Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:JohnBlackburne have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- allthefoxes ( Talk) 18:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Thomasettaei. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not misuse the help template. -- allthefoxes ( Talk) 18:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Requests for permissions. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please so not misuse the semi protected edit request template -- allthefoxes ( Talk) 18:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Requests for permissions. Mlpearc ( open channel) 18:55, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Huon (
talk)
19:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Bcdpvz2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Huon unblock admin press not disruptive editing. -- Bcdpvz2 ( talk) 19:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No useful edits from this account. --jpgordon ::==( o ) 19:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bcdpvz2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Unblock again. -- Bcdpvz2 ( talk) 19:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I do not understand this request, but it certainly does not present a reason to unblock. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 19:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:JohnBlackburne have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- allthefoxes ( Talk) 18:28, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Thomasettaei. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not misuse the help template. -- allthefoxes ( Talk) 18:29, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Requests for permissions. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please so not misuse the semi protected edit request template -- allthefoxes ( Talk) 18:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Requests for permissions. Mlpearc ( open channel) 18:55, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Huon (
talk)
19:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Bcdpvz2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Huon unblock admin press not disruptive editing. -- Bcdpvz2 ( talk) 19:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No useful edits from this account. --jpgordon ::==( o ) 19:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bcdpvz2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Unblock again. -- Bcdpvz2 ( talk) 19:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I do not understand this request, but it certainly does not present a reason to unblock. -- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 19:33, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.