This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A tag has been placed on 2005 Thailand Open – Doubles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. –
Dream out loud (
talk)
00:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hey, if you are ever light on wiki work... [1] :) You did a good job last time. Grk1011/Stephen ( talk) 00:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Afkatk, thanks for the comments on the FLC page. I've addressed all of the small issues you outlined! If I fixed everything, can you specify your view on the article. Thanks :)-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 22:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Afkatk, I took care of both of them! Thanks :)-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 22:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have restarted the above FLC because the consensus was unclear. Can you revisit it to ensure that your concerns have been resolved? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 02:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't believe the failure to translate a few words on an English-language page makes the page qualify for a language=German
parameter, as you
now insist is the case at
Mariah Carey singles discography (previously, you
insisted it was French). The site is English, and not French, and not German. The manager's Swiss and it's not astonishing that some things go untranslated from what I assume is the webmaster's usual language. It's still an English-language page, so we should leave the language unspecified (unless you want to compromise and say language=English, with some German
). Yes, the Biographie page is pure German, and if we were citing that page I'd have to specify the language as German, but it's not part of our reference, so it's irrelevant.
I'm tired of playing revert games with you, and I don't appreciate the condescension of phrases like "did you bother to click the tab" and "if you bother to check the link". I assure you I visited the page in question, as I do with every page I review, change, cite, or add in an article, every time. That's the way one is supposed to do it, and I'm insulted that you implied otherwise. As it is, I'm wondering why you insisted on French in your first reversion, if, in fact, you had bothered to examine the page before reverting, you should have left the French right out of it. And if you had bothered to study my edit before reverting it, you would have seen that I removed a citation that had nothing to do with the Australian peak of "Just Stand Up!". My edit also provided instructions on using the right tab, and corrected the work/publisher parameters, but your revert undid those changes, too. In future, please assume good faith, although I do make mistakes, and take some care when you revert others' edits. Thanks. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 14:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm not one to get in someone else business on here but when it comes to Pro wrestling and our Project members going out of line then it's my business as well. For the record 3RR only applies within a 24 hour time span of edit wars not a 48 hour time span as you said on Mickey's talk page. You edit to Bragging Rights (2010) was not right just leave it there before you make it worse for yourself and for others.-- Nascar king 16:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 2 — 3rd Quarter, 2010
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2010, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:17, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
I just want to know, since you think the edits for Bragging Rights (2010) violate Wikipedia:Manual of Style (text formatting), you have to edit all other WWE PPV's the same way. Do you think all other PPV's are also violating MOS:Text?-- Mikeymike2001 ( talk) 00:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I have replied, as I don not think that it fails WP:REF. Can you please review your comments? Thanks, Adabow ( talk · contribs) 05:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I've fixed the issue you raised in the FLC. Nergaal ( talk) 21:36, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Replied again. Nergaal ( talk) 07:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
As a regular at FLC, I'd like to draw your attention to ongoing discussion here about changes to the format of tables which will affect all existing FLs and all current and future FLCs. Your input would be welcome. Thanks for your contributions so far! The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't mean to be rude but you left a message on my talk page about my edits on WWE Raw and you said something about NPOV what does POV have anything to do with anything I did?-- Nascar king 22:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I've fixed the errors. Can you please check it out? Novice7 (Talk) 06:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
I've made some edits, if you would be able to stop back in. Thanks, Grsz 11 15:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
True, what you have written is mostly correct about the Long Island of the Holston in Kingsport. There had been a reference to Tennessee getting its name from the Cherokee meetings on Long Island that was factually incorrect, as the "Tanasee" Indian settlement was in Monroe County on the Little T, and had nothing to do with either the Holston River or Long Island.
