![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. I'd like to nominate you as an admin, as I think you're qualified. Let me know if you're interested. Epbr123 12:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Howdy... You've helped me out before so I'm going to randomly solicit you for more help. :-) What should we do with the The Torch, St. John's University article. It is not "pure vandalism" (so I didn't feel I could use the CSD tag of the same name), but it is certainly been put up there for the amusement of some folks who have worked on that student paper. Thanks for your advice. — Noah 07:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
you are disgusting freak, you are a pedo im blocking your account in 24 hours so say bye to all your eiki friends — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.146.21.103 ( talk • contribs) 18:01, 17 November 2007
You voted for one of my prior proposals to institute a List of the Day Proposal. I may have already alerted you to an experiment I am conducting at WP:LOTD. Now that the experiment is running I can point out the benefits to the project of the method I am experimenting with that other alternatives don't offer. First, there is a set of orphaned articles for persons who do not have any featured lists of their own or persons that would like to take responsibility for more. Anyone can nominate such orphans. This benefits WP by getting people involved in list articles that might not have active editors to update them or defend them against vandalism. Please consider adopting one of our orphans.
There are several other advantages that will improve the project:
Again come by and consider adopting one of our orphans this month or in future months either adopt an orphan or give feedback on the candidates.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:LOTD) 17:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. The bulk of my comments have been addressed and you've worked hard on this so I'll happily support. One of my objections to the text was the slightly clunky second paragraph of the intro. Perhaps something like this might work better?
Changing this is not a condition for support, by the way, and I'll be editing my FAC comments shortly. All the best,-- ROGER DAVIES talk 20:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all your hard work. VanTucky talk 20:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Belovedfreak, thanks for your suggestion to improve Migrants' African routes with in-text citations. I simply translated the Italian page Rotte africane dei migranti, which hasn't been suggested in-text citations. I was wondering whether an English bibliography could be the right solution or if in-text citations are compulsory. Thanks for your help! -- Silviavaiga ( talk) 17:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Neither IMDb nor somebody's own website is a reliable source. Do you have any actual impartial sources to draw on? In its present form, the article is weak on credibility. -- Orange Mike | Talk 22:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
The
November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot 01:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
File:Red leaves wreath transparent bg.png The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter File:Red leaves wreath transparent bg.png | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 20:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The LGBT Barnstar | |
I award this fruity barnstar to Belovedfreak for bringing But I'm a Cheerleader to FA status, having a cool username, and giving awesome peer review. Rock on. Moni3 ( talk) 22:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC) |
Dear Belovedfreak, I would be very pleased if you could suggest me any source for English quotes and if you could take care of them on the page I've translated (Migrants' African routes). Thanks so much. -- Silviavaiga ( talk) 16:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Belovedfreak, I wondered whether you know how to remove the inactive tag from this page Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiAfrica Palabre. The activity has resumed, therefore there is no need in keeping the tag. I don't think I can remove it, not being an administrator. On the contrary, if I can, would you please tell me which is the right procedure? Thanks. -- Silviavaiga ( talk) 16:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I just decided to edit them with more factual information, linking them to other articles on here to help with their credibility which is better than just deleting them I suppose. Thanks for the tip! Jwess ( talk) 02:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
HI Beloved hope you are having a "freakin" good christmas. Yes i hadn't got around to indexing yet -the list has been split by year now and is undergoing full development like Hong Kong films of 1971 , Hong Kong films of 1972 etc. It will take some time to add all the titles, add all the details and begin articles on all the missing films and actors and indeed expand existing ones but this is now on the right track I think. I would be immensely grateful if you could check out the HKcinemagic webiste where there is a complete listing by year. I need help in adding the titles from here by year to the lists. If you click edit on one of the 80s, 90, or 2000s film year pages e.g Hong Kong films of 1990 see here you;ll see I have a large table ready for inserting the film titles into . What I need help in doing is adding the titles and director of the filmsfor example here into the tables on wikipedia. This way it sets up a good framework to get Hong Kong cinema fully covered on wikiepdia! HELPPP! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 14:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
The category is "Television programs" NOT "Television series". There is a distinct difference. Television films are television programs. MrBlondNYC ( talk) 22:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Freak. I would like to say thanks again for welcome me. But I have alots of day in wikipedia!! Most of time I use to contribute in Kiswahili wikipedia, but not here. Here only I came for picking some knowledge and take them over. I wish you happy and enjoy ur contribution in en:wiki. See yah.-- Muddyb Blast Producer ( talk) 14:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
The
December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 21:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
You said the dispute is not resolved. Exactly what is the dispute? The user doing this, gutting the article, is gone and it is hard to have a dispute with myself.
The admin locked the gutted article on the main page, so, there is no dispute for that user.
This started 10 December 2007, three users started gutting the article. One of them also gutted the 'roy gillaspie' article down to one sentence because it relates to 'arnold murray' as well. Perhaps they can lock that one sentence version of that article too?
The admins have not done the right thing so far, only mindless things, so there is no point in having a dispute tag. Tss8071 ( talk) 15:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, well, that did not last long, the same users went back and gutted the article. Cluebot caught some of it and reverted it but they went and changed it back again. Tss8071 ( talk) 02:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.
In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.
By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.
Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.
John Carter ( talk) 21:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Wee Sing in the Marvelous Musical Mansion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Wee Sing in the Marvelous Musical Mansion.
Fabrictramp (
talk) 21:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Feel free, following the parameters listed on the banner. Some of the assessment categories and pages for the individual nations and territories still have to be created, as there are a lot of them, but User:Blofeld of SPECTRE says he's working on those, and I can finish whichever aren't created by him today on my own tomorrow. Right now, I'm updating the Chad banner, which didn't have prior assessments, but I think we can all use as much help as we can get. John Carter ( talk) 20:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered sometime in January 2008 (UTC). SatyrBot ( talk) 23:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, I'm writing to inform you that I have withdrawn my request for adminship, which was currently standing at 11 supports, 22 opposes and 6 neutrals. This count could have been so much better if I had understood policy, although I believe that 17 questions is a lot to ask of a user's first RfA. I will take on all comments given at the RfA and will endeavour to meet the high expectations of the RfA voters. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN play it cool. 21:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support, my
request for adminship passed 60/0/0 on Monday!
I want to thank Mrs.EasterBunny and Royalbroil for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. To paraphrase a president ... I wish my mum and dad could see the comments made. My dad would be so proud to see the comments ... and my mum would have believed them". I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and you may be surprised to find that I have not deleted all of the pages by accident..... yet). Thanks again, Victuallers ( talk) 13:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC) |
![]() |
---|
Hi Melesse, I've often noticed you editing imsges I've uploaded. I know you do a really good job reducing image sizes etc. In fact, seeing you reduce images has reminded me to try & upload smaller images in the first place. I'm curious though, I can't always tell what you've done. For example, what have you done in this edit? Anyway, keep up the good work, -- Beloved Freak 10:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Just curious - Stiff Upper Lips has the LGBT template, but isn't in any LGBT cats. It has an LGBT storyline, but I'm not sure if it's a significant part of the movie. Your thoughts? Should it go in the Category:LGBT-related films? Or should the project tag come off? -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 02:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I hope that by performing more edits on Wikipedia in the next few months that I could possibly change your mind by my next RfA, possibly around May 2008. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Belovedfreak! I'm posting this message to you and Benjiboi. Both of you !voted "keep" for Gay Blackpool, which confuses me. My feeling is that we're "ghetto-izing" by keeping this separate article. I'm curious if y'all have any input on that and what is gained by keeping both that one and LGBT community of Brighton and Hove? -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 15:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. I'd like to nominate you as an admin, as I think you're qualified. Let me know if you're interested. Epbr123 12:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Howdy... You've helped me out before so I'm going to randomly solicit you for more help. :-) What should we do with the The Torch, St. John's University article. It is not "pure vandalism" (so I didn't feel I could use the CSD tag of the same name), but it is certainly been put up there for the amusement of some folks who have worked on that student paper. Thanks for your advice. — Noah 07:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
you are disgusting freak, you are a pedo im blocking your account in 24 hours so say bye to all your eiki friends — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.146.21.103 ( talk • contribs) 18:01, 17 November 2007
You voted for one of my prior proposals to institute a List of the Day Proposal. I may have already alerted you to an experiment I am conducting at WP:LOTD. Now that the experiment is running I can point out the benefits to the project of the method I am experimenting with that other alternatives don't offer. First, there is a set of orphaned articles for persons who do not have any featured lists of their own or persons that would like to take responsibility for more. Anyone can nominate such orphans. This benefits WP by getting people involved in list articles that might not have active editors to update them or defend them against vandalism. Please consider adopting one of our orphans.
There are several other advantages that will improve the project:
Again come by and consider adopting one of our orphans this month or in future months either adopt an orphan or give feedback on the candidates.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:LOTD) 17:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. The bulk of my comments have been addressed and you've worked hard on this so I'll happily support. One of my objections to the text was the slightly clunky second paragraph of the intro. Perhaps something like this might work better?
Changing this is not a condition for support, by the way, and I'll be editing my FAC comments shortly. All the best,-- ROGER DAVIES talk 20:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for all your hard work. VanTucky talk 20:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Dear Belovedfreak, thanks for your suggestion to improve Migrants' African routes with in-text citations. I simply translated the Italian page Rotte africane dei migranti, which hasn't been suggested in-text citations. I was wondering whether an English bibliography could be the right solution or if in-text citations are compulsory. Thanks for your help! -- Silviavaiga ( talk) 17:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Neither IMDb nor somebody's own website is a reliable source. Do you have any actual impartial sources to draw on? In its present form, the article is weak on credibility. -- Orange Mike | Talk 22:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
The
November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot 01:59, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
File:Red leaves wreath transparent bg.png The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter File:Red leaves wreath transparent bg.png | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 20:54, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
The LGBT Barnstar | |
I award this fruity barnstar to Belovedfreak for bringing But I'm a Cheerleader to FA status, having a cool username, and giving awesome peer review. Rock on. Moni3 ( talk) 22:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC) |
Dear Belovedfreak, I would be very pleased if you could suggest me any source for English quotes and if you could take care of them on the page I've translated (Migrants' African routes). Thanks so much. -- Silviavaiga ( talk) 16:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Dear Belovedfreak, I wondered whether you know how to remove the inactive tag from this page Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiAfrica Palabre. The activity has resumed, therefore there is no need in keeping the tag. I don't think I can remove it, not being an administrator. On the contrary, if I can, would you please tell me which is the right procedure? Thanks. -- Silviavaiga ( talk) 16:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, I just decided to edit them with more factual information, linking them to other articles on here to help with their credibility which is better than just deleting them I suppose. Thanks for the tip! Jwess ( talk) 02:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
HI Beloved hope you are having a "freakin" good christmas. Yes i hadn't got around to indexing yet -the list has been split by year now and is undergoing full development like Hong Kong films of 1971 , Hong Kong films of 1972 etc. It will take some time to add all the titles, add all the details and begin articles on all the missing films and actors and indeed expand existing ones but this is now on the right track I think. I would be immensely grateful if you could check out the HKcinemagic webiste where there is a complete listing by year. I need help in adding the titles from here by year to the lists. If you click edit on one of the 80s, 90, or 2000s film year pages e.g Hong Kong films of 1990 see here you;ll see I have a large table ready for inserting the film titles into . What I need help in doing is adding the titles and director of the filmsfor example here into the tables on wikipedia. This way it sets up a good framework to get Hong Kong cinema fully covered on wikiepdia! HELPPP! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 14:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
The category is "Television programs" NOT "Television series". There is a distinct difference. Television films are television programs. MrBlondNYC ( talk) 22:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Freak. I would like to say thanks again for welcome me. But I have alots of day in wikipedia!! Most of time I use to contribute in Kiswahili wikipedia, but not here. Here only I came for picking some knowledge and take them over. I wish you happy and enjoy ur contribution in en:wiki. See yah.-- Muddyb Blast Producer ( talk) 14:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
The
December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by
BrownBot (
talk) 21:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
You said the dispute is not resolved. Exactly what is the dispute? The user doing this, gutting the article, is gone and it is hard to have a dispute with myself.
The admin locked the gutted article on the main page, so, there is no dispute for that user.
This started 10 December 2007, three users started gutting the article. One of them also gutted the 'roy gillaspie' article down to one sentence because it relates to 'arnold murray' as well. Perhaps they can lock that one sentence version of that article too?
The admins have not done the right thing so far, only mindless things, so there is no point in having a dispute tag. Tss8071 ( talk) 15:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, well, that did not last long, the same users went back and gutted the article. Cluebot caught some of it and reverted it but they went and changed it back again. Tss8071 ( talk) 02:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
...for your support in my recently closed Request for Adminship. I am more than a bit stunned by the outcome, which appears to have finished at 146 supports, no opposes, and one abstention. I am particularly grateful to Keilana and Kingboyk for their recent encouragement, and most specifically to Pastordavid, for having seen fit to nominate me. I also want to make it very clear to everyone that I have no intentions of changing my name again, so the servers should be safe for a while.
In the event you ever believe that I would ever able to assist in the future, I would be honored if you were to contact me regarding the matter. I can't guarantee results, unfortunately, but I will do what I can. Thank you again.
By the way, I know the image isn't necessarily appropriate, but I am rather fond of it, and it at least reflects the degree of honor I feel at the result. And it's hard to go wrong with a Picture of the Year candidate.
Now, off to a few last tasks before starting work in earnest on the various templates I promised I'd work on.
John Carter ( talk) 21:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Wee Sing in the Marvelous Musical Mansion, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}}
to the top of
Wee Sing in the Marvelous Musical Mansion.
Fabrictramp (
talk) 21:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Feel free, following the parameters listed on the banner. Some of the assessment categories and pages for the individual nations and territories still have to be created, as there are a lot of them, but User:Blofeld of SPECTRE says he's working on those, and I can finish whichever aren't created by him today on my own tomorrow. Right now, I'm updating the Chad banner, which didn't have prior assessments, but I think we can all use as much help as we can get. John Carter ( talk) 20:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Delivered sometime in January 2008 (UTC). SatyrBot ( talk) 23:19, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey there, I'm writing to inform you that I have withdrawn my request for adminship, which was currently standing at 11 supports, 22 opposes and 6 neutrals. This count could have been so much better if I had understood policy, although I believe that 17 questions is a lot to ask of a user's first RfA. I will take on all comments given at the RfA and will endeavour to meet the high expectations of the RfA voters. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN play it cool. 21:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support, my
request for adminship passed 60/0/0 on Monday!
I want to thank Mrs.EasterBunny and Royalbroil for nominating me, those who updated the RfA tally, and everyone for their support and many kind words. To paraphrase a president ... I wish my mum and dad could see the comments made. My dad would be so proud to see the comments ... and my mum would have believed them". I will do my best to use the new tools carefully and responsibly (and you may be surprised to find that I have not deleted all of the pages by accident..... yet). Thanks again, Victuallers ( talk) 13:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC) |
![]() |
---|
Hi Melesse, I've often noticed you editing imsges I've uploaded. I know you do a really good job reducing image sizes etc. In fact, seeing you reduce images has reminded me to try & upload smaller images in the first place. I'm curious though, I can't always tell what you've done. For example, what have you done in this edit? Anyway, keep up the good work, -- Beloved Freak 10:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Just curious - Stiff Upper Lips has the LGBT template, but isn't in any LGBT cats. It has an LGBT storyline, but I'm not sure if it's a significant part of the movie. Your thoughts? Should it go in the Category:LGBT-related films? Or should the project tag come off? -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 02:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
I hope that by performing more edits on Wikipedia in the next few months that I could possibly change your mind by my next RfA, possibly around May 2008. - Jameson L. Tai talk ♦ contribs 05:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Belovedfreak! I'm posting this message to you and Benjiboi. Both of you !voted "keep" for Gay Blackpool, which confuses me. My feeling is that we're "ghetto-izing" by keeping this separate article. I'm curious if y'all have any input on that and what is gained by keeping both that one and LGBT community of Brighton and Hove? -- SatyrTN ( talk / contribs) 15:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)