 | The owner of this account is suspected of
abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage) |
Hello, I'm
Binksternet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Youth Defence because it appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk) 15:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Youth Defence with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Torreslfchero (
talk) 16:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing.
Mean as custard (
talk) 16:12, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Youth Defence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Binksternet ( talk) 16:18, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
User talk:Binksternet.
Arctic
Kangaroo 16:24, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aoife.brauders. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Rs
chen
7754 22:49, 1 March 2013 (UTC) |
| The owner of this account is suspected of
abusively using multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage) |
Hello, I'm
Binksternet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Youth Defence because it appeared to be promotional.
Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "
soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Binksternet (
talk) 15:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Youth Defence with
this edit. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Torreslfchero (
talk) 16:10, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be
blocked from editing.
Mean as custard (
talk) 16:12, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Youth Defence shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Binksternet ( talk) 16:18, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with
this edit to
User talk:Binksternet.
Arctic
Kangaroo 16:24, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
|
| This account has been
blocked indefinitely from editing for
sock puppetry per evidence presented at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aoife.brauders. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Rs
chen
7754 22:49, 1 March 2013 (UTC) |