This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Do you have any relation to Barnecaration ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) or is he/she an impostor? This user was going declining requests for unblocking and signing them with your name despite not being a Wikipedia:Administrator to begin with. -- Netsnipe ► 06:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
My mistake! I clicked the link and it went to your username, so I assumed it was you. I didn't bother to check the history. Thanks for the correction. Nishkid64 ( talk) 22:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I honestly thought he might contribute in good faith, and he agreed to some behavioural standards that were his downfall last time. I was about to ask him what that mainspace edit was all about (assuming good faith that it wasn't vandalism), but he threw up the "retired" template before I could (I got edit-conflicted). Now, it seems pretty clear that his intention was as Lar stated on his talk, and so I have readded the sockpuppet template and had the account reblocked. Quite simply, there was no harm in trying, because he shows some 'clue', even if he applied it in the wrong way. Daniel 03:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, please fix my mess here: Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Nightscream 2. Thanks in advance. Bearian 14:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
What is wrong with you?
Why did you remove a table I created outlining PDF conversion options?
You decided in less than 2 second that the table was spam and removed it? What makes you think it was SPAM? I was outlining and attempting to find out applications which read and permit editing of converstion to and from other standards. That is why I created that table!!!!!!!
This is infuriating and evil of you to be so cynical and assume that this is spam! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.218.205 ( talk) 18:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
For heaven's sakes I only know two freaking pdf generation tools which is cutepdf and acrobat professional. Did you think for a minute that I used those two as a "Starter" and that more applications to be added was my desire and intention? I was hoping to START a table so people could start talking about options for PDF conversion!!!! Why are you so cynical? and pessimistic and so negative? How do you want me to frame the conversion options? I would like to learn what options I have in order to convert PDF to html or word? Where do I go for such conversion options if not a wikipedia article?
Cutepdf is FREE! I am not associated with cutepdf. What financial advantage will I get out of SPAMMING for cute pdf? My professor recommended the software to the whole class but I did not find it completely useful because it only converted ONE way (from any format to PDF). I was trying to find out about documents which will convert from PDF to other formats : like text and html. Have I explained myself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.218.205 ( talk) 18:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
because I dont think anyone in the wide world would react like you have or misconstrue a table outlining pdf to html/word conversion options as spam. Please ! I am really awaiting your response only... do tell me what is wrong here ... infact I wish I could email you directly or you could IM me directly and you wold know that I am not a spammer. I hate spammers.
If I am somehow benefiting cutepdf financially or some company financially by putting up a conversion table please do tell me how I can frame my "conversion options" ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.218.205 ( talk) 19:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[1] I'm currently "in" a wikibreak, and yet I've already got 360+ edits this month. I do a horrible job of taking a break... EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I saw that you mentioned that the user requesting User:AbhiJeet has created another username, what was it? The requesting user is likely User:Viran, and, any new unames should be blocked. So, if you wouldn't mind, inquiring minds would love to know :) SQL Query me! 09:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
As Siddhartha Gautama said in Kalama Sutta... (*Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing ;
So Barneca, ask this SQL where I made death threat and read my all posts on that page in order. I was trying to convince that in our society we punish person in accordance with severity of crime. If you park your car at wrong place, punishment is to fine you. Police can not hang you like saddam husain and police can't fine you again and again for same mistake.
OK, SQL. I am tired of fighting with admin for allowing so much spam, bio, music albums, video game, porn articles. This is not meaning of encyclopedia. While new page patrolling I have seen thousand user who write article about company in professional way in just first edit and vanish. Nobody dares to tag SD it even if they do not comply WP:CORP. They came inside and hide for years.
And you, Ryulong. I had told that if I choose you people can't stop me. Do you have ability to stop thousands of spammers who use single purpose account to create articles like mywikibiz? You can't. You have lost this war. I am really disgusted with this spampedia, biopedia, albumpedia, gamepedia, pornpedia.
I know chain reaction by you. Do it. I was also user TRIRASH, Abhih, Triash. Did you noticed me? I had warned you people. I had begged to allow me to use one account. But yours brain is eaten by power. If I want, I can continue. You can not catch me. But I don't want. I deliberately left track of this account for SQL. Do you think I am so stupid to request account connected to my past even after seeing that SQL is handling requests?
I proved what I wanted to prove. I saw every corner of wikipedia. I am just disgusted. I am leaving. Even if you don't trust me, it doesn't matter. Thanks. neo 20:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Here I am a vandal fighter happily reverting vandalism and I don't even notice that my own user page is vandalized - because you reverted it right away. Thanks. :) Sbowers3 02:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Hope you realize that at least 90% of what you've read on this site was written before you ever joined. Cheers, - WikiSkeptic 16:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
It's not the first time. The guy is vandalizing articles to remove links to a particular Buddhist sects' site that he believes is a cult. He needs to be blocked for a while, but never quite pushes it far enough, going away for a while before coming back and doing it again. GlassFET 21:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
You're not a complete idiot. There are plenty more errors to make in the future! ;) -- Step hen 22:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
where is the sandbox? the link linked me to that page.
WP:sandbox. -- barneca ( talk) 00:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the catch. I hit the rollback button too soon and was just getting ready to fix my mistake there.
-- Quintote ( talk) 20:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I would like to nominate you for adminship, on 31 December 2007, or 1 January 2008. Would that be acceptable to you? < DREAMAFTER>< TALK> 22:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
If you want, I can post the monobook.js article here so you can understand it better when you go to install WikiBreak Enforcer. I've read the article before, and it's actually got some pretty cool stuff in it. Best, -- Gp75motorsports 00:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on the Fides Romanin article. I greatly appreciate it. Chris 01:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah thank you. It said I couldn't create the account because it was too similar; perhaps I was going about it incorrectly and I could have while logged in?
And yes, thank you for the feedback on my user page. It's very important to me that things look good to everyone (read: pretty *and* usable), so that's nice to know. I'll be experimenting around with it in the next couple of weeks again. Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 20:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I saw your edit to Humanzee, and you did what I would have done had I noticed it. That edit alone wouldn't have made me revert, but when you look at the rest of them, it's pretty unlikely that he made one and only one good edit. Kww ( talk) 15:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Your kind note is much appreciated. I shall reply as soon as poss. It's people like you that keep me at this project!! Thanks. Pedro : Chat 10:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Im new to wikipedia so I dont know too much, but your the one who replyed on my username allowance page, The user was created and never logged in, no contributions, no talk, nothing at all, can I just get the account? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.220.137 ( talk) 19:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick reply, hopefully I get the account.
For your information, if you use {{
ACC|s|name|reason,}}
, it gets expanded into:
Similar to
Name (
talk ·
contribs ·
account creation) reason, but should be created by an administrator shortly. - a message which is slightly more friendly to the newcomers.
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu
05:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah dear. I'm like that sometimes. Heh, and I see your contributions, pretty impressive I must say. :) Best, Rt . 21:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm "B. Johnston", although at this time I cannot prove it because I suspect my email address is 'eating' the wikimedia confirmation emails. This makes finding out my new password difficult. Is there any other way to prove who I am, via the email on the account and to have the password altered to something known (until I can log in to change it, of course). Or, am I out of luck? Feel free to take this conversation to an email base via the email on file for "B. Johnston". Thank you. -- 209.171.43.194 ( talk) 22:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
OK, B. Johnston/209.171.43.194, here’s the deal:
Please let me know what you’d like to do, or if you do create another account, let me know it all worked out. -- barneca ( talk) 13:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Do you have any relation to Barnecaration ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) or is he/she an impostor? This user was going declining requests for unblocking and signing them with your name despite not being a Wikipedia:Administrator to begin with. -- Netsnipe ► 06:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
My mistake! I clicked the link and it went to your username, so I assumed it was you. I didn't bother to check the history. Thanks for the correction. Nishkid64 ( talk) 22:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I honestly thought he might contribute in good faith, and he agreed to some behavioural standards that were his downfall last time. I was about to ask him what that mainspace edit was all about (assuming good faith that it wasn't vandalism), but he threw up the "retired" template before I could (I got edit-conflicted). Now, it seems pretty clear that his intention was as Lar stated on his talk, and so I have readded the sockpuppet template and had the account reblocked. Quite simply, there was no harm in trying, because he shows some 'clue', even if he applied it in the wrong way. Daniel 03:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, please fix my mess here: Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Nightscream 2. Thanks in advance. Bearian 14:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
What is wrong with you?
Why did you remove a table I created outlining PDF conversion options?
You decided in less than 2 second that the table was spam and removed it? What makes you think it was SPAM? I was outlining and attempting to find out applications which read and permit editing of converstion to and from other standards. That is why I created that table!!!!!!!
This is infuriating and evil of you to be so cynical and assume that this is spam! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.218.205 ( talk) 18:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
For heaven's sakes I only know two freaking pdf generation tools which is cutepdf and acrobat professional. Did you think for a minute that I used those two as a "Starter" and that more applications to be added was my desire and intention? I was hoping to START a table so people could start talking about options for PDF conversion!!!! Why are you so cynical? and pessimistic and so negative? How do you want me to frame the conversion options? I would like to learn what options I have in order to convert PDF to html or word? Where do I go for such conversion options if not a wikipedia article?
Cutepdf is FREE! I am not associated with cutepdf. What financial advantage will I get out of SPAMMING for cute pdf? My professor recommended the software to the whole class but I did not find it completely useful because it only converted ONE way (from any format to PDF). I was trying to find out about documents which will convert from PDF to other formats : like text and html. Have I explained myself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.218.205 ( talk) 18:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
because I dont think anyone in the wide world would react like you have or misconstrue a table outlining pdf to html/word conversion options as spam. Please ! I am really awaiting your response only... do tell me what is wrong here ... infact I wish I could email you directly or you could IM me directly and you wold know that I am not a spammer. I hate spammers.
If I am somehow benefiting cutepdf financially or some company financially by putting up a conversion table please do tell me how I can frame my "conversion options" ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.218.205 ( talk) 19:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[1] I'm currently "in" a wikibreak, and yet I've already got 360+ edits this month. I do a horrible job of taking a break... EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I saw that you mentioned that the user requesting User:AbhiJeet has created another username, what was it? The requesting user is likely User:Viran, and, any new unames should be blocked. So, if you wouldn't mind, inquiring minds would love to know :) SQL Query me! 09:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
As Siddhartha Gautama said in Kalama Sutta... (*Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing ;
So Barneca, ask this SQL where I made death threat and read my all posts on that page in order. I was trying to convince that in our society we punish person in accordance with severity of crime. If you park your car at wrong place, punishment is to fine you. Police can not hang you like saddam husain and police can't fine you again and again for same mistake.
OK, SQL. I am tired of fighting with admin for allowing so much spam, bio, music albums, video game, porn articles. This is not meaning of encyclopedia. While new page patrolling I have seen thousand user who write article about company in professional way in just first edit and vanish. Nobody dares to tag SD it even if they do not comply WP:CORP. They came inside and hide for years.
And you, Ryulong. I had told that if I choose you people can't stop me. Do you have ability to stop thousands of spammers who use single purpose account to create articles like mywikibiz? You can't. You have lost this war. I am really disgusted with this spampedia, biopedia, albumpedia, gamepedia, pornpedia.
I know chain reaction by you. Do it. I was also user TRIRASH, Abhih, Triash. Did you noticed me? I had warned you people. I had begged to allow me to use one account. But yours brain is eaten by power. If I want, I can continue. You can not catch me. But I don't want. I deliberately left track of this account for SQL. Do you think I am so stupid to request account connected to my past even after seeing that SQL is handling requests?
I proved what I wanted to prove. I saw every corner of wikipedia. I am just disgusted. I am leaving. Even if you don't trust me, it doesn't matter. Thanks. neo 20:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Here I am a vandal fighter happily reverting vandalism and I don't even notice that my own user page is vandalized - because you reverted it right away. Thanks. :) Sbowers3 02:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Hope you realize that at least 90% of what you've read on this site was written before you ever joined. Cheers, - WikiSkeptic 16:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
It's not the first time. The guy is vandalizing articles to remove links to a particular Buddhist sects' site that he believes is a cult. He needs to be blocked for a while, but never quite pushes it far enough, going away for a while before coming back and doing it again. GlassFET 21:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
You're not a complete idiot. There are plenty more errors to make in the future! ;) -- Step hen 22:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
where is the sandbox? the link linked me to that page.
WP:sandbox. -- barneca ( talk) 00:38, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the catch. I hit the rollback button too soon and was just getting ready to fix my mistake there.
-- Quintote ( talk) 20:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
I would like to nominate you for adminship, on 31 December 2007, or 1 January 2008. Would that be acceptable to you? < DREAMAFTER>< TALK> 22:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
If you want, I can post the monobook.js article here so you can understand it better when you go to install WikiBreak Enforcer. I've read the article before, and it's actually got some pretty cool stuff in it. Best, -- Gp75motorsports 00:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on the Fides Romanin article. I greatly appreciate it. Chris 01:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah thank you. It said I couldn't create the account because it was too similar; perhaps I was going about it incorrectly and I could have while logged in?
And yes, thank you for the feedback on my user page. It's very important to me that things look good to everyone (read: pretty *and* usable), so that's nice to know. I'll be experimenting around with it in the next couple of weeks again. Xiong Chiamiov :: contact :: 20:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
I saw your edit to Humanzee, and you did what I would have done had I noticed it. That edit alone wouldn't have made me revert, but when you look at the rest of them, it's pretty unlikely that he made one and only one good edit. Kww ( talk) 15:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Your kind note is much appreciated. I shall reply as soon as poss. It's people like you that keep me at this project!! Thanks. Pedro : Chat 10:04, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Im new to wikipedia so I dont know too much, but your the one who replyed on my username allowance page, The user was created and never logged in, no contributions, no talk, nothing at all, can I just get the account? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.220.137 ( talk) 19:19, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick reply, hopefully I get the account.
For your information, if you use {{
ACC|s|name|reason,}}
, it gets expanded into:
Similar to
Name (
talk ·
contribs ·
account creation) reason, but should be created by an administrator shortly. - a message which is slightly more friendly to the newcomers.
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu
05:47, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Ah dear. I'm like that sometimes. Heh, and I see your contributions, pretty impressive I must say. :) Best, Rt . 21:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'm "B. Johnston", although at this time I cannot prove it because I suspect my email address is 'eating' the wikimedia confirmation emails. This makes finding out my new password difficult. Is there any other way to prove who I am, via the email on the account and to have the password altered to something known (until I can log in to change it, of course). Or, am I out of luck? Feel free to take this conversation to an email base via the email on file for "B. Johnston". Thank you. -- 209.171.43.194 ( talk) 22:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
OK, B. Johnston/209.171.43.194, here’s the deal:
Please let me know what you’d like to do, or if you do create another account, let me know it all worked out. -- barneca ( talk) 13:30, 28 December 2007 (UTC)