for those changes. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 17:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in
Comunitat Valenciana. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. The
three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
Despite my warnings, you have continued reversions like this one
[7] where you are replacing the 2x3 flag with an image that says "(official)" on the name and that you uplodaded yourself. However, you are perfectly aware that the official valencian flag is 2:3 that the valencian government has not set official proportions for the flag, and that it has regulated that flags of local entities should preferribly use 2:3 ratios on their flags. Also, stop trying to edit war to replace a valencia-speaking table with catalan-speaking template on a zone where the official language is valencian and not catalan. --
Enric Naval (
talk)
21:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
You got a new answer here: [15] . Regards, -- Floridianed ( talk) 03:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Followup to my comment here As one example of the dangers of original research done by persons who are not experts on vexicology or history, you provided this article [16], but you failed to point at where on the article it mentions the proportions of the flags on the pictures, and where it mentions how they are relevant to anything. Also, you centered in 1:2 depictions, but the Joan Martínez's portulan has 1:1 vertical flag. You should leave all the investigation to secondary sources, who will have access to sources that you don't have access to, and training to determine how those historical sources are relevant. You shouldn't endlessly try to insist on your ideas of how those depictions are relevant. Well, actually, wikipedia explicitally forbids your sort of original research, so stop trying to pass it a reason for edits to articles, because it's not going to work. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 21:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain of page moves which could be seen as controversial without taking the matter to requested moves. Regards, Asterion talk 20:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Benimerin ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I've given reasons about every edit I've made on talk page of Talk:Valencian Community. Other users reverted this and any reason well explained on talk page weren't given, specially User:Maurice27 (read his unrespectful response: It doesn't even deserve an answer. --MauritiusXXVII (Aut Doce, Aut Disce, Aut Discede!) 20:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)). Also I would like to complete my WP:3AN report, it's incomplete, and I would like to complete this, but if I'm blocked, I can't do this.
Decline reason:
Engaging in discussion doesn't excuse edit-warring; the actions of others aren't relevant to you own unblock request. east718 // talk // email // 13:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Post Data: If you decide not to unblock me, at least... Could you mind to add the following info to the report I've made, please?:
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place --> * Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234956624] <!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed --> * About the {{tl|3O}} and {{tl|Catalan-speaking world}} templates: ** [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=230696558 21:48, 8 August 2008] Maurice27 inserts {{3O}} tag bottom of lead text. ** [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=230704971 22:37, 8 August 2008] Mountolive removes tag arguing that it should be discussed first. ** 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=230713802 23:35, 8 August 2008], by Maurice27. **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231348290 00:53, 12 August 2008], I remove {{3O}} tag. **: 2nd change: [], I've made some changes, and add {{Catalan-speaking world}}. ** 2nd revert, and last changes were lost: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231455306 14:16, 12 August 2008], by Mountolive. ** 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231467354 15:23, 12 August 2008], by me. ** 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231469097 15:32, 12 August 200], by Mountolive. ** 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231518146 19:55, 12 August 2008], by me. **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231523339 20:22, 12 August 2008], by me, adding info about a sign language. ** 6th revert and last changes were lost: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231532585 12:36, 14 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 7th revert, recovering also last changes made by me: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231892466 12:36, 14 August 2008], by me. ** 8th revert, removing {{tl|Catalan-speaking world}} and putting again {{tl|3O}}: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231907218 14:18, 14 August 2008], by Mountolive. ** 9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231961914 19:48, 14 August 2008], by me. ** 10th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231975239 21:03, 14 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** User Enric Naval made a mediation, and {{tl|Catalan-speaking world}} stays in the article: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=232006251 00:20, 15 August 2008]. * About the {{tl|Unbalanced}} tag: ** [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=232572494 22:57, 17 August 2008]: I've removed {{tl|3O}}, because the debate was stayed, and Maurice27 didn't wanted to participate more about this, see on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Catalan-speaking Countries/Official denomination in the infobox|this talk page]]. ** 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=232634014 06:26, 18 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 2nd revert, [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233086366 10:25, 20 August 2008], by user JeremyMcCracken. ** 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233092973 11:23, 20 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233284830 08:38, 21 August 2008], by user Xtv. ** 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233396268 20:15, 21 August 2008], by Maurice27. Replaces {{tl|3O}} by {{tl|Unbalanced}}. ** 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233552523 15:29, 22 August 2008], by me. ** 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233596129 19:39, 22 August 2008], by Maurice27. * About the name of "Valencian Community" to "Region of Valencia" (and still about {{tl|Unbalanced}}): ** 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234847670 20:05, 28 August 2008], by Maurice27, **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234871226 22:17, 28 August 2008] {{userlinks|Dúnadan}} removes {{tl|Unbalanced}}. ** 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234937822 06:23, 29 August 2008], by Maurice 27. **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234954293 09:04, 29 August 2008], I recover my last editings. **: 2nd change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&diff=234956624&oldid=234954293 09:28, 29 August 2008], I made several editings. ** 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234993527 14:32, 29 August 2008], by Mountolive. **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235001347 15:16, 29 August 2008], I recover my last editings. ** 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235016967 16:48, 29 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235159628 10:35, 30 August 2008], by me. ** 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235162830 11:10, 30 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235163731 11:19, 30 August 2008], by me, and reporting here. <!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> <!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so --> * Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Valencian_Community#Moving_to_Region_of_Valencia. About my editings], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Valencian_Community#Unbalanced_tag About the "Unbalanced" tag]. * I've reported also a Wikiquette alert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&diff=prev&oldid=231431061 11:19, 12 August 2008] because of lack of civility from Maurice27. One [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk%3AValencian_Community&diff=234847282&oldid=234834909 response] from him to my reasons given to [[Talk:Valencian Community]] is also unrespectful.
