![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, Apparition11/Archives, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
AW (
talk)
18:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
it told me to leave a message so i listened to it and am leaving one —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.89.83 ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 2008 December 1
==August 2008==
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Headstart School (Pakistan). When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Jpoelma13 (
talk)
20:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
I apologize if you believe that I am taking this warning too hard, but I take warnings, both giving and receiving them, very seriously. After I stepped back and cooled off, I realized that the problem may be that you do not see where I was coming from. Below is all of the text that you restored from my removal and my reasoning for removing it. [2] is the diff for reference. Please review it and see if it really deserved a warning.
It has a co-educational setup from montessori to class 5 and beyond up to A-level. Classes 6 to O-level have separate branches for boys and girls, respectively.
This sentence maybe should've been merged into a sentence in the 'Academic Programs' section since it really makes no sense to someone not familiar with the subject and gives no explanation. Also, the sentence that previously followed was blatant POV. Perhaps it should've been merged, but I still believe that it's justified.
Headstart "Robofort" Center for Engineering and Robotics is in operation since 2003. Initial technical support was provided by PCS Edventures Inc.(based at Idaho, USA). At Headstart-Robofort we have dovetailed technology, engineering, communications, math, problem solving and team skills into existing curriculum with project-based learning.
What is the Headstart "Robofort" Center for Engineering and Robotics? It does not explain at all. This section also included an external link in the main body to the company who provides technical support, which I don't see as notable. It also uses the first person. The following sentence previously was blatant POV. Given all this, I don't really see what is accomplished by this paragraph, besides promoting the organizations.
--Academic Programs--
The 'O' and 'A' Level programs are affiliated with University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate ( UCLES). 'O' Level students are required to take minimum of eight subjects from a wide range of subjects, to qualify for the GCE ( General Certificate of Education). 'A' Level students are required to choose a minimum of three subjects.
---O-Level Subjects---
- Additional Mathematics
- Art & Design
- Biology
- Business Studies
- Chemistry
- Computer Studies
- Economics
- English Language
- English Literature
- Fashion & Fabrics
- Food & Nutrition
- Islamiat
- Mathematics
- Pakistan Studies
- Physics
- Principles of Accounting
- Urdu
- World Affairs
---A-Level Subjects---
- Accounting
- Art & Design
- Biology
- Business Studies
- Chemistry
- Computing
- Economics
- Literature in English
- General Paper (AS)
- Law
- Mathematics
- Physics
- Psychology
- Sociology
- Urdu
This section is mainly a list of subjects. According to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Article_guidelines#What_not_to_include, "Trivia which is only of interest to pupils in the school (such as daily lunch menus, location of the toilets, a room-by-room description of the school facilities)" should not be included. Unfortunately, I was unable to find as much as a discussion about lists of curriculum. I don't see how this would interest anyone but students. Regardless of if we disagree, I think this removal is justified. The opening sentence may should have been left, but the second sentence should have been deleted if the list was.
I'll conceed that possibly one sentence should have been left (and another merged with it), but I believe that the rest of what I removed was justified. I ask you, is that sentence really enough to justify the warning or do you think my logic was so flawed that it has no merit? If no, please strikeout your warning. I'm not necessarily saying that you're wrong for restoring, but I'm also not saying that I'm wrong for removing it. It seems to me that in order to make Wikipedia better, we would be better off debating the removal instead of you just saying that I'm wrong and issuing a warning. In my experience, when people see things as differently as we apparently do, the best answer is usually somewhere in the middle. Thanks.
Apparition11 (
talk)
02:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Also, in my heated moment, I overlooked one thing you said: that you probably should've written a message. This is what I was wanting. I have no problem discussing things, and, from time to time, I've been known to be wrong :). That and I believe you also admitted that the template wasn't exactly right for the situation. Well, according to Wikipedia:Warn: "you are responsible for ensuring that the template's text is appropriate to the violation: if the template's tone isn't appropriate, don't use the template." Given all of this, please strikeout the warning. Apparition11 ( talk) 10:23, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
While your edit may be true (I don't know), please do not insert commentary into the main article. Instead, use the talk page or provide a reference. Thanks. Apparition11 (talk) 23:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (pasted from 76.185.45.51's talk page) Apparition11 ( talk) 23:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
So rather than actually checking for facts, you simply revert pages.
You people are ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.45.51 ( talk) 23:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
I think you left a comment on my talk page that you intended for talk. Cheers! Apparition11 ( talk) 00:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC) (pasted from User talk:EricV89). Apparition11 ( talk) 00:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Done Ok, me and the IP address were able to discuss things, so this should end further problems. Thanks. Happy editing! --
eric
(mailbox)
00:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
GL Communications Inc - I nominated this page for speedy deletion because it is an obvious advert for the company, but the author keeps removing the speedy deletion tag. Could you look into this please? Chem-MTFC ( talk) 10:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
I literally just posted the article stub on Caxton Associates about 30 seconds before you nominated it for speedy deletion. I have not even had a chance to add to it. You need to get a life. Aside from being one of the larger hedge funds, one would think that as a business major you might have heard of its founder and operator, Bruce Kovner - whether you live (according to your user page) in the middle of nowhere or not. Stevenmitchell ( talk) 06:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
My page for my band was put up for speedy deletion? I keep editing it to try make it "ok" so it wont be deleted yet it keeps getting deleted. What do i do? Please reply as soon as possible, best wishes Ayperos.
Ayperos ( talk) 01:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
My page was put up yesterday and until I've uploaded a company logo to it, it's now under speedy deletion. I currently a general manager working for Cool Rhino and I believe I do not have any intention to sell nor promote my products through here; however, I believe Wikipedia has established a knowledgable channel for people to learn new things. This company is young; however it has a deep history behind. I hope you could help me ractify the problem for my page to stay on Linda See
Thank you for your reply; However, I've took out the picture (logo) that I've put in this morning and yet, why you still delete my page? What've I done that against the rule? Sometimes I really don't know what's wrong with my article especially if other companies could have their company information on wikepedia and I just don't understand why can I??? THis is unfair. Let me know any thing I could do the reactivate back my page again? LindaSee —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindasee ( talk • contribs) 11:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Apparition11, I am impressed by the work you've been doing here over the past few weeks. I've given you rollback permission to help with your counter-vandalism efforts. Keep up the good work! Owen× ☎ 20:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I received an "inquiry" from the subject of my article asking me to refrain from discussing him online. Can you please remove the discussion in question. I don't need a dispute with anyone. Newyork666 ( talk) 18:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
You have every right to remove a warning from your talk page; after all it is your talk page. According to the policy, the removal a warning from a talk page simply indicates that you have recieved the warning. I Looking back on the incident I was wrong to warn you about it. There are times regular users when should be warned about their actions, however that was not one of those times. I appologize for it. Considering that the article in question was pretty much in question was pretty much an advertizement, I think you that were right to try to get rid of the article. However, it would have been better if you had just marked the page for speedy deletion, instead of deleting most of it. Jpoelma13 | Talk | cont 23:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
I would also add that, as far as I know, I am not allowed to remove or change previously added comments on the talk pages of other users. There is a warning for that in the big list of warning templates. So, I think that you would have been the one to remove it. Jpoelma13 | Talk | cont 23:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
I struck out the Warning, I chose however to leave the rest of conversation intact for the records. Jpoelma13 | Talk | cont 00:12, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
...for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. I have a special present for situations like this...
![]() |
The omgz u unvandaled me Barnstar | |
OMG AWESOME KTHXBAI |
.
Prince of Canada t | c 09:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I've been using Huggle for the past few days and it's really a nice tool. Happy editing! Soliloquial talk 21:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey Apparition11,
I just wanted to point out something. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is this a mistake? I can't really see anything commendable about the edit this user made.
With respect,
ɷ i m b u s a n i a
10:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
A little something
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Just a little reminder and barnstar telling you to keep up your good huggle reerting work! ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 22:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC) |
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for defending my talkpage from the 4chan morons, it hasnt gone unnoticed. The reason I dont want my talk page protected is because of moral principals. Looks like they got bored.....for now. Thanks again ! «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 10:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC) |
lolz you have been following me around i mean cmon ROYAL OAK INTERMEDIATE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.126.11 ( talk) 07:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
hello i am Koman90 creator of my on webpage on myself User:Koman90, i have creatteing editing and maintaing articles in technology fo about two years now and i have hea of other pepole osting autobiographies on wikipedia i was wondering hoe i cloud do this without being deleted. I cannot do it all at once as i am a colege student and working on a project of this magnitude is to longof a proces to sit down and type out in one setting. Please fell free to contact me on my usertalk page or e-mail me at koman90@live.com. -- Koman90 ( talk) 20:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
So if i re-create User:Koman90 But i no dot post my autobiography and leave it just as a user profile as you have done it is safe, am i correct? -- Koman90 ( talk) 20:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
why did you congradualate me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.89.83 ( talk) 22:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
but why
why and how did tou use my ip address and what is it
Hi! Looking at all the external table tennis links, I can't see why the forum link http://forum.oneofakindtrading.com.au is any less relevant. Some of the links point directly to a shop, surely a forum is far more useful and relevant? Cheers! 121.45.18.122 ( talk) 11:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.18.122 ( talk) 11:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation! Yes that is fair enough, I was merely surprised that my links were deleted, whereas some of the others, which seemed blatant advertising, were still included. Can I ask you to consider this site: http://oneofakindtrading.com.au? Since this is my site, I have an obvious conflict of interest, so I'll let you be the judge. This site is a massive collection of equipment reviews (some highly technical) and table tennis articles and guides. Yes there is some advertising on the site, and a link to an online shop, but this is no different to most other sites listed. Compared to some of the other sites, my sites is bigger in terms of reviews, has been going for many years, and contains far more information than just reviews. It is a common reference for people wanting to buy equipment, but don't know what to choose. Table tennis is one of the most complicated sports when it comes to equipment... there are few (if any) sports with such a wide variety of equipment, and where the choice of equipment is so critical. Thanks for your consideration! Haggisv ( talk) 23:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
For reverting vandalism to my user page :) -- Faradayplank ( talk) 20:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
I just want to thank you for the reversion of vandalism you did to my talk page, it's very much appreciated. I've never been under attack like this so I am kind of surprised by this, but thanks for helping me out. -- CrohnieGal Talk 14:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
(Cross posted from User talk:TeaDrinker) I'm so sorry, but it appears that I lied during my last AIV report [5]. I said that it was fresh off of a block, but I misread it. It said December 1, I thought it said December 10 [6]. That's what I get for editing when I should be sleeping. If you feel you need to unblock, feel free to mention me and my blunder in the summary, but this user has a long history of the same disruption (virtually all of their edits). I apologize for this, I wasn't trying to mislead you. Apparition11 ( talk) 04:17, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
(Cross posted from User Talk:Commander Lightning) Please stop with this "Secret Police" nonsense; there is no secret police force on Wikipedia. Your warning here is not appropriate. We keep no list of vandals, and you seem to imply that you have some sort of special authority, which you do not. I replaced that message with a more suitable one. Please read WP:VANDAL to learn how to properly deal with vandalism. As OwenX has already explained, we attempt to educate vandals and not threaten them. In my experience, a simple {{subst:uw-vandalism1}} template stops most vandals from vandalizing again, and, those who don't stop are easier to get blocked by using these templates.
Also, when you spot vandalism, you should also revert it, which you didn't do when you left the inappropriate warning. I have reverted it now (which is how I stumbled onto this). If you really want to help Wikipedia, read the policy that I asked you to read, and follow what it says. If you need any help, feel free to ask me on my talk page, but remember, Wikipedia is a serious project and not a game, which you seem to be treating it as. If you continue like this, you could very possibly end up being blocked. I would also suggest that you think about getting adopted by an experienced user to help teach you how to become a constructive editor. Thank you. Apparition11 ( talk) 01:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
(undent) Yeah, I'm pretty sure that won't happen :) If you want to be a part of a good sized team of vandal fighters, your best bet is probably to get more involved with WP:CVU. Since all vandal fighters do pretty much the same thing, making a lot different groups won't really accomplish much. Apparition11 ( talk) 21:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
(undent)Thank you, sir. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Commander Lightning ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
This is Black Reign. I am sorry I vandalize darkness it was funny though Black Reign 56 ( talk) 16:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, Apparition11/Archives, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
AW (
talk)
18:47, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
it told me to leave a message so i listened to it and am leaving one —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.89.83 ( talk • contribs) 15:17, 2008 December 1
==August 2008==
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from
Headstart School (Pakistan). When removing text, please specify a reason in the
edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's
talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the
page history. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Jpoelma13 (
talk)
20:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
I apologize if you believe that I am taking this warning too hard, but I take warnings, both giving and receiving them, very seriously. After I stepped back and cooled off, I realized that the problem may be that you do not see where I was coming from. Below is all of the text that you restored from my removal and my reasoning for removing it. [2] is the diff for reference. Please review it and see if it really deserved a warning.
It has a co-educational setup from montessori to class 5 and beyond up to A-level. Classes 6 to O-level have separate branches for boys and girls, respectively.
This sentence maybe should've been merged into a sentence in the 'Academic Programs' section since it really makes no sense to someone not familiar with the subject and gives no explanation. Also, the sentence that previously followed was blatant POV. Perhaps it should've been merged, but I still believe that it's justified.
Headstart "Robofort" Center for Engineering and Robotics is in operation since 2003. Initial technical support was provided by PCS Edventures Inc.(based at Idaho, USA). At Headstart-Robofort we have dovetailed technology, engineering, communications, math, problem solving and team skills into existing curriculum with project-based learning.
What is the Headstart "Robofort" Center for Engineering and Robotics? It does not explain at all. This section also included an external link in the main body to the company who provides technical support, which I don't see as notable. It also uses the first person. The following sentence previously was blatant POV. Given all this, I don't really see what is accomplished by this paragraph, besides promoting the organizations.
--Academic Programs--
The 'O' and 'A' Level programs are affiliated with University of Cambridge Local Examination Syndicate ( UCLES). 'O' Level students are required to take minimum of eight subjects from a wide range of subjects, to qualify for the GCE ( General Certificate of Education). 'A' Level students are required to choose a minimum of three subjects.
---O-Level Subjects---
- Additional Mathematics
- Art & Design
- Biology
- Business Studies
- Chemistry
- Computer Studies
- Economics
- English Language
- English Literature
- Fashion & Fabrics
- Food & Nutrition
- Islamiat
- Mathematics
- Pakistan Studies
- Physics
- Principles of Accounting
- Urdu
- World Affairs
---A-Level Subjects---
- Accounting
- Art & Design
- Biology
- Business Studies
- Chemistry
- Computing
- Economics
- Literature in English
- General Paper (AS)
- Law
- Mathematics
- Physics
- Psychology
- Sociology
- Urdu
This section is mainly a list of subjects. According to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Article_guidelines#What_not_to_include, "Trivia which is only of interest to pupils in the school (such as daily lunch menus, location of the toilets, a room-by-room description of the school facilities)" should not be included. Unfortunately, I was unable to find as much as a discussion about lists of curriculum. I don't see how this would interest anyone but students. Regardless of if we disagree, I think this removal is justified. The opening sentence may should have been left, but the second sentence should have been deleted if the list was.
I'll conceed that possibly one sentence should have been left (and another merged with it), but I believe that the rest of what I removed was justified. I ask you, is that sentence really enough to justify the warning or do you think my logic was so flawed that it has no merit? If no, please strikeout your warning. I'm not necessarily saying that you're wrong for restoring, but I'm also not saying that I'm wrong for removing it. It seems to me that in order to make Wikipedia better, we would be better off debating the removal instead of you just saying that I'm wrong and issuing a warning. In my experience, when people see things as differently as we apparently do, the best answer is usually somewhere in the middle. Thanks.
Apparition11 (
talk)
02:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Also, in my heated moment, I overlooked one thing you said: that you probably should've written a message. This is what I was wanting. I have no problem discussing things, and, from time to time, I've been known to be wrong :). That and I believe you also admitted that the template wasn't exactly right for the situation. Well, according to Wikipedia:Warn: "you are responsible for ensuring that the template's text is appropriate to the violation: if the template's tone isn't appropriate, don't use the template." Given all of this, please strikeout the warning. Apparition11 ( talk) 10:23, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
While your edit may be true (I don't know), please do not insert commentary into the main article. Instead, use the talk page or provide a reference. Thanks. Apparition11 (talk) 23:34, 2 August 2008 (UTC) (pasted from 76.185.45.51's talk page) Apparition11 ( talk) 23:53, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
So rather than actually checking for facts, you simply revert pages.
You people are ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.45.51 ( talk) 23:40, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
I think you left a comment on my talk page that you intended for talk. Cheers! Apparition11 ( talk) 00:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC) (pasted from User talk:EricV89). Apparition11 ( talk) 00:10, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Done Ok, me and the IP address were able to discuss things, so this should end further problems. Thanks. Happy editing! --
eric
(mailbox)
00:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
GL Communications Inc - I nominated this page for speedy deletion because it is an obvious advert for the company, but the author keeps removing the speedy deletion tag. Could you look into this please? Chem-MTFC ( talk) 10:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
I literally just posted the article stub on Caxton Associates about 30 seconds before you nominated it for speedy deletion. I have not even had a chance to add to it. You need to get a life. Aside from being one of the larger hedge funds, one would think that as a business major you might have heard of its founder and operator, Bruce Kovner - whether you live (according to your user page) in the middle of nowhere or not. Stevenmitchell ( talk) 06:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
My page for my band was put up for speedy deletion? I keep editing it to try make it "ok" so it wont be deleted yet it keeps getting deleted. What do i do? Please reply as soon as possible, best wishes Ayperos.
Ayperos ( talk) 01:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
My page was put up yesterday and until I've uploaded a company logo to it, it's now under speedy deletion. I currently a general manager working for Cool Rhino and I believe I do not have any intention to sell nor promote my products through here; however, I believe Wikipedia has established a knowledgable channel for people to learn new things. This company is young; however it has a deep history behind. I hope you could help me ractify the problem for my page to stay on Linda See
Thank you for your reply; However, I've took out the picture (logo) that I've put in this morning and yet, why you still delete my page? What've I done that against the rule? Sometimes I really don't know what's wrong with my article especially if other companies could have their company information on wikepedia and I just don't understand why can I??? THis is unfair. Let me know any thing I could do the reactivate back my page again? LindaSee —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindasee ( talk • contribs) 11:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Apparition11, I am impressed by the work you've been doing here over the past few weeks. I've given you rollback permission to help with your counter-vandalism efforts. Keep up the good work! Owen× ☎ 20:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I received an "inquiry" from the subject of my article asking me to refrain from discussing him online. Can you please remove the discussion in question. I don't need a dispute with anyone. Newyork666 ( talk) 18:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
You have every right to remove a warning from your talk page; after all it is your talk page. According to the policy, the removal a warning from a talk page simply indicates that you have recieved the warning. I Looking back on the incident I was wrong to warn you about it. There are times regular users when should be warned about their actions, however that was not one of those times. I appologize for it. Considering that the article in question was pretty much in question was pretty much an advertizement, I think you that were right to try to get rid of the article. However, it would have been better if you had just marked the page for speedy deletion, instead of deleting most of it. Jpoelma13 | Talk | cont 23:40, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
I would also add that, as far as I know, I am not allowed to remove or change previously added comments on the talk pages of other users. There is a warning for that in the big list of warning templates. So, I think that you would have been the one to remove it. Jpoelma13 | Talk | cont 23:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
I struck out the Warning, I chose however to leave the rest of conversation intact for the records. Jpoelma13 | Talk | cont 00:12, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
...for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. I have a special present for situations like this...
![]() |
The omgz u unvandaled me Barnstar | |
OMG AWESOME KTHXBAI |
.
Prince of Canada t | c 09:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I've been using Huggle for the past few days and it's really a nice tool. Happy editing! Soliloquial talk 21:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey Apparition11,
I just wanted to point out something. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but is this a mistake? I can't really see anything commendable about the edit this user made.
With respect,
ɷ i m b u s a n i a
10:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
A little something
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Just a little reminder and barnstar telling you to keep up your good huggle reerting work! ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 22:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC) |
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thanks for defending my talkpage from the 4chan morons, it hasnt gone unnoticed. The reason I dont want my talk page protected is because of moral principals. Looks like they got bored.....for now. Thanks again ! «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 10:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC) |
lolz you have been following me around i mean cmon ROYAL OAK INTERMEDIATE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.126.11 ( talk) 07:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
hello i am Koman90 creator of my on webpage on myself User:Koman90, i have creatteing editing and maintaing articles in technology fo about two years now and i have hea of other pepole osting autobiographies on wikipedia i was wondering hoe i cloud do this without being deleted. I cannot do it all at once as i am a colege student and working on a project of this magnitude is to longof a proces to sit down and type out in one setting. Please fell free to contact me on my usertalk page or e-mail me at koman90@live.com. -- Koman90 ( talk) 20:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
So if i re-create User:Koman90 But i no dot post my autobiography and leave it just as a user profile as you have done it is safe, am i correct? -- Koman90 ( talk) 20:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
why did you congradualate me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.89.83 ( talk) 22:05, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
but why
why and how did tou use my ip address and what is it
Hi! Looking at all the external table tennis links, I can't see why the forum link http://forum.oneofakindtrading.com.au is any less relevant. Some of the links point directly to a shop, surely a forum is far more useful and relevant? Cheers! 121.45.18.122 ( talk) 11:42, 22 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.18.122 ( talk) 11:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the explanation! Yes that is fair enough, I was merely surprised that my links were deleted, whereas some of the others, which seemed blatant advertising, were still included. Can I ask you to consider this site: http://oneofakindtrading.com.au? Since this is my site, I have an obvious conflict of interest, so I'll let you be the judge. This site is a massive collection of equipment reviews (some highly technical) and table tennis articles and guides. Yes there is some advertising on the site, and a link to an online shop, but this is no different to most other sites listed. Compared to some of the other sites, my sites is bigger in terms of reviews, has been going for many years, and contains far more information than just reviews. It is a common reference for people wanting to buy equipment, but don't know what to choose. Table tennis is one of the most complicated sports when it comes to equipment... there are few (if any) sports with such a wide variety of equipment, and where the choice of equipment is so critical. Thanks for your consideration! Haggisv ( talk) 23:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
For reverting vandalism to my user page :) -- Faradayplank ( talk) 20:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
I just want to thank you for the reversion of vandalism you did to my talk page, it's very much appreciated. I've never been under attack like this so I am kind of surprised by this, but thanks for helping me out. -- CrohnieGal Talk 14:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
(Cross posted from User talk:TeaDrinker) I'm so sorry, but it appears that I lied during my last AIV report [5]. I said that it was fresh off of a block, but I misread it. It said December 1, I thought it said December 10 [6]. That's what I get for editing when I should be sleeping. If you feel you need to unblock, feel free to mention me and my blunder in the summary, but this user has a long history of the same disruption (virtually all of their edits). I apologize for this, I wasn't trying to mislead you. Apparition11 ( talk) 04:17, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
(Cross posted from User Talk:Commander Lightning) Please stop with this "Secret Police" nonsense; there is no secret police force on Wikipedia. Your warning here is not appropriate. We keep no list of vandals, and you seem to imply that you have some sort of special authority, which you do not. I replaced that message with a more suitable one. Please read WP:VANDAL to learn how to properly deal with vandalism. As OwenX has already explained, we attempt to educate vandals and not threaten them. In my experience, a simple {{subst:uw-vandalism1}} template stops most vandals from vandalizing again, and, those who don't stop are easier to get blocked by using these templates.
Also, when you spot vandalism, you should also revert it, which you didn't do when you left the inappropriate warning. I have reverted it now (which is how I stumbled onto this). If you really want to help Wikipedia, read the policy that I asked you to read, and follow what it says. If you need any help, feel free to ask me on my talk page, but remember, Wikipedia is a serious project and not a game, which you seem to be treating it as. If you continue like this, you could very possibly end up being blocked. I would also suggest that you think about getting adopted by an experienced user to help teach you how to become a constructive editor. Thank you. Apparition11 ( talk) 01:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
(undent) Yeah, I'm pretty sure that won't happen :) If you want to be a part of a good sized team of vandal fighters, your best bet is probably to get more involved with WP:CVU. Since all vandal fighters do pretty much the same thing, making a lot different groups won't really accomplish much. Apparition11 ( talk) 21:57, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
(undent)Thank you, sir. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Commander Lightning ( talk • contribs) 18:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
This is Black Reign. I am sorry I vandalize darkness it was funny though Black Reign 56 ( talk) 16:23, 28 December 2008 (UTC)