This is an archive of past discussions with Avraham. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48> |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 - 53 - 54 - 55 - 56 - 57 - 58 - 59 - 60 - ... (up to 100) |
Thank you very much. =] VirEximius ( talk) 05:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
This guy was declared as a troll in the Hebrew Wikipedia. I was the main negotiator during the time we tried reasoning with him (hence, the negotiation tag in my he talk page) including many hours of phone calls. I have no intention to handle this ticket so I leave it up to you to decide what should be done with it. If you do decide to handle it, I wish you and the commons all the best handling with this guy. Tomer A. 22:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps you can help with the discussion here? I note that you weighed in on the same article and editor a while back, and I seem not to be able to speak effectively to the editor. Thanks.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 23:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Doh... It says somewhere to recreate your old account to avoid someone else doing that. I was just testing. Oh well... -- Epipelagic ( talk) 05:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you have indicated this image MAY become available in the public domain in late 2009. It is now 2010, is there anyway to confirm the copyright status now? -- Kvasir ( talk) 07:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
So... why do you recharge blindlessly the older version of the article on Koestler's book The thirteenth tribe?. I stated it twice in the discussion page (Beginning and end). This is beginning to be strange. 153.109.42.97 ( talk) 14:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I have replied here. Steffan ( talk) 16:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
In marking this SPI closed, you indicated there was some possible relation between two found and Bambifan101. [1] This would seem to indicate that A4d49f4a, long thought to be a separate person from Indiana, is also the Bell South Atlanta based Bambifan? Is this correct, are did I just misidentify two possible socks as A4d49f4a when they were Bambi's? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 18:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm not arguing with the consensus here, but I'm confused by the method of your deletion. I can't see anything on his talk page or in the discussion about being banned. Was this meant to be another CSD and you mistyped? Or is there something that I've overlooked? -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 01:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
Thanks for your help.
תודה רבה, אברהם! בברכה
-- -- -- ( talk) 20:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Could you please tell me, how a fair use image from not a reliabale source could be removed from the articles and deleted from Wikipedia? Thanks.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 21:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have no desire to get into an edit war with User:Na Nach Nachmu Nachmun, but it looks like one is starting. He and a new editor, User:Moshenanach, have as their sole goal the promotion of Rabbi Yisroel Ber Odesser's teachings and this famous mantra. They add information with no regard for NPOV or RS and just started flooding the talk page with diatribes on all the discussions to date. All the things I corrected this morning were reverted an hour later. Could you please help me here? Thanks, Yoninah ( talk) 18:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Is requesting an unblock - I've placed it on hold for you to comment Ronhjones (Talk) 19:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Certainly I will keep their points in mind—the opposition's concerns are so familiar to me by now that I'm quite sure I will never forget them. :) As promised in the nomination, I will use the admin tools in an uncontroversial manner and will not close any AfDs. Everyking ( talk) 23:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
you deleted it with the edit summary: (U1: User request to delete page in own userspace), however U1 clearly states: (but not user talk pages). Which links to As a matter of practice, user talk pages are generally not deleted, barring legal threats or other grievous violations that have to be removed for legal reasons; however, exceptions to this can be and are made on occasion for good reason (see WP:Right to vanish). Archives of user talk pages created by using page moves are also generally not deleted. In addition, nonpublic personal information and potentially libelous information posted to your talk page may be removed by making a request for oversight. Was that the case? Is the user exercising his right to vanish? He doesn't seem to be as his user page is still there. This seems like an inappropriate deletion to me. it certainly isn't covered by U1.-- Crossmr ( talk) 13:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Seeing your post at Assessment meanings, please can you add your opinion at Jews and WikiProject Judaism. Thanks. Chesdovi ( talk) 13:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
that a user who you renamed got blocked and is back at CHU here. -- Soap Talk/ Contributions 21:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
I couldn't find the successful request; otherwise I wouldn't have reblocked. Where is it archived? Daniel Case ( talk) 23:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Taking to e-mail
|
---|
I would have chosen rather to be blocked than get the contest of my user page to be removed, but I guess I have no choice like to accept your decision whatever it is. Because now both my user pages are protected, and I am running out of places I am able to edit, I would like to use your page please to apologize for all my conduct and for my "rant full of personal attacks". Everybody, please forgive me for what I have done. Warm regards.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 17:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
|
I haven't seen you around in a while. But I saw your fancy fonted comments on a noticeboard and wanted to come by and say hello. How is the bureaucrat busienss treating you? ChildofMidnight ( talk) 02:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
A yeshiva bochur on a first date. ;-)
Jayjg
(talk)
19:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you were online and was looking for an admin who would sort a little duplication out for me, on this page AFD at the top it looks like there have been 5 previous but two are duplicates, could you get rid of the duplicated two for me, I was going to nominate them for speedy then I though I might make the wheels drop off, thanks. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sexuality_of_Robert_Baden-Powell Off2riorob ( talk) 21:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
In light of this edit summary, could you please re-read the source you deleted, available in full at the URL which was cited and which you deleted, and confirm, in your capacity as an administrator, that the source does indeed discuss FGC, or at least one form of FGC, depending on how you interpret it (" female circumcision") and that no "violation" required your intervention? Or do you still believe my edit adding that source was a violation? Blackworm ( talk) 01:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Avraham: A discussion has started if the Chabad editors case should be dismissed or should remain open. As someone who has been involved in the serious COI discussions leading up to this ArbCom case you should be informed of this motion and have the right to explain if you agree or disagree with this proposed motion and why. Please see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Evidence#Contemplated motion to dismiss. Thank you, IZAK ( talk) 08:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello Avi. Could you please take a look at this (specifically the discussion on the AJ logo)? Thanks, nableezy - 08:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I have uploaded this image File:Mercaz HaRav massacre.jpg to be used in this article Mercaz HaRav massacre. I've decided that it's ok to upload the image after I've seen File:Jerusalem Terrorist Attack on 2 July 2008 1.jpg from the same source used in Jerusalem bulldozer attack. May I please ask you to tell me, if I've done something wrong with that uploading, and if I have, I will upload another smaller version of the image as a fair use. Thanks.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 02:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I have changed the password, and thus the hash, of my committed identity. I am still in control of both this wikimedia unified account, the e-mail address to which it is linked, and the GPG key which connects to both, and which is signing this message on Monday, February 8, 2010 approximately 14:14 EST (-0500). -- Avi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.75 Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs iF4EAREKAAYFAktwYrQACgkQDWKwGfgOKfnrMgD+OIiF8RDBF+UZAkXF1JpyL5g+ UiNfTZc5DKejrbG7MAYA+gNY9SBenHhGVi1ADuVH/QcrvyKq2ul/wDXFfHawQ1X4 =awrD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Avi ( talk) 19:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm confused why you removed a reference to a religious scholar commenting on the subject and replaced it with a matter-of-fact assertion. I can see from the reference section that original research is rampant in this article and the original Rashi reference was more of a wave in that general direction, but shouldn't we take the opportunity to discourage original research and improve the references? Celestra ( talk) 20:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I apologize for leaving an edit in an unfinished state. I did some further cleanup to reduce the hype. In spite of all the nonsense, I think she is probably meets notability requirements for an author, The article will take watching, though. And if you want to work on a different field, we need articles on those two unaccredited Universities, or possibly one on akami, with links from the earlier names DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Miami Beach Community Kollel. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miami Beach Community Kollel. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
I can't get the status template working, and the creator is not responding to queries. I cannot get the "update" links to work; they simply take me to the edit tab of the status page - not updating the status. How does one fix this?
PS
Please respond on my page, due to the high level of activity on yours. -RadicalOne• Contact Me• Chase My Tail 01:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
And again. -RadicalOne• Contact Me• Chase My Tail 23:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Avi. Hope you are doing well. I've come across an excerpt from a religious text twice now in the research I've been doing for the article Qedarite, and would appreciate your help in determining what it is exactly. In this book [5], the passage is listed under the heading Bavli Taanit 1:2 E-H. While I'm quite sure it is rabbinical exegis, I'm not sure which book it belongs to, who the author is, or what the date for it is. Do you have any information you can provide about this? I'm interested in including it in the article as an example of references to the Qedarites in Jewish tradition. Thanks in advance for considering this request. Tiamut talk 16:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
I saw WP:FINGE in your edit summary on the article Criticism of Judaism. Do you know what WP:FINGE is meant to be? I would recommend a redirect for WP:FINGE to see where the real page is. Thanks. Minima c94 ( talk) 17:26, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Consider me schooled. :D Shii (tock) 19:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Could you please see this. -- Saki talk 17:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Could you give a bit more explanation of your checkuser block there, and/or help me respond intelligently to the unblock request. I have done the best I could with the information I could find, but I am unsure as to who the sockmaster is and why this specific IP is blocked? Thanks! -- Jayron 32 04:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Avi. Several sources say that al-Bassa appeared in the Talmud as Bezet or Bazet, but they don't give a Talmudic reference or even say which Talmud it was. Do you have a way to look it up? If you find the source, is there anything else of quotable interest there? Thanks. Zero talk 06:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with Avraham. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
< Archive 46 | Archive 47 | Archive 48> |
All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - 17 - 18 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22 - 23 - 24 - 25 - 26 - 27 - 28 - 29 - 30 - 31 - 32 - 33 - 34 - 35 - 36 - 37 - 38 - 39 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 43 - 44 - 45 - 46 - 47 - 48 - 49 - 50 - 51 - 52 - 53 - 54 - 55 - 56 - 57 - 58 - 59 - 60 - ... (up to 100) |
Thank you very much. =] VirEximius ( talk) 05:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
This guy was declared as a troll in the Hebrew Wikipedia. I was the main negotiator during the time we tried reasoning with him (hence, the negotiation tag in my he talk page) including many hours of phone calls. I have no intention to handle this ticket so I leave it up to you to decide what should be done with it. If you do decide to handle it, I wish you and the commons all the best handling with this guy. Tomer A. 22:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps you can help with the discussion here? I note that you weighed in on the same article and editor a while back, and I seem not to be able to speak effectively to the editor. Thanks.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 23:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Doh... It says somewhere to recreate your old account to avoid someone else doing that. I was just testing. Oh well... -- Epipelagic ( talk) 05:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, you have indicated this image MAY become available in the public domain in late 2009. It is now 2010, is there anyway to confirm the copyright status now? -- Kvasir ( talk) 07:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
So... why do you recharge blindlessly the older version of the article on Koestler's book The thirteenth tribe?. I stated it twice in the discussion page (Beginning and end). This is beginning to be strange. 153.109.42.97 ( talk) 14:39, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I have replied here. Steffan ( talk) 16:00, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
In marking this SPI closed, you indicated there was some possible relation between two found and Bambifan101. [1] This would seem to indicate that A4d49f4a, long thought to be a separate person from Indiana, is also the Bell South Atlanta based Bambifan? Is this correct, are did I just misidentify two possible socks as A4d49f4a when they were Bambi's? -- Collectonian ( talk · contribs) 18:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm not arguing with the consensus here, but I'm confused by the method of your deletion. I can't see anything on his talk page or in the discussion about being banned. Was this meant to be another CSD and you mistyped? Or is there something that I've overlooked? -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 01:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
After tolling up the votes in the revision proposals, it emerged that 5.4 had the most support, but elements of that support remained unclear, and various comments throughout the polls needed consideration.
A finalisation poll (intended, if possible, to be one last poll before finalising the CDA proposal) has been run to;
Thanks for your help.
תודה רבה, אברהם! בברכה
-- -- -- ( talk) 20:16, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Could you please tell me, how a fair use image from not a reliabale source could be removed from the articles and deleted from Wikipedia? Thanks.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 21:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have no desire to get into an edit war with User:Na Nach Nachmu Nachmun, but it looks like one is starting. He and a new editor, User:Moshenanach, have as their sole goal the promotion of Rabbi Yisroel Ber Odesser's teachings and this famous mantra. They add information with no regard for NPOV or RS and just started flooding the talk page with diatribes on all the discussions to date. All the things I corrected this morning were reverted an hour later. Could you please help me here? Thanks, Yoninah ( talk) 18:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Is requesting an unblock - I've placed it on hold for you to comment Ronhjones (Talk) 19:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Certainly I will keep their points in mind—the opposition's concerns are so familiar to me by now that I'm quite sure I will never forget them. :) As promised in the nomination, I will use the admin tools in an uncontroversial manner and will not close any AfDs. Everyking ( talk) 23:53, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
you deleted it with the edit summary: (U1: User request to delete page in own userspace), however U1 clearly states: (but not user talk pages). Which links to As a matter of practice, user talk pages are generally not deleted, barring legal threats or other grievous violations that have to be removed for legal reasons; however, exceptions to this can be and are made on occasion for good reason (see WP:Right to vanish). Archives of user talk pages created by using page moves are also generally not deleted. In addition, nonpublic personal information and potentially libelous information posted to your talk page may be removed by making a request for oversight. Was that the case? Is the user exercising his right to vanish? He doesn't seem to be as his user page is still there. This seems like an inappropriate deletion to me. it certainly isn't covered by U1.-- Crossmr ( talk) 13:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Seeing your post at Assessment meanings, please can you add your opinion at Jews and WikiProject Judaism. Thanks. Chesdovi ( talk) 13:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
that a user who you renamed got blocked and is back at CHU here. -- Soap Talk/ Contributions 21:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
I couldn't find the successful request; otherwise I wouldn't have reblocked. Where is it archived? Daniel Case ( talk) 23:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Taking to e-mail
|
---|
I would have chosen rather to be blocked than get the contest of my user page to be removed, but I guess I have no choice like to accept your decision whatever it is. Because now both my user pages are protected, and I am running out of places I am able to edit, I would like to use your page please to apologize for all my conduct and for my "rant full of personal attacks". Everybody, please forgive me for what I have done. Warm regards.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 17:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
|
I haven't seen you around in a while. But I saw your fancy fonted comments on a noticeboard and wanted to come by and say hello. How is the bureaucrat busienss treating you? ChildofMidnight ( talk) 02:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
A yeshiva bochur on a first date. ;-)
Jayjg
(talk)
19:21, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you were online and was looking for an admin who would sort a little duplication out for me, on this page AFD at the top it looks like there have been 5 previous but two are duplicates, could you get rid of the duplicated two for me, I was going to nominate them for speedy then I though I might make the wheels drop off, thanks. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sexuality_of_Robert_Baden-Powell Off2riorob ( talk) 21:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
In light of this edit summary, could you please re-read the source you deleted, available in full at the URL which was cited and which you deleted, and confirm, in your capacity as an administrator, that the source does indeed discuss FGC, or at least one form of FGC, depending on how you interpret it (" female circumcision") and that no "violation" required your intervention? Or do you still believe my edit adding that source was a violation? Blackworm ( talk) 01:04, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Avraham: A discussion has started if the Chabad editors case should be dismissed or should remain open. As someone who has been involved in the serious COI discussions leading up to this ArbCom case you should be informed of this motion and have the right to explain if you agree or disagree with this proposed motion and why. Please see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Chabad movement/Evidence#Contemplated motion to dismiss. Thank you, IZAK ( talk) 08:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Hello Avi. Could you please take a look at this (specifically the discussion on the AJ logo)? Thanks, nableezy - 08:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I have uploaded this image File:Mercaz HaRav massacre.jpg to be used in this article Mercaz HaRav massacre. I've decided that it's ok to upload the image after I've seen File:Jerusalem Terrorist Attack on 2 July 2008 1.jpg from the same source used in Jerusalem bulldozer attack. May I please ask you to tell me, if I've done something wrong with that uploading, and if I have, I will upload another smaller version of the image as a fair use. Thanks.-- Mbz1 ( talk) 02:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I have changed the password, and thus the hash, of my committed identity. I am still in control of both this wikimedia unified account, the e-mail address to which it is linked, and the GPG key which connects to both, and which is signing this message on Monday, February 8, 2010 approximately 14:14 EST (-0500). -- Avi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.75 Comment: Most recent key: Click show in box @ http://is.gd/4xJrs iF4EAREKAAYFAktwYrQACgkQDWKwGfgOKfnrMgD+OIiF8RDBF+UZAkXF1JpyL5g+ UiNfTZc5DKejrbG7MAYA+gNY9SBenHhGVi1ADuVH/QcrvyKq2ul/wDXFfHawQ1X4 =awrD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Avi ( talk) 19:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm confused why you removed a reference to a religious scholar commenting on the subject and replaced it with a matter-of-fact assertion. I can see from the reference section that original research is rampant in this article and the original Rashi reference was more of a wave in that general direction, but shouldn't we take the opportunity to discourage original research and improve the references? Celestra ( talk) 20:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I apologize for leaving an edit in an unfinished state. I did some further cleanup to reduce the hype. In spite of all the nonsense, I think she is probably meets notability requirements for an author, The article will take watching, though. And if you want to work on a different field, we need articles on those two unaccredited Universities, or possibly one on akami, with links from the earlier names DGG ( talk ) 22:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Miami Beach Community Kollel. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miami Beach Community Kollel. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
I can't get the status template working, and the creator is not responding to queries. I cannot get the "update" links to work; they simply take me to the edit tab of the status page - not updating the status. How does one fix this?
PS
Please respond on my page, due to the high level of activity on yours. -RadicalOne• Contact Me• Chase My Tail 01:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
And again. -RadicalOne• Contact Me• Chase My Tail 23:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Avi. Hope you are doing well. I've come across an excerpt from a religious text twice now in the research I've been doing for the article Qedarite, and would appreciate your help in determining what it is exactly. In this book [5], the passage is listed under the heading Bavli Taanit 1:2 E-H. While I'm quite sure it is rabbinical exegis, I'm not sure which book it belongs to, who the author is, or what the date for it is. Do you have any information you can provide about this? I'm interested in including it in the article as an example of references to the Qedarites in Jewish tradition. Thanks in advance for considering this request. Tiamut talk 16:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
I saw WP:FINGE in your edit summary on the article Criticism of Judaism. Do you know what WP:FINGE is meant to be? I would recommend a redirect for WP:FINGE to see where the real page is. Thanks. Minima c94 ( talk) 17:26, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Consider me schooled. :D Shii (tock) 19:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Could you please see this. -- Saki talk 17:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Could you give a bit more explanation of your checkuser block there, and/or help me respond intelligently to the unblock request. I have done the best I could with the information I could find, but I am unsure as to who the sockmaster is and why this specific IP is blocked? Thanks! -- Jayron 32 04:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Avi. Several sources say that al-Bassa appeared in the Talmud as Bezet or Bazet, but they don't give a Talmudic reference or even say which Talmud it was. Do you have a way to look it up? If you find the source, is there anything else of quotable interest there? Thanks. Zero talk 06:48, 17 February 2010 (UTC)