![]() |
Hi AriNikoBradshaw! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Template:Phoenix Sister Cities has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Fram (
talk)
11:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at
Talk:Fetty Wap discography, please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 18:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Stephen Davis (activist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CUPIDICAE💕
21:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello AriNikoBradshaw. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:AriNikoBradshaw. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AriNikoBradshaw|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
CUPIDICAE💕
21:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Pozzolo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
CUPIDICAE💕 21:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GeneralNotability (
talk)
23:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)AriNikoBradshaw ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have no sockpuppet account. The other account editing the pages is not me. I am being accused of things which I am not doing. AriNikoBradshaw ( talk) 23:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to specifically address the WP:MEAT part. Yamla ( talk) 13:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
So... can I be unblocked? GeneralNotability I am not being paid by Jerone. The sources in that article I thought were decent sources. I would love to, over the next few months, develop great pages for all notable candidates involved in Arizona. I do not take money from anybody who I post about. Cheers AriNikoBradshaw ( talk) 23:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
AriNikoBradshaw ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I acknowledge the meat part. I did not understand the rule. I will refrain from touching those pages and will try better to follow the rules as I had for ten years prior to this incident on Wikipedia. I still firmly believe that many of the edits made by the person who started this scuffle were politically motivated, but that is neither here nor there. I'd like to be able to access my account again and I'll stay away from controversy. Cheers. AriNikoBradshaw ( talk) 01:48, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline: You were only blocked for 1 week; it expired months ago. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A tag has been placed on Category:American politicians of Uruguyan descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, AriNikoBradshaw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Stephen Davis (activist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Vacant0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
New Ecological and Social People's Union, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Vacant0 (
talk)
07:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi AriNikoBradshaw! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Template:Phoenix Sister Cities has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Fram (
talk)
11:10, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at
Talk:Fetty Wap discography, please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- Jax 0677 ( talk) 18:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Stephen Davis (activist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CUPIDICAE💕
21:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello AriNikoBradshaw. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the
Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at
User:AriNikoBradshaw. The template {{
Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AriNikoBradshaw|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
CUPIDICAE💕
21:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Pozzolo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
CUPIDICAE💕 21:22, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GeneralNotability (
talk)
23:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)AriNikoBradshaw ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have no sockpuppet account. The other account editing the pages is not me. I am being accused of things which I am not doing. AriNikoBradshaw ( talk) 23:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to specifically address the WP:MEAT part. Yamla ( talk) 13:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
So... can I be unblocked? GeneralNotability I am not being paid by Jerone. The sources in that article I thought were decent sources. I would love to, over the next few months, develop great pages for all notable candidates involved in Arizona. I do not take money from anybody who I post about. Cheers AriNikoBradshaw ( talk) 23:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
AriNikoBradshaw ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I acknowledge the meat part. I did not understand the rule. I will refrain from touching those pages and will try better to follow the rules as I had for ten years prior to this incident on Wikipedia. I still firmly believe that many of the edits made by the person who started this scuffle were politically motivated, but that is neither here nor there. I'd like to be able to access my account again and I'll stay away from controversy. Cheers. AriNikoBradshaw ( talk) 01:48, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline: You were only blocked for 1 week; it expired months ago. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A tag has been placed on Category:American politicians of Uruguyan descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello, AriNikoBradshaw. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Stephen Davis (activist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 23:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Vacant0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
New Ecological and Social People's Union, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Vacant0 (
talk)
07:24, 8 April 2023 (UTC)