Hello user:Axxxion. Firstly, thanks for your commitment to the Luhansk/Lugansk People's Republic article. As your editing got your account blocked before, please accept a piece of advice from an editor who've been on this Wikipedia since 2005. Wikipedia is, very essentially, a collaborative project. It involves people from all over the globe, with different opinions and different ways of thinking. Most of us have that in common that we want to make a better world by making knowledge easier available. Even more so than in real life, on Wikipedia it is important to maintain a civil conduct and, for as long as possible, assume that people who disagree with you do so in good faith and maybe even for good reasons. As such, when you meet with opposing views on the articles you edit, instead of bluntly pushing controversial changes that you know will get undone, it is far better if you can bring arguments to the discussion. You will not always succeed in making Wikipedia say what you consider is right. That's how things are. You are not the most important person on the planet to determine right from wrong for all of us; nor is it realistic to hope that Wikipedia will become objectively right in our lifetime. I think that you do have the right skills to make Wikipedia better in areas where improvements are very much needed. So please, I hope you can work together with people and make a better Wikipedia. Best wishes, Heptor ( talk) 23:48, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Axxxion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syrian Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish military intervention in Syria ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
You seem to be annoying people without accomplishing anything. Maybe you should try a different strategy. AnonMoos ( talk) 16:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
I guesse you were refering to this article. Do you mind explaining what is the problem in it? Veverve ( talk) 22:08, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, a couple of days ago, you made an to 2020 United States federal government data breach. It violated MOS:SURNAME and WP:QUOTEFARM (and, incidentally, replaced one WP:RS with another without explanation), so I reverted it.
Today, without explanation or discussion, you made a very similar edit to your original one, that suffers from the same problems. That is not a collegial move.
I expect you have good intentions here, but your approach rather tarnishes them. Please could you address the MOS:SURNAME and WP:QUOTEFARM aspects of your edit? Thanks, Zazpot ( talk) 11:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
What is actually your problem?As I explained, my objection is the violation of MOS:SURNAME and WP:QUOTEFARM in your edit. Neither your edit summary, nor your reply above, gave a reason why either of those concerns should somehow not apply to that article. So, those concerns are outstanding.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatia–Russia relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Patriarchate of Karlovci, you may be blocked from editing. Theonewithreason ( talk) 26 April 2021 (UTC)
i'm not fully sure how wiki works, but hell, there must be moderators present here who can check your stubborn point of view pushing and take action accordingly. such edits will not go under their radar. adding statement by djukanovic and NOT krivokapic or other high-ranking officials is an example of creating a false narrative, which is something you are currently actively pursuing
Greetings,
Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find your interest in the topic.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 13:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
Axxxion. In the future, please avoid closely paraphrasing a source as you did at 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis. What you added was, at times, essentially verbatim what was said by The Guardian. Please see
WP:COPYVIO for more. Thank you for your contributions, but I had to undo one of them for that reason.
TheTechnician27
(Talk page) 00:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Axxxion! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. twsabin 22:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. twsabin 22:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
twsabin 22:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Do you have a post-2020 source for the claim that Kasparov has lived in Podstrana since 2020? The sources the article is citing are not recent enough to support this claim. The source from late 2020, Nacional, says " Although he usually lives in New York, he did not return from Croatia to his American home this summer due to the coronavirus pandemic, but stayed with his family in Podstrana near Split." This sounds like he intended ultimately to return to New York. Whatever. If we are going to talk about where he has lived since 2020, we should cite a source more recent than 2020. Bruce leverett ( talk) 22:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. twsabin 22:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
[1] - yes, he does look like someone who is ready for retirement. Regardless to this circus (I laughed too), some commenters claimed earlier on YuTube there was a rift between Putin (with Shoigu) and FSB/intelligence bosses. My very best wishes ( talk) 19:48, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
-- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9JfI50Q5G0 From 14:00 -- a staggering and very emphatic threat to Kiev, in fact implying that today′s recognition is de facto annexation. Axxxion ( talk) 20:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
The Current Events Barnstar | ||
Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC) |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
Awarded for efforts in expanding multiple articles to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC) |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AbsolutelyFiring ( talk) 01:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 01:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
RoySmith