When I was in Tennessee history class at Dobyns-Bennett in Kingsport 40 years ago, we were told and taught that most of the Cherokee dealings in the area occurred on the river portion at the Netherland Inn, near the confluence of the North and South Forks (Kingsport is on the South Fork). There were Cherokee outposts on the island, but none of them in village form. Again, that's what we were taught in school there. I always took the teachers' words as fact, since nobody knows more about things than the people who have lived there all their lives. Csneed ( talk) 01:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
That's OK.. the Long Island edit must have come from somewhere else. Sorry! Csneed ( talk) 22:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
You were kind enough to make detailed comments on the feature list candidacy of Order of battle of the Battle of Long Island. If you could revisit your comments to see if you think the list is now satisfactory, I'd be most grateful. Thanks! Magic ♪piano 03:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey :), please help reach consensus and vote here.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 05:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Can you please review your position at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Rihanna discography/archive1? Adabow ( talk · contribs) 09:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
You added the Expand template to the
Government of Wales Act 2006 (which happens to be on my watchlist) ...
* The template says: “Further information might be found on the
talk page”, but you haven't provided your rationale for adding the template (i.e. exactly what you want to happen to the article)
* Hundreds of thousands of Wikipedia articles need further input/expansion; why choose this one?
* I took a look at the
history page; your only contribution to the article was to add that template.
* The most obvious question, of course: what stops you from expanding the article yourself, instead of expecting others to do it for you?
Just curious like. I find the best strategy is just to get stuck in, other editors then tend to come out of the woodwork. Let me know if you think I can help. Cheers,
Daicaregos (
talk)
Hey, just to let you know, I addressed your last comment on the FLC. I added a note about the naming. The only thing I didn't address was about the two charts. If there's anything else you still object over, could you possibly let me know? Thanks! -- Hurricanehink ( talk) 04:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
All your points have been resolved, and I think the nominator would appreciate it if you revisited. Adabow ( talk · contribs) 01:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Replied on the FLC page. Adabow ( talk · contribs) 02:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
hello,
please have a look at this nomination. It would be nice if you help to promote this disco into a FL. Thank you.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:14, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Heya :) Please help reach consensus here. Its an easy vote, so don't get discouraged.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I addressed your concern at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of X-Men video games/archive1 and hope that you could comment further. ( Guyinblack25 talk 15:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC))
The club is famously not in Monaco as per other wiki pages.... KnowIG ( talk) 18:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, would you mind revisiting the loose ends at the FLC? I appreciate it. — Designate ( talk) 01:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2010
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2010, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for your comments at my nomination of List of current sovereign monarchs. I believe most of the issues you presented have been resolved. Could you please revisit your comment on the page, and let me know if there is anything else to consider before the administrators make their decision? Thanks again, Nightw 03:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Afkatk, You recently reviewed Melanie C discography. Some time has passed and the article has been updated. Could you please re-review the article. The review page is located here: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Melanie C discography/archive2 Thanks! Tsange ► talk 19:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
hello,
could you be more specific about your comment. I put this list into the WP:GOCE some times ago and added a section. I still don't understand exactly what you meant or still mean. Thank you.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
I believe that I have addressed your comments at the FLC for the Timeline of the 2004-05 Australian region cyclone season. I was wondering if you have any more comments for the list. If you have any time, could you look at the article?
Thanks!
— Iune (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Afkatk. I have restarted the above FLC because the consensus was unclear. Can you revisit it to ensure that all of your comments have been addressed, and if possible, declare whether you support, oppose, or are neutral towards the list's promotion to FL status? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey, i have just cleaned up the David Wood (Christian apologist) which you voted for deletion. Do you still maintain your original position? Someone65 ( talk) 03:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
I said I was done speaking at the AFD for the Corre (and I am), but I thought you might want to know NascarKing/Voices submitted a request for page protection. Link. Hazardous Matt ( talk) 23:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
I'll hold off on the GAR notification issue if you're going to work on the article with Nascarking. This is one of those situations where I think the person needs to explain why they did what they did. He's ducked the question twice, and I doubt he's going to learn from it. Anyway, like I said, if you're dealing with things, I'll back away. Hazardous Matt ( talk) 03:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Seeing that you reviewed my last FL nom, the List of Premiers of the Soviet Union, I was wondering if you by any chance could take a look at the List of heads of state of the Soviet Union article and review it. If you did I would be very thankful! -- TIAYN ( talk) 08:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
My apologies. I did not know I reverted that. The only reason I can see is that I toughed the rollback link at the watch list and didn't notice. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 16:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
I've responded to your comments on the review page. -- TIAYN ( talk) 22:15, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Nergaal ( talk) 02:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
It still needs reference though... Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 12:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
hello,
I don't really like to beg about response, but this list needs to be promoted today, exactly the time the first round of the WikiCup will end. I have only 2 points; this is not enough to go into the second round. I replaced IMDb links with movies.yahoo.com links, as it has much more reliability than IMDb. Thank you.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
It's already in the main page Dencod16 ( talk) 10:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC). It is redundant to put in the draw as well. Then remove the link to the main article, if everything is in the main draw article already, what is the purpose of the main article link. Dencod16 ( talk) 10:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC) The lead serves both as an introduction to the article and as a summary of its most important aspects. So the main draw is an introduction. Good Luck Dencod16 ( talk) 10:26, 1 March 2011 (UTC). What the hell. 2011 Challenger of Dallas is the main article so it summarizes 2011 Challenger of Dallas - Singles. as to who won and the seeds which are the most important details. Dencod16 ( talk) 10:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey, there is no need to put the lead again in the singles and doubles draws. There just should be the information about who was the last champion and so on. All the info is already stated in the main article... Kante4 ( talk) 11:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
you have 45 mins to sort out the houston page back to the way it was. KnowIG ( talk) 20:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Just a friendly reminder that you left comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Venues of the 1994 Winter Olympics/archive1, and Dabomb87 is nagging me to nag you :) Arsenikk (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Will you please support or oppose? [2] TCO ( talk) 03:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with taking U.S. state reptiles to star-dom. You showed that you had engaged with the article, and we implimented all of your comments, at least in part. Keep engaged. Let's work together and build great content! See you around the wiki, man!
TCO ( talk) 23:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 02:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
It's good to see you back again. I raised the question of Lilian Watson again on my talk page and on the tennis page, but no takers (again) so I'm still p[lugging on with the draws and scores. Rmallett ( talk) 00:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
– MuZemike 14:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision is currently suffering from inactivity, despite having a large number of active users as project members. It is recommended that you add the project talk page to your watchlist if you have not already done so, since there are a number of proposals on this talk page which will significantly impact on the project that should be of interest to you.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC).
Thank you for your recent editions to the Eurovision Song Contest 2012 article, however please be aware that the reliability of the news.az source is currently disputed. Myself and other editors added very similar content to what you added, but it was removed by other editors due to this dispute. You may wish to join in with the discussion on the issue at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest#news.az is an unreliable source. CT Cooper · talk 22:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
I have replied on my talk page. CT Cooper · talk 12:59, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that there have been some changes to operations surrounding Eurovision articles, these being that:
{{
WikiProject Eurovision}}
now accepts importance ratings as well as quality ratings, and the project now has a formal
assessment department which gives details on how to assess articles, and provides a place for contributors to request re-assessment. Feel free to add the {{
WikiProject Eurovision}}
template to the talk page of any new Eurovision articles you create.{{
Eurovision-stub}}
. Please only use this on Eurovision Song Contest stubs, with {{
Music-stub}}
and {{
Dance-stub}}
being the appropriate template for other Eruovision contests.If you have any questions, please ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:05, 26 August 2011 (UTC).
Just so you know, an application for mediation has been made with you listed as an involved party at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-08-29/Eurovision Song Contest 2012. CT Cooper · talk 18:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
You removed the video along with images. Can I ask why?
While I agree at the talk page to your assessment, perhaps you would consider my template proposal there for the images. I feel lots of images is a good way to illustrate the damage in the article while also feel they shouldn't over-clutter the article.
-- とある白い猫 chi? 19:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Aureez/Archive5! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC).
I changed your numbers after investigating a post at Wikipedia:Help desk#US Open (tennis) editions and examining many sources found with Google, for example on "US Open" "130th edition", but now I'm not sure what's going on. PrimeHunter ( talk) 17:12, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Are you interested in creating the Great Britain at the 2012 Winter Youth Olympics article? Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions 16:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Template duplications on the future use of navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how these templates are organized, named, and used in future, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC).
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Recategorising on the proposal of recategorising following the rollout exercise of the new navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how articles are reorganized in future to provide an easier index system, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:16, 24 April 2012 (UTC).
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the blue bar.
The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This Newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot ( talk) 00:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC). If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list.
WikiProject Eurovision: This is a reminder to all members of Project Eurovision, that there is still an ongoing RfC discussion taking place at the project talk page. It is vital that everyone participates in this discussion, as it concerns the future manual of style and article layout in regards to Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year articles. This is your ideal opportunity to contribute suggestions and ideas on a major issue, which will reflect on the way these articles will be written in future. Thank You! EdwardsBot ( talk) 14:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
• WikiProject News • Issue #20 • July 2012
| ||
Home • Talk • Portal • Newsdesk • Archives | ||
Bienvenue! Willkommen! Welcome! Please be warm-hearted in encouraging everyone to do their best to contribute to all Eurovision-related Wikipedia articles, and welcome our new members to the project. It is easy for editors to get into conflict with each other, and things can get very nasty on the most trivial of issues, whether that be on the language of songs, the names of certain countries, or how we deal with incidents at the contest. In such circumstances it is worth remembering one thing: we are all here to build an encyclopedia, and the contribution of Eurovision to human knowledge can only be given justice if we work together and make articles, not drama!
Happy editing!
|
| |
Members The project had 90 members, with eighty-six active, and four inactive members at the time of publication. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list Have you encountered an editor who is interested in Eurovision? Then why not place our invitation template on their talk page and welcome them to the project.. | ||
We would like to welcome the following new members who joined since our June publication. (in alphabetical order) |
We would like to bid farewell and show our appreciation to the following members who have decided to depart the project for personal reasons since our June publication. (in alphabetical order) |
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2012, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Your monthly WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter has arrived. To open click "show". | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WikiProject Newsletter - August 2012
| ||||||
HOME • TALK • PORTAL • NEWSDESK • ARCHIVES | ||||||
Bienvenue! Willkommen! Welcome! Please be warm-hearted in encouraging everyone to do their best to contribute to all Eurovision-related Wikipedia articles, and welcome our new members to the project. The past month has been an eventful one for the project as a whole. Old dramas have closed, new ones have begun. Four articles nominated for GA review, three of them passed and promoted, with one of them making ProjectEurovision history by being the first annual contest article to ever achieve GA status. If it wasn't for the hard work and the many hours of team collaborations that we have endured on this project, then those accolades would never have been gained. Each of those article promotions are as a result of your continuous determination to be part of the best team this project has seen for a long time. There is a teamwork barnstar with this newsletter for you to cherish and you may display the award on your pages if you wish. Now we look to the months ahead and start preparations for Malmo 2013, and see if we can work to getting another annual article to GA status. Here's to you - the team of excellence.
