Please remove the merge with war crime at your earliest...genocide not be confused with war crime...
Just a friendly reminder to use an
edit summary which clearly mentions the term "
prod" when proposing a page for uncontroversial deletion, such as on
Jahangir National University. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{proposed deletion}}
tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks!
Shadow311 (
talk)
15:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I have reworded the introduction section of the Tamil genocide article in a more neutral language and added reliable sources. As a new user, I hope you use that as a guideline on how to write an article acceptable to Wikipedia standard. For any disagreement, please take it to the article's talk page instead of disruptive editing. --- Petextrodon ( talk) 20:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamil genocide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Please remove the merge with war crime at your earliest...genocide not be confused with war crime...
Just a friendly reminder to use an
edit summary which clearly mentions the term "
prod" when proposing a page for uncontroversial deletion, such as on
Jahangir National University. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{proposed deletion}}
tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks!
Shadow311 (
talk)
15:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I have reworded the introduction section of the Tamil genocide article in a more neutral language and added reliable sources. As a new user, I hope you use that as a guideline on how to write an article acceptable to Wikipedia standard. For any disagreement, please take it to the article's talk page instead of disruptive editing. --- Petextrodon ( talk) 20:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamil genocide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.