Please be careful that you log in each time before you make edits. If you edit from both this account and your IP address, it is deceptive because most editors will not know that you operate both this account and the IP. Carefully read WP:MULTIACCOUNT and WP:SOCK. If you accidentally make an edit while logged out, note that on the article's talk page to help avoid confusion. Thank you. Sundayclose ( talk) 16:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at French people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose ( talk) 18:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
talk you will obviously refer your texts ? I do think that few people know the subject. it is therefore information that circulates on the internet and feeds itself.-- Batman06400 ( talk) 19:18, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Sundayclose (
talk)
19:57, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷
talk to me |
my contributions
21:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Julio189red (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
logs ·
block log ·
arb ·
rfc ·
lta ·
SPI ·
cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
22:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC) |
Batman06400 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
graduated in history I would like to bring more clarity and modification on the historical pages that I master. A block affects me because I want to participate in writing the truth on the internet. in the wikipedia story pages, there were marked a lot of errors. Yes I would like you to warn the User:Sundayclose of his behavior. I would also like that it is not possible to block without end date a user like me who wishes to bring his science and his participation in this company Wikipedia.
Notes:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = {{subst:accept reason here}} ~~~~}}
Please be careful that you log in each time before you make edits. If you edit from both this account and your IP address, it is deceptive because most editors will not know that you operate both this account and the IP. Carefully read WP:MULTIACCOUNT and WP:SOCK. If you accidentally make an edit while logged out, note that on the article's talk page to help avoid confusion. Thank you. Sundayclose ( talk) 16:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at French people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose ( talk) 18:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
talk you will obviously refer your texts ? I do think that few people know the subject. it is therefore information that circulates on the internet and feeds itself.-- Batman06400 ( talk) 19:18, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you.
Sundayclose (
talk)
19:57, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Dreamy Jazz 🎷
talk to me |
my contributions
21:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Julio189red (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
logs ·
block log ·
arb ·
rfc ·
lta ·
SPI ·
cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
Bbb23 (
talk)
22:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC) |
Batman06400 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
graduated in history I would like to bring more clarity and modification on the historical pages that I master. A block affects me because I want to participate in writing the truth on the internet. in the wikipedia story pages, there were marked a lot of errors. Yes I would like you to warn the User:Sundayclose of his behavior. I would also like that it is not possible to block without end date a user like me who wishes to bring his science and his participation in this company Wikipedia.
Notes:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a
default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = {{subst:accept reason here}} ~~~~}}