Happy editing! | ||||||
|
| |||||
Members The project had 92 members, with eighty-eight active, and four inactive members at the time of publication. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list Have you encountered an editor who is interested in Eurovision? Then why not place our invitation template on their talk page and welcome them to the project..
| ||||||
|
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A tag has been placed on 2005 Thailand Open – Doubles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these administrators to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. –
Dream out loud (
talk)
00:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hey, if you are ever light on wiki work... [1] :) You did a good job last time. Grk1011/Stephen ( talk) 00:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi there Afkatk, thanks for the comments on the FLC page. I've addressed all of the small issues you outlined! If I fixed everything, can you specify your view on the article. Thanks :)-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 22:18, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Afkatk, I took care of both of them! Thanks :)-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 22:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have restarted the above FLC because the consensus was unclear. Can you revisit it to ensure that your concerns have been resolved? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 02:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't believe the failure to translate a few words on an English-language page makes the page qualify for a language=German
parameter, as you
now insist is the case at
Mariah Carey singles discography (previously, you
insisted it was French). The site is English, and not French, and not German. The manager's Swiss and it's not astonishing that some things go untranslated from what I assume is the webmaster's usual language. It's still an English-language page, so we should leave the language unspecified (unless you want to compromise and say language=English, with some German
). Yes, the Biographie page is pure German, and if we were citing that page I'd have to specify the language as German, but it's not part of our reference, so it's irrelevant.
I'm tired of playing revert games with you, and I don't appreciate the condescension of phrases like "did you bother to click the tab" and "if you bother to check the link". I assure you I visited the page in question, as I do with every page I review, change, cite, or add in an article, every time. That's the way one is supposed to do it, and I'm insulted that you implied otherwise. As it is, I'm wondering why you insisted on French in your first reversion, if, in fact, you had bothered to examine the page before reverting, you should have left the French right out of it. And if you had bothered to study my edit before reverting it, you would have seen that I removed a citation that had nothing to do with the Australian peak of "Just Stand Up!". My edit also provided instructions on using the right tab, and corrected the work/publisher parameters, but your revert undid those changes, too. In future, please assume good faith, although I do make mistakes, and take some care when you revert others' edits. Thanks. — JohnFromPinckney ( talk) 14:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
I'm not one to get in someone else business on here but when it comes to Pro wrestling and our Project members going out of line then it's my business as well. For the record 3RR only applies within a 24 hour time span of edit wars not a 48 hour time span as you said on Mickey's talk page. You edit to Bragging Rights (2010) was not right just leave it there before you make it worse for yourself and for others.-- Nascar king 16:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 2 — 3rd Quarter, 2010
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2010, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:17, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
I just want to know, since you think the edits for Bragging Rights (2010) violate Wikipedia:Manual of Style (text formatting), you have to edit all other WWE PPV's the same way. Do you think all other PPV's are also violating MOS:Text?-- Mikeymike2001 ( talk) 00:06, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
I have replied, as I don not think that it fails WP:REF. Can you please review your comments? Thanks, Adabow ( talk · contribs) 05:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
I've fixed the issue you raised in the FLC. Nergaal ( talk) 21:36, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Replied again. Nergaal ( talk) 07:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
As a regular at FLC, I'd like to draw your attention to ongoing discussion here about changes to the format of tables which will affect all existing FLs and all current and future FLCs. Your input would be welcome. Thanks for your contributions so far! The Rambling Man ( talk) 20:19, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
I don't mean to be rude but you left a message on my talk page about my edits on WWE Raw and you said something about NPOV what does POV have anything to do with anything I did?-- Nascar king 22:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I've fixed the errors. Can you please check it out? Novice7 (Talk) 06:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
I've made some edits, if you would be able to stop back in. Thanks, Grsz 11 15:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
True, what you have written is mostly correct about the Long Island of the Holston in Kingsport. There had been a reference to Tennessee getting its name from the Cherokee meetings on Long Island that was factually incorrect, as the "Tanasee" Indian settlement was in Monroe County on the Little T, and had nothing to do with either the Holston River or Long Island.
When I was in Tennessee history class at Dobyns-Bennett in Kingsport 40 years ago, we were told and taught that most of the Cherokee dealings in the area occurred on the river portion at the Netherland Inn, near the confluence of the North and South Forks (Kingsport is on the South Fork). There were Cherokee outposts on the island, but none of them in village form. Again, that's what we were taught in school there. I always took the teachers' words as fact, since nobody knows more about things than the people who have lived there all their lives. Csneed ( talk) 01:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
That's OK.. the Long Island edit must have come from somewhere else. Sorry! Csneed ( talk) 22:51, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
You were kind enough to make detailed comments on the feature list candidacy of Order of battle of the Battle of Long Island. If you could revisit your comments to see if you think the list is now satisfactory, I'd be most grateful. Thanks! Magic ♪piano 03:35, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey :), please help reach consensus and vote here.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 05:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Can you please review your position at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Rihanna discography/archive1? Adabow ( talk · contribs) 09:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
You added the Expand template to the
Government of Wales Act 2006 (which happens to be on my watchlist) ...
* The template says: “Further information might be found on the
talk page”, but you haven't provided your rationale for adding the template (i.e. exactly what you want to happen to the article)
* Hundreds of thousands of Wikipedia articles need further input/expansion; why choose this one?
* I took a look at the
history page; your only contribution to the article was to add that template.
* The most obvious question, of course: what stops you from expanding the article yourself, instead of expecting others to do it for you?
Just curious like. I find the best strategy is just to get stuck in, other editors then tend to come out of the woodwork. Let me know if you think I can help. Cheers,
Daicaregos (
talk)
Hey, just to let you know, I addressed your last comment on the FLC. I added a note about the naming. The only thing I didn't address was about the two charts. If there's anything else you still object over, could you possibly let me know? Thanks! -- Hurricanehink ( talk) 04:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
All your points have been resolved, and I think the nominator would appreciate it if you revisited. Adabow ( talk · contribs) 01:58, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Replied on the FLC page. Adabow ( talk · contribs) 02:09, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
hello,
please have a look at this nomination. It would be nice if you help to promote this disco into a FL. Thank you.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:14, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Heya :) Please help reach consensus here. Its an easy vote, so don't get discouraged.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I addressed your concern at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of X-Men video games/archive1 and hope that you could comment further. ( Guyinblack25 talk 15:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC))
The club is famously not in Monaco as per other wiki pages.... KnowIG ( talk) 18:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi, would you mind revisiting the loose ends at the FLC? I appreciate it. — Designate ( talk) 01:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2010
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2010, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:18, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Thank you for your comments at my nomination of List of current sovereign monarchs. I believe most of the issues you presented have been resolved. Could you please revisit your comment on the page, and let me know if there is anything else to consider before the administrators make their decision? Thanks again, Nightw 03:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Afkatk, You recently reviewed Melanie C discography. Some time has passed and the article has been updated. Could you please re-review the article. The review page is located here: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Melanie C discography/archive2 Thanks! Tsange ► talk 19:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
hello,
could you be more specific about your comment. I put this list into the WP:GOCE some times ago and added a section. I still don't understand exactly what you meant or still mean. Thank you.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
I believe that I have addressed your comments at the FLC for the Timeline of the 2004-05 Australian region cyclone season. I was wondering if you have any more comments for the list. If you have any time, could you look at the article?
Thanks!
— Iune (talk) 20:04, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi Afkatk. I have restarted the above FLC because the consensus was unclear. Can you revisit it to ensure that all of your comments have been addressed, and if possible, declare whether you support, oppose, or are neutral towards the list's promotion to FL status? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:51, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Hey, i have just cleaned up the David Wood (Christian apologist) which you voted for deletion. Do you still maintain your original position? Someone65 ( talk) 03:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
I said I was done speaking at the AFD for the Corre (and I am), but I thought you might want to know NascarKing/Voices submitted a request for page protection. Link. Hazardous Matt ( talk) 23:06, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
I'll hold off on the GAR notification issue if you're going to work on the article with Nascarking. This is one of those situations where I think the person needs to explain why they did what they did. He's ducked the question twice, and I doubt he's going to learn from it. Anyway, like I said, if you're dealing with things, I'll back away. Hazardous Matt ( talk) 03:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Seeing that you reviewed my last FL nom, the List of Premiers of the Soviet Union, I was wondering if you by any chance could take a look at the List of heads of state of the Soviet Union article and review it. If you did I would be very thankful! -- TIAYN ( talk) 08:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
My apologies. I did not know I reverted that. The only reason I can see is that I toughed the rollback link at the watch list and didn't notice. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 16:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
I've responded to your comments on the review page. -- TIAYN ( talk) 22:15, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Nergaal ( talk) 02:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
It still needs reference though... Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 12:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
hello,
I don't really like to beg about response, but this list needs to be promoted today, exactly the time the first round of the WikiCup will end. I have only 2 points; this is not enough to go into the second round. I replaced IMDb links with movies.yahoo.com links, as it has much more reliability than IMDb. Thank you.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
It's already in the main page Dencod16 ( talk) 10:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC). It is redundant to put in the draw as well. Then remove the link to the main article, if everything is in the main draw article already, what is the purpose of the main article link. Dencod16 ( talk) 10:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC) The lead serves both as an introduction to the article and as a summary of its most important aspects. So the main draw is an introduction. Good Luck Dencod16 ( talk) 10:26, 1 March 2011 (UTC). What the hell. 2011 Challenger of Dallas is the main article so it summarizes 2011 Challenger of Dallas - Singles. as to who won and the seeds which are the most important details. Dencod16 ( talk) 10:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Hey, there is no need to put the lead again in the singles and doubles draws. There just should be the information about who was the last champion and so on. All the info is already stated in the main article... Kante4 ( talk) 11:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
you have 45 mins to sort out the houston page back to the way it was. KnowIG ( talk) 20:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Just a friendly reminder that you left comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Venues of the 1994 Winter Olympics/archive1, and Dabomb87 is nagging me to nag you :) Arsenikk (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Will you please support or oppose? [2] TCO ( talk) 03:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your help with taking U.S. state reptiles to star-dom. You showed that you had engaged with the article, and we implimented all of your comments, at least in part. Keep engaged. Let's work together and build great content! See you around the wiki, man!
TCO ( talk) 23:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 02:01, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
It's good to see you back again. I raised the question of Lilian Watson again on my talk page and on the tennis page, but no takers (again) so I'm still p[lugging on with the draws and scores. Rmallett ( talk) 00:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
– MuZemike 14:06, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision is currently suffering from inactivity, despite having a large number of active users as project members. It is recommended that you add the project talk page to your watchlist if you have not already done so, since there are a number of proposals on this talk page which will significantly impact on the project that should be of interest to you.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:30, 3 August 2011 (UTC).
Thank you for your recent editions to the Eurovision Song Contest 2012 article, however please be aware that the reliability of the news.az source is currently disputed. Myself and other editors added very similar content to what you added, but it was removed by other editors due to this dispute. You may wish to join in with the discussion on the issue at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest#news.az is an unreliable source. CT Cooper · talk 22:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
I have replied on my talk page. CT Cooper · talk 12:59, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
Please note that there have been some changes to operations surrounding Eurovision articles, these being that:
{{
WikiProject Eurovision}}
now accepts importance ratings as well as quality ratings, and the project now has a formal
assessment department which gives details on how to assess articles, and provides a place for contributors to request re-assessment. Feel free to add the {{
WikiProject Eurovision}}
template to the talk page of any new Eurovision articles you create.{{
Eurovision-stub}}
. Please only use this on Eurovision Song Contest stubs, with {{
Music-stub}}
and {{
Dance-stub}}
being the appropriate template for other Eruovision contests.If you have any questions, please ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:05, 26 August 2011 (UTC).
Just so you know, an application for mediation has been made with you listed as an involved party at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2011-08-29/Eurovision Song Contest 2012. CT Cooper · talk 18:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
You removed the video along with images. Can I ask why?
While I agree at the talk page to your assessment, perhaps you would consider my template proposal there for the images. I feel lots of images is a good way to illustrate the damage in the article while also feel they shouldn't over-clutter the article.
-- とある白い猫 chi? 19:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Aureez/Archive5! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC).
I changed your numbers after investigating a post at Wikipedia:Help desk#US Open (tennis) editions and examining many sources found with Google, for example on "US Open" "130th edition", but now I'm not sure what's going on. PrimeHunter ( talk) 17:12, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Are you interested in creating the Great Britain at the 2012 Winter Youth Olympics article? Intoronto1125 Talk Contributions 16:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2011
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Template duplications on the future use of navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how these templates are organized, named, and used in future, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 15:19, 11 March 2012 (UTC).
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4
2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
There is currently a discussion ongoing at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision#Recategorising on the proposal of recategorising following the rollout exercise of the new navigation templates (navboxes) within Eurovision articles. The consequences of this discussion could have a large impact on how articles are reorganized in future to provide an easier index system, so all project members are invited to participate in the discussion.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:16, 24 April 2012 (UTC).
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the blue bar.
The WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This Newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot ( talk) 00:10, 30 May 2012 (UTC). If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list.
WikiProject Eurovision: This is a reminder to all members of Project Eurovision, that there is still an ongoing RfC discussion taking place at the project talk page. It is vital that everyone participates in this discussion, as it concerns the future manual of style and article layout in regards to Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year articles. This is your ideal opportunity to contribute suggestions and ideas on a major issue, which will reflect on the way these articles will be written in future. Thank You! EdwardsBot ( talk) 14:06, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
• WikiProject News • Issue #20 • July 2012
| ||
Home • Talk • Portal • Newsdesk • Archives | ||
Bienvenue! Willkommen! Welcome! Please be warm-hearted in encouraging everyone to do their best to contribute to all Eurovision-related Wikipedia articles, and welcome our new members to the project. It is easy for editors to get into conflict with each other, and things can get very nasty on the most trivial of issues, whether that be on the language of songs, the names of certain countries, or how we deal with incidents at the contest. In such circumstances it is worth remembering one thing: we are all here to build an encyclopedia, and the contribution of Eurovision to human knowledge can only be given justice if we work together and make articles, not drama!
Happy editing!
|
| |
Members The project had 90 members, with eighty-six active, and four inactive members at the time of publication. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list Have you encountered an editor who is interested in Eurovision? Then why not place our invitation template on their talk page and welcome them to the project.. | ||
We would like to welcome the following new members who joined since our June publication. (in alphabetical order) |
We would like to bid farewell and show our appreciation to the following members who have decided to depart the project for personal reasons since our June publication. (in alphabetical order) |
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2012
Previous issue |
Index |
Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2
2012, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Your monthly WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter has arrived. To open click "show". | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WikiProject Newsletter - August 2012
| ||||||
HOME • TALK • PORTAL • NEWSDESK • ARCHIVES | ||||||
Bienvenue! Willkommen! Welcome! Please be warm-hearted in encouraging everyone to do their best to contribute to all Eurovision-related Wikipedia articles, and welcome our new members to the project. The past month has been an eventful one for the project as a whole. Old dramas have closed, new ones have begun. Four articles nominated for GA review, three of them passed and promoted, with one of them making ProjectEurovision history by being the first annual contest article to ever achieve GA status. If it wasn't for the hard work and the many hours of team collaborations that we have endured on this project, then those accolades would never have been gained. Each of those article promotions are as a result of your continuous determination to be part of the best team this project has seen for a long time. There is a teamwork barnstar with this newsletter for you to cherish and you may display the award on your pages if you wish. Now we look to the months ahead and start preparations for Malmo 2013, and see if we can work to getting another annual article to GA status. Here's to you - the team of excellence.
Happy editing! | ||||||
|
| |||||
Members The project had 92 members, with eighty-eight active, and four inactive members at the time of publication. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list Have you encountered an editor who is interested in Eurovision? Then why not place our invitation template on their talk page and welcome them to the project..
| ||||||
|