Thanks. -- Benimerin - كُنْ ذكورا إذا كُنْت كذوب - 12:55, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinately because I suspect that you are a sockpuppet of the blocked user Onofre Bouvila. While this is a new account, your interventions show that you are no newcomer to the way that Wikipedia works. The edits which you have made (I obviously include those made by 84.120.254.73 ( talk · contribs), which you yourself have claimed) can hardly be described as constructive, and follow in the line of those made by Onofre Bouvila ( talk · contribs). Please see our policy on sockpuppetry for more details, as you seem to have broken many of its provisions. Physchim62 (talk) 16:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Physchim62 (talk) 15:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
A request for arbitration has been filed concerning the articles Catalonia and Valencian Community. You may, if you wish, make a statement as to whether this request should be accepted or not, although the final decision rests with the Arbitration Committee. Physchim62 (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
I have created a page where we can all expose our controversial matters in each of the articles filled in the request for arbitration. You are invited to contribute in it in order to explain our POVs to the comittee in a clear way. -- Maurice27 13:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
As announced to you here [ 20:47, 12 July 2007 (last paragraph of my edit)] and here [ 20:47, 12 July 2007], you have been reported for breaking WP:3RR with a 4th revert and even 5th revert on articles Flag of Valencia and Valencian Community. You have been also reported for acting as a sock puppeteer of user Joanot for days.
-- Maurice27 23:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Y... 2 en la frente!... 2 times you have been unable to accuse me of 3RR... And twice: "Result: No violation". Any other trick? But please, continue to uncover yourself, continue to accuse me of falsities and please... Continue to give those unforgivable reasons to revert me... I'm having such a wonderful time collecting all the "pearls" that you are writting and all the rules you are breaking for my next report...
I loved your "Please, recheck this possible violation. There are three reversions within 24 hrs" ROFL!!! I can't stop laughing every time I see it!!! You seemed so angry about the result and you kept insisting!!!!
You even accused me of being implied in a request for arbitration!!!!!!!!! ROFL!!! And what about you? You are so deliciously naïve...
Now, to serious things... You are erroneously using symbols which you don't know:
You are making this a personal matter against me... But, I have sources, I have references, I'm not inventing arguments (
WP:V, I have 5 other users agreeing with me, I'm not a sock puppeteer, I haven't broke 3 times in a week the 3RR... etc..etc... Sincerely, Joanot, it is up to you to continue digging your hole. Meanwhile I'm keeping record of everything --
Maurice27
23:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
And another 3RR report for your collection (also reported)... That's makes 4 times you're breaking the rule in one week. Thattaboy! -- Maurice27 10:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Again, you are exposing completely unverified and/or invented arguments. Flags with different proportions can very well be hoisted aside like in the UN, NATO or EU. (see flags hoisted in the UN). You are starting to become an edit war specialised user who don't care about sources, references and opinion from other users. 3 other users apart me have expressed their opinions that, following the sources given by me, 2:3 proportions are the ones. You have already been reported for WP:3RR. I will, again, undo your edit to leave the one with sources. If reverting again, you will be reported for preventing WP:V (you are erasing sources given by me) and WP:NOR (your theory that 1:2 is more "representative"), apart that your countinuous edit warring. -- Maurice27 13:57, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Catalonia/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (Talk) 00:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
The above arbitration case has closed. Maurice27 is banned for 30 days, and the parties to the underlying content disputes are encouraged to continue with the normal consensus-building process to produce high-quality articles. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 02:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
(I left you a message on your cawiki user) -- Enric Naval ( talk) 19:38, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
As the guidelines about talk pages is telling, you have forgotten to sign your comment altough you put there a placeholder. I've made it for you already. Ciao baby. -- Benimerin - كُنْ ذكورا إذا كُنْت كذوب - 10:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Read the
guideline...
"Own comments It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already quoted you with a diff (see above) or have otherwise responded to your statement. Therefore, use "Show preview" and think about how your amended statement may look to others before you save it.
Altering a comment after it has been replied to robs the reply of its original context. It can also be confusing. Before you change, consider taking one of the following steps:
The guideline about discussion pages clearly states: "use strike-through or a place-holder to show the comment has been altered" (read here above what a place-holder is). A place holder has been added in every place I wrote, so I'm perfectly able to erase as many comments by myself as I wish. My username is also removed as I don't wish any longer to be related to that debate of yourselfs. Re add my text once again and I swear to Jesus Christ that I will report you! -- MauritiusXXVII (Aut Doce, Aut Disce, Aut Discede!) 07:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Read the guideline guideline about removing my own comments...
It is best to avoid changing your own comments. Other users may have already quoted you with a diff (see above) or have otherwise responded to your statement. Therefore, use "Show preview" and think about how your amended statement may look to others before you save it.
Altering a comment after it has been replied to robs the reply of its original context. It can also be confusing. Before you change, consider taking one of the following steps:
The guideline about discussion pages clearly states: "use strike-through or a place-holder to show the comment has been altered" (read here above what a place-holder is). A place holder has been added in every place I wrote, so I'm perfectly able to erase as many comments by myself as I wish. My username is also removed as I don't wish any longer to be related to that debate of yourselfs.
So, Benimerin:
NEXT TIME THAT YOU READD MY PAST COMMENTS TO THAT DEBATE YOU WILL BE REPORTED AS PER BREAKING THE
WP:TPG,
WP:ETIQ AND
WP:3RR. --
MauritiusXXVII
(Aut Doce, Aut Disce, Aut Discede!)
10:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I see that you want to change the caption of the flag on Senyera to say that it has a 1x2 ratio instead of a 2x3 [3], and you are propagating the changes to other two articles that mention the ratio [4] [5]. However, the image of the flag clearly has 2x3 ratio, you can measure it yourself and see that it has 2 of heigth for 3 of length (dos d'alçada per tres de llargària), so I have no idea of why you want to change the ratio.
Could you explain on Talk:Senyera why the ratio is incorrect instead of edit warring with Maurice, and provide some source or image using that ratio? You are way beyond 3RR, having made several reverts accross several articles on the same topic, so I ask to stop reverting and explain your reasons to convince other editors of the rationale for those changes. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 17:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits, as you are doing in
Comunitat Valenciana. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. The
three-revert rule (3RR) prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
Despite my warnings, you have continued reversions like this one
[7] where you are replacing the 2x3 flag with an image that says "(official)" on the name and that you uplodaded yourself. However, you are perfectly aware that the official valencian flag is 2:3 that the valencian government has not set official proportions for the flag, and that it has regulated that flags of local entities should preferribly use 2:3 ratios on their flags. Also, stop trying to edit war to replace a valencia-speaking table with catalan-speaking template on a zone where the official language is valencian and not catalan. --
Enric Naval (
talk)
21:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
You got a new answer here: [15] . Regards, -- Floridianed ( talk) 03:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Followup to my comment here As one example of the dangers of original research done by persons who are not experts on vexicology or history, you provided this article [16], but you failed to point at where on the article it mentions the proportions of the flags on the pictures, and where it mentions how they are relevant to anything. Also, you centered in 1:2 depictions, but the Joan Martínez's portulan has 1:1 vertical flag. You should leave all the investigation to secondary sources, who will have access to sources that you don't have access to, and training to determine how those historical sources are relevant. You shouldn't endlessly try to insist on your ideas of how those depictions are relevant. Well, actually, wikipedia explicitally forbids your sort of original research, so stop trying to pass it a reason for edits to articles, because it's not going to work. -- Enric Naval ( talk) 21:36, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain of page moves which could be seen as controversial without taking the matter to requested moves. Regards, Asterion talk 20:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Benimerin ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I've given reasons about every edit I've made on talk page of Talk:Valencian Community. Other users reverted this and any reason well explained on talk page weren't given, specially User:Maurice27 (read his unrespectful response: It doesn't even deserve an answer. --MauritiusXXVII (Aut Doce, Aut Disce, Aut Discede!) 20:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)). Also I would like to complete my WP:3AN report, it's incomplete, and I would like to complete this, but if I'm blocked, I can't do this.
Decline reason:
Engaging in discussion doesn't excuse edit-warring; the actions of others aren't relevant to you own unblock request. east718 // talk // email // 13:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Post Data: If you decide not to unblock me, at least... Could you mind to add the following info to the report I've made, please?:
<!-- In the section below, link to a version from before all the reverting took place --> * Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234956624] <!-- In the section below, link to diffs of the user's reverts. Add more lines if needed --> * About the {{tl|3O}} and {{tl|Catalan-speaking world}} templates: ** [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=230696558 21:48, 8 August 2008] Maurice27 inserts {{3O}} tag bottom of lead text. ** [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=230704971 22:37, 8 August 2008] Mountolive removes tag arguing that it should be discussed first. ** 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=230713802 23:35, 8 August 2008], by Maurice27. **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231348290 00:53, 12 August 2008], I remove {{3O}} tag. **: 2nd change: [], I've made some changes, and add {{Catalan-speaking world}}. ** 2nd revert, and last changes were lost: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231455306 14:16, 12 August 2008], by Mountolive. ** 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231467354 15:23, 12 August 2008], by me. ** 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231469097 15:32, 12 August 200], by Mountolive. ** 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231518146 19:55, 12 August 2008], by me. **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231523339 20:22, 12 August 2008], by me, adding info about a sign language. ** 6th revert and last changes were lost: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231532585 12:36, 14 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 7th revert, recovering also last changes made by me: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231892466 12:36, 14 August 2008], by me. ** 8th revert, removing {{tl|Catalan-speaking world}} and putting again {{tl|3O}}: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231907218 14:18, 14 August 2008], by Mountolive. ** 9th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231961914 19:48, 14 August 2008], by me. ** 10th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=231975239 21:03, 14 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** User Enric Naval made a mediation, and {{tl|Catalan-speaking world}} stays in the article: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=232006251 00:20, 15 August 2008]. * About the {{tl|Unbalanced}} tag: ** [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=232572494 22:57, 17 August 2008]: I've removed {{tl|3O}}, because the debate was stayed, and Maurice27 didn't wanted to participate more about this, see on [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Catalan-speaking Countries/Official denomination in the infobox|this talk page]]. ** 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=232634014 06:26, 18 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 2nd revert, [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233086366 10:25, 20 August 2008], by user JeremyMcCracken. ** 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233092973 11:23, 20 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233284830 08:38, 21 August 2008], by user Xtv. ** 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233396268 20:15, 21 August 2008], by Maurice27. Replaces {{tl|3O}} by {{tl|Unbalanced}}. ** 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233552523 15:29, 22 August 2008], by me. ** 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=233596129 19:39, 22 August 2008], by Maurice27. * About the name of "Valencian Community" to "Region of Valencia" (and still about {{tl|Unbalanced}}): ** 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234847670 20:05, 28 August 2008], by Maurice27, **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234871226 22:17, 28 August 2008] {{userlinks|Dúnadan}} removes {{tl|Unbalanced}}. ** 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234937822 06:23, 29 August 2008], by Maurice 27. **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234954293 09:04, 29 August 2008], I recover my last editings. **: 2nd change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&diff=234956624&oldid=234954293 09:28, 29 August 2008], I made several editings. ** 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=234993527 14:32, 29 August 2008], by Mountolive. **: 1st change: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235001347 15:16, 29 August 2008], I recover my last editings. ** 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235016967 16:48, 29 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 5th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235159628 10:35, 30 August 2008], by me. ** 6th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235162830 11:10, 30 August 2008], by Maurice27. ** 7th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Valencian_Community&oldid=235163731 11:19, 30 August 2008], by me, and reporting here. <!-- For more complex cases, it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert, or the actual words that are being changed. Adjust your report as necessary --> <!-- Warn the user if you have not already done so --> * Diff of 3RR warning: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Valencian_Community#Moving_to_Region_of_Valencia. About my editings], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Valencian_Community#Unbalanced_tag About the "Unbalanced" tag]. * I've reported also a Wikiquette alert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Wikiquette_alerts&diff=prev&oldid=231431061 11:19, 12 August 2008] because of lack of civility from Maurice27. One [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk%3AValencian_Community&diff=234847282&oldid=234834909 response] from him to my reasons given to [[Talk:Valencian Community]] is also unrespectful.
Thanks. -- Benimerin - كُنْ ذكورا إذا كُنْت كذوب - 12:55, 30 August 2008 (UTC)