This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Thanks. I was able to get the article up to Featured List Status, and I hope this current edit war will end soon, or else it will be grounds for it to lose its Featured Status on Wikipedia. That would truly be a shame, since I (and other editors) have put so much work into it.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 20:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
The duration of the block is 24 hours. Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 15:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I am sorry! I did not meant it, please forgive me once! Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 15:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, but he did't stop, so.. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 15:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I did read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule, but thats two days before Gun Powder Ma undid me! Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 16:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
this is ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ, thank you for the link. also i am not a sockpuppet, this is just my regular ip, and im not abusing it so dont report me. 162.83.135.213 ( talk) 13:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Actually you know what? Hardly any items he added below belong to Shang; thus Post-Shang addition makes 100% sense. Lol
Actually, not quite. Consider the entry for dagger-axe, guqin, and a couple others. See?-- Pericles of Athens Talk 06:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
You said:
Sure, but one example ain't gonna change everything and you know that
But this doesn't make sense. By my count, dagger-axe, guqin, and chopsticks make three inventions. Surely Shang deserves to be included.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 06:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Your warning here doesn't seem entirely appropriate. I acknowledge the fact that an edit war is currently in process, but JSR's edits are not vandalism and at the time, he had only made two reverts. To address the issue at Sushruta, I intend on making a compromise proposal on the article's talk page, so please watchlist that page. Also note that making three reverts on each of the two articles is still grounds for blocking, even if it is not a violation of WP:3RR. Just keep that in mind for the future. Thanks, Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
I had been blocked with no warning? Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 06:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey Mr User:Kafziel, you do aware that user JSR has been doing edit warring right? And I had been blocked for no warnings at all! What are you doing anyway? Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 06:54, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Of course, I dont intend to "win" over the aricle. By the way, how come my block is 72hrs? And he gets nothing after series of reverting WITHOUT EDIT SUMMARYING NOR DISUCCSION ON TALK PAGE until much later? Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
He also didn't provided a reason over edit summary during the first removal. So still thinks that this is purely a 3RR reverts? His edit are appear constructive on removing reference while I restore it? Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Are you sure that user don't get warning when he is reporting? It didn't shown up on the 3RR page rule. I report it because I found it hard to deal with him. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
How can his edit be constructive at all, he was removing soemthing over the article, it appears that you're quite basied on this issue by saying someting about 3RR warning for your whole life. Everybody are aware of the rules if they wanted to report over the board. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Lol, you don't have to reply anymore, I can see how you argue over your justice on blocking other. I will takes sometime on thinking how the admin system actually work for these 3 days. Period. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
While this isn't the same on your block, so you know what I probably gonna say next. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
The source did not deal with medicine and that's when I asked you to quote and produce it. Anyway, water under the bridge now. I just want you to know that whatever happened is in the past. I'm here to help if you need my help on China articles (I hope you improve a lot of them and I will help in whatever way I can). I assure you that there are many people in India who are fascinated by China and its magnificent history. I will be happy to be of service to China articles. Thank you and regards [(working right now :-)], JSR ( talk) 09:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
My featured article on Augustus! Awesome.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 03:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Anpersonalaccount. Just a brief note, mostly to thank you for having noticed and reacted to my sandbox on the Taisu. I just added a lot of content to it, including a detailed (though still incomplete) discussion of the dates of Yang Shangshan. What you found on Googe and Baidu are probably remnants of a controversy that has now been solved. No time for more today! Cheers,-- Madalibi ( talk) 08:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello Anpersonalaccount! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 876 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Thanks. I was able to get the article up to Featured List Status, and I hope this current edit war will end soon, or else it will be grounds for it to lose its Featured Status on Wikipedia. That would truly be a shame, since I (and other editors) have put so much work into it.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 20:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
The duration of the block is 24 hours. Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 15:42, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I am sorry! I did not meant it, please forgive me once! Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 15:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, but he did't stop, so.. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 15:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I did read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule, but thats two days before Gun Powder Ma undid me! Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 16:02, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
this is ㄏㄨㄤㄉㄧ, thank you for the link. also i am not a sockpuppet, this is just my regular ip, and im not abusing it so dont report me. 162.83.135.213 ( talk) 13:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Actually you know what? Hardly any items he added below belong to Shang; thus Post-Shang addition makes 100% sense. Lol
Actually, not quite. Consider the entry for dagger-axe, guqin, and a couple others. See?-- Pericles of Athens Talk 06:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
You said:
Sure, but one example ain't gonna change everything and you know that
But this doesn't make sense. By my count, dagger-axe, guqin, and chopsticks make three inventions. Surely Shang deserves to be included.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 06:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Your warning here doesn't seem entirely appropriate. I acknowledge the fact that an edit war is currently in process, but JSR's edits are not vandalism and at the time, he had only made two reverts. To address the issue at Sushruta, I intend on making a compromise proposal on the article's talk page, so please watchlist that page. Also note that making three reverts on each of the two articles is still grounds for blocking, even if it is not a violation of WP:3RR. Just keep that in mind for the future. Thanks, Nishkid64 ( Make articles, not wikidrama) 21:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
I had been blocked with no warning? Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 06:50, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey Mr User:Kafziel, you do aware that user JSR has been doing edit warring right? And I had been blocked for no warnings at all! What are you doing anyway? Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 06:54, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Of course, I dont intend to "win" over the aricle. By the way, how come my block is 72hrs? And he gets nothing after series of reverting WITHOUT EDIT SUMMARYING NOR DISUCCSION ON TALK PAGE until much later? Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
He also didn't provided a reason over edit summary during the first removal. So still thinks that this is purely a 3RR reverts? His edit are appear constructive on removing reference while I restore it? Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:02, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Are you sure that user don't get warning when he is reporting? It didn't shown up on the 3RR page rule. I report it because I found it hard to deal with him. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
How can his edit be constructive at all, he was removing soemthing over the article, it appears that you're quite basied on this issue by saying someting about 3RR warning for your whole life. Everybody are aware of the rules if they wanted to report over the board. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Lol, you don't have to reply anymore, I can see how you argue over your justice on blocking other. I will takes sometime on thinking how the admin system actually work for these 3 days. Period. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
While this isn't the same on your block, so you know what I probably gonna say next. Anpersonalaccount ( talk) 07:23, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
The source did not deal with medicine and that's when I asked you to quote and produce it. Anyway, water under the bridge now. I just want you to know that whatever happened is in the past. I'm here to help if you need my help on China articles (I hope you improve a lot of them and I will help in whatever way I can). I assure you that there are many people in India who are fascinated by China and its magnificent history. I will be happy to be of service to China articles. Thank you and regards [(working right now :-)], JSR ( talk) 09:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
My featured article on Augustus! Awesome.-- Pericles of Athens Talk 03:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Anpersonalaccount. Just a brief note, mostly to thank you for having noticed and reacted to my sandbox on the Taisu. I just added a lot of content to it, including a detailed (though still incomplete) discussion of the dates of Yang Shangshan. What you found on Googe and Baidu are probably remnants of a controversy that has now been solved. No time for more today! Cheers,-- Madalibi ( talk) 08:04, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Hello Anpersonalaccount! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 876 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article: