Ahmad Al Wafi`s brother Details 2409:40E3:1003:1539:8000:0:0:0 ( talk) 14:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to
Wikipedia are appreciated, but
a recent edit of yours to the page
Jabal Thawr has an
edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
Shaws username (
talk)
16:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ignore this, I'm sorry I just realised what you meant, I've set it back to your version Shaws username ( talk) 16:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Adakiko. I noticed that in
this edit to
Hijaz Mountains, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Adakiko (
talk)
10:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Hijaz Mountains, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Adakiko (
talk)
10:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at
Muhammad Ali Mirza, you may be
blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.
Fanfanboy (
talk)
17:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
You deleted the citation. How is it unsourced? 404? Please see wp:KDL. Adakiko ( talk) 10:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Awan Ali Abbas. Thank you for your edits to
Battle of Badr. But I don't think this particular
change is necessary. There's actually a line in
MOS:LEADCITE that says "controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none"
. Since this subject is quite controversial, I think that applies here. —
Kaalakaa
(talk)
14:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! This
change is needed in my opinion since the current article looks way untidy with so many sources in the leads. The controversial subjects can require citations but most of the part in the leads is not really controversial. For example, that the battle took place in March 624. Such statements do not need mass citations to support in at least in the leads.
Awan Ali Abbas
14:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- For the citations for the dating on the lede, it's probably okay to remove them, but for most other parts, I disagree. If you look at the revision history of this article and similar ones, there are plenty of vandal edits, either by IPs or accounts, that change the lede details. By having citations on the lede, editors can directly verify whether or not what people are adding or deleting is in line with what reliable sources say, and make correct decisions about whether or not to revert them. — Kaalakaa (talk) 04:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Also, could you please stop substituting Quraysh or Meccans for Mushrikites? Nowhere in the sources are they referred to as such. And Mushrikites is a broad term for all non-Muslims who were not followers of Abrahamic religions. — Kaalakaa (talk) 06:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Ahmad Al Wafi`s brother Details 2409:40E3:1003:1539:8000:0:0:0 ( talk) 14:58, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to
Wikipedia are appreciated, but
a recent edit of yours to the page
Jabal Thawr has an
edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an
article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use
the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.
Shaws username (
talk)
16:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ignore this, I'm sorry I just realised what you meant, I've set it back to your version Shaws username ( talk) 16:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Adakiko. I noticed that in
this edit to
Hijaz Mountains, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Adakiko (
talk)
10:51, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Hijaz Mountains, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please make use of the
sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Adakiko (
talk)
10:55, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at
Muhammad Ali Mirza, you may be
blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.
Fanfanboy (
talk)
17:12, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
You deleted the citation. How is it unsourced? 404? Please see wp:KDL. Adakiko ( talk) 10:56, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Awan Ali Abbas. Thank you for your edits to
Battle of Badr. But I don't think this particular
change is necessary. There's actually a line in
MOS:LEADCITE that says "controversial subjects may require many citations; others, few or none"
. Since this subject is quite controversial, I think that applies here. —
Kaalakaa
(talk)
14:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! This
change is needed in my opinion since the current article looks way untidy with so many sources in the leads. The controversial subjects can require citations but most of the part in the leads is not really controversial. For example, that the battle took place in March 624. Such statements do not need mass citations to support in at least in the leads.
Awan Ali Abbas
14:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- For the citations for the dating on the lede, it's probably okay to remove them, but for most other parts, I disagree. If you look at the revision history of this article and similar ones, there are plenty of vandal edits, either by IPs or accounts, that change the lede details. By having citations on the lede, editors can directly verify whether or not what people are adding or deleting is in line with what reliable sources say, and make correct decisions about whether or not to revert them. — Kaalakaa (talk) 04:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- Also, could you please stop substituting Quraysh or Meccans for Mushrikites? Nowhere in the sources are they referred to as such. And Mushrikites is a broad term for all non-Muslims who were not followers of Abrahamic religions. — Kaalakaa (talk) 06:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)