(talk) 00:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 18 § Category:Russian Orthodox churches by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Aidan721 ( talk) 15:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello user:Axxxion. Firstly, thanks for your commitment to the Luhansk/Lugansk People's Republic article. As your editing got your account blocked before, please accept a piece of advice from an editor who've been on this Wikipedia since 2005. Wikipedia is, very essentially, a collaborative project. It involves people from all over the globe, with different opinions and different ways of thinking. Most of us have that in common that we want to make a better world by making knowledge easier available. Even more so than in real life, on Wikipedia it is important to maintain a civil conduct and, for as long as possible, assume that people who disagree with you do so in good faith and maybe even for good reasons. As such, when you meet with opposing views on the articles you edit, instead of bluntly pushing controversial changes that you know will get undone, it is far better if you can bring arguments to the discussion. You will not always succeed in making Wikipedia say what you consider is right. That's how things are. You are not the most important person on the planet to determine right from wrong for all of us; nor is it realistic to hope that Wikipedia will become objectively right in our lifetime. I think that you do have the right skills to make Wikipedia better in areas where improvements are very much needed. So please, I hope you can work together with people and make a better Wikipedia. Best wishes, Heptor ( talk) 23:48, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.TonyBallioni ( talk) 01:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Axxxion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syrian Civil War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish military intervention in Syria ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:03, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
You seem to be annoying people without accomplishing anything. Maybe you should try a different strategy. AnonMoos ( talk) 16:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
I guesse you were refering to this article. Do you mind explaining what is the problem in it? Veverve ( talk) 22:08, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, a couple of days ago, you made an to 2020 United States federal government data breach. It violated MOS:SURNAME and WP:QUOTEFARM (and, incidentally, replaced one WP:RS with another without explanation), so I reverted it.
Today, without explanation or discussion, you made a very similar edit to your original one, that suffers from the same problems. That is not a collegial move.
I expect you have good intentions here, but your approach rather tarnishes them. Please could you address the MOS:SURNAME and WP:QUOTEFARM aspects of your edit? Thanks, Zazpot ( talk) 11:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
What is actually your problem?As I explained, my objection is the violation of MOS:SURNAME and WP:QUOTEFARM in your edit. Neither your edit summary, nor your reply above, gave a reason why either of those concerns should somehow not apply to that article. So, those concerns are outstanding.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Croatia–Russia relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Patriarchate of Karlovci, you may be blocked from editing. Theonewithreason ( talk) 26 April 2021 (UTC)
i'm not fully sure how wiki works, but hell, there must be moderators present here who can check your stubborn point of view pushing and take action accordingly. such edits will not go under their radar. adding statement by djukanovic and NOT krivokapic or other high-ranking officials is an example of creating a false narrative, which is something you are currently actively pursuing
Greetings,
Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find your interest in the topic.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' ( talk) 13:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
Axxxion. In the future, please avoid closely paraphrasing a source as you did at 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis. What you added was, at times, essentially verbatim what was said by The Guardian. Please see
WP:COPYVIO for more. Thank you for your contributions, but I had to undo one of them for that reason.
TheTechnician27
(Talk page) 00:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Axxxion! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. twsabin 22:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. twsabin 22:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
twsabin 22:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Do you have a post-2020 source for the claim that Kasparov has lived in Podstrana since 2020? The sources the article is citing are not recent enough to support this claim. The source from late 2020, Nacional, says " Although he usually lives in New York, he did not return from Croatia to his American home this summer due to the coronavirus pandemic, but stayed with his family in Podstrana near Split." This sounds like he intended ultimately to return to New York. Whatever. If we are going to talk about where he has lived since 2020, we should cite a source more recent than 2020. Bruce leverett ( talk) 22:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. twsabin 22:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
[1] - yes, he does look like someone who is ready for retirement. Regardless to this circus (I laughed too), some commenters claimed earlier on YuTube there was a rift between Putin (with Shoigu) and FSB/intelligence bosses. My very best wishes ( talk) 19:48, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
-- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9JfI50Q5G0 From 14:00 -- a staggering and very emphatic threat to Kiev, in fact implying that today′s recognition is de facto annexation. Axxxion ( talk) 20:12, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
The Current Events Barnstar | ||
Awarded for efforts in expanding and verifying articles related to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC) |
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
Awarded for efforts in expanding multiple articles to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 7 March 2022 (UTC) |
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AbsolutelyFiring ( talk) 01:01, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. El_C 01:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. --
RoySmith
(talk) 00:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 January 18 § Category:Russian Orthodox churches by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Aidan721 ( talk) 15:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC)